Become a Site Supporter and Never see Ads again!

Author Topic: Legality thread?  (Read 3026 times)

0 Members and 1 Guest are viewing this topic.

Offline travelinbeat

  • Trade Count: (14)
  • Needs to get out more...
  • *****
  • Posts: 2313
  • Gender: Male
  • Turning soundwaves into zeros and ones since 1999
    • http://db.etree.org/travelinbeat
Legality thread?
« on: July 01, 2008, 04:54:03 PM »
I know a long time ago I saw thread which posted all of the taper-related laws for pretty much all 50 states but now I've run several searches and I can't seem to find it-- anyone have any ideas?

Thanks in advance!
Mics: Busman BSC1's K1/K2/K3/K4, CA-14's
Units: 2x Edirol R-09HR, iRiver H120 (RockBox + 2200mAh + CF mod)
Power & Accessories: Naiant Littlebox 1.5, Church ST-9100, Denecke PS-2, 2x Kingston SDHC (Model: SD2/8GB), 2x Kingston SDHC (Model: SD4/16GB), Kingston 32GB (Model: SD4/32GB), Darktrain XLR, 2x Shure A81WS's, 4x Powerex 9.6v, 12x Sanyo 2700 NiMH, 2x AT8410A's

Team DC · Team Naiant · Team Busman · Team Church Audio · NFL Team is NY Jets

I tape in earnest dedication to the mission of breaking the back of the CTOA

Offline Josephine

  • Trade Count: (6)
  • Needs to get out more...
  • Posts: 5215
  • Gender: Female
Re: Legality thread?
« Reply #1 on: July 01, 2008, 05:11:48 PM »
Schoeps MK4 / MK4v / MK41 > actives > NBox+ > R-09HR



~   On Dime   ~
~   My Recordings   ~
~   Live Music Archive   ~

Offline flipp

  • resident curmudgeon
  • Trade Count: (17)
  • Needs to get out more...
  • *****
  • Posts: 4285
Re: Legality thread?
« Reply #2 on: July 01, 2008, 07:46:18 PM »
We remember stuff from long ago, it's recalling what happened yesterday that we have trouble with.

Offline anarkust

  • Trade Count: (0)
  • Taperssection Member
  • ***
  • Posts: 305
  • Gender: Male
Re: Legality thread?
« Reply #3 on: July 01, 2008, 08:37:14 PM »
This one?
http://taperssection.com/index.php/topic,23206.0.html

"Vermont and Texas don't appear to have anything having to do with piracy or recordings at all."

Ok people, what are your assumptions about recording if there are no laws about it?

+T Greenone

Offline Josephine

  • Trade Count: (6)
  • Needs to get out more...
  • Posts: 5215
  • Gender: Female
Re: Legality thread?
« Reply #4 on: July 01, 2008, 08:49:27 PM »
Who says Old Farts don't have good memories? ;)

We remember stuff from long ago, it's recalling what happened yesterday that we have trouble with.

Do I know you guys? 
Takes one to know one.  :-*
Schoeps MK4 / MK4v / MK41 > actives > NBox+ > R-09HR



~   On Dime   ~
~   My Recordings   ~
~   Live Music Archive   ~

Offline travelinbeat

  • Trade Count: (14)
  • Needs to get out more...
  • *****
  • Posts: 2313
  • Gender: Male
  • Turning soundwaves into zeros and ones since 1999
    • http://db.etree.org/travelinbeat
Re: Legality thread?
« Reply #5 on: July 02, 2008, 02:55:35 AM »
Mics: Busman BSC1's K1/K2/K3/K4, CA-14's
Units: 2x Edirol R-09HR, iRiver H120 (RockBox + 2200mAh + CF mod)
Power & Accessories: Naiant Littlebox 1.5, Church ST-9100, Denecke PS-2, 2x Kingston SDHC (Model: SD2/8GB), 2x Kingston SDHC (Model: SD4/16GB), Kingston 32GB (Model: SD4/32GB), Darktrain XLR, 2x Shure A81WS's, 4x Powerex 9.6v, 12x Sanyo 2700 NiMH, 2x AT8410A's

Team DC · Team Naiant · Team Busman · Team Church Audio · NFL Team is NY Jets

I tape in earnest dedication to the mission of breaking the back of the CTOA

Offline morst

  • I think I found an error on the internet; #UnionStrong
  • Trade Count: (2)
  • Needs to get out more...
  • *****
  • Posts: 5979
Re: Legality thread?
« Reply #6 on: July 02, 2008, 03:06:50 AM »
"Vermont and Texas don't appear to have anything having to do with piracy or recordings at all."

Ok people, what are your assumptions about recording if there are no laws about it?
No laws? If that's really the case then I would guess that it means there are no laws against it!?
https://toad.social/@morst spoutible.com/morst post.news/@acffhmorst

Offline greenone

  • Trade Count: (4)
  • Needs to get out more...
  • *****
  • Posts: 9273
  • Gender: Male
  • Russian mics... strong like bull...
Re: Legality thread?
« Reply #7 on: July 02, 2008, 12:55:02 PM »
If there are no state laws against it, then federal laws no doubt apply. Which is not good, since:

Quote
recording and trading without the artist's consent is a violation of Federal law and brings with it the penalties that come from copyright infringement (actual damages and profits, or statutory damages between $200 and $150,000 plus possible additional damages as well as legal/court fees).
Unofficial Blues Traveler archivist - glad to work on any BT or related recordings
archive.org admin - happy to upload tracked material to the LMA

Offline rastasean

  • in paradise
  • Trade Count: (23)
  • Needs to get out more...
  • *****
  • Posts: 3699
  • Gender: Male
Re: Legality thread?
« Reply #8 on: July 02, 2008, 01:33:39 PM »
We remember stuff from long ago, it's recalling what happened yesterday that we have trouble with.

I'm not that old but I thought today was Tuesday. I was very happy to learn it was WEDNESDAY!!!
Advice is a form of nostalgia, dispensing it is a way of fishing the past from the disposal, wiping it off, painting over the ugly parts and recycling it for more than it’s worth.

Offline Krispy D

  • Trade Count: (1)
  • Needs to get out more...
  • *****
  • Posts: 4878
  • Gender: Male
    • my recordings on LMA
Re: Legality thread?
« Reply #9 on: July 02, 2008, 06:14:55 PM »
why? If you don't mind my asking.  Are you in trouble?
Peluso CEMC6, ck4/ck21
Oktava MC012
Sony ECM260f
AT 811

canare star quads
DIY mil spec silvers

DIY (W-ish) mod UA5>JB3
Oade ACM PMD 660
R4


You cannot strengthen the weak by weakening the strong. You cannot help the wage-earner by pulling down the wage-payer. You cannot help the poor by destroying the rich. You cannot help men permanently by doing for them what they could and should do for themselves.
~Rev. William J. H. Boetcker (not Lincoln)

Offline indietaperwloo

  • Trade Count: (0)
  • Taperssection Regular
  • **
  • Posts: 125
Re: Legality thread?
« Reply #10 on: July 15, 2008, 07:37:00 AM »
I always thought that under the Fair Use Act, while the artist owns the rights to the songs performed on your recording, the taper actually has the rights to the actual recording.

For instance, if an artist appeared on Letterman, CBS still owns the rights to that particular episode of Late Night while the artist and his/her record label and publisher own the rights to the songs performed on that episode of Letterman.

That's the way I always understood it.
Portable 2 track:
Sennheiser MKE2 (HRTF) > Edirol R-09
AT822 > Edirol R-09
Studio Projects C4 (ORTF/XY) > Presonus Firepod > Edirol R-09

4 Track Open Rig:
Studio Projects C4 (ORTF)/FOH Feed > Edirol R4

FOH:
Mackie 1604 VLZ Pro > dbx 215 Graphic EQ > Behringer PMX2000 (Power Amp Section) > Behringer B1220 Mains

Multitrack:
Mackie 1604 VLZ Pro > Tascam DA-38 w/Burr Brown Op-amps

Out:
M-Audio Fast Track Pro > Mackie 1604 VLZ Pro > ESI nEar05 nearfields OR AKG K99 Headphones

Offline jonbo

  • Trade Count: (0)
  • Taperssection Regular
  • **
  • Posts: 50
Re: Legality thread?
« Reply #11 on: July 15, 2008, 09:31:37 AM »
This one?
http://taperssection.com/index.php/topic,23206.0.html

"Vermont and Texas don't appear to have anything having to do with piracy or recordings at all."

Ok people, what are your assumptions about recording if there are no laws about it?

+T Greenone

Laws are only part of the equation - case histories and precedence are really important too.
AT853 > 3-wire BB > H120

 

RSS | Mobile
Page created in 0.078 seconds with 36 queries.
© 2002-2024 Taperssection.com
Powered by SMF