Become a Site Supporter and Never see Ads again!

Author Topic: flac frontend question  (Read 1704 times)

0 Members and 1 Guest are viewing this topic.

Offline leehookem

  • Trade Count: (3)
  • Needs to get out more...
  • *****
  • Posts: 4439
  • Gender: Male
    • Texas Tapers
flac frontend question
« on: February 12, 2006, 11:09:30 PM »
I'm encoding 24 bit for the first time and i'm getting a new warning i've never seen before:

skipping unknown sub-chunk 'pad'

anybody seen this before?
www.texastapers.org


AKG c480b ck61/ck63 > Tascam DR-70D
Oade ACM Marantz PMD-671
AKG ck61/63 > NBob Actives > Naiant PFA > Tascam DR-70D
Oade ACM Marantz PMD-671
Audiophile 2496 > Mytek Stereo96 DAC > Sony MDR-7506
Dual 1229 > Marantz 2270 > Kimber Kables > Cerwin Vega VS120

Canon Rebel XSi, EF 50 mm f/1.8, EF-S 18-55mm f/3.5-5.6 IS

Offline Lil Kim Jong-Il

  • Trade Count: (6)
  • Needs to get out more...
  • *****
  • Posts: 6498
  • large Marge sent me
Re: flac frontend question
« Reply #1 on: February 12, 2006, 11:24:19 PM »
I see that message all the time.  Never has been a problem.
The first rule of amateur neurosurgery club is .... I forget.

Offline dmonterisi

  • Taper Emeritus
  • Site Supporter
  • Trade Count: (2)
  • Needs to get out more...
  • *
  • Posts: 11952
  • Gender: Male
  • Stomach Full of Regret
Re: flac frontend question
« Reply #2 on: February 12, 2006, 11:26:21 PM »
i think that refers to unnecessary header information that wavelab or other editing apps insert into the wav files.  i've seen it for 16 bit wave files that i had edited in wavelab but not run through cdwav.  i believe that cdwav typically strips that type of header info.  It has never caused a problem for me, to my knowledge.  I wouldn't worry about it.

Offline Lil Kim Jong-Il

  • Trade Count: (6)
  • Needs to get out more...
  • *****
  • Posts: 6498
  • large Marge sent me
Re: flac frontend question
« Reply #3 on: February 12, 2006, 11:28:07 PM »
edited in wavelab

Bingo.   24bit files too.
The first rule of amateur neurosurgery club is .... I forget.

Offline leehookem

  • Trade Count: (3)
  • Needs to get out more...
  • *****
  • Posts: 4439
  • Gender: Male
    • Texas Tapers
Re: flac frontend question
« Reply #4 on: February 13, 2006, 12:14:58 AM »
thanks guys!  T's to ya both.
www.texastapers.org


AKG c480b ck61/ck63 > Tascam DR-70D
Oade ACM Marantz PMD-671
AKG ck61/63 > NBob Actives > Naiant PFA > Tascam DR-70D
Oade ACM Marantz PMD-671
Audiophile 2496 > Mytek Stereo96 DAC > Sony MDR-7506
Dual 1229 > Marantz 2270 > Kimber Kables > Cerwin Vega VS120

Canon Rebel XSi, EF 50 mm f/1.8, EF-S 18-55mm f/3.5-5.6 IS

Offline JasonSobel

  • Trade Count: (8)
  • Needs to get out more...
  • *****
  • Posts: 3327
  • Gender: Male
    • My show list
Re: flac frontend question
« Reply #5 on: February 13, 2006, 08:38:04 AM »
it's just a non-standard header that FLAC is skipping over.
In WaveLab, there is a setting that you can switch to use "optimized" headers.  if you check that, you won't get a standard header, and you'll see that message when compressing to FLAC.  However, if you uncheck that choice, WaveLab will create a standard header and you won't see that message again.

Also note that every file saved from the M-Audio MicroTrack has extra junk in the header.  So if you compress a file straight from the MicroTrack, you'll also see that message.

Offline rowjimmy

  • Trade Count: (4)
  • Needs to get out more...
  • *****
  • Posts: 2175
  • Gender: Male
  • rowjimmy.com
    • Row Knows
Re: flac frontend question
« Reply #6 on: February 16, 2006, 11:32:57 PM »
Nice info as i head out to do my first 24bit show tomorrow.
+t
Bandcamp | Host of The Brokedown Podcast
mic > wires > recorder

 

RSS | Mobile
Page created in 0.169 seconds with 32 queries.
© 2002-2024 Taperssection.com
Powered by SMF