Become a Site Supporter and Never see Ads again!

Author Topic: AKG C414B-XLS windscreens  (Read 10644 times)

0 Members and 1 Guest are viewing this topic.

Offline Lil Kim Jong-Il

  • Trade Count: (6)
  • Needs to get out more...
  • *****
  • Posts: 6498
  • large Marge sent me
Re: AKG C414B-XLS windscreens
« Reply #15 on: February 27, 2007, 05:34:48 PM »
Cool.


I didn't intend to imply that the attenuation was a bad thing.  One thing I miss about running the DPAs was that flat response.  The neumann HF bup is bugging me a little and I was thinking the AKG bump might be the same way but resolved usinng the wind screens.
The first rule of amateur neurosurgery club is .... I forget.

Offline spcyrfc

  • Trade Count: (8)
  • Taperssection Member
  • ***
  • Posts: 941
  • Gender: Male
  • Live from River City
    • BordersCrossing.net
Re: AKG C414B-XLS windscreens
« Reply #16 on: October 25, 2007, 06:41:30 PM »
Months Later...

So it appears the WS 87 and WS89 both fith the 414.  Which is the better fit?  The 89 was tight, is the 87 loose at all?

thanks
luke
mkh8040>aerco mp-2>pcmd-50
PFS: AKG 414xls

Record Local

www.borderscrossing.net

Offline NOLAfishwater

  • is not taping much these days
  • Trade Count: (72)
  • Needs to get out more...
  • *****
  • Posts: 6344
  • Gender: Male
  • I LIKE FISHIN
Re: AKG C414B-XLS windscreens
« Reply #17 on: October 25, 2007, 06:49:13 PM »
Months Later...

So it appears the WS 87 and WS89 both fith the 414.  Which is the better fit?  The 89 was tight, is the 87 loose at all?

thanks
luke

read the post past the first paragraph and bingo:

Quote
And...the WS89 fit!

I actually have the Brian's old 414's with the WS89's.
« Last Edit: October 25, 2007, 06:55:15 PM by NOLAfishwater »

Offline spcyrfc

  • Trade Count: (8)
  • Taperssection Member
  • ***
  • Posts: 941
  • Gender: Male
  • Live from River City
    • BordersCrossing.net
Re: AKG C414B-XLS windscreens
« Reply #18 on: October 25, 2007, 06:53:45 PM »
From your measurements, the perimeter of the mic body would be 170mm (48 + 37 + 48 + 37).
The interior circumference of the WS89 would be ~144mm (C=D*pi), or 144=46*3.14.
The interior circumference of the WS87 would be ~176mm (C=D*pi), or 176=56*3.14.

The WS87 seems to be the closer match, but it could also be too loose, as you mentioned, which would be worse than too snug. Maybe someone has a pair of WS87 they would let you borrow?

right back at you 8)
mkh8040>aerco mp-2>pcmd-50
PFS: AKG 414xls

Record Local

www.borderscrossing.net

 

RSS | Mobile
Page created in 0.056 seconds with 29 queries.
© 2002-2024 Taperssection.com
Powered by SMF