Become a Site Supporter and Never see Ads again!

Author Topic: ad2k+ input polarity  (Read 4181 times)

0 Members and 1 Guest are viewing this topic.

Offline macdaddy

  • Trade Count: (10)
  • Needs to get out more...
  • *****
  • Posts: 7657
ad2k+ input polarity
« on: October 24, 2010, 06:19:18 AM »
I see that the ad2k+ has what seems to be a hardware manufacturing error on the xlr inputs (pdf link, p 18 describes the error); a set of custom cables fixes this for the end user...

Do the sonic branded ad2k+ also have this hardware issue, or were they manufactured as a different batch, without this hardware issue..? The manual I linked above is the benchmark manual, and not the sonic one, which is why I ask (don't want to use the wrong cables)...

Thanks.
« Last Edit: October 24, 2010, 06:24:51 AM by macdaddy »
-macdaddy ++

akg c422 > s42 > lunatec v2 > ad2k+ > roland r-44

Offline tedyun

  • Trade Count: (29)
  • Taperssection Member
  • ***
  • Posts: 456
Re: ad2k+ input polarity
« Reply #1 on: October 24, 2010, 09:50:39 AM »
I have a Sonic-branded AD2K+, and I believe it has the polarity inversion error.

I have two recordings of a show from my V3 (polarity corrected): 1. digital output to MTII and 2. analog out to AD2K+

When I took the two recordings and aligned them, you could hear the resulting merge cancel each other out.



I see that the ad2k+ has what seems to be a hardware manufacturing error on the xlr inputs (pdf link, p 18 describes the error); a set of custom cables fixes this for the end user...

Do the sonic branded ad2k+ also have this hardware issue, or were they manufactured as a different batch, without this hardware issue..? The manual I linked above is the benchmark manual, and not the sonic one, which is why I ask (don't want to use the wrong cables)...

Thanks.
Mics: B&K 4011, Schoeps MK5 (Nbobs, Naiant PFA), Busman BSC-1 (K11/K21/K31/K41 caps), Church CA-14 (o, c), Church CAFS, Core Sound Binaurals
Pre: EAA PSP-2,  Lunatec V3, Nbox-Platinum, Church CA-9200
ADC: Mytek 192 ADC, Oade Mod SBM-1
Rec: Oade Supermod PMD-661, Tascam DR60D, M-Audio MicroTrack II, Korg MR-1 (32GB SSD mod); Sony PCM-M10, Edirol R09HR; iRiver HP-120
Photo: Canon 5D3, Canon EF-S 17-55mm f2.8, Canon EF 35mm f1.4L Canon EF 24-70 f2.8L MkI, Canon EF 70-200mm f2.8L IS MkI, Canon EF 50 mm f1.4, Canon EF 50 f1.2L, Canon EF 300 f/4L IS, Canon EF 100-400 f4-5.6L IS MkI
Video: Canon HF100

Offline Myco

  • Trade Count: (11)
  • Needs to get out more...
  • *****
  • Posts: 7572
  • Gender: Male
Re: ad2k+ input polarity
« Reply #2 on: October 24, 2010, 11:32:01 AM »
I've never noticed this with my Sonic branded deck, i'll have to look into it.
Microtech Gefell M200: M20/M21/M27 caps> Bumblebee MiAGi-II/Darktrain silver cable's/"Chuck" Belden cables> Aerco MP-2 or Busman modded DR-680 pre-amps> Darktrain cables & interconnects> Tascam DR-680 (Busman mod)
AT853's(card's/hyper's)>AT8533x>Aerco MP-2>Sony M10

Offline tedyun

  • Trade Count: (29)
  • Taperssection Member
  • ***
  • Posts: 456
Re: ad2k+ input polarity
« Reply #3 on: October 24, 2010, 11:57:09 AM »
I'm not sure if a polarity inversion can produce an audible difference (which explains how it went undetected in their production models). Apparently, there are audiophiles out there who say they can hear a difference, but then again, people say they can hear a difference between things like cryo-treated speaker wires vs. normal speaker wires.


I've never noticed this with my Sonic branded deck, i'll have to look into it.
Mics: B&K 4011, Schoeps MK5 (Nbobs, Naiant PFA), Busman BSC-1 (K11/K21/K31/K41 caps), Church CA-14 (o, c), Church CAFS, Core Sound Binaurals
Pre: EAA PSP-2,  Lunatec V3, Nbox-Platinum, Church CA-9200
ADC: Mytek 192 ADC, Oade Mod SBM-1
Rec: Oade Supermod PMD-661, Tascam DR60D, M-Audio MicroTrack II, Korg MR-1 (32GB SSD mod); Sony PCM-M10, Edirol R09HR; iRiver HP-120
Photo: Canon 5D3, Canon EF-S 17-55mm f2.8, Canon EF 35mm f1.4L Canon EF 24-70 f2.8L MkI, Canon EF 70-200mm f2.8L IS MkI, Canon EF 50 mm f1.4, Canon EF 50 f1.2L, Canon EF 300 f/4L IS, Canon EF 100-400 f4-5.6L IS MkI
Video: Canon HF100

Offline Myco

  • Trade Count: (11)
  • Needs to get out more...
  • *****
  • Posts: 7572
  • Gender: Male
Re: ad2k+ input polarity
« Reply #4 on: October 24, 2010, 02:32:20 PM »
True, but thank you both for bringing this up though. I hadn't heard of this previously. I don't know that I'll do anything about it or not because I haven't heard anything in my recordings, and no one has brought it to my attention, but still not a bad thing to check it out.
Microtech Gefell M200: M20/M21/M27 caps> Bumblebee MiAGi-II/Darktrain silver cable's/"Chuck" Belden cables> Aerco MP-2 or Busman modded DR-680 pre-amps> Darktrain cables & interconnects> Tascam DR-680 (Busman mod)
AT853's(card's/hyper's)>AT8533x>Aerco MP-2>Sony M10

Offline OFOTD

  • Amorican
  • Trade Count: (7)
  • Needs to get out more...
  • *****
  • Posts: 6307
Re: ad2k+ input polarity
« Reply #5 on: October 24, 2010, 02:49:12 PM »
The polarity problem affected both Benchmark AND Sonic branded units.  It is listed in the owners manual for both products.  A cable fixes that on the fly or you can fix the issue in post.

Really the only time you will run into audible problems is when you attempt to mix/matrix with other tracks.   Two channel and you're fine.  More than two and you have to fix the polarity issue.

Offline macdaddy

  • Trade Count: (10)
  • Needs to get out more...
  • *****
  • Posts: 7657
Re: ad2k+ input polarity
« Reply #6 on: October 24, 2010, 03:33:04 PM »
The polarity problem affected both Benchmark AND Sonic branded units.  It is listed in the owners manual for both products.  A cable fixes that on the fly or you can fix the issue in post.

Really the only time you will run into audible problems is when you attempt to mix/matrix with other tracks.   Two channel and you're fine.  More than two and you have to fix the polarity issue.
This is what I thought, but it is nice to make sure.
-macdaddy ++

akg c422 > s42 > lunatec v2 > ad2k+ > roland r-44

Offline it-goes-to-eleven

  • Trade Count: (58)
  • Needs to get out more...
  • *****
  • Posts: 6696
Re: ad2k+ input polarity
« Reply #7 on: October 24, 2010, 04:12:19 PM »
I'm not sure if a polarity inversion can produce an audible difference (which explains how it went undetected in their production models).

Yes, by all means, spend thousands of dollars, sweat every detail you can control, and then ignore the polarity.... :P

It determines whether the speaker thrusts forward to produce a positive pressure wave, or goes backward. On a symmetric wave, like a sine wave, it probably does not matter.  Some sources, horns in particular, tend to produce very asymmetric waves.   I don't think those can be reproduced correctly if the polarity is wrong, though I have not done listening tests.

Fortunately it can be easily corrected in post.

Offline tedyun

  • Trade Count: (29)
  • Taperssection Member
  • ***
  • Posts: 456
Re: ad2k+ input polarity
« Reply #8 on: October 25, 2010, 01:31:47 AM »
I made adapter cables which reverses the polarity on the analog-in's, so my future recordings will be kosher (though I still can't hear the difference!).

What is the best way to invert the polarity in post?


I'm not sure if a polarity inversion can produce an audible difference (which explains how it went undetected in their production models).

Yes, by all means, spend thousands of dollars, sweat every detail you can control, and then ignore the polarity.... :P

It determines whether the speaker thrusts forward to produce a positive pressure wave, or goes backward. On a symmetric wave, like a sine wave, it probably does not matter.  Some sources, horns in particular, tend to produce very asymmetric waves.   I don't think those can be reproduced correctly if the polarity is wrong, though I have not done listening tests.

Fortunately it can be easily corrected in post.
Mics: B&K 4011, Schoeps MK5 (Nbobs, Naiant PFA), Busman BSC-1 (K11/K21/K31/K41 caps), Church CA-14 (o, c), Church CAFS, Core Sound Binaurals
Pre: EAA PSP-2,  Lunatec V3, Nbox-Platinum, Church CA-9200
ADC: Mytek 192 ADC, Oade Mod SBM-1
Rec: Oade Supermod PMD-661, Tascam DR60D, M-Audio MicroTrack II, Korg MR-1 (32GB SSD mod); Sony PCM-M10, Edirol R09HR; iRiver HP-120
Photo: Canon 5D3, Canon EF-S 17-55mm f2.8, Canon EF 35mm f1.4L Canon EF 24-70 f2.8L MkI, Canon EF 70-200mm f2.8L IS MkI, Canon EF 50 mm f1.4, Canon EF 50 f1.2L, Canon EF 300 f/4L IS, Canon EF 100-400 f4-5.6L IS MkI
Video: Canon HF100

Offline it-goes-to-eleven

  • Trade Count: (58)
  • Needs to get out more...
  • *****
  • Posts: 6696
Re: ad2k+ input polarity
« Reply #9 on: October 25, 2010, 01:48:56 PM »
Many/most of the editors have an Invert option.


Offline OFOTD

  • Amorican
  • Trade Count: (7)
  • Needs to get out more...
  • *****
  • Posts: 6307
Re: ad2k+ input polarity
« Reply #10 on: October 25, 2010, 02:11:46 PM »
In SoundForge it's  Process > Invert/Flip


 

RSS | Mobile
Page created in 0.075 seconds with 40 queries.
© 2002-2024 Taperssection.com
Powered by SMF