Become a Site Supporter and Never see Ads again!

Author Topic: Shock Mount for 480 bodies  (Read 18898 times)

0 Members and 1 Guest are viewing this topic.

Offline Chomps

  • Trade Count: (18)
  • Needs to get out more...
  • *****
  • Posts: 4239
  • Gender: Male
Shock Mount for 480 bodies
« on: February 13, 2008, 02:54:51 PM »
What is the best mount to use?
http://www.zzounds.com/item--JOEJM27SM
Will these do the trick ;D



Keith
Microtech Gefell m200/M20/M21/nBob Actives>PFA
Microtech Gefell m950
AKG 414 XLII
Telefunken M60/M61/M62
AT853
SD MP 10ii//Edirol R-44/Sony M10

Offline Chomps

  • Trade Count: (18)
  • Needs to get out more...
  • *****
  • Posts: 4239
  • Gender: Male
Re: Shock Mount for 480 bodies
« Reply #1 on: February 13, 2008, 02:58:36 PM »
Microtech Gefell m200/M20/M21/nBob Actives>PFA
Microtech Gefell m950
AKG 414 XLII
Telefunken M60/M61/M62
AT853
SD MP 10ii//Edirol R-44/Sony M10

Offline kbergend

  • Trade Count: (5)
  • Taperssection Regular
  • **
  • Posts: 238
  • Gender: Male
Re: Shock Mount for 480 bodies
« Reply #2 on: February 13, 2008, 03:47:04 PM »
http://www.fullcompass.com/product/304673.html
how about these?

I've been using the Shures for a while now, and I really like them.  They're much more compact (and thus easier to pack) than spider-type isolation systems and have been just as effective in my experience. 
Keith from NY

Gefell M200/210, AKG 481/2/3, Milab DC-196 and VM-44 Link
Darktrain cables
Grace Lunatec V3, RME Fireface UFX
Tascam DR-680, Oade Concert R-44, Oade Concert PMD661, JoeCo BlackBox

Offline Chomps

  • Trade Count: (18)
  • Needs to get out more...
  • *****
  • Posts: 4239
  • Gender: Male
Re: Shock Mount for 480 bodies
« Reply #3 on: February 13, 2008, 03:52:36 PM »
http://www.fullcompass.com/product/304673.html
how about these?

I've been using the Shures for a while now, and I really like them.  They're much more compact (and thus easier to pack) than spider-type isolation systems and have been just as effective in my experience. 


Thanks for the input. I really like how low pro they are.


Keith
Microtech Gefell m200/M20/M21/nBob Actives>PFA
Microtech Gefell m950
AKG 414 XLII
Telefunken M60/M61/M62
AT853
SD MP 10ii//Edirol R-44/Sony M10

stevetoney

  • Guest
  • Trade Count: (0)
Re: Shock Mount for 480 bodies
« Reply #4 on: February 13, 2008, 03:57:37 PM »
Shure donuts look nice...but I can tell you that without a doubt the meeks that you linked work also.  I used them without incident.  I still have the Meeks and use a single Meek as the mount for my Neumann active setup and I really like it's isolating abilities.  The bands are a bit springy so that I knwo there won't be any sound transmission through the mount.

One semi neg comment about the Meeks is that with the springy bands, if you have cables that aren't very pliable, they can tug a bit on the back of the 480s, which of course are rather long mic bodies so they jut out the back of the mount a ways.  If your cables aren't hanging very freely, they can tug at the back of the mic bodies and cause some sagging, since the mount isn't a real tight banded mount.

If I were to do it all over again, I'd probably go with the donuts as long as people could assure me that there is good sound isolution from bumps through the rubber donut in the mount. I know that there are lots of satisfied users with these.

Offline OFOTD

  • Amorican
  • Trade Count: (7)
  • Needs to get out more...
  • *****
  • Posts: 6307
Re: Shock Mount for 480 bodies
« Reply #5 on: February 13, 2008, 04:15:22 PM »
I have both mounts.  The Meeks, the donuts and some Avatones.  I use the Avatone for my 480's.  I just think they're best suited for the 480's.   The Meeks are nice for the price I just don't trust them.   The donuts feel like the 480's are a tad too heavy so I only use them with my Kwon bars now.   The Avatone's are heavier but provide great isolation as well as not dipping or moving with the weight of the full bodies and attached cables.

Offline John Willett

  • Trade Count: (0)
  • Taperssection All-Star
  • ****
  • Posts: 1550
  • Gender: Male
  • Bio:
    • Sound-Link ProAudio
Re: Shock Mount for 480 bodies
« Reply #6 on: February 13, 2008, 04:18:24 PM »
The best will definitely be the new Rycote INV-7 from their new "InVision" studio range.

Will take any SDC from 19mm to 25mm in diameter.



Not only are they virtually unbreakable - they are technically better than most manufacturer mounts - and at a price you will be surprised at (ie: very low).  ;D

In the shops soon - I am definitely going to change all my SDC shockmounts for this new range.  ;D

Offline NOLAfishwater

  • is not taping much these days
  • Trade Count: (72)
  • Needs to get out more...
  • *****
  • Posts: 6344
  • Gender: Male
  • I LIKE FISHIN
Re: Shock Mount for 480 bodies
« Reply #7 on: February 13, 2008, 04:20:05 PM »

Offline CTDave

  • Trade Count: (8)
  • Taperssection All-Star
  • ****
  • Posts: 1073
  • Gender: Male
Re: Shock Mount for 480 bodies
« Reply #8 on: February 13, 2008, 08:13:06 PM »
Hey Keith,
You probably know this, but both Kris and I use the AT8410's. Yes, they are ancient and huge, but they work, and I think there is a pair in the yard for $40.00

Dave
AKG C480b ck61/ck63 > Bumblebee Miagi-II cables > Grace Lunatec V3 > Edirol R-4

AT853RX > Denecke PS-2 > Denecke AD-20 > JB3

Offline Chuck

  • Trade Count: (42)
  • Needs to get out more...
  • *****
  • Posts: 10811
  • Gender: Male
  • time between the notes...
    • My recordings on the LMA
Re: Shock Mount for 480 bodies
« Reply #9 on: February 13, 2008, 08:29:14 PM »
I use the Joe Meeks for my C-480's. I like them.
I've heard (from Bean?) that the Shure donut is pretty tight when used with the C-480's.
Reality is merely an illusion, albeit a very persistent one.

Microphones: AKG C 480 B comb-ULS/ CK 61/ CK 63, Sennheiser MKE 2 elements,  Audix M1290-o, Micro capsule active cables w/ Naiant PFA's, Naiant MSH-1O, Naiant AKG Active cables, Church CA-11 (cardioid), (1) Nady SCM-1000 (mod)
Pre-amps: Naiant littlebox, Naiant littlekit v2.0, BM2p+ Edirol UA-5, Church STC-9000
Recorders: Sound Devices MixPre-6, iRiver iHP-120 (Rockboxed & RTC mod)

Recordings on the LMA: http://www.archive.org/bookmarks/ChuckM
Recording website & blog: http://www.timebetweenthenotes.com

Offline George2

  • Trade Count: (1)
  • Taperssection Member
  • ***
  • Posts: 312
  • Gender: Male
Re: Shock Mount for 480 bodies
« Reply #10 on: February 13, 2008, 08:29:47 PM »
I've actually used the new Rycote, and they are very good and light weight. Made out of high quality plastic, unbreakable, very fast to mount/dismount the mike. Good isolation as well.
Sennheiser 418s>SDMixPre-D>RO9HR
Beyer MC930>Fostex FM3>NagraSD
Couple of Schoeps CMT441 too.

Offline Chuck

  • Trade Count: (42)
  • Needs to get out more...
  • *****
  • Posts: 10811
  • Gender: Male
  • time between the notes...
    • My recordings on the LMA
Re: Shock Mount for 480 bodies
« Reply #11 on: February 13, 2008, 08:39:24 PM »
I've actually used the new Rycote, and they are very good and light weight. Made out of high quality plastic, unbreakable, very fast to mount/dismount the mike. Good isolation as well.

What is the cost on those?
Reality is merely an illusion, albeit a very persistent one.

Microphones: AKG C 480 B comb-ULS/ CK 61/ CK 63, Sennheiser MKE 2 elements,  Audix M1290-o, Micro capsule active cables w/ Naiant PFA's, Naiant MSH-1O, Naiant AKG Active cables, Church CA-11 (cardioid), (1) Nady SCM-1000 (mod)
Pre-amps: Naiant littlebox, Naiant littlekit v2.0, BM2p+ Edirol UA-5, Church STC-9000
Recorders: Sound Devices MixPre-6, iRiver iHP-120 (Rockboxed & RTC mod)

Recordings on the LMA: http://www.archive.org/bookmarks/ChuckM
Recording website & blog: http://www.timebetweenthenotes.com

Offline shaggy

  • Trade Count: (10)
  • Taperssection All-Star
  • ****
  • Posts: 1928
    • dwonk
Re: Shock Mount for 480 bodies
« Reply #12 on: February 13, 2008, 09:11:42 PM »
I've heard (from Bean?) that the Shure donut is pretty tight when used with the C-480's.

A53M are tight with C480 bodies, but totally doable....I dumped the AT8410s for them when I ran the C480s, those ATs are clumsy and take up too much space in a bag.  A53Ms are my favorite shock mount, really lo-profile and you can bang 'em around all day long with absolutely no ill effects.  Sold my A20s since I know they can let you down if left unsecure in a bag (the mic sled elastic hangers are the achilles heel of that mount, they sell replacements tho).

Offline George2

  • Trade Count: (1)
  • Taperssection Member
  • ***
  • Posts: 312
  • Gender: Male
Re: Shock Mount for 480 bodies
« Reply #13 on: February 13, 2008, 09:45:55 PM »
I don't know how much $, and it says on their website out March 2008.

http://www.rycote.com/products/invision/

The  one I have came with this Rycote S-series.

http://www.rycote.com/products/s_series/

Same shock mount.

Looks like shit.... works great.



Sennheiser 418s>SDMixPre-D>RO9HR
Beyer MC930>Fostex FM3>NagraSD
Couple of Schoeps CMT441 too.

Online Gordon

  • Trade Count: (22)
  • Needs to get out more...
  • *****
  • Posts: 11788
  • Gender: Male
    • my list
Re: Shock Mount for 480 bodies
« Reply #14 on: February 14, 2008, 01:08:35 AM »
from my post in the thread louie posted

many of us use the superlux hm32.  they aren't built like a tank but I'm still on my first pair ;)





http://www.superlux.us/smalldiaphragm.html

damn looks like they are about $17 each now!  I think they were like $8-10 each when I got them.  looks like the hm 30 is $9.  never used them though.


they do the job, are cheap, and are pretty damn lowpro for 480's.


here's some pics I took a while back when I first got them









Microtech Gefell M20 or M21 > Nbob actives > Naiant PFA > Sound Devices MixPre-6 II @ 32/48

https://archive.org/details/fav-gordonlw

https://archive.org/details/teamdirtysouth

 

RSS | Mobile
Page created in 0.068 seconds with 40 queries.
© 2002-2024 Taperssection.com
Powered by SMF