Use a sufficiently phat windscreen. Wind doesn't care how well-endowed your microphone may or may not be, only how wind-noise-sensitive it is. I've never understood the standard paring of tiny windscreens to tiny microphones, except in on-talent applications where everything has to be small for visual reasons. Tiny screens just don't trap sufficient dead-airspace to work well. They are fine for omnis which already have limited sensitivity to wind, but for directional mics you need a good screen of sufficient size, irregardless of the size of the microphone.
These days, I use Shure A81-WS (B.A.S.) for my directional mics, including the miniature DPA 4098 supercards, which require a little foam insert (repurposed open-pore hair curler foams) to fit snugly into the big windscreen's microphone recess without gaps. To outsiders it may seem ridiculous to mount such a large foam screen on such a tiny microphone, especially as the tiny built-in gooseneck-support of the 4098 is not strong enough to support the heft of the windscreen on it's own without sagging, but I've found that level of wind protection is what is required to sufficiently attenuate wind noise in my supercards without worries. Alternate is using a "dead-critter" long-haired fur windjammer overcoat over a smaller foam screen which would otherwise be insufficient on its own, but I find it works better and prefer the simplicity of always using the same sufficiently-large, dual-layer foam, Big Ass Shures.
If going Windtech, I'd look to their "dual foam" designs similar to the BAS using a layer of denser tiny-pore outer foam surrounding the airy, open-pore center core foam which creates a dead-airspace around the microphone, even if it requires nesting a 2nd small windscreen inside it in order to fit the diameter of the 853's.