So I watched the youtube videos, and I'm both enthused and confused. One Zoom guy was saying that you can record one channel without gain and another with say 30 dB of gain, then normalize the files in post and you won't be able to tell the difference. But then they are advertising the splendidness of their pre-amps, and I don't really get why you need any preamps at all. Why build in the cost of these?
I would have tended not to take this Zoom claim too seriously, but I have been using the 19-channel Zylia ZM-1 for about 5 months now, and that's also a mic system you use without any analog gain. I laughed when I read the discussion of gain in the Zylia material: if your recording is distorting because the source is too loud, move the ZM-1 sphere a few feet back from the instrument. So we're back to the basics of more than a century ago, before the invention of electric recording. Too loud? Please move another foot or two back from the recording horn, Mr. Caruso. When I pulled the 19 channels of a Zylia recording into Reaper, it looked like there was nothing there, but when I played it back with my Grace m900 set at 99, I heard the music. I am still conditioned by 16 bit DAT machines to try to set levels accurately, back then adding 3-4 dB in post was a big deal; now with 24 bit recorders I routinely add up to 8 dB, maybe 12 dB at times. With the Zylia recordings, even using their summed "virtual" mics or ambisonic B (first order only for me so far) output, I have to boost 20-30 dB. The B format stuff is not as good as my Josephson C700S output (well, say under $50 per capsule for the ZM-1 vs. about $3000 per capsule for the C700S) but it's not actually really noisy for chamber music, I really hope a ZM-X comes along with next generation capsules etc.
So I'll likely be getting one of these F6s in June unless someone does a field test and flunks it.
Jeff