Become a Site Supporter and Never see Ads again!

Author Topic: Which would pass off looking like something it's not?  (Read 1676 times)

0 Members and 1 Guest are viewing this topic.

Offline OrionMan

  • Trade Count: (0)
  • Taperssection Newbie
  • *
  • Posts: 48
Which would pass off looking like something it's not?
« on: September 06, 2021, 03:11:17 PM »
mods - please delete this thread.  I tried but can only edit a 1st post

« Last Edit: September 07, 2021, 01:38:21 PM by OrionMan »

Offline seethreepo

  • Trade Count: (10)
  • Taperssection All-Star
  • ****
  • Posts: 1323
  • Gender: Male
  • Resist Or Serve
Re: Which would pass off looking like something it's not?
« Reply #1 on: September 07, 2021, 10:40:43 AM »
keep stealth stealth.  open discussion of techniques are frowned upon here. 

That said if you are relying on  passing off as something other that what it is  you arent thinking outside the box enough.   dont be afraid of a metal detector. 
"Never heard anyone say that music was the thing that fucked up their day" 
-Chris Robinson 1996-09-24

 real recorder > phone
 external mics > Internal mics
 FOB > Taper Section
 HATS > better than Denied

Offline DavidPuddy

  • Trade Count: (18)
  • Taperssection All-Star
  • ****
  • Posts: 1795
  • If it's too loud, turn it down.
Re: Which would pass off looking like something it's not?
« Reply #2 on: September 07, 2021, 12:59:06 PM »
^ You need to edit this post. Please do not reference anything involving stealth setups.
« Last Edit: September 07, 2021, 01:28:31 PM by DavidPuddy »
Mics: mk4v/mk41v/mk22 > CMC1L/Nbobs, 4061, MKE2
Preamps: Mixpre-D, Nbox Platinum ABS
Recorders: Mixpre-6 ii, PCM-A10

Offline OrionMan

  • Trade Count: (0)
  • Taperssection Newbie
  • *
  • Posts: 48
Re: Which would pass off looking like something it's not?
« Reply #3 on: September 07, 2021, 01:35:14 PM »
Sorry.   I will just delete my last post. I have been searching on tappersection a lot these last few days and read a lot more detailed information than what I posted.  Maybe it is because those results were from a few years ago where it was more tolerated?  I was trying to following in line with what I was seeing as a guideline, yet also being less specific.  Sorry again.

 

RSS | Mobile
Page created in 0.058 seconds with 29 queries.
© 2002-2024 Taperssection.com
Powered by SMF