Become a Site Supporter and Never see Ads again!

Author Topic: V3/Oade-warm-mod-UA5 comparison  (Read 40778 times)

0 Members and 1 Guest are viewing this topic.

Offline Nick Culbreth

  • Trade Count: (1)
  • Needs to get out more...
  • *****
  • Posts: 3084
  • Gender: Male
Re:V3/Oade-warm-mod-UA5 comparison
« Reply #105 on: November 24, 2003, 02:33:13 PM »
something tells me that a good chunk of that 1500 bucks is attributed to the Grace name and not the product itself.

i'm not a fan of the v3 but i'm not sure i'd agree w/ that statement.  they sound great if you like transparency and they're by far the best designed box available.

Offline Brian

  • Trade Count: (2)
  • Needs to get out more...
  • Posts: 9392
  • Gender: Male
Re:V3/Oade-warm-mod-UA5 comparison
« Reply #106 on: November 24, 2003, 02:37:41 PM »
i never said i wasn't a fan of the V3 and i know you never said I wasn't. IT'S A GREAT UNIT. Top notch design and when put in the right situation it flat out smokes in terms of sound!  However i'd love to be able to see a spec sheet of just how much it cost to put it all together including parts and man hours. highly doubt it comes close to $1500.
« Last Edit: November 24, 2003, 02:38:27 PM by STL-Taper »

Offline Tim

  • Trade Count: (1)
  • Needs to get out more...
  • *****
  • Posts: 32913
  • Gender: Male
Re:V3/Oade-warm-mod-UA5 comparison
« Reply #107 on: November 24, 2003, 02:45:07 PM »
i never said i wasn't a fan of the V3 and i know you never said I wasn't. IT'S A GREAT UNIT. Top notch design and when put in the right situation it flat out smokes in terms of sound!  However i'd love to be able to see a spec sheet of just how much it cost to put it all together including parts and man hours. highly doubt it comes close to $1500.

Research and design is very and they had to come up with their own dithering algorithm (ANSR) so I'd guess that's where the cost comes in.

plus the man's got to make a living!
I’ve had a few weird experiences and a few close brushes with total weirdness of one sort or another, but nothing that’s really freaked me out or made me feel too awful about it. - Jerry Garcia

Offline Craig T

  • Trade Count: (10)
  • Needs to get out more...
  • *****
  • Posts: 4312
    • LMA
Re:V3/Oade-warm-mod-UA5 comparison
« Reply #108 on: November 24, 2003, 02:46:48 PM »
However i'd love to be able to see a spec sheet of just how much it cost to put it all together including parts and man hours. highly doubt it comes close to $1500.

Oh, there's no doubt!  Just a wild guess, but maybe $600?  Even more shocking might be how much it costs it make a UA5 - $100?
Schoeps cmc6/4v / Beyer mc950 / Line Audio CM3, OM1 / ADK A51 / Church Audio CA-14
Naiant Tinybox v2.2 / NBox(P) / Church Audio ST9200 / CA-UGLY
Sony PCM-M10 / Zoom F3 / Zoom F6

Offline pfife

  • Emperor of Ticketucky
  • Trade Count: (0)
  • Needs to get out more...
  • *****
  • Posts: 12354
  • I love/hate tickets.
Re:V3/Oade-warm-mod-UA5 comparison
« Reply #109 on: November 24, 2003, 02:52:06 PM »
Quote

how about build quality and metering?  
Quote

MIGHT, and I mean MIGHT, be able to solve the metering problem for around $50... but you are right, the meters do suck...

http://www.taperssection.com/yabbse/index.php?board=11;action=display;threadid=8806

~AP


Tickets are dead to me.  Except the ones I have, don't have, and lost.  Not to mention the ones you have, don't have, and lost.   And the ones that other dude has, doesn't have, and lost.  Let me know if you need some tickets, I'm happy to oblige. 

Tickets >>>>>>>> Oxygen

Offline chuckcage

  • Trade Count: (1)
  • Taperssection Regular
  • **
  • Posts: 243
  • Gender: Male
  • Learning fast...
Re:V3/Oade-warm-mod-UA5 comparison
« Reply #110 on: November 24, 2003, 03:06:16 PM »
The biggest point this comparison made to me is that the UA-5 is a great sounding piece of gear, and it's definitely going in my upgrade path.  I'll be able to afford it as a replacement for my AD-20 long before a V3.

When it comes to ultra-high-end gear, it's always a question of how far into diminishing returns you're willing to go.  The $750 upgrade from cheap mic > MD to C1000s > AD-20 > NJB3 made a VAST difference for me.  Another $750 mic upgrade will again get me a VAST difference.  Now it looks like $525 for a UA-5 would get me a little more.  

The place I've always found this interesting is in cables.  Ok, different story for actives, but is a $200 set of cables really going to sound that much better than my $60 set, or my $30 Neutrik/Canare star quad customs?  I bet if I did a comparison like the one above not one person could tell me the difference.  

I missidentified it mainly, I think, because I've only heard a couple of V3 shows.  (Shows you how new I am, yeah?)  

This comparison really reflects positively on both pieces of gear, yeah?

Chuck
---
Currently:
C1000s/MK012 > PB224 > AD-20 > NJB3

Offline wboswell

  • Trade Count: (0)
  • Needs to get out more...
  • *****
  • Posts: 3411
  • Gender: Male
  • Don't call what you're wearing an outfit
    • Trey Woodruff on guitar
Re:V3/Oade-warm-mod-UA5 comparison
« Reply #111 on: November 24, 2003, 03:08:25 PM »
i never said i wasn't a fan of the V3 and i know you never said I wasn't. IT'S A GREAT UNIT. Top notch design and when put in the right situation it flat out smokes in terms of sound!  However i'd love to be able to see a spec sheet of just how much it cost to put it all together including parts and man hours. highly doubt it comes close to $1500.

Parts and man hours are not a good way to measure a unit's retail cost.  A unit's marketing plan reflect years of research and design which must be accounted for in a dollar sense.  The Grace Co. may only hope to break even on the unit cost (R&D, parts, labor) on year 3 of the unit's production.  If parts and labor were the only thing you were taking into consideration in purchasing a unit, the engineers would be working pro bono...

marc0789

  • Guest
  • Trade Count: (0)
Re:V3/Oade-warm-mod-UA5 comparison
« Reply #112 on: November 24, 2003, 03:10:48 PM »
There's a lot of shit that'll make good tapes. When I upgraded from nak 100>d8 to 481>dmic-20 in '99 I noticed an unbelievable difference. And everything since has been 1-2% maybe, sometimes DOWN. If we weren't such dorks we wouldn't care. It's like going from scratch to slightly under par. Both are good, one is incrementally better, but it's noticeable. Imo.

Offline Brian

  • Trade Count: (2)
  • Needs to get out more...
  • Posts: 9392
  • Gender: Male
Re:V3/Oade-warm-mod-UA5 comparison
« Reply #113 on: November 24, 2003, 03:14:46 PM »
how much R&D can really go into a 2 channel field pre/ad. seems like a simple machine to me barring the invention of their own dithering algorithm maybe...If you are saying it took Grace Co. *years* of R&D i find that to be ridiculous on their part. It's their own fault for not being able to break even on that unit.  But i guess it could justify the price...

Then i again i don't own my own high-end audio gear company now do i, so i don't really know anything other than the end results of the product by listening to the tapes it makes. guess i'll just shut my trap for now.

Offline Tim

  • Trade Count: (1)
  • Needs to get out more...
  • *****
  • Posts: 32913
  • Gender: Male
Re:V3/Oade-warm-mod-UA5 comparison
« Reply #114 on: November 24, 2003, 03:14:49 PM »
good points Chuck!

It really has only been in the last 1.5 years or so that the ability to make really high quality tapes on a reasonable budget has come about. When the minime and v3 came out the prices dropped on the ad500's and ad1000's making them much more accessible. The mod'd ua5's are another (relatively) low cost but good sounding alternative.

As for mics the adk's have certainly taken the scene by storm and with good reason.. Mike has sent me some truly amazing tapes.

While a few years ago you could make some decent tapes on a budget I think now you can make really first class, top notch tapes on a budget!
I’ve had a few weird experiences and a few close brushes with total weirdness of one sort or another, but nothing that’s really freaked me out or made me feel too awful about it. - Jerry Garcia

Offline Brian

  • Trade Count: (2)
  • Needs to get out more...
  • Posts: 9392
  • Gender: Male
Re:V3/Oade-warm-mod-UA5 comparison
« Reply #115 on: November 24, 2003, 03:16:57 PM »

While a few years ago you could make some decent tapes on a budget I think now you can make really first class, top notch tapes on a budget!

agreed,
excellent points, Tim.  

Offline Craig T

  • Trade Count: (10)
  • Needs to get out more...
  • *****
  • Posts: 4312
    • LMA
Re:V3/Oade-warm-mod-UA5 comparison
« Reply #116 on: November 24, 2003, 03:17:23 PM »
If we weren't such dorks we wouldn't care.

no shit.  

ok, on that note, I've spent too much time on this board today...
Schoeps cmc6/4v / Beyer mc950 / Line Audio CM3, OM1 / ADK A51 / Church Audio CA-14
Naiant Tinybox v2.2 / NBox(P) / Church Audio ST9200 / CA-UGLY
Sony PCM-M10 / Zoom F3 / Zoom F6

Offline wboswell

  • Trade Count: (0)
  • Needs to get out more...
  • *****
  • Posts: 3411
  • Gender: Male
  • Don't call what you're wearing an outfit
    • Trey Woodruff on guitar
Re:V3/Oade-warm-mod-UA5 comparison
« Reply #117 on: November 24, 2003, 03:24:20 PM »
how much R&D can really go into a 2 channel field pre/ad. seems like a simple machine to me barring the invention of their own dithering algorithm maybe...If you are saying it took Grace Co. *years* of R&D i find that to be ridiculous on their part. It's their own fault for not being able to break even on that unit.  But i guess it could justify the price...

Then i again i don't own my own high-end audio gear company now do i, so i don't really know anything other than the end results of the product by listening to the tapes it makes. guess i'll just shut my trap for now.

I don't own one either, so I may be completely wrong here.  However, a good project has foresight, and Grace has one.  As far as I know, the 316 was the first production unit, which turned into the v2 ->v3.  However, I have mid 80's GD tapes with a grace p/s in the lineage.  So, this thing has been in the works for a long time...  and I would assume there are other incarnations in the future.  Hopefully, Mike Grace is doing well and will continue to present us with solid gear and affordable costs.

Offline MattD

  • Taper Emeritus
  • Trade Count: (1)
  • Needs to get out more...
  • *****
  • Posts: 4634
  • Gender: Male
Re:V3/Oade-warm-mod-UA5 comparison
« Reply #118 on: November 24, 2003, 03:32:00 PM »
how much R&D can really go into a 2 channel field pre/ad. seems like a simple machine to me barring the invention of their own dithering algorithm maybe...If you are saying it took Grace Co. *years* of R&D i find that to be ridiculous on their part. It's their own fault for not being able to break even on that unit.  But i guess it could justify the price...

Then i again i don't own my own high-end audio gear company now do i, so i don't really know anything other than the end results of the product by listening to the tapes it makes. guess i'll just shut my trap for now.

To do what any of these companies did requires a sizable chunk of change invested in R&D. We're talking on the tens-to-hundreds of thousands magnitude. I don't know if any of these were multimillion dollar investments, but to say it's a lot for a specialized company isn't too tough. As far as I know, there were ZERO 24/192 capable *portable* boxes out there when the V3 came out. That means they didn't exactly build off of anyone's design on the digital side and they modified their own design on the analog side. As for ANSR, the whole point is that it is NOT an algorithm. As far as I know this is entirely unique to dithering methods.

Since I am going through some of the agony of development with Metric Halo's products, I see exactly how hard it is to do some of this stuff. It's also why I've become very skeptical about new products ... especially those that relate to computer interfaces.

-Matt
Out of the game … for now?

Offline nic

  • Big In Japan
  • Trade Count: (1)
  • Needs to get out more...
  • *****
  • Posts: 4700
  • Gender: Male
    • half dead batteries
Re:V3/Oade-warm-mod-UA5 comparison
« Reply #119 on: November 24, 2003, 03:42:06 PM »
question about the d-mod UA-5:

while recording, is it normal for a slight digi-static to be introduced while adjusting mic gain?


the water's clean and innocent

 

RSS | Mobile
Page created in 0.066 seconds with 43 queries.
© 2002-2024 Taperssection.com
Powered by SMF