Become a Site Supporter and Never see Ads again!

Author Topic: JB3 or wait for Hi-MD ?  (Read 9599 times)

0 Members and 1 Guest are viewing this topic.

Offline Brian Skalinder

  • Complaint Dept.
  • Trade Count: (28)
  • Needs to get out more...
  • *****
  • Posts: 18868
  • Gender: Male
Re:JB3 or wait for Hi-MD ?
« Reply #15 on: February 22, 2004, 05:29:57 PM »
why the hell did they have to make it look like a CD player!?

Yeah, no doubt it's a completely dufus form-factor.

But FWIW - as others have already mentioned, I think - there are people stealthing out there with gear like Sonosax SX-M2 > SBM-1 > Sony portable DAT.  IMO stealthing AD-20 > JB3 isn't all that impractical.  The JB3 isn't much bigger than a D7/D8.  Whatever you decide, let us know and have fun!
Milab VM-44 Links > Fostex FR-2LE or
Naiant IPA (tinybox format) >
Roland R-05

jpschust

  • Guest
  • Trade Count: (0)
Re:JB3 or wait for Hi-MD ?
« Reply #16 on: February 22, 2004, 06:38:57 PM »
also the jb3 looks like a cd player, no one is gonna suspect it really for a recording device

Offline zhianosatch

  • Trade Count: (1)
  • Needs to get out more...
  • *****
  • Posts: 8992
  • Gender: Male
  • god-damned hippies!
Re:JB3 or wait for Hi-MD ?
« Reply #17 on: February 23, 2004, 05:46:43 AM »
AD-20? nah too big.

actually the really fucked up thing about Hi-MD is that it won't let you upload digital recordings to your PC (only those made via analogue). so for anyone with an external AD then Hi-MD is out of the question and JB3 wins this battle.

plus: since the JB3 is about 2-3 times the size of what the top-of-the-range Hi-MD recorder will be just makes the added size of the AD-20 even less reasonable.

i restrict myself to what i can fit down my pants (and no, before someone else says it, there isn't lots of spare room down there).

there are so many things wrong with this post that i don't know where to start. i'll work on it tomorrow. good golly.

Offline thacount1

  • Trade Count: (0)
  • Taperssection Newbie
  • *
  • Posts: 2
  • Gender: Male
  • I'm a llama!
    • www.dwightritcherband.com
Re:JB3 or wait for Hi-MD ?
« Reply #18 on: February 23, 2004, 01:00:31 PM »
I'm new to njb3 and this board. I just recieved my jb3 on friday and couldn't be happier with it.  I used minidisc for 4 years and am so glad to be done with it. I own two minidisc recorders in that time and had so many problems with dropouts skipping, setting levels, disc capacity. Who knows if the new Hi-D minidiscs will have these problems.

The big argument against the njb3 is the lack of mic in. So you need to use either a battery box/preamp or an external A/D converter.

Some people have been saying that the onboard A/D converter on the line in stinks on the JB3. After reading this:

http://audio.rightmark.org/test/creative-jukebox3-rec.html

and hearing it myself I disagree. While I'm sure it's nothing like having an external A/D converter, I suspect it's every bit as good as the ones found in a minidisc recorder. Let's face it, your external preamp is going to be better than the mic pre in the minidisc, and I just don't believe that sony is breaking the bank on the converters in their portable minidiscs.

Also if you get a refurbished njb3 on ebay your going to spend MUCH less than on a minidisc reorder.

My $.06


Offline Brian Skalinder

  • Complaint Dept.
  • Trade Count: (28)
  • Needs to get out more...
  • *****
  • Posts: 18868
  • Gender: Male
Re:JB3 or wait for Hi-MD ?
« Reply #19 on: February 23, 2004, 01:23:35 PM »
The big argument against the njb3 is the lack of mic in.

Well, it has mic-in, but David Klein and I'm sure others have done some testing and identified it's pretty darn poor.  Line-in sounds much better.  I'd be curious to hear some JB3 recordings line-in with an external preamp.  I've been considering doing a V3 analog > JB3/D100 field test to compare the ADCs but just haven't been motivated.  Maybe I'll do a test at home instead of in the field, it'll at least give some idea how they compare even if it's not a real field test.

http://audio.rightmark.org/test/creative-jukebox3-rec.html

The numbers are nice and all, but they won't tell us how it *sounds*.

and hearing it myself I disagree. While I'm sure it's nothing like having an external A/D converter, I suspect it's every bit as good as the ones found in a minidisc recorder.

Ahhhh...I jumped the gun above - good to hear it compares to MD ADCs to your ears.  Have you done any direct comparisons?  Just curious.  It may be a better stealth option than some realize as long as stealthers can run line-in to the JB3.
Milab VM-44 Links > Fostex FR-2LE or
Naiant IPA (tinybox format) >
Roland R-05

Offline Sharky

  • Trade Count: (0)
  • Taperssection Newbie
  • *
  • Posts: 46
  • Gender: Male
  • I hate wires
    • My Homepage
Re:JB3 or wait for Hi-MD ?
« Reply #20 on: February 23, 2004, 02:16:27 PM »
has anyone taken their jb3 apart to see if it would be possible to reassemble it into a smaller package? Would be a good backyard project.

i would like to see a nomad jb3 taken apart. Any pictures out there?

Offline zhianosatch

  • Trade Count: (1)
  • Needs to get out more...
  • *****
  • Posts: 8992
  • Gender: Male
  • god-damned hippies!
Re:JB3 or wait for Hi-MD ?
« Reply #21 on: February 23, 2004, 02:19:11 PM »
has anyone taken their jb3 apart

Daryan Lenz did, then sold it on eBay!  :angry2:

Offline F.O.Bean

  • Team Schoeps Tapir that
  • Trade Count: (126)
  • Needs to get out more...
  • *****
  • Posts: 40690
  • Gender: Male
  • Taperus Maximus
    • MediaFire Recordings
Re:JB3 or wait for Hi-MD ?
« Reply #22 on: February 23, 2004, 02:19:57 PM »
has anyone taken their jb3 apart to see if it would be possible to reassemble it into a smaller package? Would be a good backyard project.

i would like to see a nomad jb3 taken apart. Any pictures out there?

smaller??? campared to a full size dat deck(dap1, d10, portadat, etc) this thing is VERY small, i am quite comfortable and happy w/ its shape thus far
Schoeps MK 4V & MK 41V ->
Schoeps 250|0 KCY's (x2) ->
Naiant +60v|Low Noise PFA's (x2) ->
DarkTrain Right Angle Stubby XLR's (x3) ->
Sound Devices MixPre-6 & MixPre-3

http://www.archive.org/bookmarks/diskobean
http://www.archive.org/bookmarks/Bean420
http://bt.etree.org/mytorrents.php
http://www.mediafire.com/folder/j9eu80jpuaubz/Recordings

Offline Sharky

  • Trade Count: (0)
  • Taperssection Newbie
  • *
  • Posts: 46
  • Gender: Male
  • I hate wires
    • My Homepage
Re:JB3 or wait for Hi-MD ?
« Reply #23 on: February 23, 2004, 02:36:29 PM »
http://www.hardware-one.com/print_review.asp?reviews=249
doesnt look like it could be. lots of scary chips and wire inside.

Offline VA_TAPER

  • Trade Count: (0)
  • Taperssection Member
  • ***
  • Posts: 904
  • Gender: Male
  • SPA AKG C33E->Hamptone HVTP2->Tascam DV-RA1000 DSD
Re:JB3 or wait for Hi-MD ?
« Reply #24 on: February 23, 2004, 10:07:20 PM »
I'd be curious to hear some JB3 recordings line-in with an external preamp.  I've been considering doing a V3 analog > JB3/D100 field test to compare the ADCs but just haven't been motivated.  Maybe I'll do a test at home instead of in the field, it'll at least give some idea how they compare even if it's not a real field test.

http://www.archive.org/audio/etree-details-db.php?id=5350
Source: MXL1006BP + CAD E-100 (Center Blend) > Behringer MXB1002 > Nomad JB3 @44.1

http://www.archive.org/audio/etree-details-db.php?id=4881
Source: MXL1006BP + EV RE-20 + ECM8000 + CAD E-100 > Behringer MXB1002 > Nomad JB3 @44.1k (Live Studio Recording)

peace, chris


My recordings and transfers at archive.org: http://www.archive.org/search.php?query=berryman%20AND%20mediatype%3Aetree%20AND%20collection%3Aetree

“Those who cast the votes decide nothing. Those who count the votes decide everything.”  Joseph Stalin

Offline Ed.

  • your popsicle's melting
  • Trade Count: (0)
  • Needs to get out more...
  • *****
  • Posts: 8662
  • Gender: Male
  • FJ Baby!
Re:JB3 or wait for Hi-MD ?
« Reply #25 on: February 24, 2004, 01:03:55 AM »
keep in mind that the njb3 uses a normal laptop hdd and holds 2 rather large batteries, its gonna be hard to get that thing in a smaller package.  and to all of you who say it can't be stealthed, you're wrong - cuz it can very easily be stealthed.  also, to be completely honest, i've gotten nothing but compliments when i run stealth with just DAB > Bat box > line in on it.  No it doesn't sound as good as running a pre/adc out front, but its still hands down better than an md.  and the quality is noticeable upon first listen.

ed


Because nothing says "I have lots of money and am sort of confused as to how to spend it" like Bose.

Offline Brian Skalinder

  • Complaint Dept.
  • Trade Count: (28)
  • Needs to get out more...
  • *****
  • Posts: 18868
  • Gender: Male
Re:JB3 or wait for Hi-MD ?
« Reply #26 on: February 29, 2004, 09:33:38 PM »
probably the only reason for why i haven't definitely decided on JB3 is that people have said on this forum that it has a lousy AD converter, and if you are stealthing shows (like me) and an external converter isn't practical, then this is a problem.

If you haven't already - decide for yourself, here's an NJB3 / D100 ADC comp.  Too bad more people didn't listen and post their thoughts.  FWIW, results here and at STG are about 50% prefering source 1, and 50% preferring source 2.  DON'T read the whole thread if you want to wait til after you listen to the comp to find out which source is which.
Milab VM-44 Links > Fostex FR-2LE or
Naiant IPA (tinybox format) >
Roland R-05

BobW

  • Guest
  • Trade Count: (0)
Re:JB3 or wait for Hi-MD ?
« Reply #27 on: February 29, 2004, 10:12:00 PM »
Will a NJ 20GB record ? Or must it be a JB3 ?

Is there firmware support on the JB models ? How 'bout the hacks ?

Offline Chad817

  • Trade Count: (0)
  • Taperssection Member
  • ***
  • Posts: 457
  • Gender: Male
  • I'm a llama!
Re:JB3 or wait for Hi-MD ?
« Reply #28 on: March 06, 2004, 12:07:15 PM »
I'd venture to say that the AD in the JB3 is as good as any of the AD's in the MD recorders.  I've been running mine as a backup, analog in from my MP2, and wouldn't say the A/D is horrible.

The A/D on my jb3 sounds worlds better than my sharp 722 MD
studio projects c4 > edirol ua-5 [digi mod] > Microtrack II

laying around: sp cmc-4, power supply and jb3

Offline porphyry

  • Trade Count: (0)
  • Taperssection Regular
  • **
  • Posts: 78
  • Gender: Male
  • Grimshaw- the World's First Bootlegger
Re:JB3 or wait for Hi-MD ?
« Reply #29 on: March 08, 2004, 03:09:41 AM »
Quote
Quote from: porphyry on February 21, 2004, 01:31:36 PM
AD-20? nah too big.

actually the really fucked up thing about Hi-MD is that it won't let you upload digital recordings to your PC (only those made via analogue). so for anyone with an external AD then Hi-MD is out of the question and JB3 wins this battle.

plus: since the JB3 is about 2-3 times the size of what the top-of-the-range Hi-MD recorder will be just makes the added size of the AD-20 even less reasonable.

i restrict myself to what i can fit down my pants (and no, before someone else says it, there isn't lots of spare room down there).
 
 

there are so many things wrong with this post that i don't know where to start. i'll work on it tomorrow. good golly.


well... come on then, let's hear it.

 

RSS | Mobile
Page created in 0.076 seconds with 40 queries.
© 2002-2024 Taperssection.com
Powered by SMF