Topic: m248 vs. V3 ACM

[rasta]

opinions on the 2?

[OFOTD]

opinions on the 2?

First and foremost the 248 is a preamp only.   So you may want to ask the question a little different.  V3 pre vs. m248. 

As far as the a/d section in the ACM V3 vs. the 722 you have  No contest.  The ACM V3 a/d section runs circles around the 722 a/d. 

Of the differences between the 248 and V3 pres there are tons of threads here with people's opinions.  Alot also depends on what mics you're using.

[rasta]

opinions on the 2?

First and foremost the 248 is a preamp only.   So you may want to ask the question a little different.  V3 pre vs. m248. 

As far as the a/d section in the ACM V3 vs. the 722 you have  No contest.  The ACM V3 a/d section runs circles around the 722 a/d. 

Of the differences between the 248 and V3 pres there are tons of threads here with people's opinions.  Alot also depends on what mics you're using.

Thank you.  I didn't make it clear that I would like to still use the 722 A/D.

[Wiggler]

My understanding is that the ACM Doug does to the V3 only affects the A/D stage of the unit.
If you are going to use the 722s A/D a stock V3 should be just as affective.
See this thread pretaining to the V3 ACM.
http://taperssection.com/index.php/topic,79244.0.html

[rasta]

My understanding is that the ACM Doug does to the V3 only affects the A/D stage of the unit.
If you are going to use the 722s A/D a stock V3 should be just as affective.
See this thread pretaining to the V3 ACM.
http://taperssection.com/index.php/topic,79244.0.html

Thanks for that clarification.
+T everyone