Become a Site Supporter and Never see Ads again!

Poll

What do you prefer

Schoeps>722
6 (31.6%)
Schoeps>v3>722
13 (68.4%)

Total Members Voted: 19

Author Topic: v3 vs 722  (Read 7361 times)

0 Members and 1 Guest are viewing this topic.

Offline F.O.Bean

  • Team Schoeps Tapir that
  • Trade Count: (126)
  • Needs to get out more...
  • *****
  • Posts: 40690
  • Gender: Male
  • Taperus Maximus
    • MediaFire Recordings
Re: v3 vs 722
« Reply #15 on: November 29, 2006, 11:10:18 PM »
hmmm, mk41v is RULER flat, especially compared to the mk4v, BUT thats kind of apples/oranges isnt it, the mk4/41 have the xt bodies and the 4v/41v have the cmc6 bodies in those diagrams
Schoeps MK 4V & MK 41V ->
Schoeps 250|0 KCY's (x2) ->
Naiant +60v|Low Noise PFA's (x2) ->
DarkTrain Right Angle Stubby XLR's (x3) ->
Sound Devices MixPre-6 & MixPre-3

http://www.archive.org/bookmarks/diskobean
http://www.archive.org/bookmarks/Bean420
http://bt.etree.org/mytorrents.php
http://www.mediafire.com/folder/j9eu80jpuaubz/Recordings

Offline Brian Skalinder

  • Complaint Dept.
  • Trade Count: (28)
  • Needs to get out more...
  • *****
  • Posts: 18873
  • Gender: Male
Re: v3 vs 722
« Reply #16 on: November 29, 2006, 11:17:53 PM »
hmmm, mk41v is RULER flat, especially compared to the mk4v

Pretty darn close to the 41s, but as the polar diagram suggests, more of the MF/HF content is coming from the rear on the Vs than the 41s.

BUT thats kind of apples/oranges isnt it, the mk4/41 have the xt bodies and the 4v/41v have the cmc6 bodies in those diagrams

I don't think so.  As I read the charts, only the last freq response curve in each diagram corresponds to the XTs.  The first freq response curve and polart diagram correspond to the CMC6s.  At least that's how I read the charts.
Milab VM-44 Links > Fostex FR-2LE or
Naiant IPA (tinybox format) > Roland R-05

Offline F.O.Bean

  • Team Schoeps Tapir that
  • Trade Count: (126)
  • Needs to get out more...
  • *****
  • Posts: 40690
  • Gender: Male
  • Taperus Maximus
    • MediaFire Recordings
Re: v3 vs 722
« Reply #17 on: November 29, 2006, 11:22:30 PM »
hmmm, mk41v is RULER flat, especially compared to the mk4v

Pretty darn close to the 41s, but as the polar diagram suggests, more of the MF/HF content is coming from the rear on the Vs than the 41s.

BUT thats kind of apples/oranges isnt it, the mk4/41 have the xt bodies and the 4v/41v have the cmc6 bodies in those diagrams

I don't think so.  As I read the charts, only the last freq response curve in each diagram corresponds to the XTs.  The first freq response curve and polart diagram correspond to the CMC6s.  At least that's how I read the charts.

duh! my bad :)

hmmm, instead of the 41v's having a HF bump, seems they actually DROP at the 15k mark  :hmmm:

at least with the cmc6, maybe the xt's are diff

id like to see a chart with the 4/41v+cmcxt too :)

anyhow, wonder what youre actually getting when going mk4v/41v>lemosax? guess the capsule diagram would come into play more than anything

i think the v's have more off-axis sounds because the capsule is a bit differently made and side-address, seems like the v's have more mic capsule surface anyway, maybe thats why?

sorry for the thread highjack jon :)
« Last Edit: November 29, 2006, 11:25:25 PM by Bean »
Schoeps MK 4V & MK 41V ->
Schoeps 250|0 KCY's (x2) ->
Naiant +60v|Low Noise PFA's (x2) ->
DarkTrain Right Angle Stubby XLR's (x3) ->
Sound Devices MixPre-6 & MixPre-3

http://www.archive.org/bookmarks/diskobean
http://www.archive.org/bookmarks/Bean420
http://bt.etree.org/mytorrents.php
http://www.mediafire.com/folder/j9eu80jpuaubz/Recordings

Offline bkirby

  • Trade Count: (0)
  • Taperssection Member
  • ***
  • Posts: 768
  • Gender: Male
  • Schoeps/MGs > M148/248 > SD722
Re: v3 vs 722
« Reply #18 on: November 30, 2006, 09:22:22 AM »
The Schoeps XT bodies will only present extended frequencies with the standard capsules, and NOT the "V" caps. Using the XT bodies with any of the V caps will produce identical results to using the standard CMC6 bodies. Just an FYI...

Offline it-goes-to-eleven

  • Trade Count: (58)
  • Needs to get out more...
  • *****
  • Posts: 6696
Re: v3 vs 722
« Reply #19 on: November 30, 2006, 10:11:12 AM »
i think the v's have more off-axis sounds because the capsule is a bit differently made and side-address, seems like the v's have more mic capsule surface anyway, maybe thats why?

Question is...  Is schoeps rating the polar response with the V capsule in a vertical orientation?  I know a lot of folks run them horizontal.

I can imagine that the larger and more open grid/capsule mounting of the V may be what gives it a more even polar frequency response at say 90 degrees.  But I wonder if that consistency still applies when run horizontal?  In that case, you have the top of the cap housing possibly creating a shadow/comb/whatever.. I think it must be different on that axis.

It would be an interesting question for schoeps and a very interesting comp.

Offline ghellquist

  • Trade Count: (0)
  • Taperssection Member
  • ***
  • Posts: 477
  • Gender: Male
Re: v3 vs 722
« Reply #20 on: November 30, 2006, 02:40:28 PM »
The 4V > V3 > 722 was my least favorite. It sounded fantastic, but too clean and crisp for my tastes. The downloaders love this combo though because it is so stereo friendly on the low end.

I run a 722 without any V3 and would really like to understand what this difference is. I mean, if you enable the high-pass filter on the V3 it would be obvious, otherwise the difference should be really, really tiny. In another thread lil kim jong il posted a comparison and I must say that apart from difference in levels I cannot really hear at all what people are talking about.

Just maybe, why not high-pass a bit in post processing. With a good program it will add quite a bit to the experience. And set levels up to normal (because we all do have quite a bit of headroom on 24 recordings, do we?).

Just wondering? Are there samples anywhere?

Here are (for a short time) two short samples of my recordings:
http://hem.bredband.net/b121263/F1.mp3
http://hem.bredband.net/b121263/M1.mp3

Gunnar

Offline BC

  • Trade Count: (1)
  • Needs to get out more...
  • *****
  • Posts: 2269
  • Gender: Male
  • Bongo Bongo
Re: v3 vs 722
« Reply #21 on: November 30, 2006, 03:07:52 PM »
But I wonder if that consistency still applies when run horizontal?  In that case, you have the top of the cap housing possibly creating a shadow/comb/whatever.. I think it must be different on that axis.

I agree, I bet the off-axis response is quite different depending on the orientation of the capsule. Just my guess though.

In: DPA4022>V3>Microtracker/D8

Out: Morrison ELAD>Adcom GFA555mkII>Martin Logan Aerius i

Offline jmerin

  • Trade Count: (3)
  • Taperssection All-Star
  • ****
  • Posts: 1199
  • Gender: Male
Re: v3 vs 722
« Reply #22 on: November 30, 2006, 04:08:49 PM »
its either schoeps>v3(pre)>722 ad

or schoeps>722(pre)(ad)

thanks

jon
Mics: Schoeps MK4's | Schoeps MK41's | Schoeps Mk21's
Pre-Amps: Schoeps VMS02ib | Nbox Platinum KCY
Cables: KCY 250/5 Ig (2)
Recorders: Sony M10  | Tascam 70D l Edirol R-44

 

RSS | Mobile
Page created in 0.045 seconds with 35 queries.
© 2002-2024 Taperssection.com
Powered by SMF