Become a Site Supporter and Never see Ads again!

Author Topic: Cambridge Audio Azur 640R Receiver  (Read 5517 times)

0 Members and 1 Guest are viewing this topic.

Offline Nick's Picks

  • Trade Count: (33)
  • Needs to get out more...
  • *****
  • Posts: 10260
  • Gender: Male
  • I thought I heard.......
Cambridge Audio Azur 640R Receiver
« on: December 20, 2009, 09:48:34 AM »
http://nickspicks.com/?cat=5

Still under construction, but my initial blog notes are up.

Offline jlykos

  • Trade Count: (6)
  • Needs to get out more...
  • *****
  • Posts: 4416
  • Gender: Male
  • Don't sweat the technique
Re: Cambridge Audio Azur 640R Receiver
« Reply #1 on: December 20, 2009, 10:18:48 AM »
Nice.  I have the 840A integrated amplifier and love it.  I use it to drive my B&W CDM1SE speakers which, while bookshelf speakers, are very power-hungry.  The 120 watts per channel that the 840A outputs drive them nicely; I don't see myself upgrading for quite a while.
« Last Edit: December 20, 2009, 10:47:09 AM by jlykos »
dpa 4061 > Church Audio 9200 > Sony PCM-D50 (Moon Audio Silver Dragon v3 interconnect)

"I have no views," Mickey Melchiondo, known as Dean Ween, said in a philosophical moment. "I am way too stupid. I have no strong feelings about anything. I'm really into television and the computer. I believe everything I see on TV and read on the Internet."

Offline Nick's Picks

  • Trade Count: (33)
  • Needs to get out more...
  • *****
  • Posts: 10260
  • Gender: Male
  • I thought I heard.......
Re: Cambridge Audio Azur 640R Receiver
« Reply #2 on: December 20, 2009, 10:29:03 AM »
everything i"ve heard from the Cambridge line (a few integrated, one set of seperates)...was absolutely pleasing to me, no matter what speakers were in front of them.  Most of the demo's I've heard were through Paradigm towers or ML Vista/Vantage.

Offline Jimna

  • Zappa for President
  • Trade Count: (3)
  • Needs to get out more...
  • *****
  • Posts: 9639
  • Gender: Male
  • Audio DeutchKraft & Busman Audio
    • F.M.Record Company
Re: Cambridge Audio Azur 640R Receiver
« Reply #3 on: December 20, 2009, 11:42:02 AM »
i cant believe you think it sounds better than the t00bs.  must be the difference in wattage.
Co-Founder of F.M.Recording 
SD: Busman Audio BSC1-K1/K2/K3/K4 > Grace Lunatec V3 > Busman Hybrid R4
LD: ADK A-51TL MP > Busman Hybrid R4
+ 48 Channel Multi-track rig

Canon 5D Mark II, Canon 2x Extender Mark III, Canon 15mm f2.8, Canon 85mm f/1.8 USM, Canon 100mm Macro f2.8, Canon 16-35mm L f2.8, Canon 24-70mm L f/2.8, Canon 70-200mm L f2.8 IS, Canon ST-E2, Canon 580ex II (x2), Canon 430ex II, PocketWizard PLUS II(x4), Radiopopper PX System

http://jmimna.com/

Information is not knowledge
Knowledge is not wisdom
Wisdom is not truth
Truth is not beauty
Beauty is not love
Love is not music
Music is THE BEST
-FZ

Offline Nick's Picks

  • Trade Count: (33)
  • Needs to get out more...
  • *****
  • Posts: 10260
  • Gender: Male
  • I thought I heard.......
Re: Cambridge Audio Azur 640R Receiver
« Reply #4 on: December 20, 2009, 05:29:44 PM »
the stingray didn't suck..., but this is just a completely different presentation.  I'm enamoured by its newness

Offline Todd R

  • Over/Under on next gear purchase: 2 months
  • Trade Count: (29)
  • Needs to get out more...
  • *****
  • Posts: 4901
  • Gender: Male
Re: Cambridge Audio Azur 640R Receiver
« Reply #5 on: December 21, 2009, 11:48:14 AM »
Thanks for the review Nick!  I've got the 540R and like it quite a bit.  And I learned something from your review about the analog direct option.

I used to own the CA 540A integrated amp and liked that quite a bit too.  Also had a CA CD player, 500CD maybe?  CA is definitely my go-to company for audio electronics.  Not to say by any means that you can't do better, but CA always makes quality audio gear from my experience.
Mics: Microtech Gefell m20/m21 (nbob/pfa actives), Line Audio CM3, Church CA-11 cards
Preamp:  none <sniff>
Recorders:  Sound Devices MixPre-6, Sony PCM-M10, Zoom H4nPro

Offline whiskybob

  • Trade Count: (0)
  • Taperssection Newbie
  • *
  • Posts: 44
Re: Cambridge Audio Azur 640R Receiver
« Reply #6 on: January 01, 2010, 11:08:33 AM »
Nice review, I'm looking at one of these. Here in the U.K best price is £349.00, can be found here...
http://www.richersounds.com/showclearanceproduct/CAMB-640R-BLK/Cambridge+640r+Blk.html
I'm currently using a Azur 640A V2 hooked up to my P.C/Tape deck(Aiwa AD-S950)/Tuner(denon TU1800)/CD player(Azur 640C)/Turntable9Marantz TT-42/Cambridge Audio 540P Pre Amp all played through TDL bookshelf speakers and although there are certainly better set ups available you really can't beat this for value especially the Amplifier.



Edirol R09HR   Sony M10 
CA14 Omni's  CA14 Cards  
CA11 Omni's CA 1's  CS Binaurials
CA9100 Pre-amp CA Batt Box

Cambridge Audio Azur640Amp  Cambridge Audio Azur 640 Cd Player
Cambridge Audio 640Pre amp  Marantz Turntable TT-44  Denon t1800 Tuner
Aiwa AD-S950 tape deck  Yamaha K-939 Tape Deck

Severely outdated trade list
http://db.etree.org/oddball

Offline ducati

  • Trade Count: (3)
  • Taperssection Member
  • ***
  • Posts: 572
  • I'm a llama!
Re: Cambridge Audio Azur 640R Receiver
« Reply #7 on: February 25, 2010, 12:17:09 PM »
My local hifi dealer and friend carries Cambridge.  I happened to be over at his place and saw a bunch of Cambridge boxes arrive.  One was the little AR30 receiver & iPod dock.  I thought it would be fun to listen to, so I borrowed it and dropped it in my work office rig (which is an almarro A205A amp and almarro M1A speakers fed by an iPod and a h/k TU-912 tuner)...  I was pretty impressed with it!  I must say, the little thing did some REALLY nice stuff.  The tuner locked on difficult signals and had a more full sound than my generally decently-well-regarded h/k.  The iPod dock was great to navigate with a remote, and sounded better than direct in via a mini-to-rca plug.  And the amp section was fun--vocals and guitar had great texture and popped out of the mix well, the soundstage was wide if not terribly deep, and music flowed well and was enjoyable.

It was very sensitive to power quality, and really liked having an Audience AR1p in front of it.

But to say I was impressed was an understatement.  I'd consider their stuff elsewhere.  I would like to try their 840 pre/amp separates someday, as one reviewer specifically stated they were a good match for my speakers (Cremona M).  They're not wildly overpriced, to boot.

I would love to hear this receiver in my HT.

Offline Nick's Picks

  • Trade Count: (33)
  • Needs to get out more...
  • *****
  • Posts: 10260
  • Gender: Male
  • I thought I heard.......
Re: Cambridge Audio Azur 640R Receiver
« Reply #8 on: February 26, 2010, 07:23:45 AM »
I'm still impressed by it..., nearly 2mo later.

It stains when I crank it to 11, but its absurdly loud at that point.  I can bring my living room to 120+db w/o issue though, and it rocks the house nicely.

the analog direct signal path for my TT sounds exceptionally good to me.  The DAC in there doesn't suck either, though I have no direct A/B experience w/a different outboard DAC.   I can say it sounds better than the analog outputs of my Oppo universal player. 

 

RSS | Mobile
Page created in 0.059 seconds with 34 queries.
© 2002-2024 Taperssection.com
Powered by SMF