Become a Site Supporter and Never see Ads again!

Author Topic: Edirol R-09HR - Part THREE  (Read 86552 times)

0 Members and 1 Guest are viewing this topic.

Offline rastasean

  • in paradise
  • Trade Count: (23)
  • Needs to get out more...
  • *****
  • Posts: 3699
  • Gender: Male
Re: Edirol R-09HR - Part THREE
« Reply #45 on: October 01, 2008, 10:58:55 AM »
Scott/Digifish,

Have you ever used the Sony D50? I know you're a big fan of the R09 and R09HR but the D50 looks quite tempting.

thanks,
Sean
Advice is a form of nostalgia, dispensing it is a way of fishing the past from the disposal, wiping it off, painting over the ugly parts and recycling it for more than it’s worth.

Offline digifish_music

  • Trade Count: (0)
  • Taperssection All-Star
  • ****
  • Posts: 1016
    • digifish music
Re: Edirol R-09HR - Part THREE
« Reply #46 on: October 01, 2008, 08:27:06 PM »
Scott/Digifish,

Have you ever used the Sony D50? I know you're a big fan of the R09 and R09HR but the D50 looks quite tempting.

thanks,
Sean

No but from the comparisons/recordings I have heard it makes better (lower noise, more detailed?) internal mic recordings than the R09HR. Line in would be no better or worse IMO.

The D50 is a bit larger, and twice as heavy as the HR, so more awkward in comparison. http://www.wingfieldaudio.com/ has a good comparison.

digifish 
- What's this knob do?

Offline George

  • May the schwartz be with you!
  • Trade Count: (7)
  • Needs to get out more...
  • *****
  • Posts: 4521
  • Gender: Male
  • Unofficial TS thread killer
Re: Edirol R-09HR - Part THREE
« Reply #47 on: October 02, 2008, 03:26:33 PM »
Scott/Digifish,

Have you ever used the Sony D50? I know you're a big fan of the R09 and R09HR but the D50 looks quite tempting.

thanks,
Sean

No but from the comparisons/recordings I have heard it makes better (lower noise, more detailed?) internal mic recordings than the R09HR. Line in would be no better or worse IMO.

The D50 is a bit larger, and twice as heavy as the HR, so more awkward in comparison. http://www.wingfieldaudio.com/ has a good comparison.

digifish 

Digifish, dude, this site is incredible!  Thanks so much for posting the link.  Now when and if I decide to go 24 bit I'll have all the answers in one place.  Can someone please sticky this link? 
SP-CMC-4s (C, H, SC terminated to mini xlr)>Tinybox>Sony M10/Tascam DR-2d
Countryman B3 (Omni, mini xlr)>Tinybox>Sony M10/Tascam DR-2d
Audix 1200 series cable from Chris Church, pair of Audix M1280 card capsules

Listening: Oppo 980HD>Yamaha RXV667>Rega R1's + Rega RS VOX + Rega R5S's

"Every time I see a group of teenagers gathered around an iphone laughing at some youtube video, I walk up to them, slap the iphone out of their hand, get right up to them nose to nose, and scream at the top of my lungs:

TAKE A LOOK

IT'S IN A BOOK

READING FUCKING RAINBOW."

Offline jmz93

  • Trade Count: (1)
  • Taperssection Member
  • ***
  • Posts: 265
  • Gender: Male
Re: Edirol R-09HR - Part THREE
« Reply #48 on: October 06, 2008, 06:50:19 PM »
Update: I installed 1.04 successfully, first try, with the 512MB card that came with the recorder.  Why this wouldn't work with my 8gb card I have no idea.

Someone asked which card that is, and it's a Transend 8GB HC card, class 2.


Offline Dede2002

  • Trade Count: (0)
  • Taperssection All-Star
  • ****
  • Posts: 1217
  • Gender: Male
Re: Edirol R-09HR - Part THREE
« Reply #49 on: October 06, 2008, 08:37:10 PM »
Update: I installed 1.04 successfully, first try, with the 512MB card that came with the recorder.  Why this wouldn't work with my 8gb card I have no idea.

Someone asked which card that is, and it's a Transend 8GB HC card, class 2.



That was me.
Please, don't take me wrong, I have nothing against your choice of SD cards,
but there are lots and lots of similar cases ( errors etc) with Transend SD cards. Weird.
Anyway, it`s good to know that right now everything is OK.
Take care  ;)
Mics..........................SP-CMC-8, HLSC-1 and HLSO-MICRO
BB and Preamps........MM Micro bb / MM Custom Elite bb / Church 9100
                              
Recorders...................Tascam DR-100MKIII, Marantz PMD 620 MKII, Edirol R-09

Offline jmz93

  • Trade Count: (1)
  • Taperssection Member
  • ***
  • Posts: 265
  • Gender: Male
Re: Edirol R-09HR - Part THREE
« Reply #50 on: October 06, 2008, 11:37:44 PM »
That was me.
Please, don't take me wrong, I have nothing against your choice of SD cards,
but there are lots and lots of similar cases ( errors etc) with Transend SD cards. Weird.
Anyway, it`s good to know that right now everything is OK.
Take care  ;)

Yep, I set it to record 24/96 wav for awhile and let the card fill up ... no problems.

What brand of card are you using in yours? I might get a 16GB card since I seem to derive pleasure from knowing I'm recording so many 1's and 0's, even though I can't hear a difference between 44.1K and 96K. :) Which brand would you recommend?

Offline gmm6797

  • Trade Count: (10)
  • Needs to get out more...
  • *****
  • Posts: 3591
  • Gender: Male
  • Schoeps MK4 > nBoxPlat > Sony A10/SDMixPre6/SD 722
    • Homepage
Re: Edirol R-09HR - Part THREE
« Reply #51 on: October 06, 2008, 11:47:40 PM »
16gb adata and kingston work for me/mine

Offline Dede2002

  • Trade Count: (0)
  • Taperssection All-Star
  • ****
  • Posts: 1217
  • Gender: Male
Re: Edirol R-09HR - Part THREE
« Reply #52 on: October 07, 2008, 10:39:04 AM »
That was me.
Please, don't take me wrong, I have nothing against your choice of SD cards,
but there are lots and lots of similar cases ( errors etc) with Transend SD cards. Weird.
Anyway, it`s good to know that right now everything is OK.
Take care  ;)

Yep, I set it to record 24/96 wav for awhile and let the card fill up ... no problems.

What brand of card are you using in yours? I might get a 16GB card since I seem to derive pleasure from knowing I'm recording so many 1's and 0's, even though I can't hear a difference between 44.1K and 96K. :) Which brand would you recommend?


Hi,

Well, Kingston cards. Not because I'm some sort of an expert or something like that, but because I've never heard a single bad word about that particular brand. I use 4GB and 8 GB class 6 , no problems so far.
On the other hand, I've seen zillions of negative posts regarding Transcend ( Transend?) SD cards.
Take care  ;)


Mics..........................SP-CMC-8, HLSC-1 and HLSO-MICRO
BB and Preamps........MM Micro bb / MM Custom Elite bb / Church 9100
                              
Recorders...................Tascam DR-100MKIII, Marantz PMD 620 MKII, Edirol R-09

Offline udovdh

  • Trade Count: (0)
  • Taperssection Member
  • ***
  • Posts: 986
Re: Edirol R-09HR - Part THREE
« Reply #53 on: October 07, 2008, 01:06:33 PM »
On the other hand, I've seen zillions of negative posts regarding Transcend ( Transend?) SD cards.
My Transcends work without any problem. 4G SD and SDHC's.

Offline JD

  • Trade Count: (9)
  • Taperssection All-Star
  • ****
  • Posts: 1643
Re: Edirol R-09HR - Part THREE
« Reply #54 on: October 07, 2008, 01:12:38 PM »
FWIW, I never had any problems with Transcend cards in either my R09 or R09hr.
Mics: DPA 4022, 4060; Nevaton MC51, MCE400; Gefell sms2000, m20, m21, m27
Pres: DPA MMA6000; Grace V2; Portico 5012; Sonosax SX-M2
Recorders: Edirol R09hr, Sound Devices 722

Offline Dede2002

  • Trade Count: (0)
  • Taperssection All-Star
  • ****
  • Posts: 1217
  • Gender: Male
Re: Edirol R-09HR - Part THREE
« Reply #55 on: October 07, 2008, 01:18:13 PM »
I'm not saying that all Transcend cards are bad. I only found strange that there are many cases related to that brand. Thats' all.  :coolguy:

P.S.: What FWIW stands for?  ;)
« Last Edit: October 07, 2008, 01:20:27 PM by Dede2002 »
Mics..........................SP-CMC-8, HLSC-1 and HLSO-MICRO
BB and Preamps........MM Micro bb / MM Custom Elite bb / Church 9100
                              
Recorders...................Tascam DR-100MKIII, Marantz PMD 620 MKII, Edirol R-09

Offline JD

  • Trade Count: (9)
  • Taperssection All-Star
  • ****
  • Posts: 1643
Re: Edirol R-09HR - Part THREE
« Reply #56 on: October 07, 2008, 01:23:16 PM »
P.S.: What FWIW stands for?  ;)

For What Its Worth
Mics: DPA 4022, 4060; Nevaton MC51, MCE400; Gefell sms2000, m20, m21, m27
Pres: DPA MMA6000; Grace V2; Portico 5012; Sonosax SX-M2
Recorders: Edirol R09hr, Sound Devices 722

Offline Dede2002

  • Trade Count: (0)
  • Taperssection All-Star
  • ****
  • Posts: 1217
  • Gender: Male
Re: Edirol R-09HR - Part THREE
« Reply #57 on: October 07, 2008, 01:24:35 PM »
P.S.: What FWIW stands for?  ;)

For What Its Worth

Thanks a lot, friend ;)
Mics..........................SP-CMC-8, HLSC-1 and HLSO-MICRO
BB and Preamps........MM Micro bb / MM Custom Elite bb / Church 9100
                              
Recorders...................Tascam DR-100MKIII, Marantz PMD 620 MKII, Edirol R-09

Offline su6oxone

  • Trade Count: (38)
  • Needs to get out more...
  • *****
  • Posts: 2761
Re: Edirol R-09HR - Part THREE
« Reply #58 on: October 07, 2008, 11:31:10 PM »
I'm not saying that all Transcend cards are bad. I only found strange that there are many cases related to that brand. Thats' all.  :coolguy:

P.S.: What FWIW stands for?  ;)

FWIW, I also had the 'slow card' message with Transcend cards with the R-09 but no problems recordings so far.  8)

Offline Datfly

  • Trade Count: (10)
  • Taperssection Member
  • ***
  • Posts: 322
Re: Edirol R-09HR - Part THREE
« Reply #59 on: October 08, 2008, 09:04:05 AM »
I used my Edirol R-09HR for the first time last night and I have a question.

Set Up: Edirol > Church Ugly Pre > DPA-4060

The Edirol was set Mic Gain low > Low Cut Off ( Recorded in 48K-24B )
The Church Ugly was set a 11 o'clock (Unity gain)
The mics were used in the LINE IN Jack.

I was about 20' from a EV stack in a small club to test this set up
for the first time, the band was The Blues Travelers.

My levels were slamming so hard that I had to use the level input button
on the Edirol and bring it down to 10 or 11 just to keep the levels between 12 & 6 on the screen.

Is going that low ( since the HR goes to 80 ) a problem ?


Thanks for any input.
Datfly
« Last Edit: October 08, 2008, 11:04:50 AM by Datfly »
Mics: Schoeps MK41's - Ass't Shure & Sennheiser for stage
Pre-Amps: Naiant Tinybox 2.2 o/t 
Cables: Nbob Actives V1
Recorders: Zoom F8nPro - F3 - H6 x 3 + Tascam DR-2d x 2
Panasonic ZS100 4K X 2
Sony NX80 4K | Sony AX700 4K  X 4 Camcorders
Canon 5D MK III
Canon 300 2.8 IS II | Canon 70-200 2.8 IS II | Canon 24-70 2.8 II | Canon 16-35 4.0

 

RSS | Mobile
Page created in 0.08 seconds with 40 queries.
© 2002-2024 Taperssection.com
Powered by SMF