Become a Site Supporter and Never see Ads again!

Author Topic: Sensitivity of low-sens-modded SP-CMC-8 compared to DPA 4061  (Read 8160 times)

0 Members and 1 Guest are viewing this topic.

Offline Arni99

  • Trade Count: (0)
  • Taperssection Member
  • ***
  • Posts: 770
  • Gender: Male
Sensitivity of low-sens-modded SP-CMC-8 compared to DPA 4061
« on: March 31, 2008, 09:32:38 AM »
I ran a short test and it showed the 4.7k-low-sens-modded SP-CMC-8(AT943´s) cardioids are about 3-4db LESS sensitive than the DPA 4061 omnidirectionals.

I recorded the same song at the same volume and the same gain on my HI-MD recorder with each of the mics.
The recorded volume of the 4061`s was 3,7db louder than the AT943´s.
In Audacity I chose "amplify" up to 0db(no clipping allowed) and +3.7db was the result of max. amplification for the AT943-wav-file.
Maybe useful information for some of you.
 ::)
« Last Edit: March 31, 2008, 09:41:14 AM by Arni99 »
1st: SONY PCM-M10 + DPA 4060's + DPA MPS 6030 power supply (microdot)
2nd: iPhone 5 + "Rode iXY" microphone/"Zoom IQ5" microphone

Offline dactylus

  • Site Supporter
  • Trade Count: (62)
  • Needs to get out more...
  • *
  • Posts: 5992
  • Gender: Male
  • Maplewood, MN
Re: Sensitivity of low-sens-modded SP-CMC-8 compared to DPA 4061
« Reply #1 on: March 31, 2008, 09:40:44 AM »
I ran a short test and it showed the 4.7k-low-sens-modded SP-CMC-8(AT943´s) cardioids are about 3-4db LESS sensitive than the DPA 4061 omnidirectionals.
Maybe useful information for some of you.
 ::)



You wouldn't hazard a guess as to how the unmodded SP-CMC-8(AT943´s) cardioids would compare to the dpa 4061's "dB-wise" would you?

 ::)

hot licks > microphones > recorder



...ball of confusion, that's what the world is today, hey hey...

Offline Arni99

  • Trade Count: (0)
  • Taperssection Member
  • ***
  • Posts: 770
  • Gender: Male
Re: Sensitivity of low-sens-modded SP-CMC-8 compared to DPA 4061
« Reply #2 on: March 31, 2008, 09:45:09 AM »
I ran a short test and it showed the 4.7k-low-sens-modded SP-CMC-8(AT943´s) cardioids are about 3-4db LESS sensitive than the DPA 4061 omnidirectionals.
Maybe useful information for some of you.
 ::)



You wouldn't hazard a guess as to how the unmodded SP-CMC-8(AT943´s) cardioids would compare to the dpa 4061's "dB-wise" would you?

 ::)


I GUESS unmodded AT943s should bring +10 db to +12db compared to the modded ones.
=> unmodded AT943s should be somewhere between dpa4060´s and DPA4061´s regarding sensitivity.
=>unmodded AT943´s / DPA 4061´s: +6db to +8db/DPA 4061 at 0dB
« Last Edit: March 31, 2008, 09:48:17 AM by Arni99 »
1st: SONY PCM-M10 + DPA 4060's + DPA MPS 6030 power supply (microdot)
2nd: iPhone 5 + "Rode iXY" microphone/"Zoom IQ5" microphone

Offline Arni99

  • Trade Count: (0)
  • Taperssection Member
  • ***
  • Posts: 770
  • Gender: Male
Re: Sensitivity of low-sens-modded SP-CMC-8 compared to DPA 4061
« Reply #3 on: April 02, 2008, 09:28:01 AM »
Tonight I´ll try to make 2 recordings from the same show with my 2 mics and 2 recorders.
DPA4061+bbox+iriver rockboxed
low-sens sp-cmc-8+bbox+MZ-RH1

If all turns out as supposed to, this will show how these mics sound under the same circumstances.
« Last Edit: April 02, 2008, 09:36:49 AM by Arni99 »
1st: SONY PCM-M10 + DPA 4060's + DPA MPS 6030 power supply (microdot)
2nd: iPhone 5 + "Rode iXY" microphone/"Zoom IQ5" microphone

Offline Belexes

  • Trade Count: (10)
  • Needs to get out more...
  • *****
  • Posts: 5223
  • Gender: Male
Re: Sensitivity of low-sens-modded SP-CMC-8 compared to DPA 4061
« Reply #4 on: April 02, 2008, 09:43:44 AM »
Interested in the comp Arni, let us know what you find.
Busman Audio BSC1-K1/K2/K3/K4 > HiHo Silver XLR's > Deck TBD

CA-14 (c,o)/MM-HLSC-1 (4.7k mod)/AT853(4.7k mod)(c,o,h,sc)/CAFS (o)/CA-1 (o) > CA-9100 (V. 4.1)/CA-9200/CA-UBB > Sony PCM-D50/Sony PCM-M10

Offline Church-Audio

  • Trade Count: (44)
  • Needs to get out more...
  • *****
  • Posts: 7571
  • Gender: Male
Re: Sensitivity of low-sens-modded SP-CMC-8 compared to DPA 4061
« Reply #5 on: April 02, 2008, 10:29:40 AM »
Tonight I´ll try to make 2 recordings from the same show with my 2 mics and 2 recorders.
DPA4061+bbox+iriver rockboxed
low-sens sp-cmc-8+bbox+MZ-RH1

If all turns out as supposed to, this will show how these mics sound under the same circumstances.


Remember that an omni mic will always be louder or at least appear to be louder because its omni directional.. And a cardioid will always appear to be lower in volume. The only true way to test sensitivity is not with a music source but a steady 1k you can also use 250hz and 10khz and average them out The test tone source should be no further then 6" from the microphones this eliminates the directionality factor of the microphones. This test is not exactly how I do it but its close enough that you will get an idea.  I hope this helps.

Both microphones should be on the same axis when doing this test btw.


for warranty returns email me at
EMAIL Sales@church-audio.com

Offline Arni99

  • Trade Count: (0)
  • Taperssection Member
  • ***
  • Posts: 770
  • Gender: Male
Re: Sensitivity of low-sens-modded SP-CMC-8 compared to DPA 4061
« Reply #6 on: April 02, 2008, 11:15:30 AM »
Tonight I´ll try to make 2 recordings from the same show with my 2 mics and 2 recorders.
DPA4061+bbox+iriver rockboxed
low-sens sp-cmc-8+bbox+MZ-RH1

If all turns out as supposed to, this will show how these mics sound under the same circumstances.


Remember that an omni mic will always be louder or at least appear to be louder because its omni directional.. And a cardioid will always appear to be lower in volume. The only true way to test sensitivity is not with a music source but a steady 1k you can also use 250hz and 10khz and average them out The test tone source should be no further then 6" from the microphones this eliminates the directionality factor of the microphones. This test is not exactly how I do it but its close enough that you will get an idea.  I hope this helps.

Both microphones should be on the same axis when doing this test btw.



Of course I can´t measure my mics professionally.
I just wanted to know which of my 2 mics is less sensitive for setting levels correctly at the show tonight in order to avoid a clipped recording at the beginning ;).
Now I know I can start using my "DPA-gain-levels" with my cards and the MZ-RH1 as the cards seem to be 3-4dB less sensitive.

expected levels for this show at this venue: (been there many times and recorded many shows yet.)
25 of 30 gain on the MZ-RH1 using line in and a bbox with the low-sens-modded AT943s.
+10 to +15 gain on the dpa4061/bbox/iriver using "safety-clip" for LOWERING levels automatically.


My mics are mounted, I´m ready to record HAHA.
Still 3 1/2 hours until the show begins.....;)
1st: SONY PCM-M10 + DPA 4060's + DPA MPS 6030 power supply (microdot)
2nd: iPhone 5 + "Rode iXY" microphone/"Zoom IQ5" microphone

Offline Liquid Drum

  • Trade Count: (3)
  • Taperssection Member
  • ***
  • Posts: 661
  • Gender: Male
Re: Sensitivity of low-sens-modded SP-CMC-8 compared to DPA 4061
« Reply #7 on: April 02, 2008, 11:20:10 AM »
Nice one Arni, good luck. Interested in your results.

 :)
Mics:
AT933/C

Batt-Boxes, Pre-amps:
CA-9100

Recorders:
Edirol R-09
iRiver H120 (CF Modded)
Sony MZ-RH910 Hi-MD

Video: Canon HV20 E

Offline Church-Audio

  • Trade Count: (44)
  • Needs to get out more...
  • *****
  • Posts: 7571
  • Gender: Male
Re: Sensitivity of low-sens-modded SP-CMC-8 compared to DPA 4061
« Reply #8 on: April 02, 2008, 11:25:07 AM »
Tonight I´ll try to make 2 recordings from the same show with my 2 mics and 2 recorders.
DPA4061+bbox+iriver rockboxed
low-sens sp-cmc-8+bbox+MZ-RH1

If all turns out as supposed to, this will show how these mics sound under the same circumstances.


Remember that an omni mic will always be louder or at least appear to be louder because its omni directional.. And a cardioid will always appear to be lower in volume. The only true way to test sensitivity is not with a music source but a steady 1k you can also use 250hz and 10khz and average them out The test tone source should be no further then 6" from the microphones this eliminates the directionality factor of the microphones. This test is not exactly how I do it but its close enough that you will get an idea.  I hope this helps.

Both microphones should be on the same axis when doing this test btw.



Of course I can´t measure my mics professionally.
I just wanted to know which of my 2 mics is less sensitive for setting levels correctly at the show tonight in order to avoid a clipped recording at the beginning ;).
Now I know I can start using my "DPA-gain-levels" with my cards and the MZ-RH1 as the cards seem to be 3-4dB less sensitive.

expected levels for this show at this venue: (been there many times and recorded many shows yet.)
25 of 30 gain on the MZ-RH1 using line in and a bbox with the low-sens-modded AT943s.
+10 to +15 gain on the dpa4061/bbox/iriver using "safety-clip" for LOWERING levels automatically.


My mics are mounted, I´m ready to record HAHA.
Still 3 1/2 hours until the show begins.....;)


I am sorry I was just trying to help.
for warranty returns email me at
EMAIL Sales@church-audio.com

Offline Arni99

  • Trade Count: (0)
  • Taperssection Member
  • ***
  • Posts: 770
  • Gender: Male
Re: Sensitivity of low-sens-modded SP-CMC-8 compared to DPA 4061
« Reply #9 on: April 02, 2008, 06:08:21 PM »
@Chris: thx for your help+info.  ;)

All is cool ;), will upload one or both(DPA4061/low-sens SP-CMC-8) versions on dime during the next days.
As predicted, MZ-RH1 gain 26 of 30 on line-in with the low-sens-modded cards+bbox was perfect for this loud rock-show in a 300 people club.
Almost forgot to change HI-MDs before the 2nd set started.... ;D

By the way:
Jean Paul Bourelly(guitar+vocals)+Calvin Weston(drums+background vocals)+Melvin Gibbs(bass) rocked the house.
Need some sleep now :P
« Last Edit: April 03, 2008, 02:44:57 AM by Arni99 »
1st: SONY PCM-M10 + DPA 4060's + DPA MPS 6030 power supply (microdot)
2nd: iPhone 5 + "Rode iXY" microphone/"Zoom IQ5" microphone

Offline dactylus

  • Site Supporter
  • Trade Count: (62)
  • Needs to get out more...
  • *
  • Posts: 5992
  • Gender: Male
  • Maplewood, MN
Re: Sensitivity of low-sens-modded SP-CMC-8 compared to DPA 4061
« Reply #10 on: April 02, 2008, 06:39:27 PM »
Tonight I´ll try to make 2 recordings from the same show with my 2 mics and 2 recorders.
DPA4061+bbox+iriver rockboxed
low-sens sp-cmc-8+bbox+MZ-RH1

If all turns out as supposed to, this will show how these mics sound under the same circumstances.


Thanks Arni - Please let us know how it turns out!

 :)

hot licks > microphones > recorder



...ball of confusion, that's what the world is today, hey hey...

Offline Arni99

  • Trade Count: (0)
  • Taperssection Member
  • ***
  • Posts: 770
  • Gender: Male
Re: Sensitivity of low-sens-modded SP-CMC-8 compared to DPA 4061
« Reply #11 on: April 03, 2008, 05:18:00 AM »
Tonight I´ll try to make 2 recordings from the same show with my 2 mics and 2 recorders.
DPA4061+bbox+iriver rockboxed
low-sens sp-cmc-8+bbox+MZ-RH1

If all turns out as supposed to, this will show how these mics sound under the same circumstances.


Thanks Arni - Please let us know how it turns out!

 :)


here the SP-CMC-8 version on DIME with 2 samples
http://www.dimeadozen.org/torrents-details.php?id=191043

« Last Edit: April 03, 2008, 05:54:25 AM by Arni99 »
1st: SONY PCM-M10 + DPA 4060's + DPA MPS 6030 power supply (microdot)
2nd: iPhone 5 + "Rode iXY" microphone/"Zoom IQ5" microphone

Offline Liquid Drum

  • Trade Count: (3)
  • Taperssection Member
  • ***
  • Posts: 661
  • Gender: Male
Re: Sensitivity of low-sens-modded SP-CMC-8 compared to DPA 4061
« Reply #12 on: April 03, 2008, 06:46:50 AM »
^^ Sounds great!! Where were you in the venue?

Would love to hear the DPA source to compare when you have the time.

+t

 :)
Mics:
AT933/C

Batt-Boxes, Pre-amps:
CA-9100

Recorders:
Edirol R-09
iRiver H120 (CF Modded)
Sony MZ-RH910 Hi-MD

Video: Canon HV20 E

Offline dactylus

  • Site Supporter
  • Trade Count: (62)
  • Needs to get out more...
  • *
  • Posts: 5992
  • Gender: Male
  • Maplewood, MN
Re: Sensitivity of low-sens-modded SP-CMC-8 compared to DPA 4061
« Reply #13 on: April 03, 2008, 07:16:53 AM »
Tonight I´ll try to make 2 recordings from the same show with my 2 mics and 2 recorders.
DPA4061+bbox+iriver rockboxed
low-sens sp-cmc-8+bbox+MZ-RH1

If all turns out as supposed to, this will show how these mics sound under the same circumstances.


Thanks Arni - Please let us know how it turns out!

 :)


here the SP-CMC-8 version on DIME with 2 samples
http://www.dimeadozen.org/torrents-details.php?id=191043



Downloading this one now - I'd love to hear the dpa version side by side if you could manage that somehow...

+T


 :)
hot licks > microphones > recorder



...ball of confusion, that's what the world is today, hey hey...

Offline Arni99

  • Trade Count: (0)
  • Taperssection Member
  • ***
  • Posts: 770
  • Gender: Male
Re: Sensitivity of low-sens-modded SP-CMC-8 compared to DPA 4061
« Reply #14 on: April 03, 2008, 09:02:26 AM »
Tonight I´ll try to make 2 recordings from the same show with my 2 mics and 2 recorders.
DPA4061+bbox+iriver rockboxed
low-sens sp-cmc-8+bbox+MZ-RH1

If all turns out as supposed to, this will show how these mics sound under the same circumstances.


Thanks Arni - Please let us know how it turns out!

 :)


here the SP-CMC-8 version on DIME with 2 samples
http://www.dimeadozen.org/torrents-details.php?id=191043



Downloading this one now - I'd love to hear the dpa version side by side if you could manage that somehow...

+T


 :)
Am editing the dpa-version right now ;).
Upload will follow in about 1-2 hours on DIME.
1st: SONY PCM-M10 + DPA 4060's + DPA MPS 6030 power supply (microdot)
2nd: iPhone 5 + "Rode iXY" microphone/"Zoom IQ5" microphone

 

RSS | Mobile
Page created in 0.08 seconds with 39 queries.
© 2002-2024 Taperssection.com
Powered by SMF