Become a Site Supporter and Never see Ads again!

Author Topic: best for downsampling?  (Read 5134 times)

0 Members and 1 Guest are viewing this topic.

Offline Ed.

  • your popsicle's melting
  • Trade Count: (0)
  • Needs to get out more...
  • *****
  • Posts: 8662
  • Gender: Male
  • FJ Baby!
best for downsampling?
« on: December 17, 2003, 05:18:03 PM »
So i've read that wavelab is the best for dithering because its the same as apogee.  what about downsampling?  what rules that realm?  I have access to adobe audition, soundforge 7.0 and wavelab 4.01b  can also get just about any other audio program, so the options are pretty much limitless.

Does anyone have a preference on which is better? and why?  Also, while i'm at it, which is better for recording in the field.  To be honest, i switch things up just about every time i record and down sample as of late.  but i'd really like to just start sticking with one.

thanks
ed


Because nothing says "I have lots of money and am sort of confused as to how to spend it" like Bose.

Offline Simp-Dawg

  • Bad Little Dawggie
  • Trade Count: (2)
  • Needs to get out more...
  • *****
  • Posts: 15077
  • Gender: Male
  • Daddy needs a drink!
    • Colorado Tapers
Re:best for downsampling?
« Reply #1 on: December 17, 2003, 05:29:27 PM »
i think you should stick with sound forge for downsampling, it is supposedly very accurate and precise.
CO Crüe Benchwarmer

Playback: Denon DVD-2910 > Denon AVR-3806 > Segue Doghouse Speaker Cable > B&W DM-610i / Klipsch RW-10 Subwoofer

cpclark

  • Guest
  • Trade Count: (0)
Re:best for downsampling?
« Reply #2 on: December 18, 2003, 12:41:04 AM »
i use SF for my downsampling and see many many tapers using it, wavlab would be the standard for dither

Offline dmonterisi

  • Taper Emeritus
  • Site Supporter
  • Trade Count: (2)
  • Needs to get out more...
  • *
  • Posts: 11952
  • Gender: Male
  • Stomach Full of Regret
Re:best for downsampling?
« Reply #3 on: December 18, 2003, 12:43:05 AM »
i use wavelab for resampling, have never had any issues....and from what i understand it is way faster than the other programs (at least CEP).  it takes me about 3-4 minutes to resample an hour long set from 48 to 44.  i've heard CEP can take around an hour.  not sure about SF.

Offline F.O.Bean

  • Team Schoeps Tapir that
  • Trade Count: (126)
  • Needs to get out more...
  • *****
  • Posts: 40690
  • Gender: Male
  • Taperus Maximus
    • MediaFire Recordings
Re:best for downsampling?
« Reply #4 on: December 18, 2003, 06:14:28 AM »
i use wavelab for recording/finding peaks(no dithering for me), and samplitude 6.0 for resampling/normalizing/saving 8)seems to work great this way since there are some glitches in wavelab 4.0c resampling ;)

oh and wavelabs editing is the SHIZ-NIT 8)
« Last Edit: December 18, 2003, 06:15:14 AM by bean »
Schoeps MK 4V & MK 41V ->
Schoeps 250|0 KCY's (x2) ->
Naiant +60v|Low Noise PFA's (x2) ->
DarkTrain Right Angle Stubby XLR's (x3) ->
Sound Devices MixPre-6 & MixPre-3

http://www.archive.org/bookmarks/diskobean
http://www.archive.org/bookmarks/Bean420
http://bt.etree.org/mytorrents.php
http://www.mediafire.com/folder/j9eu80jpuaubz/Recordings

Offline dmonterisi

  • Taper Emeritus
  • Site Supporter
  • Trade Count: (2)
  • Needs to get out more...
  • *
  • Posts: 11952
  • Gender: Male
  • Stomach Full of Regret
Re:best for downsampling?
« Reply #5 on: December 18, 2003, 08:22:11 AM »
what are the glitches in wavelab resampling?  i've heard that the uv22hr dither in 4.0c is not up to agogee specs, but never heard anything about the resampling issues before.  ruh-roh.

jpschust

  • Guest
  • Trade Count: (0)
Re:best for downsampling?
« Reply #6 on: December 18, 2003, 09:56:19 AM »
it is only in 4.0c, in 4.0g it is all corrected

Offline dmonterisi

  • Taper Emeritus
  • Site Supporter
  • Trade Count: (2)
  • Needs to get out more...
  • *
  • Posts: 11952
  • Gender: Male
  • Stomach Full of Regret
Re:best for downsampling?
« Reply #7 on: December 18, 2003, 10:07:38 AM »
dithering or resampling or both?

jpschust

  • Guest
  • Trade Count: (0)
Re:best for downsampling?
« Reply #8 on: December 18, 2003, 10:40:11 AM »
the issue, i believe, was in dithering and not resampling, however I am not entirely sure.

Offline F.O.Bean

  • Team Schoeps Tapir that
  • Trade Count: (126)
  • Needs to get out more...
  • *****
  • Posts: 40690
  • Gender: Male
  • Taperus Maximus
    • MediaFire Recordings
Re:best for downsampling?
« Reply #9 on: December 18, 2003, 10:58:01 AM »
i always believed it was the resampling...i know you peeps let me in on that, im positive its the 4.0c resampling.....

anyone else??
Schoeps MK 4V & MK 41V ->
Schoeps 250|0 KCY's (x2) ->
Naiant +60v|Low Noise PFA's (x2) ->
DarkTrain Right Angle Stubby XLR's (x3) ->
Sound Devices MixPre-6 & MixPre-3

http://www.archive.org/bookmarks/diskobean
http://www.archive.org/bookmarks/Bean420
http://bt.etree.org/mytorrents.php
http://www.mediafire.com/folder/j9eu80jpuaubz/Recordings

jpschust

  • Guest
  • Trade Count: (0)
Re:best for downsampling?
« Reply #10 on: December 18, 2003, 11:14:34 AM »
he he he i think bean is right and im wrong on this one :-)  

Offline Ed.

  • your popsicle's melting
  • Trade Count: (0)
  • Needs to get out more...
  • *****
  • Posts: 8662
  • Gender: Male
  • FJ Baby!
Re:best for downsampling?
« Reply #11 on: December 18, 2003, 02:40:07 PM »
dither = wavelab
resample = soundforge, samplitude

got it, so what should i do with adobe audition, just keep it around cuz it looks cool? :)

ed


Because nothing says "I have lots of money and am sort of confused as to how to spend it" like Bose.

jpschust

  • Guest
  • Trade Count: (0)
Re:best for downsampling?
« Reply #12 on: December 18, 2003, 03:02:14 PM »
ha ha ha i dont really like CEP myself, the interface and i just dont seem to get along so well

Offline nic

  • Big In Japan
  • Trade Count: (1)
  • Needs to get out more...
  • *****
  • Posts: 4700
  • Gender: Male
    • half dead batteries
Re:best for downsampling?
« Reply #13 on: December 18, 2003, 04:41:18 PM »
ha ha ha i dont really like CEP myself, the interface and i just dont seem to get along so well

thats the way I am with ProTools.
after using Digital Performer, PT seems klunky/awkward


the water's clean and innocent

Offline Brian Skalinder

  • Complaint Dept.
  • Trade Count: (28)
  • Needs to get out more...
  • *****
  • Posts: 18868
  • Gender: Male
Re:best for downsampling?
« Reply #14 on: December 18, 2003, 05:05:48 PM »
ha ha ha i dont really like CEP myself, the interface and i just dont seem to get along so well

thats the way I am with ProTools.
after using Digital Performer, PT seems klunky/awkward

Yeah, same here - after using CEP, I find ProTools and Soundforge clunky and awkward.  All depends on what you're used to, I guess...
Milab VM-44 Links > Fostex FR-2LE or
Naiant IPA (tinybox format) >
Roland R-05

 

RSS | Mobile
Page created in 1.426 seconds with 43 queries.
© 2002-2024 Taperssection.com
Powered by SMF