Become a Site Supporter and Never see Ads again!

Author Topic: Best Mini Disc recorder???  (Read 20094 times)

0 Members and 1 Guest are viewing this topic.

Offline mihu23

  • Trade Count: (0)
  • Taperssection Newbie
  • *
  • Posts: 15
Best Mini Disc recorder???
« on: September 17, 2006, 09:35:46 PM »
Hi, i'm quite a newbie in trying to become a taper, i have a NJ3 but i would like to have a mini disc so it would be a perfect second choice whenever i have to tape a show.

I've been searching, asking and reading about mini discs but i don't have a clue in which one is the best, i know that there ain't a best one since it deppends of the needing, so my needings are:

  • To be a MD recorder
  • I can upload the audio to my computer
  • That the batteries last long, if its possible to use AA batteris it would be better
  • That if I jump while i'm one a show, it won't skip something or mess the taping
  • I don't care too much in the price since the most of the MDs in ebay are lower than 100 bucks

Hope someone could help me since a lot of interestins shows are coming to Mexico and i would like to tape some of them, anyway, thanks in advance

:D

Offline panicland

  • Trade Count: (0)
  • Taperssection Newbie
  • *
  • Posts: 15
Re: Best Mini Disc recorder???
« Reply #1 on: September 18, 2006, 11:39:55 AM »
Back in the day many moons ago I would just patch in with my MD..  I had some Sony I got from best buy and it worked just fine... I still have a folder around here somewhere with about 200 shows in MD.  If you're worried about battery life, I just took a package of battery's to the show with me...  Although I always felt stupid asking to patch into peoples mics with my blazing hot MD, luckily I had friends who didn't mind, they just chuckled a little :)

My advice would be to get a DAT. You can get a D8 or D100 for fairly cheap these days, and the quality will be far supierior to that of any MD.  Also you could freely trade those tapes.  Your MD's are untradeable and highly advised giving them out at all, other then personal use.
« Last Edit: September 18, 2006, 11:42:11 AM by panicland »

Offline Ryan Sims

  • Trade Count: (0)
  • Taperssection All-Star
  • ****
  • Posts: 1522
  • Gender: Male
  • A vision of a gentle coast
    • Something
Re: Best Mini Disc recorder???
« Reply #2 on: September 18, 2006, 11:51:01 AM »
Any Hi-MD is lossless and would be the same quality as any DAT recording. 
Ryan (minus sign) Sims dot com
http://www.flickr.com/photos/ryan-sims/

No single raindrop believes it's to blame for the flood.

Offline lbgspam

  • Trade Count: (0)
  • Taperssection Regular
  • **
  • Posts: 202
Re: Best Mini Disc recorder???
« Reply #3 on: September 18, 2006, 01:48:11 PM »
IMHO, it is a MISTAKE to waste any money on a MD/HIMD. :(
 
Honestly, the Edirol R-09 flash memory recorder is  the same price ($339 delivered) as a HIMD and has lots of benefits over the MD's early 1990s technolgoy. Check the R-09  FAQ sticky at the top of this forum.
« Last Edit: September 18, 2006, 01:51:02 PM by lbgspam »

Offline lbgspam

  • Trade Count: (0)
  • Taperssection Regular
  • **
  • Posts: 202
Re: Best Mini Disc recorder???
« Reply #4 on: September 18, 2006, 01:50:30 PM »
One other thing.  I and GuySonic reviewed all the reasons why a MD/HIMD is not a smart purchase today anymore...

http://taperssection.com/index.php?topic=71130.0

Offline beefstew

  • Trade Count: (0)
  • Taperssection Member
  • ***
  • Posts: 675
  • Gender: Male
  • 18
Re: Best Mini Disc recorder???
« Reply #5 on: September 18, 2006, 04:25:41 PM »
In my opinion - most beginners start out w/ MD - then move up to HD or w/e
*Audio*
Mics:
SP-CMC-19
Panasonic WM61a

Recorders:
MZ-RH910 (Hi-MD)
Sony TC-WE435 (CASS)

*Video*
Canon ZR-500 [Mini DV]
54" Tripod

I spend most of my money on gambling, booze, and women. The rest i spend foolishly.

Offline mihu23

  • Trade Count: (0)
  • Taperssection Newbie
  • *
  • Posts: 15
Re: Best Mini Disc recorder???
« Reply #6 on: September 18, 2006, 05:42:54 PM »
In my opinion - most beginners start out w/ MD - then move up to HD or w/e

and which do you think is the best MD model???

Offline twoheadedboy

  • Trade Count: (0)
  • Taperssection Regular
  • **
  • Posts: 125
  • Gender: Male
  • Catching signals that sound in the dark....
Re: Best Mini Disc recorder???
« Reply #7 on: September 18, 2006, 06:09:54 PM »
IMHO, it is a MISTAKE to waste any money on a MD/HIMD. :(
 
Honestly, the Edirol R-09 flash memory recorder is  the same price ($339 delivered) as a HIMD and has lots of benefits over the MD's early 1990s technolgoy. Check the R-09  FAQ sticky at the top of this forum.

Who sells it for $339 shipped?! I have not seen it a penny under $399.99.

Offline beefstew

  • Trade Count: (0)
  • Taperssection Member
  • ***
  • Posts: 675
  • Gender: Male
  • 18
Re: Best Mini Disc recorder???
« Reply #8 on: September 18, 2006, 06:17:52 PM »
In my opinion - most beginners start out w/ MD - then move up to HD or w/e

and which do you think is the best MD model???

I have a Sony MZ-RH910 - gets the job done
its not as nice as the MZ-RH1 - but i have no complaints with my model
*Audio*
Mics:
SP-CMC-19
Panasonic WM61a

Recorders:
MZ-RH910 (Hi-MD)
Sony TC-WE435 (CASS)

*Video*
Canon ZR-500 [Mini DV]
54" Tripod

I spend most of my money on gambling, booze, and women. The rest i spend foolishly.

Offline beefstew

  • Trade Count: (0)
  • Taperssection Member
  • ***
  • Posts: 675
  • Gender: Male
  • 18
Re: Best Mini Disc recorder???
« Reply #9 on: September 18, 2006, 06:18:22 PM »
Your MD's are untradeable and highly advised giving them out at all, other then personal use.

oh yeah... i forgot i couldnt trade a MD recording by burning the .wav file as data onto a cdr - then mail trading it ::) ::)
*Audio*
Mics:
SP-CMC-19
Panasonic WM61a

Recorders:
MZ-RH910 (Hi-MD)
Sony TC-WE435 (CASS)

*Video*
Canon ZR-500 [Mini DV]
54" Tripod

I spend most of my money on gambling, booze, and women. The rest i spend foolishly.

Offline lbgspam

  • Trade Count: (0)
  • Taperssection Regular
  • **
  • Posts: 202
Re: Best Mini Disc recorder???
« Reply #10 on: September 18, 2006, 06:56:59 PM »
IMHO, it is a MISTAKE to waste any money on a MD/HIMD. :(
 
Honestly, the Edirol R-09 flash memory recorder is  the same price ($339 delivered) as a HIMD and has lots of benefits over the MD's early 1990s technolgoy. Check the R-09  FAQ sticky at the top of this forum.

Who sells it for $339 shipped?! I have not seen it a penny under $399.99.

It's in the R-09 FAQ

Offline mihu23

  • Trade Count: (0)
  • Taperssection Newbie
  • *
  • Posts: 15
Re: Best Mini Disc recorder???
« Reply #11 on: September 19, 2006, 01:27:17 AM »
In my opinion - most beginners start out w/ MD - then move up to HD or w/e

and which do you think is the best MD model???

I have a Sony MZ-RH910 - gets the job done
its not as nice as the MZ-RH1 - but i have no complaints with my model

those are HI MD's, right??? if you have to choose between the normal MD's, which would you think is the best one?

Offline twoheadedboy

  • Trade Count: (0)
  • Taperssection Regular
  • **
  • Posts: 125
  • Gender: Male
  • Catching signals that sound in the dark....
Re: Best Mini Disc recorder???
« Reply #12 on: September 19, 2006, 01:45:36 AM »
In my opinion - most beginners start out w/ MD - then move up to HD or w/e

and which do you think is the best MD model???

I have a Sony MZ-RH910 - gets the job done
its not as nice as the MZ-RH1 - but i have no complaints with my model

those are HI MD's, right??? if you have to choose between the normal MD's, which would you think is the best one?

Anything by Sharp.

Offline Jamos

  • Trade Count: (61)
  • Taperssection All-Star
  • ****
  • Posts: 1646
  • Gender: Male
Re: Best Mini Disc recorder???
« Reply #13 on: September 19, 2006, 02:51:35 AM »
IMHO, it is a MISTAKE to waste any money on a MD/HIMD. :(
 
Honestly, the Edirol R-09 flash memory recorder is  the same price ($339 delivered) as a HIMD and has lots of benefits over the MD's early 1990s technolgoy. Check the R-09  FAQ sticky at the top of this forum.

Who sells it for $339 shipped?! I have not seen it a penny under $399.99.

Check out this thread in the Ebay Sales section:

http://taperssection.com/index.php?topic=71029.0

 ;D

Offline mihu23

  • Trade Count: (0)
  • Taperssection Newbie
  • *
  • Posts: 15
Re: Best Mini Disc recorder???
« Reply #14 on: September 19, 2006, 09:57:17 AM »
In my opinion - most beginners start out w/ MD - then move up to HD or w/e

and which do you think is the best MD model???

I have a Sony MZ-RH910 - gets the job done
its not as nice as the MZ-RH1 - but i have no complaints with my model

those are HI MD's, right??? if you have to choose between the normal MD's, which would you think is the best one?

Anything by Sharp.

yeah, someone told that sharp's MD recorder are far better than sony's but i don't know which is the best model, i've founded this models on ebay:

MD-MT170E
MD-MT831H
MD-MT15
MD-MT80H

All of these are from England so I think that I have to buy an adaptar in order to use them in Mexico, and I found this model too:

MD-SR60

Which woul you think it's better??? or there is a model that is better and I missed it???

Offline larrysellers

  • Trade Count: (35)
  • Needs to get out more...
  • *****
  • Posts: 2152
  • Gender: Male
  • Qualified
Re: Best Mini Disc recorder???
« Reply #15 on: September 19, 2006, 04:27:42 PM »
In my opinion - most beginners start out w/ MD - then move up to HD or w/e

and which do you think is the best MD model???

I know this is not what you ment by the best (I am thinking the best in your<$100 estimate) but for a non hi-md machine, this thing is tits. It even has an optical output. HHB put this out only a few years back... too bad they didn't wait awhile and introduce this in a uncompressed version. Hands down, the best md ever made...



HHB PortaDisc MDP500
Professional Portable MiniDisc Recorder

HHB’s new PORTADISC is a rugged, fully-featured MiniDisc portable set to become standard issue in TV, film and broadcast audio acquisition. Developed in consultation with leading sound recordists, the PORTADISC optimises the many advantages of the MD format - sound quality, random access, editing, etc. - in a robust, portable package loaded with the features essential for a life on location. The PORTADISC records on standard MiniDiscs, easily available anywhere in the world, and uses ATRAC compression to ensure optimum sound quality. Sonic performance is further enhanced by a high quality balanced microphone input circuit, which also features switchable phantom power, limiting and ganging. Power is supplied by AA alkaline batteries, again widely available, or by rechargeable Nickel Metal Hydride batteries (supplied), delivering recording times of up to 4 hours before recharging is necessary. A universal 100V-240V charger is also supplied. Connectivity is comprehensive, including balanced XLR mic/line inputs, RCA phono line outputs, headphone jack and coaxial and optical SPDIF digital I/Os. Of particular interest to radio journalists will be the provision of a USB interface for the real-time transfer of files to laptop editing systems, enabling the production of finished news pieces in the field. In addition, basic editing functions are also available on the PORTADISC itself, accessed via an intuitive software controlled menu system.

Solid and sturdy, the PORTADISC is housed in a tough, shockproof case with a large, illuminated display and a built in monitoring speaker and back-up microphone. A memory buffer delivers glitch-free recording on the move, and a 6 second pre-record buffer ensures that the sound recordist never misses a take. An auto start / cut function with adjustable threshold is invaluable in environmental noise monitoring applications, particularly when used in conjunction with the PORTADISC’s time / date stamp function. Additional features including automatic gain control, one touch recording, lockable record level and key hold facilities, all contribute to making the HHB PORTADISC the most highly specified audio acquisition recorder in the business.

• Balanced XLR mic / line input
• Coaxial and optical SPDIF digital I/O
• Unbalanced RCA phono line output
• Clear display with accurate metering and margin indicator
• Automatic gain control
• One touch record
• Key hold and record level lock
• Powered by standard AA alkaline batteries or rechargeable NiMh batteries (8 supplied, rechargeable in the PORTADISC)
• AC adaptor

 

 

« Last Edit: September 19, 2006, 04:42:39 PM by larrysellers »

Offline beathydrolysis

  • Trade Count: (0)
  • Taperssection Regular
  • **
  • Posts: 61
  • Gender: Male
Re: Best Mini Disc recorder???
« Reply #16 on: September 20, 2006, 02:52:03 PM »
All right, here is the definitive answer to squash all the other banter.
1.  PREFACE:  Yes flash is hands down better than mini-disc
2.  Mini-disc is okay if you're only looking to spend $100
3.  Of the non-hi-md models sharp is better only because old sony's didn't have the ability to adjust levels while recording (you needed a preamp with level control, but if you're going to use an old md player you need a preamp anyway because the internal md ADC is not sufficient for high SPL situations - aka rock concerts)
4.  If you get a non-hi-md model you will NOT be able to upload to your computer except in real-time through your soundcard.
5.  If you buy a hi-md player you can adjust levels on the fly and upload to your computer.
6.  Buying a hi-md model will set you back $200+ dollars (over 300 for the new rh1)
7.  You can use AA batts. with the hi-md models like the mz-rh900 and mz-m100 (and a usb power pack with the new mz-rh1)
8.  If you are going to spend 200-300 dollars you might as well move to a flash player like the R-09 (or a hard drive player, though they can be skipped just like any player with moving parts including md)

It depends on how serious you are, how attuned your ear is, how much you really care about a particular feature, how much your willing to spend, and the list goes on endlessly.   I started with a sony mz-n707 to get in the door cheap and see if I liked taping.  I was also in high school and on a tight budget.  It served my needs well for a couple years but did not produce tradeable tapes or satisfy the audiophile in me.  So I traded up.  If you are hell bent on a non-hi-md player, I'd get a sony mzn-707 with a small preamp.  That said the suit of features you requested do not fit in an old md player in the price range you wanted.  You'll either have to up the investment or compromise your needs. 
Take care of the tapers and the tapers will take care of you.

nameloc01

  • Guest
  • Trade Count: (0)
Re: Best Mini Disc recorder???
« Reply #17 on: September 20, 2006, 04:48:31 PM »
md haters.
please. ::)
a hi-md can get just as good a "tape" as any DAT.its a fact.
if you are going to get one get a mz-m100 or one of the 2 newest models.whichever one,make sure you get one with an illuminated display.
a few things i read previously..
1. md tapes are undesireable...fucking completely not true(unless lossy early md units)
2.the batteries are no good.... LOL  with the dry battery attachment i get over 5 hours of continous lossless recording.
3.they are for beginners...and why is that exactly??

and if i am correct they are one of the smallest recording units avalaible,perfect for stealth missions.as i'll prove this weekend.

Offline beefstew

  • Trade Count: (0)
  • Taperssection Member
  • ***
  • Posts: 675
  • Gender: Male
  • 18
Re: Best Mini Disc recorder???
« Reply #18 on: September 20, 2006, 06:57:47 PM »

3.they are for beginners...and why is that exactly??

and if i am correct they are one of the smallest recording units avalaible,perfect for stealth missions.as i'll prove this weekend.

i only say that cuz there cheap, affordable, and give u a taste of what taping is about  :)

i love my MZ-RH910  :-*
*Audio*
Mics:
SP-CMC-19
Panasonic WM61a

Recorders:
MZ-RH910 (Hi-MD)
Sony TC-WE435 (CASS)

*Video*
Canon ZR-500 [Mini DV]
54" Tripod

I spend most of my money on gambling, booze, and women. The rest i spend foolishly.

Offline lbgspam

  • Trade Count: (0)
  • Taperssection Regular
  • **
  • Posts: 202
Re: Best Mini Disc recorder???
« Reply #19 on: September 20, 2006, 07:13:33 PM »
I read somewhere in the forums that another problem with MD/HIMD is that they can SKIP while recording (there is no buffer for recording like they have in playback).

If true, that's a fairly large negative IMHO. 

Offline twoheadedboy

  • Trade Count: (0)
  • Taperssection Regular
  • **
  • Posts: 125
  • Gender: Male
  • Catching signals that sound in the dark....
Re: Best Mini Disc recorder???
« Reply #20 on: September 20, 2006, 08:04:54 PM »
I am no MD hater, in fact for the longest time I taped through original MD and Hi-MD. However...

a hi-md can get just as good a "tape" as any DAT.its a fact.

As good as DAT, sure, I'll give it that. However, a better comparison is made to flash recorders like the R-09 which do 24-bit and are BETTER THAN DAT (and MD or Hi-MD for that matter). And keep in mind, the ultimate (in taper suitability and as the last of the line) DAT recorder was the PCM-M1, which was released over 8 1/2 years ago! So yeah, hopefully MD would be better than that!

[quote[if you are going to get one get a mz-m100 or one of the 2 newest models.whichever one,make sure you get one with an illuminated display.[/quote]

Agreed, but the difference in price between these units and the R-01/R-09/microtracker is so negligible that anyone would be silly to get a Hi-MD unit today, September 2006.

Quote
1. md tapes are undesireable...fucking completely not true(unless lossy early md units)

They only hold 1 GB, or 94 min of PCM audio (and no 24-bit capability). That's pretty undesirable to me. If they would come out with a 2 GB unit at $10 per disc that ran on AA battery(ies) and could connect to the computer as a mass storage device (like the flash recorders) via Firewire or USB 2 (Hi-MD advertises USB 2 but actually uses a USB 1.1 connection speed which is why it's so slow), recording directly to .wav files, at a $200 price point, that would be a great unit for PCM audio. It'll never happen, however.

Quote
2.the batteries are no good.... LOL  with the dry battery attachment i get over 5 hours of continous lossless recording.

Having to use an attachment for AA batteries is a kludge. This is why I had the NHF-800, which ONLY was able to take 1 AA battery and no attachments necessary.

Quote
3.they are for beginners...and why is that exactly??

Because that's how Sony has marketed and developed the format...it's always been the digital replacement for cassette tapes, which was never a serious format to begin with. The limitations Sony puts on the format are not taper friendly at all. I daresay I would prefer a MD for ipod-like applications (i.e. portable music listening), but it sucks hardcore as a taping device (many units without a backlight, AGC on by default and cannot turn off permanently, extremely slow performance to go from off to recording etc.)

Quote
and if i am correct they are one of the smallest recording units avalaible,perfect for stealth missions.as i'll prove this weekend.

The R-09 is slightly shorter and a little thicker than your average candy bar cell phone...since the advent of flash recorders, MD's have no longer had the monopoly on ultra-compact high quality stealth recorders. I stealthed my entire setup this past weekend (deck, preamp, and mics) by sticking them all in a gallon ziplock bag and putting the bag in a jock strap with the protective cup removed. Unless security directly grabs my nuts, they're never going to find it, and there is no visual indication under a slightly baggy pair of jeans.

MD could have been great, but Sony has not released a good product (outside of the PS1 and PS2) in quite some time.

Offline twoheadedboy

  • Trade Count: (0)
  • Taperssection Regular
  • **
  • Posts: 125
  • Gender: Male
  • Catching signals that sound in the dark....
Re: Best Mini Disc recorder???
« Reply #21 on: September 20, 2006, 08:05:24 PM »
I read somewhere in the forums that another problem with MD/HIMD is that they can SKIP while recording (there is no buffer for recording like they have in playback).

If true, that's a fairly large negative IMHO. 

I never had this problem.

Offline twoheadedboy

  • Trade Count: (0)
  • Taperssection Regular
  • **
  • Posts: 125
  • Gender: Male
  • Catching signals that sound in the dark....
Re: Best Mini Disc recorder???
« Reply #22 on: September 20, 2006, 08:08:43 PM »
Quote
4.  If you get a non-hi-md model you will NOT be able to upload to your computer except in real-time through your soundcard.

Not true, I bought a standalone MD deck for $75 off ebay a few years ago that's still in my closet "just in case" :D Also, I guess the new Sonic Stage software allows you to upload regular MD recordings (though for that, you need a Hi-MD recorder/player anyway, heh).

Quote
7.  You can use AA batts. with the hi-md models like the mz-rh900 and mz-m100

Only the discontinued NHF-800/NH-700 allow you to use AA batteries without an attachment, to my understanding.

Quote
8.  If you are going to spend 200-300 dollars you might as well move to a flash player like the R-09 (or a hard drive player, though they can be skipped just like any player with moving parts including md)

I think that's the bottom line.

Offline beathydrolysis

  • Trade Count: (0)
  • Taperssection Regular
  • **
  • Posts: 61
  • Gender: Male
Re: Best Mini Disc recorder???
« Reply #23 on: September 21, 2006, 11:14:42 AM »
Quote
7.  You can use AA batts. with the hi-md models like the mz-rh900 and mz-m100

Quote
Only the discontinued NHF-800/NH-700 allow you to use AA batteries without an attachment, to my understanding.

Correct.  The the rh900 and mz-m100 require a dry battery case (which attaches to the unit) to run on AA cells.  My point was simply that you could run AAs with hi-md models (save the rh1).  In reference to the uploads, realtime is almost universal for md players pre-hi-md.  IMO any player that mihu23 will get will not facilitate direct transmission of audio to pc via usb or firewire.

And please guys, let's try and answer the question posted by mihu23 instead of getting bogged down in our respective camps.  We have established that flash is the way of the future, and md is a format which has served many of us well.  Regardless of whether you love md or hate it, we have suggested that if mihu23 can bite the bullet and pay $300 plus dollars for a unit, then md may not be the way to go (though I agree it is a great stealth tool, and if an old md player gets confiscated your not out big bucks).  But it really appears that mihu23 is after a 100 dollar rig and nobody is parting with an R-09 for a hundred bucks.  So it would be great if we could suggest some classic net md models or others of that vintage which will serve mihu23 well for a hundred bucks.

My vote is still the mz-n707 w/ a preamp.

Another great reference for models is minidisc.org .  What other models have people had good luck with?
Take care of the tapers and the tapers will take care of you.

Offline larrysellers

  • Trade Count: (35)
  • Needs to get out more...
  • *****
  • Posts: 2152
  • Gender: Male
  • Qualified
Re: Best Mini Disc recorder???
« Reply #24 on: September 21, 2006, 11:36:03 AM »
.
« Last Edit: February 21, 2012, 03:52:06 PM by larrysellers »

nameloc01

  • Guest
  • Trade Count: (0)
Re: Best Mini Disc recorder???
« Reply #25 on: September 27, 2006, 03:49:50 PM »
i have an old mzr-3,if you pay for the postage its yours.(really) :)

Offline taper420

  • Trade Count: (0)
  • Taperssection All-Star
  • ****
  • Posts: 1039
  • Gender: Male
Re: Best Mini Disc recorder???
« Reply #26 on: September 27, 2006, 10:39:54 PM »
If you only have $100 I'd go with a first-gen hi-md unit. And maybe a really cheap old md recorder (i used to use the mzr-70 previously mentioned) for the 20 second patch you'll need while switching discs (the biggest md headache in my opinion).

Offline King Ghidora

  • Trade Count: (0)
  • Taperssection Regular
  • **
  • Posts: 72
Re: Best Mini Disc recorder???
« Reply #27 on: September 27, 2006, 10:42:30 PM »
MD has really seen it's better days as far as being the top technology for recording audio on location.  They still are the best if you're looking for a bargain because they can be bought fairly cheap on eBay or used.  All HIMD recorders have very similar quality.  The very latest edition of HIMD has some advantages but you're still better off buying something else (like the Edirol) if what you want is top quality audio.

I just bought a used HIMD because I knew it was the best deal for a recording device that fit the needs I have.  I didn't really need 24 bit because my primary reason for getting a HIMD was as a audio recorder for my video projects.  24 bit isn't much of an advantage if you have to convert it back to 16 bit to use it with the video format I'm using (mini-dv).  24 bit would have been overkill for me so I saved a few hundred bucks and bought a used HIMD.

For a long time someone had Sony MZ-NH700's and MZ-NHF800's for sale cheap on eBay.  They generally sold at auction for around $100 and $125 respectively.  I think maybe they have sold out all of their stock but maybe they still have a few.  They are decent recorders even if they aren't the best and these models are the last to use regular AA batteries without having to use a seperate battery box.  If you decide to save a few bucks and go with HIMD you might check eBay for these models for sale from a place called Norco or something similar in California.  

Offline King Ghidora

  • Trade Count: (0)
  • Taperssection Regular
  • **
  • Posts: 72
Re: Best Mini Disc recorder???
« Reply #28 on: September 27, 2006, 10:57:34 PM »
If you only have $100 I'd go with a first-gen hi-md unit. And maybe a really cheap old md recorder (i used to use the mzr-70 previously mentioned) for the 20 second patch you'll need while switching discs (the biggest md headache in my opinion).

I have a MZ-R70 that I intend to use as a backup now that I have a HIMD.  Using it to cover the gap between discs on my MZ-NHF800 is a good idea.  My primary use isn't for taping shows but I do sometimes do that including sometimes when I'm producing concert video for sale as a DVD. 

Offline flintstone

  • Trade Count: (2)
  • Taperssection Member
  • ***
  • Posts: 767
Re: Best Mini Disc recorder???
« Reply #29 on: September 28, 2006, 12:25:36 AM »
The source for inexpensive Hi-MD recorders in Norco, CA is Shewas Inc.
http://www.shewasinc.com/minidisc.html

Shewas price for a new (not refurbished) MZ-NH700 is $125.  The NH700
operates on a single AA battery and accepts mic, line and digital optical inputs.

The optical input works fine with the Denecke AD-20 preamp.  Core Sound
sells the AD-20 for $310, and they offer an attractive 30 day trial for the
cost of shipping ($9 for standard US Mail).

Flintstone

Offline dunebug81

  • Trade Count: (0)
  • Needs to get out more...
  • *****
  • Posts: 2045
  • Gender: Male
Re: Best Mini Disc recorder???
« Reply #30 on: September 28, 2006, 12:42:07 AM »
I read somewhere in the forums that another problem with MD/HIMD is that they can SKIP while recording (there is no buffer for recording like they have in playback).

If true, that's a fairly large negative IMHO. 

No its not true.
Greg
www.enemyzero.com/greg/
aim: dunebug81

Offline knoxmallette

  • Trade Count: (0)
  • Taperssection Newbie
  • *
  • Posts: 28
  • Gender: Male
Re: Best Mini Disc recorder???
« Reply #31 on: September 28, 2006, 01:03:38 PM »
I have a MZ-M100 and I like it -however, I have had two bad experiences moving music through sonic stage onto my computer- one I could recover from and the other I could not. During the conversion to WAV from the M100 to my computer I received an error and the conversion/transfer stopped. I figured the size of the file was too big and cut the show in half using the track mark- this solved the problem and everything worked like it should. The next time, (DMB 8/13/06) I decided to put track marks using the minidisc after each song. During the conversion/transfer I received the same error but this time my minidisc media was corrupted and I could not recover the last dozen songs. I placed calls to Sony and they had me try some stuff that I had already tried and they decided it had something to do with my desktop- sorry. The problem is that the minidisc writes a flag to the media that indicates that the music has been transferred once- their system for stopping music swapping. This pisses me off since it is not copyright protected music- it was mine (and Dave's).
Since then I have purchase an H120 and installed rockbox- and I could not be happier. A recorder mounting as an external hard drive with drag and drop- what a concept! The M100 will serve as back-up from now on.
SP-CMC-2 (AT831s) --> SP-SPSB-1 (with levels & bass roll-off) --> iRiver H320 Rockboxed
SP-CMC-2 --> SP-SPSB-1 --> MZ-M100

ilduclo

  • Guest
  • Trade Count: (0)
Re: Best Mini Disc recorder???
« Reply #32 on: September 28, 2006, 01:48:11 PM »
I have an MDMT770 Sharp, bulletproof, nice recordings and real easy on batteries ( 3  hours on the internal ,6+ hrs on one AA). IMHO, it's the mics and the room. If you have decent mics, the MD does just as well as my DAT (TCDD100). I usta use Coresound mics, but now have DPA 4061's. I'd compare my MD rec's with these to a lot of higher priced gear. 200 for the MD new (which was from Minidisc HK, which I think is now out of business) and 500 complete for the DPA's including conversion from Lemo to 1/8" mini and a Bat Box from Sound Pros)......just my 2 cents.....

Offline dunebug81

  • Trade Count: (0)
  • Needs to get out more...
  • *****
  • Posts: 2045
  • Gender: Male
Re: Best Mini Disc recorder???
« Reply #33 on: September 28, 2006, 01:50:18 PM »
I have a MZ-M100 and I like it -however, I have had two bad experiences moving music through sonic stage onto my computer- one I could recover from and the other I could not. During the conversion to WAV from the M100 to my computer I received an error and the conversion/transfer stopped. I figured the size of the file was too big and cut the show in half using the track mark- this solved the problem and everything worked like it should. The next time, (DMB 8/13/06) I decided to put track marks using the minidisc after each song. During the conversion/transfer I received the same error but this time my minidisc media was corrupted and I could not recover the last dozen songs. I placed calls to Sony and they had me try some stuff that I had already tried and they decided it had something to do with my desktop- sorry. The problem is that the minidisc writes a flag to the media that indicates that the music has been transferred once- their system for stopping music swapping. This pisses me off since it is not copyright protected music- it was mine (and Dave's).
Since then I have purchase an H120 and installed rockbox- and I could not be happier. A recorder mounting as an external hard drive with drag and drop- what a concept! The M100 will serve as back-up from now on.

You must using an old version of Sonic Stage.  Upgrade to 4.0 and you will no longer have that issue.  I upgraded to the new version and have had no problems since.  Sonic Stage also seems to like SP2 for XP so if you havnt upgraded to SP2 Id suggest that as well.  How many shows have you taped with no problems with your MD?  I taped ~100 shows and Sonic Stage killed 2 of them.  One I cared about....the other I didnt.  How many people have had issue after issue with the MT?

IMHO, it's the mics and the room. If you have decent mics, the MD does just as well as my DAT (TCDD100).

While Ive never used a DAT the mics make a way bigger difference in sound.  i used CSBs with my Sharp MT90 and RH10 and didnt really notice any difference in my recordings.  When I stepped up to the DPAs w/mma6000 it was like night vs day.  Its hard to enjoy just an OK recording that was done with the CSBs where as an OK recording w/ DPAs is still better then at steller tape with the CSBs. 

« Last Edit: September 28, 2006, 01:58:22 PM by dunebug81 »
Greg
www.enemyzero.com/greg/
aim: dunebug81

Offline knoxmallette

  • Trade Count: (0)
  • Taperssection Newbie
  • *
  • Posts: 28
  • Gender: Male
Re: Best Mini Disc recorder???
« Reply #34 on: September 28, 2006, 04:01:15 PM »
dunebug, I am at the office and will check which version of SS I use but I am almost positive that it is 4.0. I bought the M100 in January and loaded the software that arrived with it- but I'll check. I have used the MD for 7 shows and used a box of 10 discs. The results were great but the transfer through SS is a drag-- problems with two of the discs. The DMB show hurt since I had seats directly behind the sunken soundboard @ West Palm and the 5 songs I was able to transfer sounded great.
SP-CMC-2 (AT831s) --> SP-SPSB-1 (with levels & bass roll-off) --> iRiver H320 Rockboxed
SP-CMC-2 --> SP-SPSB-1 --> MZ-M100

Offline dunebug81

  • Trade Count: (0)
  • Needs to get out more...
  • *****
  • Posts: 2045
  • Gender: Male
Re: Best Mini Disc recorder???
« Reply #35 on: September 28, 2006, 05:06:14 PM »
dunebug, I am at the office and will check which version of SS I use but I am almost positive that it is 4.0. I bought the M100 in January and loaded the software that arrived with it- but I'll check. I have used the MD for 7 shows and used a box of 10 discs. The results were great but the transfer through SS is a drag-- problems with two of the discs. The DMB show hurt since I had seats directly behind the sunken soundboard @ West Palm and the 5 songs I was able to transfer sounded great.

if you installed it off the CD you dont have 4.0.  I have the RH1 which came out a few months ago and dont believe it shipped with 4.0 either.  Check out minidisc.org for links and such to download 4.0.  You will occasionaly run across a bad disc and there isnt anything you can do about that.  Ive got thru about 100 1gb discs and have only had 2-3 be defective.  Usually Sonic Stage will hang up when trying to upload them but if you play them and hook up your MD via the phone out to your computer you can salvage it that way.  I had a Breaking Benjamin tape just not want to do anything and I got so pissed that I also broke the disc in half the my brother (the most untechinical person in US) suggested I just play it like normal and see if that will work and sure enough it did.

I will say that the transfer is a little slow but I start uploading it when i get home and go off and do the dishes and such and its done when i get back.  If you can get a good deal on the RH1 the transfer speed is almost 3x as fast as the RH10/M100. 
« Last Edit: September 28, 2006, 05:16:04 PM by dunebug81 »
Greg
www.enemyzero.com/greg/
aim: dunebug81

Offline taper420

  • Trade Count: (0)
  • Taperssection All-Star
  • ****
  • Posts: 1039
  • Gender: Male
Re: Best Mini Disc recorder???
« Reply #36 on: September 28, 2006, 09:36:45 PM »
yes i believe 4.0 did address the copy flag issues, as all uploads are free now and no flag is written....unfortunatly if you tried to upload to a version previously, the flag has already been written and can't be undone.....

I really think what makes a pull good or not are the mics, placement, and room.....a bit buckets a bit bucket....preamp accounts for some but not as much as the mics unless its a REALLY crappy preamp like the one in minidisc recorders (and that just depends on the mics your using i think...for instance my sennheisers run way too hot to plug direct to the minidisc mic-in) ... as I've said before though... my biggest headache with minidisc is changing discs.....
that said.... with my senn's, and a samson mixpad, I've made some SICK pulls with a minidisc recorder.

nameloc01

  • Guest
  • Trade Count: (0)
Re: Best Mini Disc recorder???
« Reply #37 on: September 28, 2006, 10:26:34 PM »
i love my MDrs,no complaints at all ;D

Offline dunebug81

  • Trade Count: (0)
  • Needs to get out more...
  • *****
  • Posts: 2045
  • Gender: Male
Re: Best Mini Disc recorder???
« Reply #38 on: September 28, 2006, 10:32:41 PM »
I really think what makes a pull good or not are the mics, placement, and room.....a bit buckets a bit bucket....preamp accounts for some but not as much as the mics unless its a REALLY crappy preamp like the one in minidisc recorders (and that just depends on the mics your using i think...for instance my sennheisers run way too hot to plug direct to the minidisc mic-in) ... as I've said before though... my biggest headache with minidisc is changing discs.....
that said.... with my senn's, and a samson mixpad, I've made some SICK pulls with a minidisc recorder.

Thats why you run line-in with the MD.  I could never get enough signal out of my 4060s to run linein but when I got the 4061s w/mma6000 theres plenty of signal with out having to add any additional gain from my pre. 

i love my MDrs,no complaints at all ;D

Been using MD for 5 years now and its pretty much bulletproof...no complaints here either.

Greg
www.enemyzero.com/greg/
aim: dunebug81

nameloc01

  • Guest
  • Trade Count: (0)
Re: Best Mini Disc recorder???
« Reply #39 on: September 28, 2006, 10:36:50 PM »
I really think what makes a pull good or not are the mics, placement, and room.....a bit buckets a bit bucket....preamp accounts for some but not as much as the mics unless its a REALLY crappy preamp like the one in minidisc recorders (and that just depends on the mics your using i think...for instance my sennheisers run way too hot to plug direct to the minidisc mic-in) ... as I've said before though... my biggest headache with minidisc is changing discs.....
that said.... with my senn's, and a samson mixpad, I've made some SICK pulls with a minidisc recorder.

Thats why you run line-in with the MD.  I could never get enough signal out of my 4060s to run linein but when I got the 4061s w/mma6000 theres plenty of signal with out having to add any additional gain from my pre. 

i love my MDrs,no complaints at all ;D

Been using MD for 5 years now and its pretty much bulletproof...no complaints here either.


thats right.always use line in,only use mic in when doing acoustic music.

Offline King Ghidora

  • Trade Count: (0)
  • Taperssection Regular
  • **
  • Posts: 72
Re: Best Mini Disc recorder???
« Reply #40 on: September 29, 2006, 03:05:23 AM »
The source for inexpensive Hi-MD recorders in Norco, CA is Shewas Inc.
http://www.shewasinc.com/minidisc.html

Shewas price for a new (not refurbished) MZ-NH700 is $125.  The NH700
operates on a single AA battery and accepts mic, line and digital optical inputs.


The price they get at auction is always a little under the prices they list on their site.  I think they are buying back their own stuff at auction once in a while but I see these MD's sell for well under $100 at times. 

Offline knoxmallette

  • Trade Count: (0)
  • Taperssection Newbie
  • *
  • Posts: 28
  • Gender: Male
Re: Best Mini Disc recorder???
« Reply #41 on: September 29, 2006, 10:12:32 AM »
Dunebug, you're right, I upgraded to 4.0 last night. Glad to hear that the flag is no longer written to the minidisc- I wished I upgraded prior to transferring the shows but....
Taper420, I started out using PCM but found that HI-SP sounded plenty fine to me & eliminated the need to swap out discs.
Thanks guys for your help- SS 4.0 should make my M100 more better.
SP-CMC-2 (AT831s) --> SP-SPSB-1 (with levels & bass roll-off) --> iRiver H320 Rockboxed
SP-CMC-2 --> SP-SPSB-1 --> MZ-M100

Offline dunebug81

  • Trade Count: (0)
  • Needs to get out more...
  • *****
  • Posts: 2045
  • Gender: Male
Re: Best Mini Disc recorder???
« Reply #42 on: September 29, 2006, 01:42:49 PM »
Dunebug, you're right, I upgraded to 4.0 last night. Glad to hear that the flag is no longer written to the minidisc- I wished I upgraded prior to transferring the shows but....
Taper420, I started out using PCM but found that HI-SP sounded plenty fine to me & eliminated the need to swap out discs.
Thanks guys for your help- SS 4.0 should make my M100 more better.

Glad it worked out for you.  You should find that 4.0 is much more stable then the previous versions.
Greg
www.enemyzero.com/greg/
aim: dunebug81

Offline Scuba Jeremy

  • Trade Count: (0)
  • Taperssection Member
  • ***
  • Posts: 735
  • Gender: Male
  • "Ugh, is that digi noise?"
Re: Best Mini Disc recorder???
« Reply #43 on: October 01, 2006, 01:39:39 AM »
I read somewhere in the forums that another problem with MD/HIMD is that they can SKIP while recording (there is no buffer for recording like they have in playback).

If true, that's a fairly large negative IMHO. 

No its not true.
It's a spinning magneto-optical disc. There is far more room for error with an MD that with a solid state or even HD recorder. You can't beat the performance for the money, but I would rather not sacrifice quality just to make sure shows fit on a single disc. It's why I switched from MD to DAT, and then from DAT to SD.

Does anyone here actually enjoy mid show disc flips? And how hard is it to convince yourself that "SP1" really doesn't sound all that different from true lossless? Personally, I would never trade a show recorded at anything other than true lossless, and I know I'm not the only one. Yeah, location has a lot to do with the quality of a recording, but that's no reason to skimp on other factors, particularly recording media. But like it's been said, MD is the cheap way to get started in recording. And MD has come a long, long way from where it was just five years ago, but it's far from the end-all-be-all of field recording.

Offline beefstew

  • Trade Count: (0)
  • Taperssection Member
  • ***
  • Posts: 675
  • Gender: Male
  • 18
Re: Best Mini Disc recorder???
« Reply #44 on: October 01, 2006, 02:29:18 PM »
yeah i forsee all MD field recording to be almost non-existent within the next 5 years - if not earlier :-\
*Audio*
Mics:
SP-CMC-19
Panasonic WM61a

Recorders:
MZ-RH910 (Hi-MD)
Sony TC-WE435 (CASS)

*Video*
Canon ZR-500 [Mini DV]
54" Tripod

I spend most of my money on gambling, booze, and women. The rest i spend foolishly.

Offline King Ghidora

  • Trade Count: (0)
  • Taperssection Regular
  • **
  • Posts: 72
Re: Best Mini Disc recorder???
« Reply #45 on: October 02, 2006, 01:30:28 AM »
Again I think MD is already obselete for field recording of rock shows etc..  The technology had a long and very useful life but there are new technologies on the horizon that surpass it. 

But there are still good reasons to buy a HIMD recorder.  Recording rock concerts just isn't one of them.  It's still possible to record a rock concert well with MD.  But there are better ways to do it if you are just getting into recording.  When I first got into recording regular MD was among the best ways to record live.  DAT was around but it was ridiculously expensive and hard to find too.  I would still think I got a good recording if I recorded a rock show with HIMD but switching discs is definitely a hassle and can result in a lost section of a show if you aren't prepared.  A second recorder and mic will fix the problem even if the quality drops on a short section of your recording.  But it isn't 24 bit which obviously means it isn't top quality.  It's very good quality but it isn't top quality.  So if you're thinking about buying something really good why not go for top quality.  Unless you have a special need for MD it's really on it's way out.  It's had a great run but it's nearly over.

nameloc01

  • Guest
  • Trade Count: (0)
Re: Best Mini Disc recorder???
« Reply #46 on: October 02, 2006, 10:26:16 PM »
Again I think MD is already obselete for field recording of rock shows etc..  The technology had a long and very useful life but there are new technologies on the horizon that surpass it.  I would still think I got a good recording if I recorded a rock show with HIMD but switching discs is definitely a hassle and can result in a lost section of a show if you aren't prepared. 

well,its interesting to me.one of the top three reasons not to buy a md,is the removable media issus,more specifically flipping discs and losing part of a show.i dont think i have ever lost a part of a show(besides crowd noise)due to flipping discs. with the recent advent of that thing the internet,its not too difficult to do a little reaseach on a group or bands recent concert patterns setlists ect.you can almost predict,with 100% acurracy when there will be a moment pefect for the flip. and really most of the stuff i tape, i am already quite knowledgeable about setlists/patterns ect. and it really isnt a problem.
-like tommorrow for instance,social distortion... i havent looked at anything recently,but i can tell you i am only taking one 1GB disc,b/c i know they wont play over 1:20 minutes at the most.or at the TOOL shows i just did, that there would be a ten minute music free interlude,wher i could flip.
and i could be wrong, but it doesnt seem to me like mdhi-md is being played off as the "best" recording setup,technically its obvious,it isnt.its just a nice easy,DEPENDABLE way of getting a...,i'll as far as to say,generally good to really good recording.i mean its a stealth setup basically.what can really be expected?
i really love taping, most of the stuff i do is stealth. but i am honestly never going to drop any serious$$ on any open rig, i really just dont want to. i am fairly happy with what i have and do now(at least for now)and  i've managed to get several"tapes" that really can make you get up and boogie. :D
just my $.02
« Last Edit: October 02, 2006, 10:39:18 PM by nameloc01 »

Offline King Ghidora

  • Trade Count: (0)
  • Taperssection Regular
  • **
  • Posts: 72
Re: Best Mini Disc recorder???
« Reply #47 on: October 03, 2006, 02:32:49 AM »
Again I think MD is already obselete for field recording of rock shows etc..  The technology had a long and very useful life but there are new technologies on the horizon that surpass it.  I would still think I got a good recording if I recorded a rock show with HIMD but switching discs is definitely a hassle and can result in a lost section of a show if you aren't prepared. 

well,its interesting to me.one of the top three reasons not to buy a md,is the removable media issus,more specifically flipping discs and losing part of a show.i dont think i have ever lost a part of a show(besides crowd noise)due to flipping discs. with the recent advent of that thing the internet,its not too difficult to do a little reaseach on a group or bands recent concert patterns setlists ect.you can almost predict,with 100% acurracy when there will be a moment pefect for the flip.

I couldn't agree more.  I just bought a HIMD myself and it will be more than adequate for most of my applications.  My point about it being obselete is that there are better technologies available now.  Maybe obselete was the wrong word.  There are other things that are better about the newer technologies including bounce/skip errors not being a problem and uploads to a computer being much easier and far less risk of corrupted uploads.  Basically if I wanted to get the top show taping technology now I would have bought a R-09.  But I didn't need the best.  I paid about a third of what a R-09 costs and I got a recorder that has as much quality as I need at this point.  Some day I might need to do better audio but for now I'm set with a HIMD. 

I needed a really good audio recording device to match up with my video equipment.  I operate on a budget because I'm trying to make money at what I do and so far I've done pretty well at it.  I have a project that I'm working on where I need better audio than I can get with a less than pro level video camera.  The video is great with my cameras but the audio could be better.  So I'm using HIMD.  I already have a distribution setup for my project and they know what they're getting from my company.  I've done several projects (including a concert video) with MD audio uploaded through a decent sound card.  I haven't had a single complaint.  In fact I've had compliments on the sound quality from people who have been pros in the video field for many years.  I'm talking tv production pros not wedding video pros.  Mic placement means a LOT when it comes to recording audio.  If you get that part down then use a decent recording device people are going to like what you do.  I've already proven that.

HIMD is certainly a quality way to record and can easily produce the kind of audio that I need for my project.  That's why I just bought one.

Offline knoxmallette

  • Trade Count: (0)
  • Taperssection Newbie
  • *
  • Posts: 28
  • Gender: Male
Re: Best Mini Disc recorder???
« Reply #48 on: October 03, 2006, 12:47:28 PM »
I've made recordings that I am very proud of with Hi-MD- some lossless and some HI-SP (I know that may offend the lossless only crowd). However, I've had upload issues that I hope will be solved by SS 4.0.
I recently purchased an iRiver H120 that offers some features that my M100 didn't- (like 20gb on board) and it is my first line recorder but I believe there are occasions where my M100 may be a better option. In addition, the lossless recordings from both the H120 and M100 are equally impressive- to my ears anyway.
SP-CMC-2 (AT831s) --> SP-SPSB-1 (with levels & bass roll-off) --> iRiver H320 Rockboxed
SP-CMC-2 --> SP-SPSB-1 --> MZ-M100

Offline (((KB)))

  • Trade Count: (0)
  • Taperssection Member
  • ***
  • Posts: 361
  • Gender: Male
Re: Best Mini Disc recorder???
« Reply #49 on: October 03, 2006, 01:31:21 PM »
If you're deadset on MD, hi-MD is the way to go... some models are better only because of metering differences and in-put/ out-puts. If those are out of your price range and would settle for a normal MD, I have 2 decks still for sale.

http://taperssection.com/index.php?topic=71721.msg962725

PM me if you're interested.

-Kevin
C3000B>GP-DMIC20>ODL312>NJB3
One of my old fav's:
http://www.archive.org/details/antibalas2004-03-27

Offline Carlos E. Martinez

  • Trade Count: (0)
  • Taperssection Regular
  • **
  • Posts: 246
  • Gender: Male
Re: Best Mini Disc recorder???
« Reply #50 on: October 03, 2006, 05:22:25 PM »
Quote
Anything by Sharp.

But Sharp is not manufacturing any Hi-MD model, are they?


Offline Carlos E. Martinez

  • Trade Count: (0)
  • Taperssection Regular
  • **
  • Posts: 246
  • Gender: Male
Re: Best Mini Disc recorder???
« Reply #51 on: October 03, 2006, 05:48:13 PM »
I have a Sony Hi-MD, type MZ-RH10, which I bought some months ago, and could not use last Saturday because the Record steps are really a pain to go through.   

You have to go into Rec mode, then go into the menu, find Recording Settings, then REC Level, then go to Manual, then set Levels. This you have to do EVERY time you press Stop to wait for the next take. All this because Sony's default mode is AGC instead of Manual. This recording I was doing was not stealth, but going though all these paces was too much.

Is there any other way to handle this routine?

Unfortunately my Sharp 722 was not working well, and it failed to record that concert.

In any case I still find recording PCM in the Sony Hi-MD a good option, because the media is still cheaper than any card. So I think you can mate a card recorder, like the R-09, with Hi-MD as a more practical backup than using a laptop. You can store your recordings better.

If someone else can suggest a better way to handle recordings that you want to keep with pristine quality please do. By pristine I mean better than CD quality.

Carlos 
« Last Edit: October 03, 2006, 06:53:41 PM by Carlos E. Martinez »

Offline flintstone

  • Trade Count: (2)
  • Taperssection Member
  • ***
  • Posts: 767
Re: Best Mini Disc recorder???
« Reply #52 on: October 03, 2006, 06:51:09 PM »
"With Sony MZ-RH10...You have to go into Rec mode, then go into the menu,
find Recording Settings, then REC Level, then go to Manual,
then set Levels. This you have to do EVERY time you press Stop..."

Yes, this is truly a pain, and one major reason why Sharp MD recorders
used to be recommended over Sony MD models.

The new Sony MZ-RH1 Hi-MD fixes this issue.  The machine remembers
your settings from one recording session to the next.  It holds the settings
until you remove the internal battery for several minutes.  A quick change
of batteries usually retains the settings. 

This may sound like a little thing, but it makes the recorder a lot friendlier
and more spontaneous to use.

Flintstone


Offline Carlos E. Martinez

  • Trade Count: (0)
  • Taperssection Regular
  • **
  • Posts: 246
  • Gender: Male
Re: Best Mini Disc recorder???
« Reply #53 on: October 03, 2006, 06:58:32 PM »
It holds the settings until you remove the internal battery for several minutes.  A quick change
of batteries usually retains the settings. 


It holds the "Manual" setting too? That would be great.

Perhaps it's something that can be changed through firmware? That would be even better!

Though I don't think Sony uses such customer-friendly resources. Better get stupid us buy the new type.


Carlos

nameloc01

  • Guest
  • Trade Count: (0)
Re: Best Mini Disc recorder???
« Reply #54 on: October 03, 2006, 08:24:18 PM »
why are you hitting stop????? set your rec function(levels) and use the "pause button" this will stop the recording process but not require you to reset level functions.its really not that big of a deal.a little practice and you should be able to do it in the dark.

Offline Carlos E. Martinez

  • Trade Count: (0)
  • Taperssection Regular
  • **
  • Posts: 246
  • Gender: Male
Re: Best Mini Disc recorder???
« Reply #55 on: October 03, 2006, 09:06:26 PM »
why are you hitting stop????? set your rec function(levels) and use the "pause button" this will stop the recording process but not require you to reset level functions.

That is if you are recording one thing after another, like a musical concert or similar. But most portable units are fed with batteries, so you need to go into Stop on location recording, which is what I am planning to use it for.

It's not only the audio I am dealing with, but also video synced to it. Between one take and the other there might be long pauses, where  the battery would run down and the unit itself would shut-off.

Sony using automatic level as a default, set by a menu, is completely twisted. None of the Sharp MD recorders (don't know about the others, like Aiwa or Panasonic) were designed like that. If you want to put that into a cheaper model, where people might accept that, I can understand. Like on cheaper video cameras. But to put AGC as default on a top model costing more than $300?

On the Sharp you pressed REC, then PAUSE, and you were recording in Manual. Same levels and all. As you did even on a home cassette deck in the past.     

Offline (((KB)))

  • Trade Count: (0)
  • Taperssection Member
  • ***
  • Posts: 361
  • Gender: Male
Re: Best Mini Disc recorder???
« Reply #56 on: October 03, 2006, 10:04:10 PM »
why are you hitting stop????? set your rec function(levels) and use the "pause button" this will stop the recording process but not require you to reset level functions.

That is if you are recording one thing after another, like a musical concert or similar. But most portable units are fed with batteries, so you need to go into Stop on location recording, which is what I am planning to use it for.

It's not only the audio I am dealing with, but also video synced to it. Between one take and the other there might be long pauses, where  the battery would run down and the unit itself would shut-off....    

Just an FYI, with any DC powered device you can run an external battery pack. With this, pausing it for long lengths of time really isn't an issue. These can be fabricated w/ normal d-cell batteries, a consumer battery pack, or a professional battery pack. For instance, my battery pack (14 ah 12v SLA) would run a MD for about 24 hrs straight. A typical 7 ah 12v SLA it would be like 12 hrs straight. If you have issues w/ using aa batteries, this would be something ideal for you to look into.

-K
C3000B>GP-DMIC20>ODL312>NJB3
One of my old fav's:
http://www.archive.org/details/antibalas2004-03-27

Offline Carlos E. Martinez

  • Trade Count: (0)
  • Taperssection Regular
  • **
  • Posts: 246
  • Gender: Male
Re: Best Mini Disc recorder???
« Reply #57 on: October 03, 2006, 10:12:35 PM »

Just an FYI, with any DC powered device you can run an external battery pack.


Of course I am aware of that. But the portable units don't!

Try leaving a video camera or a DAT or an MD in pause: it will shut-off after a few minutes.

What I am saying is perhaps waiting 5, 10, 15, 30 minutes or more for the next take.

That Sony design has that flaw, no way to walk around it. Going into record mode in a flip is not something you can do with it. Pity.

Offline (((KB)))

  • Trade Count: (0)
  • Taperssection Member
  • ***
  • Posts: 361
  • Gender: Male
Re: Best Mini Disc recorder???
« Reply #58 on: October 03, 2006, 10:26:00 PM »

Just an FYI, with any DC powered device you can run an external battery pack.


Of course I am aware of that. But the portable units don't!

Try leaving a video camera or a DAT or an MD in pause: it will shut-off after a few minutes.

What I am saying is perhaps waiting 5, 10, 15, 30 minutes or more for the next take.

That Sony design has that flaw, no way to walk around it. Going into record mode in a flip is not something you can do with it. Pity.

ALL MD units can be run this way unless power is interupted... check out the photo.

EDIT: If the unit shuts off running something like this or off of AC,  it is because of excessive heat to the unit. This Will shut off the unit.

-K
« Last Edit: October 03, 2006, 10:33:41 PM by (((KB))) »
C3000B>GP-DMIC20>ODL312>NJB3
One of my old fav's:
http://www.archive.org/details/antibalas2004-03-27

Offline taper420

  • Trade Count: (0)
  • Taperssection All-Star
  • ****
  • Posts: 1039
  • Gender: Male
Re: Best Mini Disc recorder???
« Reply #59 on: October 03, 2006, 10:41:18 PM »
When changing discs, the unit MUST be stopped, not paused, in order to write the TOC....this mean on all units, but the new RH1 (and the old sharps), the manual settings must be set again...in addition to waiting for the TOC to write, and changing disc time, this means any SERIOUS taper, must have two units. Now I say serious because amongst the trading community, having a 30 second gap isn't usually acceptable, and if your recording lossy so you don't have to flip, it surely isnt acceptable. Now if your just recording for yourself, and your not trading, then thats one thing, but for serious tapers that actually want to share their recordings, two units is the only way to do it. Now if your thinking optimum setup for hi-md, its would be two rh1's, so you don't have to worry about the default settings, and no gap to worry about (just some minor cut and paste in post). Two Rh1's will run you $640. And that's 16 bit remember. Even a lesser setup with an Rh1 and first gen-unit (cause you have time setting up for the gap, so why worry about default settings on your patch unit) will run you around $420. The only way to do it cheap and serious is to get two first gen units for $200 and say screw the defaults.

So what was the questions...best md recorder?
Best HiMD with no money in mind = 2 X Rh1 = ~$640
best value HiMD = 2 x first gen units ~$200
best recorder for the money without all the headaches with patches and uploads (and how are the defaults?) and 24 bit= R09 ~$350

Offline King Ghidora

  • Trade Count: (0)
  • Taperssection Regular
  • **
  • Posts: 72
Re: Best Mini Disc recorder???
« Reply #60 on: October 04, 2006, 05:12:56 AM »
Neither one of my video cameras shut down while in paused mode.  They will sit until the battery goes dead before they shut down.  And battery life is one of the good things about MD recording.  I haven't really tried my HIMD to see how long it will record on a single battery but I get several hours of record time on a single battery from my old MD recorder.  It will certainly far exceed the length of the tape.

For my purposes letting the HIMD keep recording even during pauses is a very good idea because I only have to sync once with my video cameras that way.  People think they will get out of sync over the course of a disk or a tape on my video cameras but that has not been my experience except for a hiccup on my HIMD after I bought it.  I start all my recorders and sync one in editing and I don't have to sync again.  It's a very good setup really.

Swapping discs in the middle of a set is certainly a hassle.  If you know there will be a pause in the action for a couple of minutes then that's usually enough time to swap.  I've lost more time swapping video tapes really and they don't have any record settings to change.  I guess it was just more of a case of trying to swap too many things at once.

Regular MD was meant to be a replacement for cassettes.  I believe Sony accomplished that quite well when they first came out with MD technology.  MD grew into being a serious tapers technology replacing DAT for many people after the advent of HIMD.  Even before that people used MD because it was available and it was very good quality even if it was lossy.  There just wasn't anything better around at the time unless you wanted to spring for pro equipment.

nameloc01

  • Guest
  • Trade Count: (0)
Re: Best Mini Disc recorder???
« Reply #61 on: October 04, 2006, 08:43:02 PM »
When changing discs, the unit MUST be stopped, not paused, in order to write the TOC....this mean on all units, but the new RH1 (and the old sharps), the manual settings must be set again...in addition to waiting for the TOC to write, and changing disc time, this means any SERIOUS taper, must have two units. Now I say serious because amongst the trading community, having a 30 second gap isn't usually acceptable, and if your recording lossy so you don't have to flip, it surely isnt acceptable. Now if your just recording for yourself, and your not trading, then thats one thing, but for serious tapers that actually want to share their recordings, two units is the only way to do it. Now if your thinking optimum setup for hi-md, its would be two rh1's, so you don't have to worry about the default settings, and no gap to worry about (just some minor cut and paste in post). Two Rh1's will run you $640. And that's 16 bit remember. Even a lesser setup with an Rh1 and first gen-unit (cause you have time setting up for the gap, so why worry about default settings on your patch unit) will run you around $420. The only way to do it cheap and serious is to get two first gen units for $200 and say screw the defaults.

So what was the questions...best md recorder?
Best HiMD with no money in mind = 2 X Rh1 = ~$640
best value HiMD = 2 x first gen units ~$200
best recorder for the money without all the headaches with patches and uploads (and how are the defaults?) and 24 bit= R09 ~$350
umm............ the only way to do it seriously is to run 2 himd's because serious traders/tapers find a thirty second missing audience chatter unacceptable??  are you fucking kidding me????
i can probably give 500 names of people that have gotten shows from me over the years,but they too must not be too serious about anything.,seeing as how i only run one of my decks at a time,and there is always(at least with shows over 1.5 hours) a 20-30 gap of missing audience B.S. while the discs are flipped.
anyone else want to address these remarks?????

i'm now wondering if you have any of my non-acceptable recordings in your collection of serious tapes.???

Offline Carlos E. Martinez

  • Trade Count: (0)
  • Taperssection Regular
  • **
  • Posts: 246
  • Gender: Male
Re: Best Mini Disc recorder???
« Reply #62 on: October 04, 2006, 09:32:46 PM »
Neither one of my video cameras shut down while in paused mode.  They will sit until the battery goes dead before they shut down.  And battery life is one of the good things about MD recording.  I haven't really tried my HIMD to see how long it will record on a single battery but I get several hours of record time on a single battery from my old MD recorder.  It will certainly far exceed the length of the tape.

You know? You are absolutely right and I had it wrong. I just tried leaving the Sony Hi-MD and my Sony PDX10 in rec-pause, and they did not shut off even after half an hour. I missed a good chance to leave things recording in the Sony MD, instead of having the Shar shut-off due to some problem right by the end of the concert. I was video-taping, and I left the Sharp recording. Checked just by the end of the part I was most interested in, and it was still recording. When I got back the unit was off, and I thought the battery or the disc had run out. To find out later that it didn't write anything. 

Quote
For my purposes letting the HIMD keep recording even during pauses is a very good idea because I only have to sync once with my video cameras that way.  People think they will get out of sync over the course of a disk or a tape on my video cameras but that has not been my experience except for a hiccup on my HIMD after I bought it.  I start all my recorders and sync one in editing and I don't have to sync again.  It's a very good setup really.

You may not keep total sync in takes longer than 30 minutes, but you can always correct some frames now and then to get back to it. Probably one or two frames in one hour.

Quote
Swapping discs in the middle of a set is certainly a hassle.  If you know there will be a pause in the action for a couple of minutes then that's usually enough time to swap.  I've lost more time swapping video tapes really and they don't have any record settings to change.  I guess it was just more of a case of trying to swap too many things at once.

Swapping video tapes is certainly a lot quicker. I do it (as I did during that show) in less than 30 seconds. And you don't need to shut-off anything. The Sony MD is certainly a lot more complicated.

Quote
Regular MD was meant to be a replacement for cassettes.  I believe Sony accomplished that quite well when they first came out with MD technology.  MD grew into being a serious tapers technology replacing DAT for many people after the advent of HIMD.  Even before that people used MD because it was available and it was very good quality even if it was lossy.  There just wasn't anything better around at the time unless you wanted to spring for pro equipment.


In fact DAT was to be a cassette replacement, but the record industry did not allow that to happen. And MD just made it, mostly in Japan ane Europe, because it was not such great quality at first. So the labels didn't care for it. Sony was not smart enough to make it into a serious media, probably because by then they were already selling records too.

Another thing: how good is the quality when you tape in Hi-SP as compared to PCM? Same or better than old MD standard?

Offline Arni99

  • Trade Count: (0)
  • Taperssection Member
  • ***
  • Posts: 770
  • Gender: Male
Re: Best Mini Disc recorder???
« Reply #63 on: October 05, 2006, 04:21:13 AM »
HI-SP on HI-MD records in 256kbit/s ATRAC format.
It doesn´t sound bad BUT of course a WAV recording at 1411kbit/s sounds better and is more likely being accepted by lots of traders.
The transfer of a 95min WAV recording on HI-MD takes up to 40min as mechanical restrictions don´t allow a higher transfer-speed.

I used my md-recorders since 1994 for taping concerts.
Now i recently got an iriver H120 from ebay and it´s just awesome with rockbox-firmware for taping shows etc.!
Will NEVER use my HI-MD recorder again as I hate swapping discs after 95min when recording in WAV quality.
Arni
1st: SONY PCM-M10 + DPA 4060's + DPA MPS 6030 power supply (microdot)
2nd: iPhone 5 + "Rode iXY" microphone/"Zoom IQ5" microphone

Offline taper420

  • Trade Count: (0)
  • Taperssection All-Star
  • ****
  • Posts: 1039
  • Gender: Male
Re: Best Mini Disc recorder???
« Reply #64 on: October 05, 2006, 04:56:06 AM »
When changing discs, the unit MUST be stopped, not paused, in order to write the TOC....this mean on all units, but the new RH1 (and the old sharps), the manual settings must be set again...in addition to waiting for the TOC to write, and changing disc time, this means any SERIOUS taper, must have two units. Now I say serious because amongst the trading community, having a 30 second gap isn't usually acceptable, and if your recording lossy so you don't have to flip, it surely isnt acceptable. Now if your just recording for yourself, and your not trading, then thats one thing, but for serious tapers that actually want to share their recordings, two units is the only way to do it. Now if your thinking optimum setup for hi-md, its would be two rh1's, so you don't have to worry about the default settings, and no gap to worry about (just some minor cut and paste in post). Two Rh1's will run you $640. And that's 16 bit remember. Even a lesser setup with an Rh1 and first gen-unit (cause you have time setting up for the gap, so why worry about default settings on your patch unit) will run you around $420. The only way to do it cheap and serious is to get two first gen units for $200 and say screw the defaults.

So what was the questions...best md recorder?
Best HiMD with no money in mind = 2 X Rh1 = ~$640
best value HiMD = 2 x first gen units ~$200
best recorder for the money without all the headaches with patches and uploads (and how are the defaults?) and 24 bit= R09 ~$350
umm............ the only way to do it seriously is to run 2 himd's because serious traders/tapers find a thirty second missing audience chatter unacceptable??  are you fucking kidding me????
i can probably give 500 names of people that have gotten shows from me over the years,but they too must not be too serious about anything.,seeing as how i only run one of my decks at a time,and there is always(at least with shows over 1.5 hours) a 20-30 gap of missing audience B.S. while the discs are flipped.
anyone else want to address these remarks?????

i'm now wondering if you have any of my non-acceptable recordings in your collection of serious tapes.???

Ok, I'm not saying it's impossible to get a serious recording with one unit. What I'm saying is it's not practical to rely on one unit to get a glitch free recording EVERYTIME. If you can make your flip happen during pure audience chatter, then more power to you. It cross-fades great, and some dropped audience is always acceptable. But if your missing even ONE musical note, then you ARE making a compromise due to the limits of your technology. It might be fine if there are other tapers there, and you can download a patch later. But what happens when your the sole taper, and you gotta make that flip... and dam that jam has just been going on forever...I shoulda filpped at 60 min. But hey, if your one of the guys that stands there for a half hour and waits for that perfect moment between songs that might never come, go for it. It does add more sport to the hobby. Hell I did it for years, till I realized I could get a used patch unit dirt cheap, and save myself TONS of worrying that takes away from the show. When I say serious taper, I mean one who is going out there intent on getting the best recording they are capable of, and then trading it with the public. And believe it or not, most of the people I would call serious tapers believe "set it and forget it". This seems to be antithesis to minidisc. Now I'm also willing to accept that were coming from different places. There are plenty of bands out there that play songs, and then they stop and then they play another song. These also tend to be stealth jobs that minidisc is particularly well suited for. If this is the case then flipping is less of a concern (accept getting busted maybe). Then there are the bands which I KNOW will cause problems for a one unit, disc-flipper everytime. For instance, I just taped WSP recently and watched as the second set started stretching toward 90. There was only one flipper there, but he had to compromise his recording to do it. I always ask MDers what they do when they have to flip. I always get interesting answers. "oh, i'll flip during drums" "oh, can I record a patch?", "oh, I just run it on SP"... whatever the answer... if it's not "i got two", it's a compromise. I'm sorry but I can't remember EVER possessing a show that had music missing on it. Except for me back in the single md days. I realize the crux of your argument is that having a gap of audience chatter is fine. I agree. But I don't agree having any music missing is fine, when there is a dirt cheap alternative...to me, it just seems if you're flying solo you're not taking the hobby seriously. And in fact the number one reason I find when I ask an MDer what they do when they gotta flip, "Oh, I'll do it quick at a good spot, I've gotten pretty good at it.... besides, it's just for me".
« Last Edit: October 05, 2006, 05:06:06 AM by taper420 »

Offline knoxmallette

  • Trade Count: (0)
  • Taperssection Newbie
  • *
  • Posts: 28
  • Gender: Male
Re: Best Mini Disc recorder???
« Reply #65 on: October 05, 2006, 11:23:55 AM »
I guess the moral to the story is Hi-MD users are serious tapers just willing to deal with the disc swapping. I got exposed to taping through dead shows when cassettes were the only medium and losing part of the show came with territory.
SP-CMC-2 (AT831s) --> SP-SPSB-1 (with levels & bass roll-off) --> iRiver H320 Rockboxed
SP-CMC-2 --> SP-SPSB-1 --> MZ-M100

Offline dunebug81

  • Trade Count: (0)
  • Needs to get out more...
  • *****
  • Posts: 2045
  • Gender: Male
Re: Best Mini Disc recorder???
« Reply #66 on: October 05, 2006, 02:01:41 PM »
WTF?  A *SERIOUS* taper.....hahahah.  Taper 420 you take your recordings to a whole new level of obsessiveness.  In the last 2 months of taping Ive seen Tool, Raconteurs, Jars of Clay, Wolfmother, Nickelback, Godsmack, Candlebox, Muse, Rollins Band, and OAR.  Of those 10 bands only 3 have played longer then 90 min and all 3 had a break of several minutes at around the 75 min mark.  Plenty enough to make a tape flip.  A tape swap takes all of about 45 seconds.  I don't see why this is such a huge deal that would cause you such stress.  Perhaps you should start drinking more...or worry less about what other people use to tape shows with. 
Greg
www.enemyzero.com/greg/
aim: dunebug81

Offline taper420

  • Trade Count: (0)
  • Taperssection All-Star
  • ****
  • Posts: 1039
  • Gender: Male
Re: Best Mini Disc recorder???
« Reply #67 on: October 05, 2006, 02:31:49 PM »
WTF?  A *SERIOUS* taper.....hahahah.  Taper 420 you take your recordings to a whole new level of obsessiveness. 

Touche


In the last 2 months of taping Ive seen Tool, Raconteurs, Jars of Clay, Wolfmother, Nickelback, Godsmack, Candlebox, Muse, Rollins Band, and OAR.  Of those 10 bands only 3 have played longer then 90 min and all 3 had a break of several minutes at around the 75 min mark.  Plenty enough to make a tape flip.  A tape swap takes all of about 45 seconds. 

Like I said, we're coming from different places. These bands are better suited for taping with minidisc. The bands I see usually just play one 2+ hour jam, rarely with any musical breaks. Plus...it's not gonna work perfect for you everytime, even if you are seeing these bands. Although I can see why it's not so much a concern, stealth usually doesn't sound as good as open anyway, so why bother with perfection.

I don't see why this is such a huge deal that would cause you such stress. 
It used to be a cause for concern. Not so stressful as I made it seem I guess. Like I said, it can be fun cause it adds sport to the whole thing.

Perhaps you should start drinking more...or worry less about what other people use to tape shows with. 

Calm down, perhaps you should smoke more.....I'm just sharing my experience with people so they know what to expect. I'm not writing this so much for the people who are already using MD to record. If your using it, you already know the strengths and weaknesses and if the format is suited to the type of bands you like to see. I'm writing this more for the newbie that's just getting started and letting them know what they have in store if they choose MD.



nameloc01

  • Guest
  • Trade Count: (0)
Re: Best Mini Disc recorder???
« Reply #68 on: October 05, 2006, 06:49:07 PM »
When changing discs, the unit MUST be stopped, not paused, in order to write the TOC....this mean on all units, but the new RH1 (and the old sharps), the manual settings must be set again...in addition to waiting for the TOC to write, and changing disc time, this means any SERIOUS taper, must have two units. Now I say serious because amongst the trading community, having a 30 second gap isn't usually acceptable, and if your recording lossy so you don't have to flip, it surely isnt acceptable. Now if your just recording for yourself, and your not trading, then thats one thing, but for serious tapers that actually want to share their recordings, two units is the only way to do it. Now if your thinking optimum setup for hi-md, its would be two rh1's, so you don't have to worry about the default settings, and no gap to worry about (just some minor cut and paste in post). Two Rh1's will run you $640. And that's 16 bit remember. Even a lesser setup with an Rh1 and first gen-unit (cause you have time setting up for the gap, so why worry about default settings on your patch unit) will run you around $420. The only way to do it cheap and serious is to get two first gen units for $200 and say screw the defaults.

So what was the questions...best md recorder?
Best HiMD with no money in mind = 2 X Rh1 = ~$640
best value HiMD = 2 x first gen units ~$200
best recorder for the money without all the headaches with patches and uploads (and how are the defaults?) and 24 bit= R09 ~$350
umm............ the only way to do it seriously is to run 2 himd's because serious traders/tapers find a thirty second missing audience chatter unacceptable??  are you fucking kidding me????
i can probably give 500 names of people that have gotten shows from me over the years,but they too must not be too serious about anything.,seeing as how i only run one of my decks at a time,and there is always(at least with shows over 1.5 hours) a 20-30 gap of missing audience B.S. while the discs are flipped.
anyone else want to address these remarks?????

i'm now wondering if you have any of my non-acceptable recordings in your collection of serious tapes.???

Ok, I'm not saying it's impossible to get a serious recording with one unit. What I'm saying is it's not practical to rely on one unit to get a glitch free recording EVERYTIME. If you can make your flip happen during pure audience chatter, then more power to you. It cross-fades great, and some dropped audience is always acceptable. But if your missing even ONE musical note, then you ARE making a compromise due to the limits of your technology. It might be fine if there are other tapers there, and you can download a patch later. But what happens when your the sole taper, and you gotta make that flip... and dam that jam has just been going on forever...I shoulda filpped at 60 min. But hey, if your one of the guys that stands there for a half hour and waits for that perfect moment between songs that might never come, go for it. It does add more sport to the hobby. Hell I did it for years, till I realized I could get a used patch unit dirt cheap, and save myself TONS of worrying that takes away from the show. When I say serious taper, I mean one who is going out there intent on getting the best recording they are capable of, and then trading it with the public. And believe it or not, most of the people I would call serious tapers believe "set it and forget it". This seems to be antithesis to minidisc. Now I'm also willing to accept that were coming from different places. There are plenty of bands out there that play songs, and then they stop and then they play another song. These also tend to be stealth jobs that minidisc is particularly well suited for. If this is the case then flipping is less of a concern (accept getting busted maybe). Then there are the bands which I KNOW will cause problems for a one unit, disc-flipper everytime. For instance, I just taped WSP recently and watched as the second set started stretching toward 90. There was only one flipper there, but he had to compromise his recording to do it. I always ask MDers what they do when they have to flip. I always get interesting answers. "oh, i'll flip during drums" "oh, can I record a patch?", "oh, I just run it on SP"... whatever the answer... if it's not "i got two", it's a compromise. I'm sorry but I can't remember EVER possessing a show that had music missing on it. Except for me back in the single md days. I realize the crux of your argument is that having a gap of audience chatter is fine. I agree. But I don't agree having any music missing is fine, when there is a dirt cheap alternative...to me, it just seems if you're flying solo you're not taking the hobby seriously. And in fact the number one reason I find when I ask an MDer what they do when they gotta flip, "Oh, I'll do it quick at a good spot, I've gotten pretty good at it.... besides, it's just for me".
since you are apparently not aware... there are 3 crucial things that make or break a "good/serious" tape.
these three things are equally important,none more than the other.

1.the sound your recording itself.(this encompasses,the bands sound itself,the venue and its acoustics,and additional noise ie. drunken hillbliies next to you screaming,crowd chatter,whatever....)
2.your position in the venue.you're only going to pick up what you are able to.ie. if your in the back of a 20,000 seat arena its going to sound somewhat like it.)
3.your rig.i really dont think we need to go into this anymore.

WITHOUT ALL THREE OF THESE FACTORS IN THE BEST POSSIBLE ARRANGEMENT YOU WILL NOT GET A PERFECT RECORDING.PERIOD.

so to put the emphasis solely on what rig your are running,really, is very,very wookie-ish.you could be recording with a 128 channel digital recording console,but if your in the nosebleeds with a bunch of asshole screaming,its not going to do a whole hell of a lot of good.

like i said before, to go into a situation not knowing what the fuck you are recording is also very wookie-ish. a little research and its not hard to find out (pre-show) where you need to flip(its worked for me every time)

and i cant think of off hand,any band that doesnt take at least a 30 second break somewhere prior to 1.5 hours into the show.i am sure they are out there, but i havent run across one yet.

your comments about earlier about anyone who doesnt run 2 himds or a r-9 obviously isnt serious,makes me think of this.

mike milliard,circa 1977.taping zeppelin at the forum(L.A.) uses a wheel chair as a prop to import his analog cassette deck and mics into the arena,along with his helpers,yes,he had them.and then proceeds to record some of the best live stuff ever done.period. on a fuckin cassette recorder.if you  dont know what i am talking about,listen to his 6/21/77 source.tits.
its surprising,coming from someone who really wasnt a serious taper.


Offline King Ghidora

  • Trade Count: (0)
  • Taperssection Regular
  • **
  • Posts: 72
Re: Best Mini Disc recorder???
« Reply #69 on: October 07, 2006, 01:46:06 AM »


For my purposes letting the HIMD keep recording even during pauses is a very good idea because I only have to sync once with my video cameras that way.  People think they will get out of sync over the course of a disk or a tape on my video cameras but that has not been my experience except for a hiccup on my HIMD after I bought it.  I start all my recorders and sync one in editing and I don't have to sync again.  It's a very good setup really.

You may not keep total sync in takes longer than 30 minutes, but you can always correct some frames now and then to get back to it. Probably one or two frames in one hour.

I actually don't have much of a problem with sync times.  With my old recorders I can record a full mini-dv tape and only be off by a frame or two (1/29th of a second).  The used HIMD I just bought started out having a SERIOUS problem with sync times though.  It was off by as much as 4 minutes on a 30 minute recording.  It finally started recording right on time just like my old MD but I almost sent it back to the seller after some serious drama over whether it actually had a problem or not.  It's always possible to use time stretch in a good audio editor to fix problems but it's a hassle to get it right.  Still I prefer time stretch to messing with the frames unless it's just a single frame or two.  Not too many people will notice that small of a correction.

Regular MD was meant to be a replacement for cassettes.  I believe Sony accomplished that quite well when they first came out with MD technology.  MD grew into being a serious tapers technology replacing DAT for many people after the advent of HIMD.  Even before that people used MD because it was available and it was very good quality even if it was lossy.  There just wasn't anything better around at the time unless you wanted to spring for pro equipment.


In fact DAT was to be a cassette replacement, but the record industry did not allow that to happen. And MD just made it, mostly in Japan ane Europe, because it was not such great quality at first. So the labels didn't care for it. Sony was not smart enough to make it into a serious media, probably because by then they were already selling records too.


Yeah both technologies along with DCC were meant to replace cassettes and there was supposed to be a war to see which technology won out.  But as we know cassettes continued for quite a while after that mainly because of price IMO.  BTW I have only actually seen one or two DCC decks ever.  They just never got out of the starting gate.  I know most people think SCMS killed DAT but for me it was the price.  I could just never justify spending $600 in early 1990's  dollars for a recorder when a MD was available for much less (I bought a my first md, a MD-R70, at a Sony outlet store for $70 which was a steal of course).  I think price was a problem for a lot of people.  $600 back then would be equal to $1000 today.  Even on this board there aren't a lot of people spending that much before they start buying mics.  And even MD was priced too high for the market cassettes really occupied.  DAT and MD were both much more upscale and people were just happy to have anything that would give them decent sound so they stuck with the cheaper priced technology.  Plus the marketing of both technologies really stunk.  There was just never enough of a first buyer market to drive the price down.  Whether it was SCMS or whether people just thought cassettes were really good enough and the price was too high or maybe it was a combination of both at any rate none of those technologies really caught on in the US.  MD did in Japan thank goodness or we would have never had the good stuff we did get.

As for Hi-SP compared to old MD recorders I can't say as I can hear much of a difference.  They both sound pretty good.  It's not like LP-4 or anything.  The earlier models of MD might not sound as good IMO.

Offline Carlos E. Martinez

  • Trade Count: (0)
  • Taperssection Regular
  • **
  • Posts: 246
  • Gender: Male
Re: Best Mini Disc recorder???
« Reply #70 on: October 08, 2006, 12:29:15 PM »
At the time of DAT development I followed the comes and goings a lot, through a magazine called Studio Sound (unfortunately dead now).

The main question was that the recording companies threatened to sue the equipment manufacturers in spite of any protection measures that were being taken. The whole copy protection story would be funny if it wasn't tragic, because the question made it to the US Congress, to test a system (pre-SCMS) that supposedly locked recorders if you tried to record a protected disk.

The problem was the system was analog and didn't work as it should, didn't protect when it should have. Even worst: you could identify protected recordings from unprotected by just listening to them, when the protection should be invisible. It was rejected by Congress and the bill didn't pass.

But the threat on manufacturers was so high that they gave up on real mass production, making only DAT machines with SCMS (which could be easily defeated, as proved later on) mostly for the hi-end and pro market. That's why they were expensive.

Scale manufacturing, which would have lowered the prices in machines and tapes, never took over. But if they did you would have found a $70 DAT player.

So you have to blame this on the recording labels, mainly RIAA. They should be blamed for not letting progress and high quality move the road it was moving in.

In fact I am very pleased to see what is happening to audio & film industry, with piracy taking over a large part of their business and they not knowing how to fight it.

My recipe for fighting piracy: sell records so cheap that it wouldn't be good business to copy them, instead of going after as much money as they want to get. Same thing for movie tickets or DVDs.
 
« Last Edit: October 08, 2006, 09:12:51 PM by Carlos E. Martinez »

Offline King Ghidora

  • Trade Count: (0)
  • Taperssection Regular
  • **
  • Posts: 72
Re: Best Mini Disc recorder???
« Reply #71 on: October 09, 2006, 12:35:52 AM »
I knew the record companies were behind SCMS and other hassles for DAT.  It was before they learned their lesson on VCR's where what they thought would kill them became one of their biggest markets.  It's the same now.  They keep fighting downloads but they don't understand that 20 people will pay a dollar for a CD more often than one person will pay $20 for a CD.  It's simple economics but I guess they are too simple to get it.

Offline Carlos E. Martinez

  • Trade Count: (0)
  • Taperssection Regular
  • **
  • Posts: 246
  • Gender: Male
Re: Best Mini Disc recorder???
« Reply #72 on: October 09, 2006, 07:12:44 AM »
I knew the record companies were behind SCMS and other hassles for DAT.  It was before they learned their lesson on VCR's where what they thought would kill them became one of their biggest markets. 

Yes. What they wanted to forbid was cassette home copies people were starting to do for their cars and walkmans. So the inhibiting system, called Copycode, was supposed to be added in every cassette recorder. Every disc, LP and CD, was to have a fixed frequency peak recorded, which the recording machine would identify and not allow recording from it. That peak was supposed not to be listened.

The problem, as I said above, was the system didn't disengage recording on the presence of the tone and on listening tests people could identify recordings with that tone included.

But with DAT they were absolutely vicious. As this analog protection system was not approved, and they knew an analog recording from CD would still be very good, they threatened suing any vendor that brought DAT machines into the US. None did and the manufacturers, which would also be sued, developed the SCMS and try for a long time until they could get a green light from the RIAA.

By then the equipment manufacturers were already onto different plans, none of them considering a no-loss system as something for everybody. MD, DCC, etc. were some of them. None of them providing a perfect copy. Only the pro market, with pro prices, was allowed using DAT. And it didn't last too long.

The irony was that people didn't want all that quality and accepted MD quite well, mainly in Japan and Europe. Even cassette recordings flourished, still sold today,  mostly for commuters and their walkmans. You could find excellent walkman machines, by Sony and others, out of the US.

Until someone invented MP3 and the rest is history.

Something similar happened in video, where LV records were much better, quality wise, than DVD. But they were cheaper to produce, even if at first not sold so cheap. Only now, with new HD formats coming by, we may get back on track with "high quality for everybody", which I think should be fair. You can see how RIAA's greed was prejudicial to us all.     

 

RSS | Mobile
Page created in 0.453 seconds with 98 queries.
© 2002-2024 Taperssection.com
Powered by SMF