Become a Site Supporter and Never see Ads again!

Author Topic: This is a new one.. weird channel imbalance with 4-channel mix (Audacity)  (Read 5489 times)

0 Members and 1 Guest are viewing this topic.

Offline acidjack

  • Site Supporter
  • Trade Count: (37)
  • Needs to get out more...
  • *
  • Posts: 5845
  • Gender: Male
Trying to mix two mic sources from a show.  Both from an R-44 so perfectly synced. I am using Audacity.

When I split stereo track and check the peak amplification, it is off by no more than .5dB in either direction between channels in each of the 2-channel pairs.  The waveforms look nearly identical. When played back individually, each channel peaks out pretty close to the same.

But when played back together, one channel (left) peaks dramatically higher - like one is peaking 6dB or more differently.  Given that the waveforms are both approximately channel balanced, can anyone give me any idea of why this would be?
Mics: Schoeps MK4V, MK41V, MK5, MK22> CMC6, KCY 250/5, KC5, NBob; MBHO MBP603/KA200N, AT 3031, DPA 4061 w/ d:vice, Naiant X-X, AT 853c, shotgun, Nak300
Pres/Power: Aerco MP2, tinybox v2  [KCY], CA-UBB
Decks: Sound Devices MixPre 6, Zoom F8, M10, D50

My recordings on nyctaper.com: http://www.nyctaper.com/?tag=acidjack | LMA: http://www.archive.org/bookmarks/acidjack | twitter: http://www.twitter.com/acidjacknyc | Soundcloud: https://soundcloud.com/acidjacknyc

Offline hoserama

  • Trade Count: (1)
  • Taperssection Member
  • ***
  • Posts: 521
  • Gender: Male
Might one of the channels gotten inverted somewhere along the way? Play with the phase inversion and that may fix it.
Audio: Countryman B3 + AT853(hypers/cards/subcards) + SBD feeds
Wireless Receivers: Lots of those
Antennas: Lots of those
Cables: Lots of those
Recorders: TE TX-6, Zoom L20R, Zoom F8, (3) Tascam 680, (3) Tascam 2D, Zoom H6, and a graveyard of irivers/nomads/minidiscs.

Offline page

  • Trade Count: (25)
  • Needs to get out more...
  • *****
  • Posts: 8388
  • Gender: Male
  • #TeamRetired
That would be my first check as well. Second would be it sounds like you are experiencing some phase cancelation (or phase amplification).
"This is a common practice we have on the bus; debating facts that we could easily find through printed material. It's like, how far is it today? I think it's four hours, and someone else comes in at 11 hours, and well, then we'll... just... talk about it..." - Jeb Puryear

"Nostalgia ain't what it used to be." - Jim Williams

Offline acidjack

  • Site Supporter
  • Trade Count: (37)
  • Needs to get out more...
  • *
  • Posts: 5845
  • Gender: Male
How would "phase inversion" have happened?   I apologize for not understanding - I assume you mean it's as if there are 2L, 2R (a 4ch mix) but one channel now has 3 channels and the other only has one? 

How would you check for this? And, given that all I did was take the raw recordings and import into Audacity, how could it have occurred? I tried re-importing the second set of channels, but it did not help...
Mics: Schoeps MK4V, MK41V, MK5, MK22> CMC6, KCY 250/5, KC5, NBob; MBHO MBP603/KA200N, AT 3031, DPA 4061 w/ d:vice, Naiant X-X, AT 853c, shotgun, Nak300
Pres/Power: Aerco MP2, tinybox v2  [KCY], CA-UBB
Decks: Sound Devices MixPre 6, Zoom F8, M10, D50

My recordings on nyctaper.com: http://www.nyctaper.com/?tag=acidjack | LMA: http://www.archive.org/bookmarks/acidjack | twitter: http://www.twitter.com/acidjacknyc | Soundcloud: https://soundcloud.com/acidjacknyc

Offline page

  • Trade Count: (25)
  • Needs to get out more...
  • *****
  • Posts: 8388
  • Gender: Male
  • #TeamRetired
How would "phase inversion" have happened?   I apologize for not understanding - I assume you mean it's as if there are 2L, 2R (a 4ch mix) but one channel now has 3 channels and the other only has one? 

How would you check for this? And, given that all I did was take the raw recordings and import into Audacity, how could it have occurred? I tried re-importing the second set of channels, but it did not help...

polarity inversion. In audacity, it's the Invert plugin. Some hardware have settings that will, or bugs that cause it (the V3 had a bug on certain serial numbers which would invert the polarity on one channel).
"This is a common practice we have on the bus; debating facts that we could easily find through printed material. It's like, how far is it today? I think it's four hours, and someone else comes in at 11 hours, and well, then we'll... just... talk about it..." - Jeb Puryear

"Nostalgia ain't what it used to be." - Jim Williams

runonce

  • Guest
  • Trade Count: (0)
You have your individual source's levels too high...

When you combine - some frequencies reinforce each other and create higher peaks than in either source alone.

This is a common problem when combining sources...and often overlooked.

One of the beauties of 24 bit audio is being able to record at a lower level so you still have some headroom when you combine sources.

Try reducing both sources 3db - before you combine -  until you dont get any overs...

Offline acidjack

  • Site Supporter
  • Trade Count: (37)
  • Needs to get out more...
  • *
  • Posts: 5845
  • Gender: Male
You have your individual source's levels too high...

When you combine - some frequencies reinforce each other and create higher peaks than in either source alone.

This is a common problem when combining sources...and often overlooked.

One of the beauties of 24 bit audio is being able to record at a lower level so you still have some headroom when you combine sources.

Try reducing both sources 3db - before you combine -  until you dont get any overs...

...but would this explain overloading only, or would it also explain one channel suddenly being dramatically higher?   The sources do not overload at all - they still have about -3dB of headroom, even on the higher-peaking one.

I'm going to try "invert" and this and see what I come up with.
Mics: Schoeps MK4V, MK41V, MK5, MK22> CMC6, KCY 250/5, KC5, NBob; MBHO MBP603/KA200N, AT 3031, DPA 4061 w/ d:vice, Naiant X-X, AT 853c, shotgun, Nak300
Pres/Power: Aerco MP2, tinybox v2  [KCY], CA-UBB
Decks: Sound Devices MixPre 6, Zoom F8, M10, D50

My recordings on nyctaper.com: http://www.nyctaper.com/?tag=acidjack | LMA: http://www.archive.org/bookmarks/acidjack | twitter: http://www.twitter.com/acidjacknyc | Soundcloud: https://soundcloud.com/acidjacknyc

runonce

  • Guest
  • Trade Count: (0)
Have you exported the mix and inspected the wav form or is this just on playback via audacity?

Id export it at least once - rule out a playback bug...

If the invert works - then I guess you have to start taking a look at the gear involved?

runonce

  • Guest
  • Trade Count: (0)
Another thought...

Is it possible that one channel is somehow - slightly out of sync?

Perhaps L+L is correct and has the higher peaks...but R+R is out of sync - and not getting the higher peaks that result when combining...

Offline page

  • Trade Count: (25)
  • Needs to get out more...
  • *****
  • Posts: 8388
  • Gender: Male
  • #TeamRetired
Another thought...

Is it possible that one channel is somehow - slightly out of sync?

Perhaps L+L is correct and has the higher peaks...but R+R is out of sync - and not getting the higher peaks that result when combining...

Also a possibility, especially if you are using 2 mic sources compared to a board and a set of room mics.

Can we get a 30 second sample of both sets?
"This is a common practice we have on the bus; debating facts that we could easily find through printed material. It's like, how far is it today? I think it's four hours, and someone else comes in at 11 hours, and well, then we'll... just... talk about it..." - Jeb Puryear

"Nostalgia ain't what it used to be." - Jim Williams

Offline acidjack

  • Site Supporter
  • Trade Count: (37)
  • Needs to get out more...
  • *
  • Posts: 5845
  • Gender: Male
^^^ I will try and do that.  Just to summarize:

Original sources were 2 mic pairs evenly spaced, running into an R-44.  Thus, they are not out of sync time-wise.

The individual stereo WAVs are within .5dB of each other consistently (visually and if you try the "Amplify" function to tell you how far the peaks are from 0)

I tried reversing the phasing, but all that did was result in the same effect in reverse.

I went ahead and exported the mixed WAV.  I then rebalanced the channels on the mixed WAV, and it seemed to be fine. 

I will try and post samples of each source individually plus a raw mixed later today or tomorrow.
Mics: Schoeps MK4V, MK41V, MK5, MK22> CMC6, KCY 250/5, KC5, NBob; MBHO MBP603/KA200N, AT 3031, DPA 4061 w/ d:vice, Naiant X-X, AT 853c, shotgun, Nak300
Pres/Power: Aerco MP2, tinybox v2  [KCY], CA-UBB
Decks: Sound Devices MixPre 6, Zoom F8, M10, D50

My recordings on nyctaper.com: http://www.nyctaper.com/?tag=acidjack | LMA: http://www.archive.org/bookmarks/acidjack | twitter: http://www.twitter.com/acidjacknyc | Soundcloud: https://soundcloud.com/acidjacknyc

Offline kcmule

  • Trade Count: (4)
  • Needs to get out more...
  • *****
  • Posts: 3159
  • Gender: Male
I'm voting for phase inverting as well.  I often have to do this
when taking 4 channel to my R4 (two ambient, two sbd).  I
generally only have to apply the phase inversion to one of the
channels on one of the sources, not to both channels of one
source.

runonce

  • Guest
  • Trade Count: (0)
For one track to be out of time - you would almost have to do this on purpose...(or by mistake)

And to be clear - I understand that the tracks are clock-synced...but Im suggesting one track has lost its time-sync with the other tracks...(although still clock synced)

Not too familiar with the R44 as far as importing goes...does it import all 4 tracks at once..?

I assume you are still moving one or another track set forward or backward in time using the Time Shift tool?

Offline page

  • Trade Count: (25)
  • Needs to get out more...
  • *****
  • Posts: 8388
  • Gender: Male
  • #TeamRetired
I'll go with general phase cancelation due to placement, but I'll wait till I see a 4ch sample to pass judgement. I've had it happen before.
"This is a common practice we have on the bus; debating facts that we could easily find through printed material. It's like, how far is it today? I think it's four hours, and someone else comes in at 11 hours, and well, then we'll... just... talk about it..." - Jeb Puryear

"Nostalgia ain't what it used to be." - Jim Williams

Offline live2496

  • Trade Count: (6)
  • Taperssection Member
  • ***
  • Posts: 699
  • Gender: Male
    • Gidluck Mastering
But when played back together, one channel (left) peaks dramatically higher - like one is peaking 6dB or more differently.  Given that the waveforms are both approximately channel balanced, can anyone give me any idea of why this would be?

Quite possibly there is some DC offset in that one channel.

I don't have experience removing it with Audacity but it does seem to have the function in the Normalize dialog. Perhaps it can be convinced to remove DC offset without normalizing the file.

Alternatively, you could try eq'ing out anything below 20 Hz or lower.

Gordon
AEA R88MKII > SPL Crimson 3 > Tascam DA-3000

Offline Shadow_7

  • Trade Count: (0)
  • Taperssection Member
  • ***
  • Posts: 310
I could also have been that one of your cables is inverted wiring wise.  Where they your cables?  It's not uncommon to have an inverted cable in your collection if you double mic drums on opposite sides of the head.  I've never done that myself, but in the absence of a phase reversal switch in the chain, it can be done to lower the work in post.

Depending on how you did the editing, you might have mixed things up.  On the little drop down to the left of tracks, you can split a stereo track.  And you can also assign whether that track plays left or right or both (mono).  Perhaps that track is set to mono, while the others only play on one of two ouput channels.  Or theres some phase thing going on.

Offline acidjack

  • Site Supporter
  • Trade Count: (37)
  • Needs to get out more...
  • *
  • Posts: 5845
  • Gender: Male
^^ So far I think it's just an odd reinforcement of signals.  I tested the mics at the show by snapping fingers in front of R/R and L/L.... both were right, so it's not the cables.

Also familiar with the Audacity drop-down settings - those were fine, too...

Anyway, the show ended up sounding fine - I just adjusted the levels.   Hear for yourself... http://www.nyctaper.com/?p=2821
Mics: Schoeps MK4V, MK41V, MK5, MK22> CMC6, KCY 250/5, KC5, NBob; MBHO MBP603/KA200N, AT 3031, DPA 4061 w/ d:vice, Naiant X-X, AT 853c, shotgun, Nak300
Pres/Power: Aerco MP2, tinybox v2  [KCY], CA-UBB
Decks: Sound Devices MixPre 6, Zoom F8, M10, D50

My recordings on nyctaper.com: http://www.nyctaper.com/?tag=acidjack | LMA: http://www.archive.org/bookmarks/acidjack | twitter: http://www.twitter.com/acidjacknyc | Soundcloud: https://soundcloud.com/acidjacknyc

Offline Shadow_7

  • Trade Count: (0)
  • Taperssection Member
  • ***
  • Posts: 310
Phase inversion isn't going to show up as Left being Right or Right being Left.  Phase doesn't really affect anything until you mix it with tracks recorded with the opposite phase.  You can get this effect with differences in distance of the mic(s) from the source.  Or because the clocks on different devices (even of the same make / model) differ.  i.e. using 2x 2 track recorders instead of 1x 4 track recorder.  Not saying that that is what's going on.  Basically if you invert the track and it corrects, that's a good indicator.  Or if it's different by itself, than it is mixed, which you seemed to have already noticed.  Could be lots of things, but phase is a common thing when dealing with mixes.  If it's a difference in clocks, it'll come and go in and out of phase as things line up, then get out of alignment.  Stuff which wasn't present in the original source, or present in the individual tracks when solo'd.

 

RSS | Mobile
Page created in 0.103 seconds with 42 queries.
© 2002-2024 Taperssection.com
Powered by SMF