Become a Site Supporter and Never see Ads again!

Author Topic: reducing loud audience applause between (and sometimes during) music  (Read 1199 times)

0 Members and 1 Guest are viewing this topic.

Offline daze

  • Trade Count: (1)
  • Taperssection Regular
  • **
  • Posts: 172
Re: reducing loud audience applause between (and sometimes during) music
« Reply #15 on: March 28, 2022, 09:13:24 PM »
This may be an interesting read for you, daze. 

https://taperssection.com/index.php?PHPSESSID=887c56f86bcdd5c9341ab7e8ebbfae7a&topic=137594.0

Thanks.  I somehow missed this during my search!  It will take a few careful reads for this to sink in, but it looks like another valuable tool for the arsenal. 

Offline tim in jersey

  • Site Supporter
  • Trade Count: (8)
  • Needs to get out more...
  • *
  • Posts: 3711
  • Gender: Male
Re: reducing loud audience applause between (and sometimes during) music
« Reply #16 on: March 28, 2022, 09:16:25 PM »
Thread is 12 years old and I have it bookmarked and still constantly refer to it.


Offline daze

  • Trade Count: (1)
  • Taperssection Regular
  • **
  • Posts: 172
Re: reducing loud audience applause between (and sometimes during) music
« Reply #17 on: March 28, 2022, 10:39:36 PM »
Thread is 12 years old and I have it bookmarked and still constantly refer to it.

I'm still not sure I understand it, I'll fiddle around and see what I can figure out.  Thanks again.

Offline nulldogmas

  • Trade Count: (6)
  • Taperssection All-Star
  • ****
  • Posts: 1304
    • How I Escaped My Uncertain Fate
Re: reducing loud audience applause between (and sometimes during) music
« Reply #18 on: March 29, 2022, 07:55:11 AM »
Thread is 12 years old and I have it bookmarked and still constantly refer to it.

I'm still not sure I understand it, I'll fiddle around and see what I can figure out.  Thanks again.

Parallel compression isn't all that complicated when it comes down to it — it's mostly a way to create a compression curve (more compressed for loud bits, less so for quiet bits, making the quiet bits louder without making the whole thing sound unnatural) without mucking around too much with numbers.

If the crowd noise is louder than whatever else is going on, dynamic compression is a great way to lower its relative volume; as kindms suggested above, just eyeball what dB level the actual music reaches, and compress the hell out of anything that exceeds that in the sections with crowd noise. If you have loud music plus loud crowd it's trickier, and starts requiring things like Izotope filters.

Offline daze

  • Trade Count: (1)
  • Taperssection Regular
  • **
  • Posts: 172
Re: reducing loud audience applause between (and sometimes during) music
« Reply #19 on: March 29, 2022, 09:21:40 AM »
Thanks for the explanation and additional information. What is the difference between parallel compression and dynamic compression?  (Is it, that in parallel compression, your ultimately overlying the compressed track on the original track?).

Izotope filters are also something I'm trying to learn.  Steep learning curve but I trying to immerse myself.

Offline nulldogmas

  • Trade Count: (6)
  • Taperssection All-Star
  • ****
  • Posts: 1304
    • How I Escaped My Uncertain Fate
Re: reducing loud audience applause between (and sometimes during) music
« Reply #20 on: March 29, 2022, 04:07:46 PM »
Thanks for the explanation and additional information. What is the difference between parallel compression and dynamic compression?  (Is it, that in parallel compression, your ultimately overlying the compressed track on the original track?).

Dynamic compression just means compressing the loudness of the sound, so the peaks are lower. To distinguish it from data compression, like turning a WAV into an MP3.

Parallel compression is splitting your file in two and dynamically compressing them differently, then remixing them.

Offline daze

  • Trade Count: (1)
  • Taperssection Regular
  • **
  • Posts: 172
Re: reducing loud audience applause between (and sometimes during) music
« Reply #21 on: March 29, 2022, 07:37:24 PM »
Thanks for the explanation and additional information. What is the difference between parallel compression and dynamic compression?  (Is it, that in parallel compression, your ultimately overlying the compressed track on the original track?).

Dynamic compression just means compressing the loudness of the sound, so the peaks are lower. To distinguish it from data compression, like turning a WAV into an MP3.

Parallel compression is splitting your file in two and dynamically compressing them differently, then remixing them.

Thanks for articulating that so clearly.  It seems like parallel compression may not be the best route for the problem I'm trying to solve right now (someone pointed that out in the thread tim in jersey referenced), and I'll play around with dynamic compression, and limiting, and compare and see what sounds best.  But I have a ton of other recordings that I think can benefit from parallel compression.

 

RSS | Mobile
Page created in 0.036 seconds with 29 queries.
© 2002-2022 Taperssection.com
Powered by SMF