Become a Site Supporter and Never see Ads again!

Author Topic: CA UGLY VS ST9100?  (Read 6172 times)

0 Members and 1 Guest are viewing this topic.

Offline taperwheeler

  • Trade Count: (5)
  • Taperssection Member
  • ***
  • Posts: 496
  • Gender: Male
Re: CA UGLY VS ST9100?
« Reply #15 on: November 14, 2008, 12:48:36 PM »
Postage size pre!  :o Sign me up Chris, for the pre-order. I've been using CA pre and mics now for about a year(?) and absolutely love the combination with the MTII. I'd love to downsize a bit for better  >:D but damn if this doesn't pull great tapes.

Keep up the great work, Chris!  ;D

What input are you using on the MT2 and if you are using the 1/4 inputs are you running them unbalanced by shorting out the ring to ground?

Thanks for the kind words about my products.

Chris


Hey Chris.  I have been researching info on 1/4 cabling that will work 9100>MT2 as that will be part of my setup in the near future  :)

I have come across a variety of answers.  Here's a recent thread that I started on the subject:
http://taperssection.com/index.php/topic,112659.0.html

There has been other talk on the mt2 discussion thread about modding cables to use.  I picked up a Hosa 3.5mm to dual mono TS cable that I will be testing out once the 9100 arrives.  I expect it will be fine as long as I keep the mt2's levels all the way down.  Will let you know what I find out.
Mics: SP-CMC-8 AT933 Body 4.7K mod AT853 (c, sc) U853 (h) Microline Shotguns
Pres: CA 9100, SP-Preamp
Recorders: MT2 , Tascam DR-07, PCM-M10, PCM A10

 

RSS | Mobile
Page created in 0.032 seconds with 29 queries.
© 2002-2024 Taperssection.com
Powered by SMF