Become a Site Supporter and Never see Ads again!

Author Topic: DPA4061's - Questions  (Read 19547 times)

0 Members and 1 Guest are viewing this topic.

Offline Brian Skalinder

  • Complaint Dept.
  • Trade Count: (28)
  • Needs to get out more...
  • *****
  • Posts: 18868
  • Gender: Male
Re: DPA4061's - Questions
« Reply #45 on: March 26, 2006, 02:02:36 AM »
but i forgot, your always right so I wont say anything else  ::)

I'm often wrong, but this isn't one of those moments - I've not taken a stance on the discussion one way or the other.

actually bri i have used them and i have heard plenty of recordings made by them and just voiced an opinion

You're entitled to your opinion and no one suggested otherwise.
Milab VM-44 Links > Fostex FR-2LE or
Naiant IPA (tinybox format) >
Roland R-05

Offline Nick's Picks

  • Trade Count: (33)
  • Needs to get out more...
  • *****
  • Posts: 10260
  • Gender: Male
  • I thought I heard.......
Re: DPA4061's - Questions
« Reply #46 on: March 26, 2006, 08:12:24 AM »
well i have heard two real good recordings from two different people the last month and both have the same swishing sound, bottom line is 4061's are omnis and the fact is you will need to be in tight to pull a nice recording, if you get lucky a few times thats just it,luck, not to mention the fact that if you happen to see a band with any sort of panning at all your fucked....

you dont really need to be up tight, but as omni's, proximity is good.  but thats true w/any mic.
-55 tickets?  how'd that happen  ::)

the DPAs are areguably the finest sounding little mic like this around.  everybody uses them for that reason, and due to the good deals and wide availability.  they sound great on your head, exceptional on a baffle or Jdisk, and very sweet spaced out 4 or 5 feet, which is how I often ran mine when I had mine.
« Last Edit: March 26, 2006, 08:20:42 AM by Nick's Picks »

Offline Nick's Picks

  • Trade Count: (33)
  • Needs to get out more...
  • *****
  • Posts: 10260
  • Gender: Male
  • I thought I heard.......
Re: DPA4061's - Questions
« Reply #47 on: March 26, 2006, 08:22:10 AM »

actually bri i have used them and i have heard plenty of recordings made by them and just voiced an opinion

You're entitled to your opinion and no one suggested otherwise.

.....even if its totaly ass-backwards.

Offline Belexes

  • Trade Count: (10)
  • Needs to get out more...
  • *****
  • Posts: 5223
  • Gender: Male
Re: DPA4061's - Questions
« Reply #48 on: March 29, 2006, 10:16:52 AM »
I'd strongly suggest NOT purchasing new ones with microdots if you are going to cut the connectors - you're just wasting money then.

A pair are on Ebay if anyone is interested...with the microdots.  :(

Busman Audio BSC1-K1/K2/K3/K4 > HiHo Silver XLR's > Deck TBD

CA-14 (c,o)/MM-HLSC-1 (4.7k mod)/AT853(4.7k mod)(c,o,h,sc)/CAFS (o)/CA-1 (o) > CA-9100 (V. 4.1)/CA-9200/CA-UBB > Sony PCM-D50/Sony PCM-M10

Offline zhianosatch

  • Trade Count: (1)
  • Needs to get out more...
  • *****
  • Posts: 8992
  • Gender: Male
  • god-damned hippies!
Re: DPA4061's - Questions
« Reply #49 on: April 09, 2006, 01:55:14 AM »
That's $1250. Hell, for $2000, I could get an MK4 > Nbox set-up going. Although I've never been the biggest Schoeps fan, for stealthing I'd imagine they almost always beat the DPAs.

i was as surprised as anyone that in many situations, a good 406x setup can definitely play with the big boys. unless i suffer some financial catastrophe, i don't think i'll ever get rid of my 4061s, no matter what else i add to my setup.

Offline it-goes-to-eleven

  • Trade Count: (58)
  • Needs to get out more...
  • *****
  • Posts: 6696
Re: DPA4061's - Questions
« Reply #50 on: April 09, 2006, 11:46:46 AM »
i was as surprised as anyone that in many situations, a good 406x setup can definitely play with the big boys.

Definitely.. but it depends on the situation.. I continue to hang onto my 4061's with a deathgrip even though I haven't used them in a long while. Given a choice between 4061's and mk4 actives, I always pick the mk4's.  The only exception might be something where intense security prevents my first choice (or maybe weather/wind/etc).

The cards will have the obvious minor advantages.. Like the woman sitting behind you opening a candy wrapper during your jazz show and it shows up on the 4061 version but not the mk21 or mk4.  If you have a hard clapper sitting right next to you, cards aren't really going to solve that problem.

But there is a much bigger difference in other cases..  I recorded the SF Jazz Collective last week from the front row of an okay sounding room. Unfortunately, I could hear it all bouncing off the back wall and reflecting back.. Those reflections weren't just the character of a nice sounding room, they were nasty boom and reflection. From my seat it really didn't sound very good at all. It sounded pretty nasty.

Adding to the problem was the instrument position and their attempt to squeeze all musicians in the front row: vibraphone, trombone, sax and trumpet. Hell, the drums were even way up front along the side. The piano was in the back.. The LCJO, in contrast, uses a traditional stage layout and Marsalis has no problem standing way in the back where he should be as a trumpet player.. I'm not sure if it is egos that force everyone to try and be up front with SFJC.. but I digress..  Bottom line is that I could not hear certain instruments from my great seat..

The cards cut the mud and the result sounds excellent and much better than the sound at my seat. I know any omni would have picked up the nasty room and the result would have been hugely disappointing..  It might be interesting to compare the 4061 to the AT853 in a situation like this.. I am not a big fan of at853's but this is a case where they just might have beat the dpa's..

Offline zhianosatch

  • Trade Count: (1)
  • Needs to get out more...
  • *****
  • Posts: 8992
  • Gender: Male
  • god-damned hippies!
Re: DPA4061's - Questions
« Reply #51 on: April 09, 2006, 01:46:45 PM »
i was as surprised as anyone that in many situations, a good 406x setup can definitely play with the big boys.

Definitely.. but it depends on the situation..

i agree completely.

Offline Josephine

  • Trade Count: (6)
  • Needs to get out more...
  • Posts: 5215
  • Gender: Female
Re: DPA4061's - Questions
« Reply #52 on: April 09, 2006, 02:18:55 PM »
This thread has me inspired . . . . I'm thinking the DPAs would be a great alternative mic to have available for heavy-duty stealth situations.
Can someone explain to me the differences between the 4060's and the 4061's?
Thanks.
:)
Schoeps MK4 / MK4v / MK41 > actives > NBox+ > R-09HR



~   On Dime   ~
~   My Recordings   ~
~   Live Music Archive   ~

Offline it-goes-to-eleven

  • Trade Count: (58)
  • Needs to get out more...
  • *****
  • Posts: 6696
Re: DPA4061's - Questions
« Reply #53 on: April 09, 2006, 02:52:52 PM »
They would probably compliment your mk41's well.. Especially in cases where you know you'll have to move around during the show or if a lot of people will be passing right in front of you, etc.  Some people run the 4061's on their shoulders (poking out the shirt seam) to avoid any hat at all. Even when I Know those people are taping, it can be really hard to tell.  Another way to run them is mounted on a bag or on the shoulders of a coat draped over a chair (at jazz clubs, etc, those techniques can work better than hat mounting).

The big difference between them is that the 4060 output is about 6dB higher than the 4061.

For what I record, I wish I had 4060's instead of 4061's.  I don't need the 144dB of sound pressure that the 4061 can handle (vs. 134 for the 4061).  The 4060 has 3dB better signal to noise and dynamic range..  The higher output of the 4060 would help when using noisy pre-amps like the microtrack or at quiet shows.. The 4060's are much harder to find used.

They are small enough to hide in your hair without a hat.. I'd suggest borrowing a pair, along with a little extra gear, and try running them along with the schoeps. You could probably tape them temporarily along the band so they poke down just in front of your ears (the ear is very reflective and I don't like to run my dpa's too close to them). Alternatively, you could run them in the hat but if your head isn't acting as a baffle, you'll lose some imaging.

Offline Genghis Cougar Mellen Khan

  • Trade Count: (2)
  • Needs to get out more...
  • *****
  • Posts: 2238
  • Gender: Male
  • Tin Can > Wax String > Dictaphone
Re: DPA4061's - Questions
« Reply #54 on: April 09, 2006, 07:37:05 PM »
This thread has me inspired . . . . I'm thinking the DPAs would be a great alternative mic to have available for heavy-duty stealth situations.
Can someone explain to me the differences between the 4060's and the 4061's?
Thanks.
:)

To make it simple, the lower the number the higher the sensitivity/higher output.

4060 sensitive
4061 low sensitivity
4062 extra low sensitivity

the lower the sensitivity the higher the spl handling, but even the 4060's should handle a loud rock show as long as you can handle the hot signal.  The self noise goes up a touch with the drop in sensitivity as well. 
Maybe a couple of small scratches, but thats because these mics are chick magnets.
Girls always up on Andy tryin to grab these mics, the scratches are from their wedding rings.

CMC641 / DPA4022 / DPA4062>mod MPS6030
V3 / PMD671 / field ready DV-RA1000 / Oade W-mod PMD661 / PCM-M10

Offline Aaron41

  • Trade Count: (0)
  • Needs to get out more...
  • *****
  • Posts: 2504
  • Quack
Re: DPA4061's - Questions
« Reply #55 on: April 09, 2006, 08:06:34 PM »
They are small enough to hide in your hair without a hat.. I'd suggest borrowing a pair, along with a little extra gear, and try running them along with the schoeps. You could probably tape them temporarily along the band so they poke down just in front of your ears (the ear is very reflective and I don't like to run my dpa's too close to them). Alternatively, you could run them in the hat but if your head isn't acting as a baffle, you'll lose some imaging.

I didn't know the ear was that reflective. I'll need to find a good way to mount my new toys.
"The pizza game has treated me well" - Evil Taper

Offline Nick's Picks

  • Trade Count: (33)
  • Needs to get out more...
  • *****
  • Posts: 10260
  • Gender: Male
  • I thought I heard.......
Re: DPA4061's - Questions
« Reply #56 on: April 10, 2006, 07:23:11 AM »
4060 is the one you want.  the 61s are overkill.
and they sound AWESOME mounted on your head, on a j-disc, any type of baffle or split a few feet.
I made many great recordings using them in an open taping environment on my home-made "omni antenna"


:0
« Last Edit: April 10, 2006, 07:29:53 AM by Nick's Picks »

Offline Nick's Picks

  • Trade Count: (33)
  • Needs to get out more...
  • *****
  • Posts: 10260
  • Gender: Male
  • I thought I heard.......
Re: DPA4061's - Questions
« Reply #57 on: April 10, 2006, 07:33:43 AM »
in fact, i'd go as far as to say that the 4060 could easily be the best universal concert taping mic available for many reasons, but the big one being consistantly pleasing results, as long as you can position yourself favorably.

1. easy to run
2. easy to power
3. easy to hide, if necessary
4. versitile in that you can run omnis in many ways
5. they produce ! 

Ive run them into shitty gear (line in on a JB3, for example) and high end gear (v3, dpa pre, etc etc) and they excell w/everything.

Offline George

  • May the schwartz be with you!
  • Trade Count: (7)
  • Needs to get out more...
  • *****
  • Posts: 4521
  • Gender: Male
  • Unofficial TS thread killer
Re: DPA4061's - Questions
« Reply #58 on: April 10, 2006, 11:52:04 AM »
After taping MMW last Thursday I love my dpa's, the results are stunning. 
SP-CMC-4s (C, H, SC terminated to mini xlr)>Tinybox>Sony M10/Tascam DR-2d
Countryman B3 (Omni, mini xlr)>Tinybox>Sony M10/Tascam DR-2d
Audix 1200 series cable from Chris Church, pair of Audix M1280 card capsules

Listening: Oppo 980HD>Yamaha RXV667>Rega R1's + Rega RS VOX + Rega R5S's

"Every time I see a group of teenagers gathered around an iphone laughing at some youtube video, I walk up to them, slap the iphone out of their hand, get right up to them nose to nose, and scream at the top of my lungs:

TAKE A LOOK

IT'S IN A BOOK

READING FUCKING RAINBOW."

Offline itook2much

  • Trade Count: (0)
  • Taperssection All-Star
  • ****
  • Posts: 1526
  • Gender: Male
  • AKA rspencer
    • my masters
Re: DPA4061's - Questions
« Reply #59 on: April 10, 2006, 12:47:58 PM »
I'd strongly suggest NOT purchasing new ones with microdots if you are going to cut the connectors - you're just wasting money then. 

Another option that, although doesn't waste $, does cost more is to also purchase microdot-to-1/8 mini adaptors (available for $80 at sweetwater).  Of course, that adds $160 to the cost, puts another link in the chain, don't know if it would affect stealthability much.

Might be better just to go with the DPA battery box, or HEB's from CoreSound.  Not much price difference then, when you add up new DPA 406Xs, adaptors, & the cost of a SP 9or other) battery box.
DPA 4060 (CS HEB) > CS BB > Edirol R-09

Backups:  DPA 4060 (1/8"), SP-BMC-2, SP-SPSB-6, Sony MZ-NH1

Quote from: tomluvsgiants
rule #1 - get the show taped
rule #2 - see rule #1    >:D

Quote from: Grace Hopper
“If it's a good idea, go ahead and do it. It's much easier to apologize than it is to get permission.”

 

RSS | Mobile
Page created in 0.081 seconds with 39 queries.
© 2002-2024 Taperssection.com
Powered by SMF