Author Topic: Iriver 120 dropped samples? (Read 22287 times)

whatboutbob · « **Reply #30 on:** April 28, 2007, 06:47:04 PM »

Sorry...I've got a bunch of shows this week - but if its still an issue next w/e I can help out w/ testing. Good luck with isolating the issues guys...and once again, thank you soooo much to Mmmm and petur.

Chuck · « **Reply #31 on:** April 29, 2007, 07:04:26 PM »

I won't have an opportunity to fully test the REP in Mmmm's sig until May 9. But, I will be in the same club, using the same rig that I used when I had problems, when I do get to testing it.

bugg100 · « **Reply #32 on:** April 30, 2007, 05:43:39 AM »

Mmmm - Would be glad to test.... BUT I am on h320. If you want to compile for it, I'll run it.

Mmmm · « **Reply #33 on:** May 01, 2007, 03:23:35 PM »

I seem to have fixed it now so that even less buffer is needed while recording while using the REP than when not using it!

Only testing will tell if this fixes the problem, so please please give the build in my sig a go (H120/140)...

If you are using the H3xx: H3xx build HERE

Chuck · « **Reply #34 on:** May 01, 2007, 04:45:15 PM »

Quote from: Mmmm on May 01, 2007, 03:23:35 PM

I seem to have fixed it now so that even less buffer is needed while recording while using the REP than when not using it!

Only testing will tell if this fixes the problem, so please please give the build in my sig a go (H120/140)...

If you are using the H3xx: H3xx build HERE

WoW! That's cool! I plan to test that build in an iHP-120 and an iHP-140 next Wednesday night.

Mmmm · « **Reply #35 on:** May 02, 2007, 03:17:00 PM »

Quote from: Chuck on May 01, 2007, 04:45:15 PM

WoW! That's cool! I plan to test that build in an iHP-120 and an iHP-140 next Wednesday night.

Good stuff, just make sure that you have the recent version (that I uploaded just before my previous post) and not the one of a couple of days ago...

Chuck · « **Reply #36 on:** May 02, 2007, 03:30:23 PM »

Quote from: Mmmm on May 02, 2007, 03:17:00 PM

Quote from: Chuck on May 01, 2007, 04:45:15 PM
WoW! That's cool! I plan to test that build in an iHP-120 and an iHP-140 next Wednesday night.
Good stuff, just make sure that you have the recent version (that I uploaded just before my previous post) and not the one of a couple of days ago...

Yeah, I've got it... 05-01 is the date on the files. You say there is a debug screen? Anything I need to know if it pops up?

Mmmm · « **Reply #37 on:** May 03, 2007, 05:50:16 AM »

Quote from: Chuck on May 02, 2007, 03:30:23 PM

Yeah, I've got it... 05-01 is the date on the files. You say there is a debug screen? Anything I need to know if it pops up?

No, I got rid of that seeing as I have seemingly sorted the buffer problem... So it's just record as normal and see if the same problems pop up. If not then it's probably fixed!

Semayat · « **Reply #38 on:** May 07, 2007, 01:00:18 PM »

Hi,

I've had the same problem saturday night, and we've talked about that in another topic...

IF I understand what you say is : I take your latest rockbox version (in your signature) and it should work fine because you fixed it??
Sorry but my comprehension of that problems, and my lack of english pratice can't be good in that situation

Bye
Semayat

petur · « **Reply #39 on:** May 08, 2007, 02:56:32 AM »

Quote from: Semayat on May 07, 2007, 01:00:18 PM

I've had the same problem saturday night, and we've talked about that in another topic...

Can you confirm to me that when you had that warning you were using the official rockbox version and not the REP?

Semayat · « **Reply #40 on:** May 09, 2007, 03:48:01 AM »

Quote from: petur on May 08, 2007, 02:56:32 AM

Quote from: Semayat on May 07, 2007, 01:00:18 PM
I've had the same problem saturday night, and we've talked about that in another topic...
Can you confirm to me that when you had that warning you were using the official rockbox version and not the REP?

I've had a rockbox+firmware dled from their "official" site, not the REP (the one i just installed sunday from the link a member sent me in the topic) ...It has new features, i mean new bars on the bottom...
I am going to tape some shows saturday & i hope it won't let me down

Semayat

Mmmm · « **Reply #41 on:** May 09, 2007, 04:11:59 AM »

Quote from: Semayat on May 07, 2007, 01:00:18 PM

IF I understand what you say is : I take your latest rockbox version (in your signature) and it should work fine because you fixed it??

Well....maybe, or maybe not... it needs testing.

It's also possible that it is a scheduling error which I think JSMikes has fixed in the official build so maybe it never was anything to do with the REP in the first place...especially if you encountered the error in an official build..

Arni99 · « **Reply #42 on:** May 09, 2007, 04:48:14 AM »

Quote from: Mmmm on May 09, 2007, 04:11:59 AM

Quote from: Semayat on May 07, 2007, 01:00:18 PM
IF I understand what you say is : I take your latest rockbox version (in your signature) and it should work fine because you fixed it??

Well....maybe, or maybe not... it needs testing.

It's also possible that it is a scheduling error which I think JSMikes has fixed in the official build so maybe it never was anything to do with the REP in the first place...especially if you encountered the error in an official build..

Mmmm, I´ve always been using your latest REP-build and never had warnings or drops on ANALOG-line in and I recorded 17 concerts since August 2006. Sometimes I record via optical line-in from my dvd-recorder to my H140 without any drops or failures or warning messages but optical makes only 1-2% of my recordings.

Chuck · « **Reply #43 on:** May 10, 2007, 11:32:26 AM »

Well, I tested the 05-01 Mmmm REP build last night and....

All is good. I recorded the same way I have been, with and the iHP-120 and IHP-140. No warning messages!
...and more importantly, no dropped samples

Mmmm · « **Reply #44 on:** May 10, 2007, 01:27:22 PM »

Quote from: Chuck on May 10, 2007, 11:32:26 AM

Well, I tested the 05-01 Mmmm REP build last night and....

All is good. I recorded the same way I have been, with and the iHP-120 and IHP-140. No warning messages!
...and more importantly, no dropped samples

So, if you had done that before the fix, would you say that you would definitely have had some warnings or dropped samples? or is it more of a hit and miss affair?