Become a Site Supporter and Never see Ads again!

Author Topic: TLs vs. 414s  (Read 11016 times)

0 Members and 1 Guest are viewing this topic.

Offline Bdifr78

  • Trade Count: (3)
  • Taperssection All-Star
  • ****
  • Posts: 1865
  • Gender: Male
TLs vs. 414s
« on: November 26, 2005, 07:16:43 PM »
Hey All,

I am at the point where I want to get a pair of LD mics to play around with and need help with the decision.  I really like the AKG 414s, one of the new versions with the subcards of course.  But I also seem to love the sound of the ADK TLs.  So I would love to hear people's opinions on the comparison of the two.  I am looking for opinions on sound quality, and of course VALUE.  Seeing that I could get a new pair of TLs for around $500 less than a used pair of 414s, I think that will make it hard to argue that the 414s are a better value but you gotta factor in the subcards.  So please fly your opinions at me and don't be shy with reccomendations of other LDs either.  The reason I am focusing on these two mics is because any other LD mic that I know of that I would want are gonna be way out of my price range for an upcoming purchase.  I have certainly heard people argue this case before but when doing a search I couldn't find a good comparison thread.  Any input would be greatly appreciated.

Thanks,
Joe
Neumann KM140s>Bumblebee MIAGI-II XLRs>Lunatec V3>SD722

Offline bagtagsell

  • Trade Count: (0)
  • Taperssection All-Star
  • ****
  • Posts: 1221
  • Gender: Male
  • Man is condemned to be free- Sartre
Re: TLs vs. 414s
« Reply #1 on: November 26, 2005, 07:30:19 PM »
how often are you going to run subcards?  seems like a very seldom used pattern...
MG200/210>m148>v3>MT2496
                       
*aspiring gear slut of the month year*
"I am the gear slut goo goo g’joob g’goo goo g’joob"

Offline Bdifr78

  • Trade Count: (3)
  • Taperssection All-Star
  • ****
  • Posts: 1865
  • Gender: Male
Re: TLs vs. 414s
« Reply #2 on: November 27, 2005, 12:19:25 AM »
very true...

But might it not be worth it to always have the option?
Neumann KM140s>Bumblebee MIAGI-II XLRs>Lunatec V3>SD722

Offline sygdwm

  • unknown sleath taper
  • Trade Count: (1)
  • Needs to get out more...
  • *****
  • Posts: 8747
  • Gender: Male
Re: TLs vs. 414s
« Reply #3 on: November 27, 2005, 12:26:00 AM »
sac up and get the 414's. subcards are sick. you will run them more often than you think.
mics: (4)akg c460b(a60,mk46,ck1x,ck1,ck2,ck3,ck61,ck63)
pres: oade m148/edirol wmod ua5
recorders: marantz stock671/oade acm671/fostex busman vintage fr2le

(P.S.: On a threaded discussion board like this one, there's no need to repeat someone's post when you reply to them; everyone can see all the messages in the thread.)

Offline Brian Skalinder

  • Complaint Dept.
  • Trade Count: (28)
  • Needs to get out more...
  • *****
  • Posts: 18868
  • Gender: Male
Re: TLs vs. 414s
« Reply #4 on: November 27, 2005, 12:49:01 AM »
sac up and get the 414's. subcards are sick. you will run them more often than you think.

With my Schoeps, I run subcards every chance I get.  With my 414s, I find myself running Blumlein instead of subcards b/c Blumlein sounds soooooo good!  I haven't even run my 414s subcards yet...that'll change soon.  :)  And I suspect it'll sound mighty fine.
Milab VM-44 Links > Fostex FR-2LE or
Naiant IPA (tinybox format) >
Roland R-05

Offline audBall

  • Trade Count: (37)
  • Needs to get out more...
  • Posts: 6479
  • Gender: Male
  • Feel brand new about it
Re: TLs vs. 414s
« Reply #5 on: November 27, 2005, 12:53:09 PM »
sac up and get the 414's. subcards are sick. you will run them more often than you think.

With my Schoeps, I run subcards every chance I get.  With my 414s, I find myself running Blumlein instead of subcards b/c Blumlein sounds soooooo good!  I haven't even run my 414s subcards yet...that'll change soon.  :)  And I suspect it'll sound mighty fine.

Another 414 vote here.  Given the right circumstances, you may wish you had the subs if you end up going the TL route.    However, I instantly fell in love with blumlein the first time I ran it.   .....soooo dreamy!!   :P  I do think they're worth it for the extra pattern, and yes, you will use it.
mg m20.21.23 ■ akg ck61.62.63 »  nbob■naiant
aercomp2 ■ v2∞3 ■ sx-m2d2
d100 ■ pmd661 ■ r44ocm ■ f3

Offline spyder9

  • Trade Count: (82)
  • Needs to get out more...
  • *****
  • Posts: 13198
  • Gender: Male
  • "Are you Zman?"
    • My Archived shows
Re: TLs vs. 414s
« Reply #6 on: November 27, 2005, 01:24:53 PM »
sac up and get the 414's. subcards are sick. you will run them more often than you think.

With my Schoeps, I run subcards every chance I get.  With my 414s, I find myself running Blumlein instead of subcards b/c Blumlein sounds soooooo good!  I haven't even run my 414s subcards yet...that'll change soon.  :)  And I suspect it'll sound mighty fine.

Another 414 vote here.  Given the right circumstances, you may wish you had the subs if you end up going the TL route.    However, I instantly fell in love with blumlein the first time I ran it.   .....soooo dreamy!!   :P  I do think they're worth it for the extra pattern, and yes, you will use it.

A vote for 414s as well.  The 414s are way more sensitive than the TL's (23mv vs 11mv).  Which helps in the "detail" department.  I really liked the 414s when I had them. Though, the TL's are rock solid themselves from the recordings I've heard, I'd suggest the 414s over the TL's if you have the extra money to spend.  They're worth it. 

Offline SonicSound

  • Trade Count: (0)
  • Taperssection All-Star
  • ****
  • Posts: 1569
  • Gender: Male
Re: TLs vs. 414s
« Reply #7 on: November 27, 2005, 01:54:16 PM »
With my Schoeps, I run subcards every chance I get.  With my 414s, I find myself running Blumlein instead of subcards b/c Blumlein sounds soooooo good!  I haven't even run my 414s subcards yet...that'll change soon.  :)  And I suspect it'll sound mighty fine.

Run your Schoeps Blumlein ===>  SWEET ;)

I love the sound of subcards NOS
SD: Schoeps  M222/NT222's & CMC6's - MK 41V's, 21's, 5's, 8's
LD: Microtech Gefell UM900's, Shure KSM44's
V3, 744t

Offline Brian Skalinder

  • Complaint Dept.
  • Trade Count: (28)
  • Needs to get out more...
  • *****
  • Posts: 18868
  • Gender: Male
Re: TLs vs. 414s
« Reply #8 on: November 27, 2005, 02:19:29 PM »
Run your Schoeps Blumlein ===>  SWEET ;)

I would love to!  But I don't have a pair of MK8s.  I don't even have a single MK8 to run M-S.  Figure-8s is one of the big reasons I keep my 414s.  One of these days, I'll have the cash to pick up a pair of MK8s...   :drool:
Milab VM-44 Links > Fostex FR-2LE or
Naiant IPA (tinybox format) >
Roland R-05

Offline keepongoin

  • Trade Count: (4)
  • Needs to get out more...
  • Posts: 5433
  • Gender: Male
Re: TLs vs. 414s
« Reply #9 on: November 27, 2005, 04:44:07 PM »
i don't think that the 414s are quite as forgiving as the TLs in shitty sounding rooms.  just my experience in running them twice and running the TLs over 150 times.
“When fascism comes to America, it will be wrapped in the flag and carrying the cross.” Sinclair Lewis: How Fascism Will Come To America (1935)

"Science is facts; just as houses are made of stones, so is science made of facts; but a pile of stones is not a house and a collection of facts is not necessarily science."- Henri Poincare

http://www.archive.org/bookmarks/pierce

Offline Unitmonster

  • Trade Count: (0)
  • Taperssection Member
  • ***
  • Posts: 556
  • taboot taboot
    • List
Re: TLs vs. 414s
« Reply #10 on: November 27, 2005, 05:55:44 PM »
I love subcards.  Possibly my fave pickup pattern.
AT853rx (c,sc,o)> Fostex FR2-LE (Busman T-Mod)

Offline carlbeck

  • Trade Count: (14)
  • Needs to get out more...
  • *****
  • Posts: 2811
  • Gender: Male
Re: TLs vs. 414s
« Reply #11 on: November 27, 2005, 08:11:36 PM »
I am a huge fan of Blumlein & sub-cards. Go for the 414's, you will love them.
I know you like, tape for people's approval and stuff, and wave your tapes around like they're your dick...  but even you can't actually think section tapes from philips sound good.  



Mics: Telefunken Elam 260, 61, 62, MBHO KA200, KA500 > Niant PFA's, AKG C34L-MS
Preamps: Grace Lunatec V2, Shure FP24
Decks: Tascam DR-2d, Zoom F8

Old rig: Recording: AKG C34 & AKG CK1X or CK2X > MK46 > 460 > Aeta Mix2000 > Sound Devices 702

Playback: Thorens TD125, Denon DVD-2900> Bel Canto DAC-1 > Audible Illusions 3B > Rogue Atlas >ZU Wax Shotgun> Hyperion 938
ALL TUBES BABY!!!

Offline eric.B

  • to the side qualified
  • Trade Count: (0)
  • Needs to get out more...
  • *****
  • Posts: 2796
Re: TLs vs. 414s
« Reply #12 on: November 27, 2005, 08:43:37 PM »
I am a huge fan of Blumlein & sub-cards. Go for the 414's, you will love them.

yes..  and dont forget about m/s..  hmm  come to think of it, as long as the mics are in a location that sounds good with the right config, the 414's will make tasty tapes..  its just that m/s blumlien add a dash of magic to the mix     :D
We have a system that increasingly taxes work and subsidizes nonwork.  ~Milton Friedman

Offline Bdifr78

  • Trade Count: (3)
  • Taperssection All-Star
  • ****
  • Posts: 1865
  • Gender: Male
Re: TLs vs. 414s
« Reply #13 on: November 28, 2005, 05:03:12 PM »
WOW!  Overwhelming vote for 414s.  I am in no hurry so I could save a couple more months to get the 414s if that is they I decide to go.
Neumann KM140s>Bumblebee MIAGI-II XLRs>Lunatec V3>SD722

spreadheadtom

  • Guest
  • Trade Count: (0)
Re: TLs vs. 414s
« Reply #14 on: November 28, 2005, 05:22:45 PM »
414's  >:D

 

RSS | Mobile
Page created in 0.108 seconds with 40 queries.
© 2002-2024 Taperssection.com
Powered by SMF