Become a Site Supporter and Never see Ads again!

Author Topic: Microtrack 24/96 1.3.3  (Read 70986 times)

0 Members and 1 Guest are viewing this topic.

Offline mwz

  • Trade Count: (0)
  • Taperssection Member
  • ***
  • Posts: 311
  • Gender: Male
Microtrack 24/96 1.3.3
« on: March 03, 2006, 11:28:27 PM »
 :D

http://www.m-audio.com/index.php?do=support.drivers

Major new Features and Improvements

- Auto split added. If the 2GB file size limit is reached during a recording, the MicroTrack will automatically start a new file for recording. This will continue until either the MicroTrack battery runs out of sufficient charge or the media runs out of space (at which time the currently recording file will be saved and recording will stop). NOTE: There will be a gap between files ranging from 5-9 seconds, depending on the recording resolution and size/speed of the media being used.
- Mono Recording added. When recording mono from the analog inputs, the inputs are monitored directly. This means that when monitoring, you will still hear whatever source is on the right channel even though it is not being recorded. Only the left channel will be recorded. For MP3 format recordings, a Stereo MP3 file will be created but both left and right tracks will contain whatever was recorded into the left channel. For WAV recordings a true mono WAV file is created. Note that when recording from S/PDIF, input monitoring (whether mono or stereo) is not supported.
- Increased record buffer size to increase compatibility with media when recording 24-bit/96kHz.
- S/PDIF is now enabled to record at sample rates up to 24-bit/96kHz.

New UI Items:

- Adjusted the response of the NAV control to better prevent navigation double entries.
- Recorder menus now pin at top and bottom.
- French, German, and Italian languages added.
- Added warning at boot-up with the option of reformatting if the CF card is not formatted properly.
- Added automatic reboot after formatting media.
- Standardized the buttons to boot up the Application when in Card Reader mode or AC Power mode and to exit the ‘sleep’ screen. Previously, the DEL key launched the application from card reader or AC power modes and the POWER button exited from the ‘sleep’ screen. Both buttons will now work in either situation.
- Removed boot loader version display on power-up. Boot loader and firmware versions are now both displayed in MENU > SYSTEM > VERSION.

General Fixes:

- Changed the behavior of the MicroTrack when powered up with hold button engaged. MicroTrack will now display “Hold Key is Active” message and then power off unless it is plugged into power or USB in which case it will go into either Card Reader mode if connected to a computer or AC Power mode if plugged into the power supply. To boot up into the ‘Application’, turn off the hold switch and then press either the DEL button or the POWER button. If you remove power from the MicroTrack while the hold switch is on and while still in Card Reader mode or AC Power mode, the MicroTrack will power off.
- Fixed the time available counter so it displays properly on cards over 4GB in size.
- Turned off the backlight when in Card Reader mode or AC Power mode.
- Fixed issue of not always allowing 2GB recordings on media larger than 4GB.
- Fixed problem where files sometimes wouldn't save properly when volume filled to capacity.
- Fixed problem of certain CF media not being recognized as inserted.

Offline Jamos

  • Trade Count: (61)
  • Taperssection All-Star
  • ****
  • Posts: 1646
  • Gender: Male
Microtrack 24/96 1.3.3
« Reply #1 on: March 03, 2006, 11:31:12 PM »
M-Audio just released this today!  2006.03.03   ;D

Get it here:
http://www.m-audio.com/index.php?do=support.drivers

Looks like some of the big fixes did happen...

The auto-start a new file after 2GB's are reached (w/a 5-9 second delay), S/PDIF @ 24/96, and correct display for remaining time w/cards >4GB were all implemented.

*Thanks to whomever moved my thread into this thread*
« Last Edit: March 03, 2006, 11:53:09 PM by jamosb78 »

Offline anhisr

  • Trade Count: (6)
  • Needs to get out more...
  • Posts: 2974
  • Gender: Male
Re: Microtrack 24/96 1.3.3
« Reply #2 on: March 03, 2006, 11:33:13 PM »
Great,  now they feel they fixed the 2gb limit but there will be 5-9 second gap.  That will not work. 
Audio: Neumann KM 100> 20, 30, 40, 43 or 50 > V3 > MT II (love that M/S)
Still Camera Body: Canon D5 Mark II
Canon Lenses:  16-35mm f2.8L II USM; 28-135mm f3.5-5.6 IS USM; 70-200mm f2.8L IS USM
Video Canon HF R30

archive  http://www.archive.org/bookmarks/anhisr

Offline anhisr

  • Trade Count: (6)
  • Needs to get out more...
  • Posts: 2974
  • Gender: Male
Re: Microtrack 24/96 1.3.3
« Reply #3 on: March 03, 2006, 11:34:11 PM »
5-9 second gap is not a fix
Audio: Neumann KM 100> 20, 30, 40, 43 or 50 > V3 > MT II (love that M/S)
Still Camera Body: Canon D5 Mark II
Canon Lenses:  16-35mm f2.8L II USM; 28-135mm f3.5-5.6 IS USM; 70-200mm f2.8L IS USM
Video Canon HF R30

archive  http://www.archive.org/bookmarks/anhisr

Offline mwz

  • Trade Count: (0)
  • Taperssection Member
  • ***
  • Posts: 311
  • Gender: Male
Re: Microtrack 24/96 1.3.3
« Reply #4 on: March 03, 2006, 11:38:24 PM »
yea - but it's still vers. 1.x.  Given the price and the size of the unit - i'll give 'em a few more rev's of firmware to get it right(or at least as good as my jb3).  If I didn't love my v3 - I'd buy a 722 tomorrow.

Offline anhisr

  • Trade Count: (6)
  • Needs to get out more...
  • Posts: 2974
  • Gender: Male
Re: Microtrack 24/96 1.3.3
« Reply #5 on: March 03, 2006, 11:42:19 PM »
I feel the same way.  I love my V3 and I would like a bit dump that can handle the 2gb split (with no loss of time).   
Audio: Neumann KM 100> 20, 30, 40, 43 or 50 > V3 > MT II (love that M/S)
Still Camera Body: Canon D5 Mark II
Canon Lenses:  16-35mm f2.8L II USM; 28-135mm f3.5-5.6 IS USM; 70-200mm f2.8L IS USM
Video Canon HF R30

archive  http://www.archive.org/bookmarks/anhisr

Offline anhisr

  • Trade Count: (6)
  • Needs to get out more...
  • Posts: 2974
  • Gender: Male
Re: Microtrack 24/96 1.3.3
« Reply #6 on: March 03, 2006, 11:50:25 PM »
I just hope that they don't feel they have fixed the problem and that is all they are going to do on that point.
Audio: Neumann KM 100> 20, 30, 40, 43 or 50 > V3 > MT II (love that M/S)
Still Camera Body: Canon D5 Mark II
Canon Lenses:  16-35mm f2.8L II USM; 28-135mm f3.5-5.6 IS USM; 70-200mm f2.8L IS USM
Video Canon HF R30

archive  http://www.archive.org/bookmarks/anhisr

Offline SClassical

  • Trade Count: (3)
  • Taperssection Member
  • ***
  • Posts: 821
  • Gender: Male
Re: Microtrack 24/96 1.3.3
« Reply #7 on: March 03, 2006, 11:51:07 PM »
It's already been reported by users in this group that the previous firmware (1.2.3) allowed 24/96 recording via S/PDIF.
Mics: DPA3552 kit/DPA3521 kit/DPA SMK4081 kit/DPA SMK4060 kit/Schoeps 2X MK21, 2X MK22 and 2X MK4v and 2X Schoeps CCM2S
Mixers/preamps: Sonosax SX-M32/Sonosax SX-M2 LS/Grace Design V3/DPA MMA6000/Millennia HV-32P
Recorders: SD722/PCM-D50/MT2
Playback: Grace m903 - Sennheiser HD650 / Bowers & Wilkins Nautilus 805s

Offline balou2

  • Crippled, but still dancin'
  • Trade Count: (0)
  • Needs to get out more...
  • *****
  • Posts: 4442
  • Gender: Male
  • He was a friend of mine.
    • Little Mountain Sound Archive
Re: Microtrack 24/96 1.3.3
« Reply #8 on: March 04, 2006, 12:00:09 AM »
I agree.  The 5-9 split will not work, but I can't help but agree with Tim.  This upgrade addresses several of the pending issues, and is likely a step in the right direction.  M-Audio is bound to have someone consulting this forum- in other words, I am pretty confident that they are aware of what this is being used for and what the ramifications of their ignorance would be...i.e. tapers (at least the serious ones) wouldn't every buy M-Audio again.  I'm gonna wait this out and see what comes...I'm confident that it will play out. :guitarist:
Socks are overrated.

Offline bconnolly

  • Trade Count: (0)
  • Taperssection All-Star
  • ****
  • Posts: 1567
  • Gender: Male
  • Serious Business
    • Serious Business
Re: Microtrack 24/96 1.3.3
« Reply #9 on: March 04, 2006, 12:26:33 AM »
Quote
Fixed issue of not always allowing 2GB recordings on media larger than 4GB.

Fucking shit yes.  Yes yes y-e-s yes.

Offline corsair

  • Trade Count: (0)
  • Taperssection Regular
  • **
  • Posts: 117
  • Gender: Male
Re: Microtrack 24/96 1.3.3
« Reply #10 on: March 04, 2006, 12:54:37 AM »
Why are you guys paying so much for a device whose s/w operates
like though its an open-source s/w proj, where the users
are constantly hanging on for big updates to serious problems?
Audio-Technica ES943/C's -> Home-made 3-wire battery box -> Tascam DR-07

Offline cpatch

  • Trade Count: (0)
  • Taperssection Member
  • ***
  • Posts: 417
  • Gender: Male
  • I STOP FOR CAFFEINE
    • The GodCast Network
Re: Microtrack 24/96 1.3.3
« Reply #11 on: March 04, 2006, 01:07:05 AM »
Why are you guys paying so much for a device whose s/w operates
like though its an open-source s/w proj, where the users
are constantly hanging on for big updates to serious problems?

Because even with its problems it still does more than any other current device at its price point and size.

Craig
Home (Podcasting): AT4040,NT-1A > Symetrix 528e > dbx 1066 > Mackie 1202-VLZ-PRO > 24" Intel iMac
Field (Podcasting/Taping): AT853RX,LSD2,MD46 > Bus PMD660/H4
$100 Super Stealth: Giant Squid Stereo Omnis > iRiver iFP-795

Offline corsair

  • Trade Count: (0)
  • Taperssection Regular
  • **
  • Posts: 117
  • Gender: Male
Re: Microtrack 24/96 1.3.3
« Reply #12 on: March 04, 2006, 01:09:12 AM »
Why are you guys paying so much for a device whose s/w operates
like though its an open-source s/w proj, where the users
are constantly hanging on for big updates to serious problems?

Because even with its problems it still does more than any other current device at its price point and size.

Craig

I dun think so... given its pre-mature release to the market...
There are too many 'potentials' that are not realised...
Look at it this way... Companies such as Roland has core businesses in
music recording and has been doing so for ages.. M-audio in this case
is getting lost over their new product, and I think spiralling continual
post-devmt support is going to get it killed.
I'm sure many will agree with me.
« Last Edit: March 04, 2006, 01:12:49 AM by corsair »
Audio-Technica ES943/C's -> Home-made 3-wire battery box -> Tascam DR-07

Offline Nick Graham

  • Amorican
  • Trade Count: (3)
  • Needs to get out more...
  • Posts: 4068
  • Gender: Male
Re: Microtrack 24/96 1.3.3
« Reply #13 on: March 04, 2006, 01:10:43 AM »
Why are you guys paying so much for a device whose s/w operates
like though its an open-source s/w proj, where the users
are constantly hanging on for big updates to serious problems?

Because even with its problems it still does more than any other current device at its price point and size.

Craig

I dun think so... given its pre-mature release to the market...
I'm sure many will agree with me.

Okay, tell me ANY other product that retails for less than $400 that does 24/96 via S/PDIF, uses CF media, and has a decent A/D?

Waiting....

Right now nothing...in the past: Schoeps CMC6, AKG 480, AKG 460, AKG 414, MBHO 603a, Neumann KM100, ADK TL>Schoeps MK4, Schoeps MK2, Schoeps MK41, AKG ck61, AKG ck62, AKG ck63, Neumann AK40, Neumann AK50, MBHO ka200>Lunatec V2, Lunatec V3, Apogee Mini-Me, Oade M148, Oade M248, Sound Devices MP2, Sonosax SXM2>Sony (mod)SBM1, Apogee AD500>D7, D8, D100, M1, R1, R4, R09, iRiver HP120, Microtrack

Offline bconnolly

  • Trade Count: (0)
  • Taperssection All-Star
  • ****
  • Posts: 1567
  • Gender: Male
  • Serious Business
    • Serious Business
Re: Microtrack 24/96 1.3.3
« Reply #14 on: March 04, 2006, 01:26:11 AM »
Better question: why are you trolling a thread for a piece of equipment you obviously don't own and don't intend to buy?

 

RSS | Mobile
Page created in 0.244 seconds with 40 queries.
© 2002-2024 Taperssection.com
Powered by SMF