0 Members and 1 Guest are viewing this topic.
So a 32gb SDHC will work in the M10? I thought it only was supported for 16gb max?
Word of warning...I took my microsd card out of the m10 and put it in my card reader just a little askew and I had to use pliers to yank the card out. The card was fine but then I decided not to use the card reader any more.
Quote from: rastasean on October 15, 2011, 10:33:11 AMWord of warning...I took my microsd card out of the m10 and put it in my card reader just a little askew and I had to use pliers to yank the card out. The card was fine but then I decided not to use the card reader any more. My Sandisk card reader is no better. My microSD card slot leaves only 2mm of card out so I have to use pliers every time. Disappointing but hey, at least it functions as a card reader should.
Not sure if this is the right place to post this, but noticed one of my 24 bit recordings (a sbd recording) after encoding to flac and to 16 bit, the file size was pretty low (271mb for 16 files, 1 hour 34 minute show). Also saw this - http://bt.etree.org/details.php?id=549154 also a 24 to 16 bit recording from a sony pcm-m10 that seems that the file size was low (515mb for a 2 hour 45 minute show). Is this common with the sony pcm-m10 recorder? Maybe i'm overlooking something
Quote from: concordniners on October 18, 2011, 11:32:07 AMNot sure if this is the right place to post this, but noticed one of my 24 bit recordings (a sbd recording) after encoding to flac and to 16 bit, the file size was pretty low (271mb for 16 files, 1 hour 34 minute show). Also saw this - http://bt.etree.org/details.php?id=549154 also a 24 to 16 bit recording from a sony pcm-m10 that seems that the file size was low (515mb for a 2 hour 45 minute show). Is this common with the sony pcm-m10 recorder? Maybe i'm overlooking somethingI can see this happening; it's nothing to do with your M10 (all digital recorders do this). When you're recording from the desk at 24/48 and then dumb down (or record at 16/44), a desk recording usually doesn't have a lot of "special" frequencies or separation between channels. In fact, if your board feed was closer to a MONO feed, FLAC can almost dumb it down to one-channel's worth of bandwidth and then add the extra bits it needs. hen you have an audience pull, the frequencies are more involved and more separate in each channel making FLAC's life harder and you'll usually see a compression rate (at FLAC of maybe 65-70% of the original file size.Hope I've helped.
internal mics on the Sony pcm-10 are very good in my opinon if you are in the sweet spot when stealthing, looking for reasons to add external's for stealth recording please provide Constructive criticism of this recording..pm's welcomed.. http://dl.dropbox.com/u/3425026/jacksonbrowne%202011-10-12.zip
Quote from: gdplusmore on October 19, 2011, 07:56:35 PMinternal mics on the Sony pcm-10 are very good in my opinon if you are in the sweet spot when stealthing, looking for reasons to add external's for stealth recording please provide Constructive criticism of this recording..pm's welcomed.. http://dl.dropbox.com/u/3425026/jacksonbrowne%202011-10-12.zipThe fidelity of the recording sounds surprisingly good to me. I would be more than happy with recordings of this quality while saving up for external mics. However I hear no stereo separation in the recording (the result of using omni mics spaced only a few inches apart). I find recordings with stereo separation much more enjoyable to listen to even in cases where the monitors are basically producing a mono sound and you only notice the separation in the room ambiance. I would recommend trying good external mics for that reason alone, besides their other benefits.
^yes. I was surprised to find that the channels danced so differently on the meters, considering the mics are so close together. The left does seem to peak a little hotter, though the overall balance isn't as bad. It isn't audible.
