Thank You Gutbucket for taking the time and listen to the example. I am not suggesting anything. Neither is the picture of the anti-reflecting mounting device in any way conclusive about the type of acoustical elements mounted on it. It is not always you hear what you see. As you may have noticed, I am no longer presenting the mount on my website. In this thread the technique is mentioned as the ULSI mic technique, I have never promoted it like that, it is the ULSI stereo technique. The mount indeed does contribute to the quality of the ULSI technique, but its contribution is limited to the upper octaves, the part of the audio band where reflections do play a larger role than many of microphone manufacturers will admit to their customers, although they are well aware of it. You would be surprised to see the continuous ripple caused by a simple device as the DPA anti-vibration mount icw a DPA 4006 microphone. The mount as referred to in this thread is made in such way the upper frequencies do not get manipulated by plugs, wires, tripot and clamps, but neither do reflections of the microphone housing reach the membrane of the opposite channel microphone. The result is a very clean lively upper range of the audio band, and some of my customer claim to hear that difference. Set back, the mount has a fixed spacing and fixed angle, and therefore in some situations a compromise, as so many things in recording. The mount was specifically designed for baroque organs.