Become a Site Supporter and Never see Ads again!

Author Topic: chopped NAK's?  (Read 1453 times)

0 Members and 1 Guest are viewing this topic.

Offline mikesalvo

  • Trade Count: (51)
  • Taperssection All-Star
  • ****
  • Posts: 1835
  • Gender: Male
  • get your Avett on!!!
chopped NAK's?
« on: September 23, 2008, 08:46:14 PM »
any thoughts? Yes? No? They seem like a reasonably priced active option. What are your thoughts?
AKG se300b (ck/91, ck/93) > Busman T-Mod R-4

Offline TNJazz

  • Ninja
  • Trade Count: (44)
  • Needs to get out more...
  • *****
  • Posts: 5530
  • Gender: Male
  • "Those who know, know."
    • NINJA DYNAMITE
Re: chopped NAK's?
« Reply #1 on: September 23, 2008, 09:17:37 PM »
7's yes.

3's...not so much.

My opinion only.  YMMV.
Check out my band!  --> http://www.ninjadynamite.com

Offline run_run_run

  • Trade Count: (7)
  • Needs to get out more...
  • *****
  • Posts: 5253
  • Gender: Male
Re: chopped NAK's?
« Reply #2 on: September 23, 2008, 09:28:35 PM »
Depends on what you like

Offline scottwu

  • Trade Count: (0)
  • Taperssection Newbie
  • *
  • Posts: 12
Re: chopped NAK's?
« Reply #3 on: October 02, 2008, 08:01:41 PM »
I chopped a pair of CM-300's and changed them to three wire power, unbalanced low impedance out with a custom 21dB gain frontend for nature recording. I tapped the  6/7.2 volt battery in my FR2LE and snaked the wire out the cover of the battrey compartment and into the XLR with an RCA jack disconnect. Not everyones' cup of tea but several others have judged the noise coming in at 12-15dBA out of the CP-2. As a head spaced boundary pair I got some very nice recordings this summer.

 

RSS | Mobile
Page created in 0.107 seconds with 29 queries.
© 2002-2024 Taperssection.com
Powered by SMF