hmmm, mk41v is RULER flat, especially compared to the mk4v
Pretty darn close to the 41s, but as the polar diagram suggests, more of the MF/HF content is coming from the rear on the Vs than the 41s.
BUT thats kind of apples/oranges isnt it, the mk4/41 have the xt bodies and the 4v/41v have the cmc6 bodies in those diagrams
I don't think so. As I read the charts, only the last freq response curve in each diagram corresponds to the XTs. The first freq response curve and polart diagram correspond to the CMC6s. At least that's how I read the charts.
duh! my bad
hmmm, instead of the 41v's having a HF bump, seems they actually DROP at the 15k mark
at least with the cmc6, maybe the xt's are diff
id like to see a chart with the 4/41v+cmcxt too
anyhow, wonder what youre actually getting when going mk4v/41v>lemosax? guess the capsule diagram would come into play more than anything
i think the v's have more off-axis sounds because the capsule is a bit differently made and side-address, seems like the v's have more mic capsule surface anyway, maybe thats why?
sorry for the thread highjack jon