Become a Site Supporter and Never see Ads again!

Author Topic: Recorder for home use  (Read 5494 times)

0 Members and 1 Guest are viewing this topic.

Offline Martinez Llorca

  • Trade Count: (0)
  • Taperssection Newbie
  • *
  • Posts: 18
Recorder for home use
« on: July 16, 2020, 08:25:19 AM »
It's been some since I haven't visited this forum. So please excuse some ignorance on later models that might have been released in the last 3 or 4 years.

The application I'm planning is also different, because it will be focused on playing rather than recording.

But I wouldn't be surprised if, with the actual quarantine situation that has stopped most external recordings in all areas, some recordists might not be already thinking or even using their units for home use. It should be fine both for the electronics and for the minds that handle them.

The matter came up because a friend of mine asked of a way to play his music at home with high quality, minimum CD quality.

He's a very demanding person, as he manufactures high quality home speakers, some of the best there is, so he never listens with headphones, which is how most portable recorders have been designed for.

Budget is a very important issue too, because we are not talking about an studio unit, with proper external outputs, like RCA or XLR, instead of 3.5mm mini-plug interface.

The first unit I started with was the Tascam DR-05X, priced at a very affordable $90 at B&H. I did already own a DR-05 in the past, which I unfortunately lost on a cab. And it was great when I had it.

Its weak point is the analog output, which for the price can't be too good. But it now has a digital USB interface, which I think might be used with an external DAC, something like a Topping D50 or something similarly priced. Both units would make a total of around $300, and for that money you can't even find a decent CD player nowadays, not to speak of a good one, like a Marantz.

So I'm coming here to listen to some suggestions on what path to take, particularly from those that are already using some recorder for home music.

Thanks!

Carlos

Offline heathen

  • Trade Count: (23)
  • Needs to get out more...
  • *****
  • Posts: 3528
Re: Recorder for home use
« Reply #1 on: July 16, 2020, 10:01:41 AM »
I don't know much about this subject (though I do use my Zoom F8 for home recordings), but one thing to look into is a recorder that can also serve as a USB interface.
Mics: AT4050ST | AT4031 | AT853 (C/SC) | Line Audio CM3 | Sennheiser e614 | Sennheiser MKE2 | DPA 4061 Pre: CA9200 Decks: Zoom F8 | Roland R-05

Offline Gutbucket

  • record > listen > revise technique
  • Trade Count: (16)
  • Needs to get out more...
  • *****
  • Posts: 15700
  • Gender: Male
  • "Better to love music than respect it" ~Stravinsky
Re: Recorder for home use
« Reply #2 on: July 16, 2020, 10:58:02 AM »
You might look for an inexpensive recorder that features some form of digital output.  Not sure which have them these days and its not always obvious by looking at them.  The Original Edirol R-09 which came to market something like 15 year ago and served as a model for most other small handhelds to follow had a optical-toslink output that shared the 3.5mm miniplug analog output.  I used to use that for playback through a quality DAC.  Coaxial SPDIF out tended to be available on slightly larger recorders.  Recently direct digital output (along with digital input) has become less common, while USB interface functionality has become more prevalent.  With any of those options the recorder serves simply as a "file server" streaming out digital data, what folks around here used to call a "bit bucket" on the recording side.  Most (all?) USB interface functionality will need to be to a computer which serves as host.  The recorder is unlikely to be able to function as a USB host allowing connection directly to a DAC.

Might also check the TS yardsale for a larger used recorder that features RCA or balanced XLR analog outs. 
musical volition > vibrations > voltages > numeric values > voltages > vibrations> virtual teleportation time-machine experience
Better recording made easy - >>Improved PAS table<< | Made excellent- >>click here to download the Oddball Microphone Technique illustrated PDF booklet<< (note: This is a 1st draft, now several years old and in need of revision!  Stay tuned)

Offline Martinez Llorca

  • Trade Count: (0)
  • Taperssection Newbie
  • *
  • Posts: 18
Re: Recorder for home use
« Reply #3 on: July 16, 2020, 01:14:27 PM »
Does anybody know any brand and model where the digital output can be recognized as USB host by an external DAC? 

Offline Gutbucket

  • record > listen > revise technique
  • Trade Count: (16)
  • Needs to get out more...
  • *****
  • Posts: 15700
  • Gender: Male
  • "Better to love music than respect it" ~Stravinsky
Re: Recorder for home use
« Reply #4 on: July 16, 2020, 01:21:20 PM »
Best to look for one with a SPDIF digital output (either optical or coax) on that account as they definitely exist.  A small and inexpensive recorder which can act as USB host is likely a unicorn.
musical volition > vibrations > voltages > numeric values > voltages > vibrations> virtual teleportation time-machine experience
Better recording made easy - >>Improved PAS table<< | Made excellent- >>click here to download the Oddball Microphone Technique illustrated PDF booklet<< (note: This is a 1st draft, now several years old and in need of revision!  Stay tuned)

Offline heathen

  • Trade Count: (23)
  • Needs to get out more...
  • *****
  • Posts: 3528
Re: Recorder for home use
« Reply #5 on: July 16, 2020, 02:10:03 PM »
Does anybody know any brand and model where the digital output can be recognized as USB host by an external DAC?

I'm guessing (just a guess!) that any of the recorders that also serve as a USB interface might be recognized by a DAC that has USB input.  I can test my F8 with my Schiit DAC this weekend if you'd like (though the F8 may be overkill for your purposes...if nothing else it might serve as "proof of concept" though).  Shoot me a PM this weekend if you'd like me to do that...I've got a lot going on today and tomorrow so I'll need the reminder.
Mics: AT4050ST | AT4031 | AT853 (C/SC) | Line Audio CM3 | Sennheiser e614 | Sennheiser MKE2 | DPA 4061 Pre: CA9200 Decks: Zoom F8 | Roland R-05

Offline Gutbucket

  • record > listen > revise technique
  • Trade Count: (16)
  • Needs to get out more...
  • *****
  • Posts: 15700
  • Gender: Male
  • "Better to love music than respect it" ~Stravinsky
Re: Recorder for home use
« Reply #6 on: July 16, 2020, 02:58:53 PM »
If it is going be used for playback only, and needs USB host capability to drive a USB DAC directly while being relatively inexpensive, it may be best to look into a cheap phone as media player.
musical volition > vibrations > voltages > numeric values > voltages > vibrations> virtual teleportation time-machine experience
Better recording made easy - >>Improved PAS table<< | Made excellent- >>click here to download the Oddball Microphone Technique illustrated PDF booklet<< (note: This is a 1st draft, now several years old and in need of revision!  Stay tuned)

Offline Martinez Llorca

  • Trade Count: (0)
  • Taperssection Newbie
  • *
  • Posts: 18
Re: Recorder for home use
« Reply #7 on: July 16, 2020, 03:05:42 PM »
AFAIK phones are not good or capable to record or play high resolution files, which would be the case here.

And I don't think you can connect a DAC to a phone, can you? What program can you use?

Note: please do not consider any iPhone as an option.

Offline carpa

  • Trade Count: (0)
  • Taperssection Regular
  • **
  • Posts: 207
Re: Recorder for home use
« Reply #8 on: July 16, 2020, 05:12:08 PM »
Does anybody know any brand and model where the digital output can be recognized as USB host by an external DAC?

I'm guessing (just a guess!) that any of the recorders that also serve as a USB interface might be recognized by a DAC that has USB input.  I can test my F8 with my Schiit DAC this weekend if you'd like (though the F8 may be overkill for your purposes...if nothing else it might serve as "proof of concept" though).  Shoot me a PM this weekend if you'd like me to do that...I've got a lot going on today and tomorrow so I'll need the reminder.

Nice point....I don't think a recorder's usb out can serve as a "playback" digital port if not connected to a pc as an audio interface. I suspect that only headphone out and line out ( if present) would serve as outputs. It would be a great feature though, allowing the use of a dac or a better check of the recorded material ( better sound, more powerful headphone amp). I'll also try tomorrow with my Zoom h6, but with very little hope of success.

I second the advice of connecting a usb dac to a cell phone for a portable solution. Things like audioquest dragonfly red or similar would serve well. I own an Apogee Groove which is very good and powerful, but differently from Dragonfly it is meant mainly for desktop use as it drains a bit of energy. It works with some phones and not with others through a usb on the go cheap dongle, depending on - I think - on their battery capacity. Other models work with every cell phone but can only convert and play files up to hi res.  This is the best solution if you don't need recording, or if you use a recorder at the purpose but then move your files to the cell phone.
Other option is a Digital Audio Player ( there are from 30 to 2000 euros) which combines storage, app for playing dac and analog out into a single little pice of gear ( an iPod alternative/evolution ).
Lastly, I've read more than once that some LG phone models have a very good onboard DAC ( let's say "audiophile" grade). Maybe worth giving a look.....
« Last Edit: July 16, 2020, 05:26:41 PM by carpa »

Offline Gutbucket

  • record > listen > revise technique
  • Trade Count: (16)
  • Needs to get out more...
  • *****
  • Posts: 15700
  • Gender: Male
  • "Better to love music than respect it" ~Stravinsky
Re: Recorder for home use
« Reply #9 on: July 16, 2020, 05:28:52 PM »
Phone devices are most certainly are capable of both playing and recording high resolution files via external USB interfaces.  I am not suggesting use of the phone's analog input/output jack.

Unlike most recorders, modern phone devices have not just USB client but USB host capability, meaning they can be directly connected to and control a USB client device such as a storage device, DAC or certain USB ADC recording interfaces.  They essentially act like a portable computer in this respect.  Somewhat older phones without USB-C but with OTG support require an OTG adapter cable to act as a host, recent phones with USB-C do not.  Not sure when such support started with iPhones and the specifics of their proprietary USB connections.

I'm not an iOS user but why not iPhone?  One of the highest-end ultra-compact recording setups currently available is the DPA d:vice which currently only works with iOS.  Most tapers using it record directly to iPhone rather and iPad.  Similarly some Zoom recorders such as F8 heathen mentions (which I also use but is priced beyond your loosely implied cost constraint) have remote control apps which are currently iOS only. I wish both of these products were compatible with Android devices but they currently are not.  Some member here have purchased low cost apple devices for $60-$80 solely for dedicated recording use with those products.

Most recorders with a USB port are client devices only.  They can be accessed for storage and sometimes as audio interfaces by a USB host, but do not have host capability themselves.  The ones which do are larger and more expensive, and even then such host capability tends to be limited to things like keyboard input and/or specific mixer surface devices.


« Last Edit: July 16, 2020, 05:35:50 PM by Gutbucket »
musical volition > vibrations > voltages > numeric values > voltages > vibrations> virtual teleportation time-machine experience
Better recording made easy - >>Improved PAS table<< | Made excellent- >>click here to download the Oddball Microphone Technique illustrated PDF booklet<< (note: This is a 1st draft, now several years old and in need of revision!  Stay tuned)

Offline Martinez Llorca

  • Trade Count: (0)
  • Taperssection Newbie
  • *
  • Posts: 18
Re: Recorder for home use
« Reply #10 on: July 16, 2020, 05:46:53 PM »
First let me tell you why iPhone is a no no. 

To start with all things are Mac, both phones and computers are scarce and very expensive in Latin America, where I live. Those prices you mention will never happen here for an iPhone.

Second I don't understand how I will connect both the DAC and a storage driver to the single USB phone input, as I am not sure both things can be connected in parallel.

Only high definition files are useful, that is they have to be equal or superior to a CD. So any type of MP3 is out.

DAPs were the first option I mentioned to my friend, and then I thought of digital recorders. It will probably be one of those choices. I would prefer my friend having a recorder with an external DAC connected to it though, but it seems it's unlikely to happen.

Offline heathen

  • Trade Count: (23)
  • Needs to get out more...
  • *****
  • Posts: 3528
Re: Recorder for home use
« Reply #11 on: July 16, 2020, 06:08:00 PM »
Does your friend need portability?  Because if not a Raspberry Pi is worth considering.  They're easy to build, and high quality DAC "hats" are available for very reasonable prices.  I have used one to record as an experiment, and it's like recording with any computer.  I have also used one for playback and it's fully capable of bit-perfect high resolution playback.  For someone who is not used to building this sort of thing it might appear intimidating at first, but there are plenty of online guides where you literally just follow the instructions step-by-step.
« Last Edit: July 16, 2020, 06:40:33 PM by heathen »
Mics: AT4050ST | AT4031 | AT853 (C/SC) | Line Audio CM3 | Sennheiser e614 | Sennheiser MKE2 | DPA 4061 Pre: CA9200 Decks: Zoom F8 | Roland R-05

Offline Gutbucket

  • record > listen > revise technique
  • Trade Count: (16)
  • Needs to get out more...
  • *****
  • Posts: 15700
  • Gender: Male
  • "Better to love music than respect it" ~Stravinsky
Re: Recorder for home use
« Reply #12 on: July 16, 2020, 06:38:59 PM »
Unavailability of Apple products in Latin America at competitive cost is a valid dismissal.  The other concerns you list are not.  A phone acts the same as a DAP or recorder (or computer, which is essentially what it is), providing both storage and playback control of files of any rate up to that supported by the USB DAC and the app used to play the files.  You needn't choose to use one, but there is no quality bottle neck there.

I'll leave it to heathen, who's advice above is spot on.
musical volition > vibrations > voltages > numeric values > voltages > vibrations> virtual teleportation time-machine experience
Better recording made easy - >>Improved PAS table<< | Made excellent- >>click here to download the Oddball Microphone Technique illustrated PDF booklet<< (note: This is a 1st draft, now several years old and in need of revision!  Stay tuned)

Offline jerryfreak

  • No PZ
  • Trade Count: (31)
  • Needs to get out more...
  • *
  • Posts: 6205
  • The plural of anecdote is not data
Re: Recorder for home use
« Reply #13 on: July 16, 2020, 06:58:06 PM »
AFAIK phones are not good or capable to record or play high resolution files, which would be the case here.

And I don't think you can connect a DAC to a phone, can you? What program can you use?

Note: please do not consider any iPhone as an option.
Nothing wrong with phones you can get yourself a Chromecast and stream lossless from the phone to a DAC
Unable to post or PM due to arbitrary censorship of people the mod doesn't like. Please email me using the link in my profile if you need to connect

Offline Martinez Llorca

  • Trade Count: (0)
  • Taperssection Newbie
  • *
  • Posts: 18
Re: Recorder for home use
« Reply #14 on: July 17, 2020, 08:36:35 AM »
I went find about Chromecast. It's a hardware, apparently, isn't it?

Offline vanark

  • TDS
  • Site Supporter
  • Trade Count: (29)
  • Needs to get out more...
  • *
  • Posts: 8510
  • If you ain't right, you better get right!
    • The Mudboy Grotto - North Mississippi Allstar fan site
Re: Recorder for home use
« Reply #15 on: July 17, 2020, 10:15:09 AM »
I was just coming in to suggest Raspberry Pi but see heathen has done so.
If you have a problem relating to the Live Music Archive (http://www.archive.org/details/etree) please send an e-mail to us admins at LMA(AT)archive(DOT)org or post in the LMA thread here and we'll get on it.

Link to LMA Recordings

Link to Team Dirty South Recordings on the LMA

Mics: Microtech Gefell M21 (with Nbob actives) | Church Audio CA-11 (cards) (with CA UBB)
Pres: babynbox
Recorders: Tascam DR-60D | Tascam DR-40 | Sony PCM-A10 | Edirol R-4

Offline Martinez Llorca

  • Trade Count: (0)
  • Taperssection Newbie
  • *
  • Posts: 18
Re: Recorder for home use
« Reply #16 on: July 17, 2020, 10:58:07 AM »
Raspberry is a two-edge sword.

To start with the internal power supply is all DC-DC and certainly affects the analog audio quality.

So better not use that DAC that plugs into it.

The option is the one I used for my audio network, which is just using the Raspberry for the ethernet interface, converting the signal to USB and then a proper DAC, like a Topping D50, on the USB output.

The problem then is the program you will use to control the whole thing, which are not there many options.

Offline vanark

  • TDS
  • Site Supporter
  • Trade Count: (29)
  • Needs to get out more...
  • *
  • Posts: 8510
  • If you ain't right, you better get right!
    • The Mudboy Grotto - North Mississippi Allstar fan site
Re: Recorder for home use
« Reply #17 on: July 17, 2020, 11:01:54 AM »
I'm confused. He/you want this done on a budget but are very concerned about audio quality? Those two usually have a hard time reconciling. Good luck with your search. Hope he/you find something that works for you/him.
If you have a problem relating to the Live Music Archive (http://www.archive.org/details/etree) please send an e-mail to us admins at LMA(AT)archive(DOT)org or post in the LMA thread here and we'll get on it.

Link to LMA Recordings

Link to Team Dirty South Recordings on the LMA

Mics: Microtech Gefell M21 (with Nbob actives) | Church Audio CA-11 (cards) (with CA UBB)
Pres: babynbox
Recorders: Tascam DR-60D | Tascam DR-40 | Sony PCM-A10 | Edirol R-4

Offline Martinez Llorca

  • Trade Count: (0)
  • Taperssection Newbie
  • *
  • Posts: 18
Re: Recorder for home use
« Reply #18 on: July 17, 2020, 11:24:34 AM »
Sorry, but top quality is a no negotiable demand. I thought I made that clear.

And if you pick your units carefully you can have both.

If the Tascam I had thought of could have had a host USB interface, adding a Topping D50 DAC would end up in $300, which would be a nice budget price.


Offline heathen

  • Trade Count: (23)
  • Needs to get out more...
  • *****
  • Posts: 3528
Re: Recorder for home use
« Reply #19 on: July 17, 2020, 06:02:51 PM »
Raspberry is a two-edge sword.

To start with the internal power supply is all DC-DC and certainly affects the analog audio quality.

So better not use that DAC that plugs into it.

The option is the one I used for my audio network, which is just using the Raspberry for the ethernet interface, converting the signal to USB and then a proper DAC, like a Topping D50, on the USB output.

The problem then is the program you will use to control the whole thing, which are not there many options.

The Raspberry Pi has proven to be fully capable of bit-perfect playback, so I'm not sure what the concern is here.  I could link you more information if you want.
Mics: AT4050ST | AT4031 | AT853 (C/SC) | Line Audio CM3 | Sennheiser e614 | Sennheiser MKE2 | DPA 4061 Pre: CA9200 Decks: Zoom F8 | Roland R-05

Offline Martinez Llorca

  • Trade Count: (0)
  • Taperssection Newbie
  • *
  • Posts: 18
Re: Recorder for home use
« Reply #20 on: July 17, 2020, 07:31:23 PM »
I do not doubt of the Raspberry bit-perfect playback capability. That's why I bought one, and enjoyed many hours of listening to it.

What I say is it has poor quality if you use it as an analog player, powering the the DAC with the Raspberry power supply.

I use it just to convert the ethernet network signal into usb, and then a quality DAC for the analog output.

Offline heathen

  • Trade Count: (23)
  • Needs to get out more...
  • *****
  • Posts: 3528
Re: Recorder for home use
« Reply #21 on: July 17, 2020, 08:26:43 PM »
I do not doubt of the Raspberry bit-perfect playback capability. That's why I bought one, and enjoyed many hours of listening to it.

What I say is it has poor quality if you use it as an analog player, powering the the DAC with the Raspberry power supply.

I use it just to convert the ethernet network signal into usb, and then a quality DAC for the analog output.

We might have a disconnect here. There are DACs that are essentially integrated into the Pi.  Tests have shown the capability of that setup.  It's fully capable of playback that's as accurate as any other DAC.  If you have any doubts I can link you to actual measurements.
Mics: AT4050ST | AT4031 | AT853 (C/SC) | Line Audio CM3 | Sennheiser e614 | Sennheiser MKE2 | DPA 4061 Pre: CA9200 Decks: Zoom F8 | Roland R-05

Offline Martinez Llorca

  • Trade Count: (0)
  • Taperssection Newbie
  • *
  • Posts: 18
Re: Recorder for home use
« Reply #22 on: July 17, 2020, 10:00:28 PM »
No, we do not have a disconnect here, but we may be about to have is a disagreement. Which I wouldn't like to get into.

Of course I have seen the DACs that plug directly into the Raspberry Pi, and the comments I have read about them on listening tests compared to the same Rasp Pi with external DAC were not very good ones for the former ones. Integrated DACs were systematically lower in subjective audio quality.

I do not want to get into a discussion over this, because in my experience it gets you nowhere.

The only thing I would like to be able to see is if anyone has tried the USB interface on the recorders connecting an external DAC to it, and see if the DAC sees it as a host.

If that is not possible I will abandon this search with recorders.

Offline vanark

  • TDS
  • Site Supporter
  • Trade Count: (29)
  • Needs to get out more...
  • *
  • Posts: 8510
  • If you ain't right, you better get right!
    • The Mudboy Grotto - North Mississippi Allstar fan site
Recorder for home use
« Reply #23 on: July 17, 2020, 10:26:17 PM »
Ouch. I hope the tone I'm reading is simply English as a second language coming across much harsher than intended.
If you have a problem relating to the Live Music Archive (http://www.archive.org/details/etree) please send an e-mail to us admins at LMA(AT)archive(DOT)org or post in the LMA thread here and we'll get on it.

Link to LMA Recordings

Link to Team Dirty South Recordings on the LMA

Mics: Microtech Gefell M21 (with Nbob actives) | Church Audio CA-11 (cards) (with CA UBB)
Pres: babynbox
Recorders: Tascam DR-60D | Tascam DR-40 | Sony PCM-A10 | Edirol R-4

Offline rocksuitcase

  • Trade Count: (4)
  • Needs to get out more...
  • *****
  • Posts: 8283
  • Gender: Male
    • RockSuitcase: stage photography
Re: Recorder for home use
« Reply #24 on: July 18, 2020, 04:09:26 AM »
OK. HOw about going with HIgh Res player only, loading the files on from PC or SD card reader?
I only have experience with fiio, but they are good players which play high res files.
https://www.fiio.com/player
music IS love

When you get confused, listen to the music play!

Mics:         AKG460|CK61|CK1|CK3|CK8|Beyer M 201E|DPA 4060 SK
Recorders:Marantz PMD661 OADE Concert mod; Tascam DR680 MKI x2; Sony PCM-M10

Offline Martinez Llorca

  • Trade Count: (0)
  • Taperssection Newbie
  • *
  • Posts: 18
Re: Recorder for home use
« Reply #25 on: July 18, 2020, 06:40:19 AM »
Ouch. I hope the tone I'm reading is simply English as a second language coming across much harsher than intended.

I'm sorry if my answer sounded harsh, because that was not my intention. You have been helping me a lot with my query, so it would be far from me to be harsh, particularly with heathen.

Maybe I misunderstood his expression that we might have a "disconnect" over this matter. I thought he thought I was not understanding what he was proposing, and I just said that it seemed I did. And that it seemed this conversation might turn into a discussion about the sound quality of a Raspberry Pi with its own DAC socketed in versus a Rasp with an external DAC. I did research that option for me several months ago, when I was assembling my own audio streamer.

Yes, a high resolution player, like the fiio, does seem to be a very valid option, in fact the first I had thought before recorders coming to my mind. The question is to pick the right model, as from feedback I see from fiio users in Amazon, only the very expensive models seem to fulfill audio high quality demands.


Offline justme

  • Trade Count: (0)
  • Taperssection Regular
  • **
  • Posts: 231
  • Gender: Male
Re: Recorder for home use
« Reply #26 on: July 18, 2020, 05:33:00 PM »
The Fiio and Shanling are two great companies producing amazing hi res players that works both standalone as well as DACs and Bluetooth.

Offline kuba e

  • Trade Count: (1)
  • Taperssection Member
  • ***
  • Posts: 492
  • Gender: Male
Re: Recorder for home use
« Reply #27 on: July 19, 2020, 08:19:28 AM »
Rory, it is nice from you that you are aware that non native speakers can do easily faux pas. My English is bad so first I must make sentence in my native language and then translate it into English. Unfortunately, there are many sentences that sounds good in my language but sounds harsh in English. It is easier now - the Google translator is great help, but still it can't fix everything. When I was little it was written about these tools in sci-fi books only.

At home, I am using NAS (a network drive) connected via wifi to the old Roku SoundBridge. Roku is connected to my stereo via it's analog output.  I am sure there must be some new hifi replacement for the Roku. Jerryfreak mentioned Chromecast, it looks very interesting.

Also I read recently about an android application that allows you to connect your smartphone phone to an external sound card and record at a high bit rate. I haven't a smartphone, I cant test it. But maybe it could be very interesting alternative for our recorders -  a multi inputs soundcard with external power and self phone. And maybe it would also work for a quality playback as well.
http://www.extreamsd.com/index.php/products/usb-audio-recorder-pro
« Last Edit: July 19, 2020, 08:29:04 AM by kuba e »

Offline aaronji

  • Site Supporter
  • Trade Count: (9)
  • Needs to get out more...
  • *
  • Posts: 3861
Re: Recorder for home use
« Reply #28 on: July 19, 2020, 05:06:43 PM »
^ Personally, I think your English is quite good. Maybe not 100% perfect, but always comprehensible...

Offline Gutbucket

  • record > listen > revise technique
  • Trade Count: (16)
  • Needs to get out more...
  • *****
  • Posts: 15700
  • Gender: Male
  • "Better to love music than respect it" ~Stravinsky
Re: Recorder for home use
« Reply #29 on: July 20, 2020, 02:09:33 PM »
Tascam DR-680 with coaxial SPDIF/AES digital output is generally available used for $250-300, new for around $500.  It's a solid machine.  There are others with digital out but not sure if currently available or priced less.

Here's a listing for new one for $321 (disclaimer, I've never heard of this vendor and cannot vouch for them)-  https://www.greentoe.com/product/Tascam_DR-680MKII_Portable_Multichannel_Recorder_DR-680MK2?utm_source=Google&utm_medium=web&utm_campaign=GoogleShopping&utm_content=DR-680MK2&price=321
musical volition > vibrations > voltages > numeric values > voltages > vibrations> virtual teleportation time-machine experience
Better recording made easy - >>Improved PAS table<< | Made excellent- >>click here to download the Oddball Microphone Technique illustrated PDF booklet<< (note: This is a 1st draft, now several years old and in need of revision!  Stay tuned)

Offline Martinez Llorca

  • Trade Count: (0)
  • Taperssection Newbie
  • *
  • Posts: 18
Re: Recorder for home use
« Reply #30 on: July 20, 2020, 05:11:53 PM »
Those prices are only valid in the USA. I do not live there.

Has anyone actually tried a Tascam, if possible de DR-05, and tried to connect a DAC to the USB socket, and see what happens?

Offline Gutbucket

  • record > listen > revise technique
  • Trade Count: (16)
  • Needs to get out more...
  • *****
  • Posts: 15700
  • Gender: Male
  • "Better to love music than respect it" ~Stravinsky
Re: Recorder for home use
« Reply #31 on: July 20, 2020, 08:27:05 PM »
Checked the DR-05 manual.  USB functionality is power in and file storage/transfer to a host computer only.

Quote
USB jack
Connector: Mini-B type
Format: USB 2.0 HIGH SPEED mass storage class

It does not include the functionality to operate as a USB audio interface when connected to a USB host computer, which is a less demanding function than acting as USB host itself. 

[edit- I don't think ANY Tascam portable recorders incorporate USB interface or host functions.  All of them use USB for storage/file-access only, and in a few instances external power input.]
« Last Edit: July 20, 2020, 08:36:20 PM by Gutbucket »
musical volition > vibrations > voltages > numeric values > voltages > vibrations> virtual teleportation time-machine experience
Better recording made easy - >>Improved PAS table<< | Made excellent- >>click here to download the Oddball Microphone Technique illustrated PDF booklet<< (note: This is a 1st draft, now several years old and in need of revision!  Stay tuned)

Offline kuba e

  • Trade Count: (1)
  • Taperssection Member
  • ***
  • Posts: 492
  • Gender: Male
Re: Recorder for home use
« Reply #32 on: July 21, 2020, 05:49:54 AM »
Thanks Aaronji.

Offline jerryfreak

  • No PZ
  • Trade Count: (31)
  • Needs to get out more...
  • *
  • Posts: 6205
  • The plural of anecdote is not data
Re: Recorder for home use
« Reply #33 on: July 21, 2020, 10:35:01 AM »
Those prices are only valid in the USA. I do not live there.

Has anyone actually tried a Tascam, if possible de DR-05, and tried to connect a DAC to the USB socket, and see what happens?
none of these handhelds will have host functionality
Unable to post or PM due to arbitrary censorship of people the mod doesn't like. Please email me using the link in my profile if you need to connect

Offline rastasean

  • in paradise
  • Trade Count: (23)
  • Needs to get out more...
  • *****
  • Posts: 3699
  • Gender: Male
Re: Recorder for home use
« Reply #34 on: August 07, 2020, 12:12:54 AM »
The Tascam DR-05 can't operate as a USB interface, but the DR-05x can (along with the 07x and 40x). The 05x can likely be found for $100 or less.
Advice is a form of nostalgia, dispensing it is a way of fishing the past from the disposal, wiping it off, painting over the ugly parts and recycling it for more than it’s worth.

 

RSS | Mobile
Page created in 0.131 seconds with 63 queries.
© 2002-2024 Taperssection.com
Powered by SMF