Ran my P2 as a bit bucket behind the V3 last night (24/96) for John Butler Trio. Everything went great for the opener & the first 1.5GB split of JBT. During the second 1.5GB recording of JBT, I got a "Buffer Over-Run. Media might be too slow" error message. Once I got the message the recorder basically locked up. I could clear the message and access menus, but it stopped recording & I couldn't get it to do anything with the card after that. Not even play back the files on using the internal speaker or headphones. I was using a Kingston 8GB Elite Pro 45x CF card & had no problems with it up till this point for one show previously and several tests at the house.
Googling the error message this morning, I found this:
Subject: Re: Tascam HD-P2
Date: Thu, 29 Dec 2005 14:50:22 -0000
The new TASCAM HD-P2 (Firmware v. 1.03) seems to have a problem with the Pre-Record mode. I always get a "Buffer Over-Run. Media might be
too slow" error message once the Pre-Record mode is activated. This effect is independent of the selected sample rate and bit depth. It
appears even at the lowest possible data rate (44.1kHz, 16 bit, mono). However, when I disable the Pre-Record mode, the recorder works fine
at up to 192kHz/24bit/stereo with the same CF cards (I tried various Toshiba, Kodak and Hitachi cards). The integrated "Media Speed Check"
also reports an "OK" for all combinations of sample rates and bit depths. So, I guess that the pre-record problem is a firmware bug that
will be fixed soon (I already reported it to TASCAM).
Looks like I need to verify if my unit has the most current V1.04 firmware. I assume it does since the new firmware came out in February 2006, and I just bought the unit in the last couple months (They were on backorder at Oade & he was waiting on new stock from Tascam). What confuses me is that I had the pre-record function enabled, and the opener set recorded fine as well as the first file of JBT prior to the 1.5GB split? I read through the V1.04 "Read Me" file (see attached), and see a couple items regarding cleanup regarding the buffer, but not anything that clearly addresses this issue IMO.
Anyone else run into this?