Become a Site Supporter and Never see Ads again!

Author Topic: Does DSP degrade sound quality: normalizing when mixing a matrix  (Read 2549 times)

0 Members and 1 Guest are viewing this topic.

Offline checht

  • Site Supporter
  • Trade Count: (5)
  • Taperssection Member
  • *
  • Posts: 765
  • Let's meet at alternate foods at the break
So, starting out on matrixing AUD + SBD. My workflow is to line 'em up, sync length, then mix them by ear at their recorded levels, render to 1 stereo track, and bring it up to a bit below zero. The recordings are within a few db of each other, so I can get the sound I want, usually applying negative gain to the SBD.

Sometimes I wonder if it would be better to bring them both to -3db then mix, render, and normalize to close to zero. I am not sure if this additional DSP is a bad idea. I realize I'm applying DSP when I apply negative gain to the SBD, and when rendering, so does the extra normalizing make a difference?

TIA
« Last Edit: August 14, 2018, 12:29:13 AM by checht »
Schoeps MK41 x 2, MK22 x 2; Vanguard V1s matched pair; Niaint x8
Schoeps kcy5, nbob actives
Naiant PFA 60v, PFA 48v, IPA
Sound Devices MP-6II; Sony PCM-A10

Recordings at LMA

Offline wforwumbo

  • Trade Count: (11)
  • Taperssection Regular
  • **
  • Posts: 186
Re: Does DSP degrade sound quality: normalizing when mixing a matrix
« Reply #1 on: August 15, 2018, 09:40:19 AM »
Depends on the source material. Given you mentioned mixing in an SBD I’ll assume the source is amplified music - probably pop, rock, or electronica, please correct me if I am wrong.

If that assumption is true, then the difference you’d get in post processing from DSP is pretty minimal. Your sound card (depending on the quality of your amp and converters) will likely inject more noise overall into the system.
North Jersey native, Upstate veteran, proud Texan

2x Schoeps mk2; 2x Schoeps mk21; 2x Schoeps mk4

4x Schoeps cmc5; 4x Schoeps KC5; Nbob KCY; Naiant PFA

EAA PSP-2

Sound Devices Mixpre-6

Offline morst

  • I think I found an error on the internet; #UnionStrong
  • Trade Count: (2)
  • Needs to get out more...
  • *****
  • Posts: 5950
Re: Does DSP degrade sound quality: normalizing when mixing a matrix
« Reply #2 on: August 15, 2018, 03:53:05 PM »
So, starting out on matrixing AUD + SBD. My workflow is to line 'em up, sync length, then mix them by ear at their recorded levels, render to 1 stereo track, and bring it up to a bit below zero. The recordings are within a few db of each other, so I can get the sound I want, usually applying negative gain to the SBD.

Sometimes I wonder if it would be better to bring them both to -3db then mix, render, and normalize to close to zero. I am not sure if this additional DSP is a bad idea. I realize I'm applying DSP when I apply negative gain to the SBD, and when rendering, so does the extra normalizing make a difference?


I would suggest mixing them at whatever levels get you close to 0 dB full-scale as possible, without going over.


Negative gain (if necessary) at mix time is the right time to do that, in my opinion. Less DSP is logically better, based on Occam's Razor if nothing else.
https://toad.social/@morst spoutible.com/morst post.news/@acffhmorst

Offline Gutbucket

  • record > listen > revise technique
  • Trade Count: (16)
  • Needs to get out more...
  • *****
  • Posts: 15700
  • Gender: Male
  • "Better to love music than respect it" ~Stravinsky
Re: Does DSP degrade sound quality: normalizing when mixing a matrix
« Reply #3 on: October 18, 2018, 08:59:56 AM »
With modern DAW editing software you needn't worry about this much, especially in the case you describe where each source has decent levels to begin with and the overall level change is not dramatic.  The mathematical calculation space in which the summing and level adjustment is taking place is significantly larger than the bit-depth of the recorded input files as well as the target output format.  The data being manipulated fits entirely within that mathematical calculation space with room to spare at the both the low-level and high-level ends of the range.  So regardless of whether you sum first and then tweak level for output, or tweak levels first and then sum to the target output level, the result should be mathematically equivalent.

What you don't want to do is reduce the level of the sources by an arbitrarily large amount, sum them, then increase the level of the summed output by a dramatic amount to get it back up to the desired output level.  That can cause the loss of low level information and increase the noise floor.
musical volition > vibrations > voltages > numeric values > voltages > vibrations> virtual teleportation time-machine experience
Better recording made easy - >>Improved PAS table<< | Made excellent- >>click here to download the Oddball Microphone Technique illustrated PDF booklet<< (note: This is a 1st draft, now several years old and in need of revision!  Stay tuned)

 

RSS | Mobile
Page created in 0.049 seconds with 32 queries.
© 2002-2024 Taperssection.com
Powered by SMF