Topic: interesting comment by Doug

[Brian]

v3>flash tracker is an all-in-one solution?  seems like two boxes to me. allbeit, the maudio is smaller than the v2, but it's still two boxes

[nic]

v3>flash tracker is an all-in-one solution?  seems like two boxes to me. allbeit, the maudio is smaller than the v2, but it's still two boxes

I think your misunderstanding him as he said the 722 was not a 1-box-solution for HIM as it required a pre in front of it(according to his ears)

[Brian]

yeah i think it's too early for me to post at TS.com

i just re-read your posts Todd......sorry for the misunderstanding

[CQBert]

When I was at Cochella I ran CCM4's in front of the 722 and the bass was overpowering..  mainly the fault of the sound guys IMO. 

I am back home now and running my ADK's again.  Prior to the 722 I ran a V3 and nearly always ran a bass roll of at 75htz at 12db/octave... never had boom or muddy low end.

After Cochella I decided to do the bass roll off with the 722...  changed it to 40htz and 18db/octave on the 722 and had a fantastic result.

FWIW I am not a fan of overpowering sub bass that has been digitally created at the booth...  give me solid, tight low end that makes the music whole, not thump thump like a cheesy honda with a 15 in sub in it you can here for 3 blocks!

CQBert

[dmonterisi]

changed it to 40htz and 18db/octave on the 722 and had a fantastic result.

whoa!  that's a serious roll-off...18db an octave??  not my speed...

[bkirby]

Has anyone tried 24/192 into the 722/744 either line/mic-in or V3>722 via. coax or aes/ebu?

[dmonterisi]

Has anyone tried 24/192 into the 722/744 either line/mic-in or V3>722 via. coax or aes/ebu?

i don't think you can do 24/192 over coax??  the v3 only does it via dual output AES right?

[Tim]

24/192 requires dual aes I believe

[Brian]

Has anyone tried 24/192 into the 722/744 either line/mic-in or V3>722 via. coax or aes/ebu?

i don't think you can do 24/192 over coax?? the v3 only does it via dual output AES right?

24/192 requires dual aes I believe

you guys have me second guessing myself now(must research) but I believe you can do 192 over an AES line.  Even the latest toslink optical inputs can handle 192.  hmmmmmm.  i'll have to do some reading up

[bkirby]

I don't have anything that will record 24/192, so I'm not sure. It may be only through dual aes/ebu. What about mic/line-in to the 722/744 at 24/192?

[nickgregory]

I don't have anything that will record 24/192, so I'm not sure. It may be only through dual aes/ebu. What about mic/line-in to the 722/744 at 24/192?

scott brown did an ABB show 4022->722 I believe (though he may have had the mytek in that lineage) during the beacon run

[Tim]

Has anyone tried 24/192 into the 722/744 either line/mic-in or V3>722 via. coax or aes/ebu?

i don't think you can do 24/192 over coax?? the v3 only does it via dual output AES right?

24/192 requires dual aes I believe

you guys have me second guessing myself now(must research) but I believe you can do 192 over an AES line. Even the latest toslink optical inputs can handle 192. hmmmmmm. i'll have to do some reading up

I could very well be wrong, I'd like to know the answer but that is what I always thought. Maybe that was the case when the V3 came out 2.5 years ago?

[heath]

i've never seen 192 carried over a single aes cable.  every 192 transfer i've ever done has been via wide wire (dual).  i'll have to checck the AES specs...

[Tim]

i've never seen 192 carried over a single aes cable. every 192 transfer i've ever done has been via wide wire (dual). i'll have to checck the AES specs...

yeah but really what do you know about audio?

[heath]

there is an emerging standard for single wire 192.  I guess I was mistaken (or just haven't kept up with the latest news)