Does everyone ALWAYS heed this warning from gear manufacturers? I mean, tell me if I'm wrong, but if you take care to properly replicate the OEM design specs, then you should be OK to use a non-OEM replacement. The reason I ask this of course is that some OEMs will charge ridiculous amounts for their OEM wall warts.
Are there any other design considerations besides...
- tip polarity
- tip design/type
- input voltage
- transformer specifics, ie amperage, and if it has a voltage cut-out at a certain charge voltage in the case of battery chargers.
TIA
There are a limited few that have charge controllers in the brick or cord assembly, most will warn when that is the case.
There also is "passive" current limiting in some, where the design only delivers as what it can, limiting charging rate.
Apple (I hate them, seriously) actually warned on an older iPhone to not attempt to charge with the bigger iPad charger of its day.
Dumb, dumb,dumb....
Good design puts charge controller inside the device, is voltage and current aware, and saves the device.
Related story...
I once bought a $1000 VHF radio for $275 in "as-is" condition.
Owner warned me that he had plugged it in to a reverse polarity, high current, 12v. auto supply.
I knew the brand, and felt I could get any needed support, even if costly.
A few hours and $20 in parts (capacitor, zener diode, & a resistor), it was repaired and back on the air.
Partly lucky, if I would have billed myself, it would have been $350....
Check, then recheck, if a generic supply works for others
The Internet is a tremendous resource.