Taperssection.com
Gear / Technical Help => Battery Boxes, Preamps, Mixers, ADCs, and Processors => Topic started by: kylieshotpants on April 04, 2009, 10:26:22 AM
-
Hi
at the moment for loud shows I use
mini disc
line in to 9v batt box to binaural microphone
I know that buying a preamplifer will boost the finished sound
what I was wondering could I use it when I get home and upload the show to the computer and get a fairly similar result (for stealth reasons)
or would the difference be much better using it whilst recording the show?
-
I believe that boosting the sound at the source is cleaner than recording air and boosting it post. I try to get as close to 0db without going over, so on post, all I have to do is boost 20% post. I am not a tech guy, this is episodic.
-
A good preamp will give you gain without adding noise. If you boost a low signal in post you're boosting the noise also. If you need more gain than you have now it would be better to have a preamp than to amplify a low signal in post.
-
in 24 bit, no... in 16 bit, possibly. at least that is how i now understand it.
i would run my 16 bit recordings as hot as possible (peaking between -3dB and 0dB)... 24 bit i can boost in post if necessary (although i still shoot for -6dB peaks).
-
theres no simple answer, and yes you when you normalize in post, you also normalize the noise floor of the weakest link in the chain.
i use my setup (cmr>ad2k), peaking at -25 dB and do it all in post, and it works out fine as the noise floor of the ad2k is like -115db.
for your minidisc, the noise floor is probably -80 to -100 dB, so if you are post-normalizing more than 18dB you'll probably increase the audible noise, depending on the environment
-
i use my setup (cmr>ad2k), peaking at -25 dB and do it all in post, and it works out fine as the noise floor of the ad2k is like -115db.
Finally someone who recommends using basically the same system that I use. When recording in 24 bits it is insane to try to peak close to 0 dB. Too much danger of the some of the peaks clipping. For music with a big dynamic range, even aiming for peaks of -12 dB's could easily lead to clipping. Plus some tapers have reported that at least some recorders sound cleaner when their levels are not pushed too close to 0 dB even if they don't go over.
I never hear any audible noise when I boost 20-30 dB in post with a 24 bit recording and I don't spoil my enjoyment of the show by having to sweat my levels. And that is even with equipment as inexpensive as an ST-9100 > recorder's line in.
Most will disagree with this, but I have even made some 16 bit recordings that peaked at around -30 that sounded absolutely wonderful when converted to 32 bit by Adobe Audition before doing the boosting. I didn't set the levels that low by design, but it came out sounding better than if I kept fooling with the levels while making the recording.