Become a Site Supporter and Never see Ads again!

Author Topic: Measuring performance of audio interfaces  (Read 1599 times)

0 Members and 1 Guest are viewing this topic.

Offline jerryfreak

  • No PZ
  • (31)
  • Needs to get out more...
  • *
  • Posts: 6206
  • The plural of anecdote is not data
Re: Measuring performance of audio interfaces
« Reply #45 on: September 04, 2020, 10:19:10 AM »
reserved:TBD
currently "banned" for this "controversial" post
email me if you need to connect, as i am not allowed to send PM

-------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------
for sale (email in profile):
Mixpre6 v1 (NIB)
CA14 cards
(2) Manfrotto 099B mic poles
CMC-1K now orderable

Offline jerryfreak

  • No PZ
  • (31)
  • Needs to get out more...
  • *
  • Posts: 6206
  • The plural of anecdote is not data
Re: Measuring performance of audio interfaces
« Reply #46 on: September 04, 2020, 10:19:18 AM »
reserved:TBD
currently "banned" for this "controversial" post
email me if you need to connect, as i am not allowed to send PM

-------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------
for sale (email in profile):
Mixpre6 v1 (NIB)
CA14 cards
(2) Manfrotto 099B mic poles
CMC-1K now orderable

Offline jerryfreak

  • No PZ
  • (31)
  • Needs to get out more...
  • *
  • Posts: 6206
  • The plural of anecdote is not data
Re: Measuring performance of audio interfaces
« Reply #47 on: September 04, 2020, 10:19:26 AM »
reserved:TBD
currently "banned" for this "controversial" post
email me if you need to connect, as i am not allowed to send PM

-------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------
for sale (email in profile):
Mixpre6 v1 (NIB)
CA14 cards
(2) Manfrotto 099B mic poles
CMC-1K now orderable

Offline jerryfreak

  • No PZ
  • (31)
  • Needs to get out more...
  • *
  • Posts: 6206
  • The plural of anecdote is not data
Re: Measuring performance of audio interfaces
« Reply #48 on: September 04, 2020, 10:19:36 AM »
reserved:TBD
currently "banned" for this "controversial" post
email me if you need to connect, as i am not allowed to send PM

-------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------
for sale (email in profile):
Mixpre6 v1 (NIB)
CA14 cards
(2) Manfrotto 099B mic poles
CMC-1K now orderable

Offline jerryfreak

  • No PZ
  • (31)
  • Needs to get out more...
  • *
  • Posts: 6206
  • The plural of anecdote is not data
Re: Measuring performance of audio interfaces
« Reply #49 on: September 04, 2020, 10:19:49 AM »
reserved:TBD
currently "banned" for this "controversial" post
email me if you need to connect, as i am not allowed to send PM

-------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------
for sale (email in profile):
Mixpre6 v1 (NIB)
CA14 cards
(2) Manfrotto 099B mic poles
CMC-1K now orderable

Offline jerryfreak

  • No PZ
  • (31)
  • Needs to get out more...
  • *
  • Posts: 6206
  • The plural of anecdote is not data
Re: Measuring performance of audio interfaces
« Reply #50 on: September 04, 2020, 10:22:05 AM »
ok first page was blocked out for a wikis of testing software, discussion of noise and its measurements, etc and perhaps we can post actual reviews and measurements neatly on the first page as they are collected.

Please feel free to add any info here in a general discussion format and we can use it to aggregate content for the first page wiki
currently "banned" for this "controversial" post
email me if you need to connect, as i am not allowed to send PM

-------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------
for sale (email in profile):
Mixpre6 v1 (NIB)
CA14 cards
(2) Manfrotto 099B mic poles
CMC-1K now orderable

Offline jerryfreak

  • No PZ
  • (31)
  • Needs to get out more...
  • *
  • Posts: 6206
  • The plural of anecdote is not data
Re: Measuring performance of audio interfaces
« Reply #51 on: September 06, 2020, 10:30:46 AM »
i was thinking of grabbing one of these:

https://www.amazon.com/SONCOZ-Silver-Digital-Converters-Balanced/dp/B089KMYL1V

https://www.amazon.com/Flagship-Decoding-Ultra-high-Ultra-Low-Distortion/dp/B07PDKQQ7Y

at ~$200 both are nice little units that test pretty well, close to 120 dB of dynamic range at their max +14dBU level

https://www.audiosciencereview.com/forum/index.php?threads/soncoz-la-qxd1-balanced-dac-review.13459/

https://www.audiosciencereview.com/forum/index.php?threads/wolfx700-measurement-of-smsl-m300-mkii-edition.10836/

would be cheap enough to pass around for people to test their own gear from a standard unit without shipping the more expensive gear all over
currently "banned" for this "controversial" post
email me if you need to connect, as i am not allowed to send PM

-------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------
for sale (email in profile):
Mixpre6 v1 (NIB)
CA14 cards
(2) Manfrotto 099B mic poles
CMC-1K now orderable

 

RSS | Mobile
Page created in 0.036 seconds with 31 queries.
© 2002-2021 Taperssection.com
Powered by SMF