Become a Site Supporter and Never see Ads again!

Author Topic: Is DCC the same as DAT???????  (Read 3002 times)

0 Members and 1 Guest are viewing this topic.

Offline Tye

  • Trade Count: (9)
  • Taperssection All-Star
  • ****
  • Posts: 1519
  • Gender: Male
  • No news is good gnews without Gary Gnu
Is DCC the same as DAT???????
« on: June 08, 2004, 12:16:16 PM »
I found a cheap deck I would like to use for transfers on ebay. The thing is it is a DCC player and it comes with tapes like Reba Mcentire , Spyro Gyro ect. the tapes seem to be studio releases with covers and all . I emailed the guy and he says yes it is digital audio tape. But my guess is he does not know the diffrence. Anyone know what DCC is and is it the same as DAT?Is it something along the lines of DSS?           Thanks
Peluso cemc6/ck-21/ck-4 > Karma K10mp > Hydra's > Sound Devices MP-2> Buman T mod R4 - R9HR


zowie

  • Guest
  • Trade Count: (0)
Re: Is DCC the same as DAT???????
« Reply #1 on: June 08, 2004, 12:38:35 PM »
It is not the same as DAT.  DCC is a failed format that was backward compatible with analogue cassette.

Offline Weazel

  • Trade Count: (0)
  • Taperssection Regular
  • **
  • Posts: 229
  • Gender: Male
  • sp-cmc-8-> DIY BB -> Iriver IHP120 (rockbox)
Re: Is DCC the same as DAT???????
« Reply #2 on: June 08, 2004, 12:41:12 PM »
dcc is digital compact cassette invented by phillips, its not the same as DAT. It's not supported by phillips anymore for some several years.


-[ pop goes the weazel ...]-

Offline Tye

  • Trade Count: (9)
  • Taperssection All-Star
  • ****
  • Posts: 1519
  • Gender: Male
  • No news is good gnews without Gary Gnu
Re: Is DCC the same as DAT???????
« Reply #3 on: June 08, 2004, 01:34:41 PM »
thanks much guys. I thought that might be the case.
Peluso cemc6/ck-21/ck-4 > Karma K10mp > Hydra's > Sound Devices MP-2> Buman T mod R4 - R9HR


Offline Todd R

  • Over/Under on next gear purchase: 2 months
  • Trade Count: (29)
  • Needs to get out more...
  • *****
  • Posts: 4901
  • Gender: Male
Re: Is DCC the same as DAT???????
« Reply #4 on: June 08, 2004, 02:17:09 PM »
Also notable is that DCC was not lossless like DAT, but used some form of data compression.
Mics: Microtech Gefell m20/m21 (nbob/pfa actives), Line Audio CM3, Church CA-11 cards
Preamp:  none <sniff>
Recorders:  Sound Devices MixPre-6, Sony PCM-M10, Zoom H4nPro

Offline seethreepo

  • Trade Count: (10)
  • Taperssection All-Star
  • ****
  • Posts: 1329
  • Gender: Male
  • Resist Or Serve
Re: Is DCC the same as DAT???????
« Reply #5 on: June 08, 2004, 11:02:14 PM »
there are unscrupulous types on ebay trying to pass these dcc decks off as DAT all the time. 
 ::)
"Never heard anyone say that music was the thing that fucked up their day" 
-Chris Robinson 1996-09-24
Mics:Schoeps Mk4,   Beyerdynamic ck930(for sale)  ,Sound Professionals - SP-CMC-8 , Marcsounds binaurals  Pre amps: Beyerdynamic MV-1 ,  Naiant IPA  Recorders:  Edirol R-44, Edirol R-09HR, Roland  R-05
 
real recorder > phone
 external mics > Internal mics
 FOB > Taper Section
 HATS > better than Denied

Offline Popmarter

  • Trade Count: (2)
  • Taperssection Member
  • ***
  • Posts: 738
  • Gender: Male
    • Live Music Archive
Re: Is DCC the same as DAT???????
« Reply #6 on: June 09, 2004, 08:24:21 AM »
all true, but a bit of a shame. Friend of mine has used them back in 1997 to tape a few U2 shows, with amazing results  ;D But, yes i doubt if there are still empty tapes left..  :-\
Recorders: Zoom F3; SD MixPre 3 II; Sony A10; Edirol R44; Sony M10; Sony WM-D6; iRiver IHP-120; Sharp MD-MT20; Sharp MD-MT190
Microphones: Schoeps MK41; Nevaton MC59/S (cards); Milab VM-44 Links (cards), AT853 7.4mod (cards); AT831 (cards); Nakamichi CM300 (all CP's); Soundman OKM II Rock Studios
Preamps: Beyerdynamic MV100; JK Laboratories DVC-X-17b; Naiant IPA; Nakamichi MX-100 modded for 9v battery use ; Baby Nbox

zowie

  • Guest
  • Trade Count: (0)
Re: Is DCC the same as DAT???????
« Reply #7 on: June 09, 2004, 10:49:15 AM »
Also notable is that DCC was not lossless like DAT, but used some form of data compression.

My recollection -- which could be wrong after all these years -- was not that they used compression but that it was like an inferior 13 or 14 bit system.

Offline Scuba Jeremy

  • Trade Count: (0)
  • Taperssection Member
  • ***
  • Posts: 735
  • Gender: Male
  • "Ugh, is that digi noise?"
Re: Is DCC the same as DAT???????
« Reply #8 on: June 09, 2004, 03:09:02 PM »
I wonder how these would sound next to modern day ATRAC?

Offline George

  • May the schwartz be with you!
  • Trade Count: (7)
  • Needs to get out more...
  • *****
  • Posts: 4521
  • Gender: Male
  • Unofficial TS thread killer
Re: Is DCC the same as DAT???????
« Reply #9 on: June 09, 2004, 05:33:36 PM »
Also notable is that DCC was not lossless like DAT, but used some form of data compression.

My recollection -- which could be wrong after all these years -- was not that they used compression but that it was like an inferior 13 or 14 bit system.

http://home.netvigator.com/~ntomyng/dcc900/

Clau\ims the format is 16 bit and used compression.
SP-CMC-4s (C, H, SC terminated to mini xlr)>Tinybox>Sony M10/Tascam DR-2d
Countryman B3 (Omni, mini xlr)>Tinybox>Sony M10/Tascam DR-2d
Audix 1200 series cable from Chris Church, pair of Audix M1280 card capsules

Listening: Oppo 980HD>Yamaha RXV667>Rega R1's + Rega RS VOX + Rega R5S's

"Every time I see a group of teenagers gathered around an iphone laughing at some youtube video, I walk up to them, slap the iphone out of their hand, get right up to them nose to nose, and scream at the top of my lungs:

TAKE A LOOK

IT'S IN A BOOK

READING FUCKING RAINBOW."

Depechemode1993

  • Guest
  • Trade Count: (0)
Re: Is DCC the same as DAT???????
« Reply #10 on: June 10, 2004, 03:23:00 PM »
anyone know where I can get a DCC! I would definately want one!

BobW

  • Guest
  • Trade Count: (0)
Re: Is DCC the same as DAT???????
« Reply #11 on: June 13, 2004, 11:46:13 PM »
Also notable is that DCC was not lossless like DAT, but used some form of data compression.

My recollection -- which could be wrong after all these years -- was not that they used compression but that it was like an inferior 13 or 14 bit system.

http://home.netvigator.com/~ntomyng/dcc900/

Clau\ims the format is 16 bit and used compression.

Companding, if my aged memory is still there.  In the heyday of Dolby, compression and expansion at playback were considered ne plus ultra.  Now it seems arcane for a digital format.

 

RSS | Mobile
Page created in 0.075 seconds with 37 queries.
© 2002-2024 Taperssection.com
Powered by SMF