Become a Site Supporter and Never see Ads again!

Author Topic: M-Audio Pulsars...  (Read 10993 times)

0 Members and 1 Guest are viewing this topic.

Offline taperwheeler

  • Trade Count: (5)
  • Taperssection Member
  • ***
  • Posts: 496
  • Gender: Male
Re: M-Audio Pulsars...
« Reply #30 on: May 20, 2009, 09:36:38 PM »
And I was about to trade my 480's in...
Mics: SP-CMC-8 AT933 Body 4.7K mod AT853 (c, sc) U853 (h) Microline Shotguns
Pres: CA 9100, SP-Preamp
Recorders: MT2 , Tascam DR-07, PCM-M10, PCM A10

Offline Walstib62

  • Site Supporter
  • Trade Count: (32)
  • Needs to get out more...
  • *
  • Posts: 3266
  • Gender: Male
Re: M-Audio Pulsars...
« Reply #31 on: May 20, 2009, 10:55:08 PM »
OK Guys-Calm down! All i'm saying here is what I've read from industry insiders. I have 0 experience w/m-audio products. Just the same, I'm Very interested in listening to not only the pulsars, but especially the Sputnik.
The point being that the german mics have a long history of extremely hi qual. product. Nobody in their right mind would dispute that. BUT.. It seems as though there are products entering the market that emulate that great german engineering.  As a matter of fact, there is a Telefunken mic made in China on the market, and is possibly inferior to it's US competitor, which is identical, but uses better components.
Remember, we are in times of a "global economy". Europe is no exception to this reality.

Offline illconditioned

  • Trade Count: (9)
  • Needs to get out more...
  • *****
  • Posts: 2996
Re: M-Audio Pulsars...
« Reply #32 on: May 21, 2009, 12:25:29 AM »
OK Guys-Calm down! All i'm saying here is what I've read from industry insiders. I have 0 experience w/m-audio products. Just the same, I'm Very interested in listening to not only the pulsars, but especially the Sputnik.
The point being that the german mics have a long history of extremely hi qual. product. Nobody in their right mind would dispute that. BUT.. It seems as though there are products entering the market that emulate that great german engineering.  As a matter of fact, there is a Telefunken mic made in China on the market, and is possibly inferior to it's US competitor, which is identical, but uses better components.
Remember, we are in times of a "global economy". Europe is no exception to this reality.
Nothing wrong with looking for inexpensive "sleeper" mics.

However, I would trust other brands more than Maudio.  I've got some of their gear (usb interfaces) and the quality is highly variable.  There are some winners (maudio transit, maudio duo), but there are some really bad ones too.

  Richard
Please DO NOT mail me with tech questions.  I will try to answer in the forums when I get a chance.  Thanks.

Sample recordings at: http://www.soundmann.com.

Offline taperwheeler

  • Trade Count: (5)
  • Taperssection Member
  • ***
  • Posts: 496
  • Gender: Male
Re: M-Audio Pulsars...
« Reply #33 on: May 21, 2009, 07:26:14 AM »
OK Guys-Calm down! All i'm saying here is what I've read from industry insiders. I have 0 experience w/m-audio products. Just the same, I'm Very interested in listening to not only the pulsars, but especially the Sputnik.
The point being that the german mics have a long history of extremely hi qual. product. Nobody in their right mind would dispute that. BUT.. It seems as though there are products entering the market that emulate that great german engineering.  As a matter of fact, there is a Telefunken mic made in China on the market, and is possibly inferior to it's US competitor, which is identical, but uses better components.
Remember, we are in times of a "global economy". Europe is no exception to this reality.
Nothing wrong with looking for inexpensive "sleeper" mics.

However, I would trust other brands more than Maudio.  I've got some of their gear (usb interfaces) and the quality is highly variable.  There are some winners (maudio transit, maudio duo), but there are some really bad ones too.

  Richard


And along that note, seems like there's been some real lemons out there among the microtracks, so even within a particular product line, potential for variability.

These are stereo matched sets? 

I gave the nmas tape a listen, thojght it did sound good.  Eager to hear more from these mics.
Mics: SP-CMC-8 AT933 Body 4.7K mod AT853 (c, sc) U853 (h) Microline Shotguns
Pres: CA 9100, SP-Preamp
Recorders: MT2 , Tascam DR-07, PCM-M10, PCM A10

Offline Nick's Picks

  • Trade Count: (33)
  • Needs to get out more...
  • *****
  • Posts: 10260
  • Gender: Male
  • I thought I heard.......
Re: M-Audio Pulsars...
« Reply #34 on: May 21, 2009, 07:35:12 AM »
you want some more ?
here is my last band practice.
recorded ORTF in the room (small) where we practice.
www.nickspicks.com/music/DOUBT
there are flac's and MP3s.  tracks are labeled.  give it a listen.

and from the week before, same room...mics setup XY.
www.hydra-audio.com/mp3/RO

I'm going to tape BK3 with them next week, I'll post it.

I'm not implying that these mics approach German build quality..., i'm just saying they sound *surprisingly good*...very smooth , nothing "bloated" or tinny.
the matched stereo kit for $300odd is a screaming deal.

Offline Walstib62

  • Site Supporter
  • Trade Count: (32)
  • Needs to get out more...
  • *
  • Posts: 3266
  • Gender: Male
Re: M-Audio Pulsars...
« Reply #35 on: May 21, 2009, 10:08:34 AM »
That's what I'm thinking. Not the absolute best mics out there, but certainly a high quality/price ratio.
I hope nobody took the "calm down" remark the wrong way. I didn't mean it the way it may have sounded. :-)

Offline Nick's Picks

  • Trade Count: (33)
  • Needs to get out more...
  • *****
  • Posts: 10260
  • Gender: Male
  • I thought I heard.......
Re: M-Audio Pulsars...
« Reply #36 on: May 21, 2009, 12:25:06 PM »
it was helpful, I needed to relax.
:)

Offline Walstib62

  • Site Supporter
  • Trade Count: (32)
  • Needs to get out more...
  • *
  • Posts: 3266
  • Gender: Male
Re: M-Audio Pulsars...
« Reply #37 on: May 26, 2009, 08:06:08 PM »
listen to these clips-interesting! U47 to Sputnik comparison.

http://emusician.com/web_clips/webclips_1207/

jnorman34

  • Guest
  • Trade Count: (0)
Re: M-Audio Pulsars...
« Reply #38 on: May 27, 2009, 12:28:23 PM »
so, how do these pulsars compare to avantone CK-1's?  which one is smoother in the top end?  how do these little guys compare to some of the more expensive models, like beyer MC930s or km184s or C461s?  i am currently doing some studio testing of 184s, mc930s, AT4051s, and want to include a pair of pulsars or ck-1s.  any other entry level SDCs i should also consider?  thanks.

Offline sanaka

  • Trade Count: (0)
  • Taperssection Regular
  • **
  • Posts: 213
  • Gender: Male
  • Perpetual n00b
    • My first Dead show
Re: M-Audio Pulsars...
« Reply #39 on: May 27, 2009, 01:55:35 PM »
Quote
any other entry level SDCs i should also consider?

Busman BSC1 and Avantone CK-1

Offline Chuck

  • Trade Count: (42)
  • Needs to get out more...
  • *****
  • Posts: 10811
  • Gender: Male
  • time between the notes...
    • My recordings on the LMA
Re: M-Audio Pulsars...
« Reply #40 on: May 27, 2009, 02:01:13 PM »
Studio Projects C-4's.
Reality is merely an illusion, albeit a very persistent one.

Microphones: AKG C 480 B comb-ULS/ CK 61/ CK 63, Sennheiser MKE 2 elements,  Audix M1290-o, Micro capsule active cables w/ Naiant PFA's, Naiant MSH-1O, Naiant AKG Active cables, Church CA-11 (cardioid), (1) Nady SCM-1000 (mod)
Pre-amps: Naiant littlebox, Naiant littlekit v2.0, BM2p+ Edirol UA-5, Church STC-9000
Recorders: Sound Devices MixPre-6, iRiver iHP-120 (Rockboxed & RTC mod)

Recordings on the LMA: http://www.archive.org/bookmarks/ChuckM
Recording website & blog: http://www.timebetweenthenotes.com

Offline OOK

  • Trade Count: (17)
  • Needs to get out more...
  • *****
  • Posts: 2727
  • Gender: Male
  • formerly OtherOneK
Re: M-Audio Pulsars...
« Reply #41 on: May 27, 2009, 03:37:34 PM »
Oktava.....
DPA/HEB 4060's > R09HR
MBHO648/KA100Lk/KA200/KA300/KA500 > SD702

Offline Javier Cinakowski

  • !! Downhill From Here !!
  • Trade Count: (11)
  • Needs to get out more...
  • *****
  • Posts: 4325
  • Gender: Male
Re: M-Audio Pulsars...
« Reply #42 on: May 27, 2009, 04:10:15 PM »
Rote NT55, Karma K10, Peluso,
Neumann KM185mp OR DPA ST2015-> Grace Design Lunatec V2-> Tascam DR-100mkIII

Offline Nick's Picks

  • Trade Count: (33)
  • Needs to get out more...
  • *****
  • Posts: 10260
  • Gender: Male
  • I thought I heard.......
Re: M-Audio Pulsars...
« Reply #43 on: May 28, 2009, 07:14:47 AM »
you can forget the C4s and the Oktavas.  the Pulsars burry them.

the other mics you mentioned, we must remember those mics cost more than $1000 beyond the M-Audio Pulsars.

IMO, based on numbers and estimated value vs. cost..., the Pulsars should cost around $600 per pair.  but dont.
:)
for the money, you can't go wrong..., and wont be disappointed. 
FullCompass is having a moving sale.  these were in their latest flier..., might be worth a call

Offline Javier Cinakowski

  • !! Downhill From Here !!
  • Trade Count: (11)
  • Needs to get out more...
  • *****
  • Posts: 4325
  • Gender: Male
Re: M-Audio Pulsars...
« Reply #44 on: May 28, 2009, 08:12:22 AM »
Normally I agree with Nick on his microphone preferences, but I disagree on a few.

Quote
you can forget the C4s and the Oktavas.  the Pulsars burry them.

You made similar claims about the Peluso's on your website review.  M-Audio didn't demo you a set of these Pulsars did they?   ;)

Anyway, I like the C4's, Oktava's, Busmans, and Avantones WAY more than the Peluso's for diffuse/far field recording.  I can't really say the same for the Pulsars as I havn't owned a pair, but if history of your reviews is any indication, I won't like them....    :)
Neumann KM185mp OR DPA ST2015-> Grace Design Lunatec V2-> Tascam DR-100mkIII

 

RSS | Mobile
Page created in 0.091 seconds with 43 queries.
© 2002-2024 Taperssection.com
Powered by SMF