Become a Site Supporter and Never see Ads again!

Author Topic: 24/48 to 16/44 conversion introducing clipping...  (Read 16334 times)

0 Members and 1 Guest are viewing this topic.

Offline breakonthru

  • Trade Count: (1)
  • Taperssection Member
  • ***
  • Posts: 263
Re: 24/48 to 16/44 conversion introducing clipping...
« Reply #15 on: April 07, 2024, 08:50:02 PM »
Sample Rate Conversion (SRC) can introduce peak levels beyond 0 dbfs due to interpolation. So the order of operations is the key.

Gordon
there was a huge debate about this
“Intersample overs” back in the day when benchmark introduced the DAC 2. While I generally find the technical discussions of John Siau to be impenetrable, the “community” as it were just poo-poo’d the idea as if it wasn’t a thing, or at least not as significant as benchmark made it out to be

https://benchmarkmedia.com/blogs/application_notes/intersample-overs-in-cd-recordings

Offline tim in jersey

  • Site Supporter
  • Trade Count: (8)
  • Needs to get out more...
  • *
  • Posts: 3838
  • Gender: Male
Re: 24/48 to 16/44 conversion introducing clipping...
« Reply #16 on: April 07, 2024, 11:21:29 PM »
I use Sound Forge and normalize to 98.14% (not sure what the dB value of that is), and then dither with iZotope's mbit process.  I never noticed any clipping after dithering.


Looks like 98.14% is about -0.16dB.

I was just coming to post that! :D

I'm curious as to the math behind y'all coming up with that number. Care to enlighten me?

Offline nulldogmas

  • Trade Count: (6)
  • Taperssection All-Star
  • ****
  • Posts: 1753
    • How I Escaped My Uncertain Fate
Re: 24/48 to 16/44 conversion introducing clipping...
« Reply #17 on: April 08, 2024, 12:31:12 AM »
I'm curious as to the math behind y'all coming up with that number. Care to enlighten me?


 

RSS | Mobile
Page created in 0.044 seconds with 26 queries.
© 2002-2024 Taperssection.com
Powered by SMF