Become a Site Supporter and Never see Ads again!

Author Topic: Playback Software  (Read 6648 times)

0 Members and 1 Guest are viewing this topic.

Offline kindms

  • Trade Count: (6)
  • Needs to get out more...
  • *****
  • Posts: 5956
    • The Breakfast
Playback Software
« on: February 22, 2005, 04:56:23 PM »
I was wonder what apps people were using to playback files off their computer bassed listening. I know there have been a few responses about not wanting the computer any where near the hifi etc but what playback software offers the best solution for quality. I have Wavelab 5.0a and it is what I use for editing etc and I usually just use that but it isnt as user friendly for loading hours of music for conitual playback as say winamp.

I bulit an extremely quiet PC for this purpose. I have a nice interconnect coming from leegeedy and I am running a ESI waveterminal 192x -> marantz sr880.

Any recs. on playback apps is greatly appreciated (Free is always nice as well)
AKG c426, AKG414 XLS/ST, AKG ck61, ck22, >nBob colettes >PFA > V3, SD MixPre >  TCM-Mod Tascam HDP2, Sony M10
Little Bear tube Pre >Outlaw Audio 2200 Monoblocks > VR-2's

Offline Lil Kim Jong-Il

  • Trade Count: (6)
  • Needs to get out more...
  • *****
  • Posts: 6498
  • large Marge sent me
Re: Playback Software
« Reply #1 on: February 22, 2005, 05:18:04 PM »
The free version of music match jukebox that does what you want. 


edit:
http://www.musicmatch.com/download/free/?OS=pc&MODE=input&DID=&OEM=MMD&LANG=&SOURCE=getbasic_jbpromo
The first rule of amateur neurosurgery club is .... I forget.

Offline dnsacks

  • Trade Count: (9)
  • Taperssection All-Star
  • ****
  • Posts: 1640
Re: Playback Software
« Reply #2 on: February 22, 2005, 05:21:44 PM »
why not use winamp? 


Offline Tall Adam

  • The Artist Formerly Known as GQJSP
  • Trade Count: (1)
  • Needs to get out more...
  • *****
  • Posts: 3418
  • Gender: Male
Re: Playback Software
« Reply #3 on: February 22, 2005, 05:27:00 PM »
does winamp acutally play back at 24/96 when you play 24/96? i suspect it does because my 24-bit sound card does some funky stuff when i switch between 24 and 16 bit files...but does anyone know for sure. also, is there a newer winamp with gapless playback?

Offline kindms

  • Trade Count: (6)
  • Needs to get out more...
  • *****
  • Posts: 5956
    • The Breakfast
Re: Playback Software
« Reply #4 on: February 22, 2005, 05:57:14 PM »
Wiamp will palyback 24bit files if your soundcard supports it. You have to go in and select the soundcard in Winamp to do this sometimes.  It sometimes will default to the windows audio driver
AKG c426, AKG414 XLS/ST, AKG ck61, ck22, >nBob colettes >PFA > V3, SD MixPre >  TCM-Mod Tascam HDP2, Sony M10
Little Bear tube Pre >Outlaw Audio 2200 Monoblocks > VR-2's

Offline Tall Adam

  • The Artist Formerly Known as GQJSP
  • Trade Count: (1)
  • Needs to get out more...
  • *****
  • Posts: 3418
  • Gender: Male
Re: Playback Software
« Reply #5 on: February 22, 2005, 06:05:07 PM »
nah my echo is the default. thanks! +T

Offline ducati

  • Trade Count: (3)
  • Taperssection Member
  • ***
  • Posts: 572
  • I'm a llama!
Re: Playback Software
« Reply #6 on: February 23, 2005, 08:55:00 AM »
I did a shootout between playback software a few years ago and was shocked at the results.  Playback software SIGNIFICANTLY alters the sound you get out of your files.  I was running my Dell lappy > EMI 2|6 > dCS Delius at 24/96, and some playback apps caused the Delius to lose lock if I had the DAC in "narrow mode."  Narrow mode was better sounding on the Delius, and related to the PLL lock that it would perform on the incoming datastream.  You could switch it to "wide mode" for jittery sources, but this somewhat softened and diffused the soundfield to a negative degree, as I recall.

Anyway, even among the apps that I could get to lock with "narrow" I found a wide variability in the sound quality.

I am sorry I don't have the results of my test, but I specifically recall WinAmp was the WORST sounding alternative, and either Wavelab or CoolEdit was the best (I am thinking it was CoolEdit...  don't remember).  Since all my 24/96 files were very large, I didn't care too much that I had to get up and re-load the tune every hour or so.  Now this was when I was *really* listening... If I was just putting on background tunes WinAmp was fine.

FWIW WinAmp will definitely output 24 bit.

Offline Nick in Edinboro

  • Wishes he was fishing right now...
  • Trade Count: (0)
  • Needs to get out more...
  • *****
  • Posts: 2924
  • Gender: Male
  • Toshiba SD3690 > HK AR-20 > B&K ST-140 > Axiom M22
    • moepics.com - share your shots of moe.
Re: Playback Software
« Reply #7 on: February 23, 2005, 09:58:38 AM »
FooBar 2000 is cool too, small footprint, low cpu usage.  http://www.foobar2000.org/
Oktava MC012's (dorseymod) > UA-5 (digmod) > JB3
http://braintuba.no-ip.com

Offline kindms

  • Trade Count: (6)
  • Needs to get out more...
  • *****
  • Posts: 5956
    • The Breakfast
Re: Playback Software
« Reply #8 on: February 23, 2005, 12:08:22 PM »
Great responses. I would have to agree that when listening to full shows this becomes less of an issue.

I will continue to use Wavelab. Glad to hear it did well in your earlier trials.
AKG c426, AKG414 XLS/ST, AKG ck61, ck22, >nBob colettes >PFA > V3, SD MixPre >  TCM-Mod Tascam HDP2, Sony M10
Little Bear tube Pre >Outlaw Audio 2200 Monoblocks > VR-2's

Offline Tall Adam

  • The Artist Formerly Known as GQJSP
  • Trade Count: (1)
  • Needs to get out more...
  • *****
  • Posts: 3418
  • Gender: Male
Re: Playback Software
« Reply #9 on: February 23, 2005, 12:12:01 PM »
unless its a full tracked, then what do you do?

Offline kindms

  • Trade Count: (6)
  • Needs to get out more...
  • *****
  • Posts: 5956
    • The Breakfast
Re: Playback Software
« Reply #10 on: February 23, 2005, 12:26:33 PM »
good point I didnt think of that. hmmm. will files paly 1 after another if loaded in wavelab as a montage ?
AKG c426, AKG414 XLS/ST, AKG ck61, ck22, >nBob colettes >PFA > V3, SD MixPre >  TCM-Mod Tascam HDP2, Sony M10
Little Bear tube Pre >Outlaw Audio 2200 Monoblocks > VR-2's

Offline ducati

  • Trade Count: (3)
  • Taperssection Member
  • ***
  • Posts: 572
  • I'm a llama!
Re: Playback Software
« Reply #11 on: February 23, 2005, 01:57:48 PM »
Good question--my 24 bit shows have never been tracked out (at the time I was just burning as one long file to a DVD-V), so I am not sure of that.

Pressing play after every tune would be annoying, rather like flipping my 45s after every tune.

Offline Tim

  • Trade Count: (1)
  • Needs to get out more...
  • *****
  • Posts: 32913
  • Gender: Male
Re: Playback Software
« Reply #12 on: February 23, 2005, 04:05:50 PM »
why not use winamp?



I've never liked the way winamp sounded... maybe it's just me
I’ve had a few weird experiences and a few close brushes with total weirdness of one sort or another, but nothing that’s really freaked me out or made me feel too awful about it. - Jerry Garcia

Offline Tim

  • Trade Count: (1)
  • Needs to get out more...
  • *****
  • Posts: 32913
  • Gender: Male
Re: Playback Software
« Reply #13 on: February 23, 2005, 04:06:43 PM »
I did a shootout between playback software a few years ago and was shocked at the results. Playback software SIGNIFICANTLY alters the sound you get out of your files. I was running my Dell lappy > EMI 2|6 > dCS Delius at 24/96, and some playback apps caused the Delius to lose lock if I had the DAC in "narrow mode." Narrow mode was better sounding on the Delius, and related to the PLL lock that it would perform on the incoming datastream. You could switch it to "wide mode" for jittery sources, but this somewhat softened and diffused the soundfield to a negative degree, as I recall.

Anyway, even among the apps that I could get to lock with "narrow" I found a wide variability in the sound quality.

I am sorry I don't have the results of my test, but I specifically recall WinAmp was the WORST sounding alternative, and either Wavelab or CoolEdit was the best (I am thinking it was CoolEdit... don't remember). Since all my 24/96 files were very large, I didn't care too much that I had to get up and re-load the tune every hour or so. Now this was when I was *really* listening... If I was just putting on background tunes WinAmp was fine.

FWIW WinAmp will definitely output 24 bit.

apparently it isn't just me :P

spoke too soon, glad to see someone has actually done some a/b's though
I’ve had a few weird experiences and a few close brushes with total weirdness of one sort or another, but nothing that’s really freaked me out or made me feel too awful about it. - Jerry Garcia

Offline ducati

  • Trade Count: (3)
  • Taperssection Member
  • ***
  • Posts: 572
  • I'm a llama!
Re: Playback Software
« Reply #14 on: February 24, 2005, 08:28:25 AM »
 ;D

 

RSS | Mobile
Page created in 0.069 seconds with 39 queries.
© 2002-2024 Taperssection.com
Powered by SMF