Become a Site Supporter and Never see Ads again!

Author Topic: UA5 vs. M-Audio Duo vs. M-Audio Firewire 410  (Read 2877 times)

0 Members and 1 Guest are viewing this topic.

Offline twatts (pants are so over-rated...)

  • <://PHiSH//><
  • Trade Count: (16)
  • Needs to get out more...
  • *****
  • Posts: 9941
  • Gender: Male
  • Lego made a Mini-Fig of me!
UA5 vs. M-Audio Duo vs. M-Audio Firewire 410
« on: January 11, 2004, 05:27:12 PM »
I use the Oade Digi-Mod UA5.  I've heard it offers better performance than the Duo, as well as runs on DC so you can use batteries (Duo is AC).

Yesterday I saw the Firewire 410 at Guitar Center, and damned, if it don't look tempting!!!

So I ask, has anyone/used one???  Will it (and the Duo), require mods for standalone use like the UA5???

And is it possible to run the 410 in the field w/o USB power???

Just curious,

Terry
***Do you have PHISH, VIDA BLUE, JAZZ MANDOLIN PROJECT or any other Phish related DATs/Tapes/MDs that need to be transferred???  I can do them for you!!!***

I will return your DATs/Tapes/MDs.  I'll also provide Master FLAC files via DropBox.  PM me for details.

Sony PCM R500 > SPDIF > Tascam HD-P2
Nakamichi DR-3 > (Oade Advanced Concert Mod) Tascam HD-P2
Sony MDS-JE510 > Hosa ODL-276 > Tascam HD-P2

******

zowie

  • Guest
  • Trade Count: (0)
Re:UA5 vs. M-Audio Duo vs. M-Audio Firewire 410
« Reply #1 on: January 11, 2004, 09:18:22 PM »
FW 410 needs mods to use without a computer, and no one seems to have figured them out yet, if they are possible.

The Duo needs no mods for stand alone use, and IMO it has better pre's than the UA-5.  However it needs AC so is complex and expensive to power.

Offline greenone

  • Trade Count: (4)
  • Needs to get out more...
  • *****
  • Posts: 9273
  • Gender: Male
  • Russian mics... strong like bull...
Re:UA5 vs. M-Audio Duo vs. M-Audio Firewire 410
« Reply #2 on: January 12, 2004, 11:08:56 AM »
The Duo can be used in the field with a power supply that Core Sound makes. However, I think you have to buy it from them directly as a whole package; they don't sell the power setup separately.

http://www.core-sound.com/duo.html

They do a comparison of the UA-5, the Duo, the Mini-Me and Sound Devices' USBPre (feature sets only, not sound) here:

http://www.core-sound.com/ua5-duo-usbpre-comparison.html

Not all that helpful for a Duo-FW410 comparison, but it's a start.

John Kelly from this board uses the FW410 and records to an iBook. I seem to remember him saying that he was pestering Doug Oade to start offering a standalone mod to it but no luck thus far...
Unofficial Blues Traveler archivist - glad to work on any BT or related recordings
archive.org admin - happy to upload tracked material to the LMA

Offline chase

  • Trade Count: (0)
  • Taperssection Member
  • ***
  • Posts: 662
  • Gender: Male
    • Etree List
Re:UA5 vs. M-Audio Duo vs. M-Audio Firewire 410
« Reply #3 on: January 12, 2004, 04:36:38 PM »
i dunno if the Duo has better pre's than the UA-5.  i think core-sound charges ~$180 for the battery pack that lasts 4 hours.  i found a portable battery pack/power invertor at target in the camping supplies for $20/$40, can't remember, might have been onsale one time.  i think this could run the Duo for ~6 hours.  now the problem that len over at core-sound stated was that other power invertors would cause the noise in the preamps to rise and that he had figured out how to avoid this in his design.  i never heard any rise in noise using the power pack from target though.  one thing to keep in mind though is that the noise will be increased no matter what you do, even with the core-sound pack, it is an inevitable side affect of converting DC>AC.

Offline John Kelly

  • Been a while...
  • Trade Count: (1)
  • Needs to get out more...
  • *****
  • Posts: 9753
  • Gender: Male
    • The Jokell
Re:UA5 vs. M-Audio Duo vs. M-Audio Firewire 410
« Reply #4 on: January 12, 2004, 11:41:37 PM »
John Kelly from this board uses the FW410 and records to an iBook. I seem to remember him saying that he was pestering Doug Oade to start offering a standalone mod to it but no luck thus far...

I do run it, and I love it.  However, I have no plans to pester Doug about a standalone mod.  I recommended that other people may want to, but I have no need for such a mod. ;)
Sennheiser MKH8040st > SD 702
XBL/PSN/Steam ID: thejokell

zowie

  • Guest
  • Trade Count: (0)
Re:UA5 vs. M-Audio Duo vs. M-Audio Firewire 410
« Reply #5 on: January 13, 2004, 10:20:32 AM »
I wrote to M-Audio's dev. people a couple months ago to recommend they implement this in the future.

Offline bush

  • "Taper Pimp"
  • Trade Count: (0)
  • Taperssection Member
  • ***
  • Posts: 752
  • Gender: Male
  • Steppin to the beat
Re:UA5 vs. M-Audio Duo vs. M-Audio Firewire 410
« Reply #6 on: January 14, 2004, 11:33:45 PM »
I ran the duo for a while , used a convertor, when battery power went low, noise was introduced.

2-3 hours on a 12v was not worth it to me.

I also didnt think the pres were as good as the ua-5, really loose sounding to me...YMMV

i ran it with rode nt-5 then oktava mc-012

bush
Team Bama--Duct tape Mafia

"RIGLESS"

1985 CJ-7 stretched on 38's

Offline nic

  • Big In Japan
  • Trade Count: (1)
  • Needs to get out more...
  • *****
  • Posts: 4700
  • Gender: Male
    • half dead batteries
Re:UA5 vs. M-Audio Duo vs. M-Audio Firewire 410
« Reply #7 on: January 15, 2004, 06:57:17 AM »
"when battery power went low, noise was introduced. "

for what its worth, the same applies to the Benchmark AD2K+


the water's clean and innocent

 

RSS | Mobile
Page created in 0.056 seconds with 32 queries.
© 2002-2024 Taperssection.com
Powered by SMF