I'm sure that Jerry doesn't have RX7 and is simply offering an opinion without any basis for it.
of course you would be wrong, but you obviously have a track record for making up random stuff, so there's that.
Like the 'restoring files with full dynamic range' claim. Its an approximation/recreation at best, and is by definition inferior to properly non-clipped levels in the first place
All of this is academic as clearly David's waveforms are not clipped
Its apparent you are still hell-bent on insulting people first then attempting to contribute topically as an after thought. Maybe best to stick with your buddies in the PZ echo chamber. At least your odd takes won't be challenged there. In any case, poor form to drag your animosities out into the actual content areas of the site
also re:
Let's just say that it is way better than simply lowering the gain as Jerry suggests. Software Engineers that make a lot more money than you and me times 10 with college degrees in this specific area developed it, and the latest version (I have 2019) is amazing. I also get it that it is stupidly expensive, which is why most people don't bother purchasing it, and simply criticize it.
David's waveforms aren't clipped. It is indisputably better to simply adjust volume in a 32-bit-float file with samples over 0db, than it is to use software to needlessly interpolate data. Thats how the format is designed. The former is inherently a less-destructive process than recreating anything. While it is fine that you may think the people who developed your software are genuiuses, if you dont understand the fundamentals of how the software works, you will never reap the full benefits of the tools they offer. I can build an entire house by hammering the nails in with the side of a hammer if i desire.