Become a Site Supporter and Never see Ads again!

Author Topic: Zoom R16 8 track recorder.....  (Read 20159 times)

0 Members and 1 Guest are viewing this topic.

Offline cybergaloot

  • Trade Count: (7)
  • Needs to get out more...
  • *****
  • Posts: 4079
  • Gender: Male
  • Poohbah!
Re: Zoom R16 8 track recorder.....
« Reply #75 on: February 21, 2010, 01:25:07 PM »
OK, I got mine and I'm still trying to learn how to use it. I've run a couple of recordings so far, mainly tests of some mics. One thing I've run into is what appears to be a 2GB file limit. I don't know for sure until I dig into it deeper but I was testing some cheap mics I have to see if they would be suitable for a project and the recorder did shut down sometime during a 2 hour set. This could be my own ignorance or just the way the recorder works. I did have four channels set as two stereo pairs. It may have run longer if I left them as mono files.
--
Walter

Everybody is ignorant, only on different subjects. Will Rogers

this>that>the other

Offline Nick's Picks

  • Trade Count: (33)
  • Needs to get out more...
  • *****
  • Posts: 10260
  • Gender: Male
  • I thought I heard.......
Re: Zoom R16 8 track recorder.....
« Reply #76 on: February 21, 2010, 04:29:23 PM »
I've not run any two channel recordings with it to exceed any limit yet.  but then again, I'm doing 8 tracks mostly, and a 3 hour session comes in at about 5gb worth of files ( divided by 8).

Not exactly a turn key intuitive deck like the Edirols eh ?
Its taken me a while to learn how to use 70% of it.  We are just getting to the point now where we are utilizing tracks 9-16, laying down on top of 1-8 and doing all the mixing on the board itself.  Headphones for each band member, and a mixing station with near-field monitors ( I hate mixing on headphones)
« Last Edit: February 21, 2010, 04:50:46 PM by Nick's Picks »

Offline cybergaloot

  • Trade Count: (7)
  • Needs to get out more...
  • *****
  • Posts: 4079
  • Gender: Male
  • Poohbah!
Re: Zoom R16 8 track recorder.....
« Reply #77 on: February 21, 2010, 04:47:30 PM »
Since it wasn't really designed to be a field recorder I wouldn't be surprised that file size was a low priority. It also did not start writing a new file either.

The first time I ran it I didn't run into this but then I had it writing mono files and the set didn't go so long.

A couple of samples:
CA-1 (omni)>battery box>R16
http://yodaslai.ipower.com/bradfordvilleblues/media/CA-1.wav
CA-11 (omni)>CA-9000 pre>R16
http://yodaslai.ipower.com/bradfordvilleblues/media/CA-11.wav
--
Walter

Everybody is ignorant, only on different subjects. Will Rogers

this>that>the other

 

RSS | Mobile
Page created in 0.046 seconds with 28 queries.
© 2002-2024 Taperssection.com
Powered by SMF