Become a Site Supporter and Never see Ads again!

Author Topic: Edirol R4 review  (Read 20625 times)

0 Members and 1 Guest are viewing this topic.

Offline Nick's Picks

  • Trade Count: (33)
  • Needs to get out more...
  • *****
  • Posts: 10260
  • Gender: Male
  • I thought I heard.......
Re: Edirol R4 review
« Reply #15 on: May 22, 2005, 08:01:01 PM »
yes, its a 4 track 24/96 recorder.
:)

Offline Flarnet

  • Trade Count: (0)
  • Taperssection Newbie
  • *
  • Posts: 31
  • I'm a llama!
Re: Edirol R4 review
« Reply #16 on: May 23, 2005, 02:27:16 PM »
Can it be used for 4-track recording in the "porta studio" sense? I.e. can it play back any of the 4 channels while recording on the remaining one(s)?

Offline Nick's Picks

  • Trade Count: (33)
  • Needs to get out more...
  • *****
  • Posts: 10260
  • Gender: Male
  • I thought I heard.......
Re: Edirol R4 review
« Reply #17 on: May 24, 2005, 07:08:54 AM »
hmm....good question.
probably not, but I dont know for sure.  a good question for edirol, imo.

Offline bhtoque

  • Trade Count: (3)
  • Needs to get out more...
  • *****
  • Posts: 3308
  • Gender: Male
  • So much music, so little time.
Re: Edirol R4 review
« Reply #18 on: May 24, 2005, 06:40:51 PM »
Can it be used for 4-track recording in the "porta studio" sense? I.e. can it play back any of the 4 channels while recording on the remaining one(s)?


Nope. When in 4 channel mode, all 4 channels are recorded as 1 wave file. So a) you need software than can deal w/ a 4ch .wav file and b) even without 4 input sources, you get a 4 ch .wav with silence in the empty tracks.

JAson
MG 200/210/270
AKG c422>s42>Hydra silver interconnects
AKG 391/92/93>MK 90/3 actives
>AM Hyper-Conductors
Studio Projects LSD2>MiAGi II
>Edirol R-4 (Oade T Mod)

db.etree.org/bhtoque

Offline Nick's Picks

  • Trade Count: (33)
  • Needs to get out more...
  • *****
  • Posts: 10260
  • Gender: Male
  • I thought I heard.......
Re: Edirol R4 review
« Reply #19 on: May 25, 2005, 01:26:22 PM »
see Jason....these are the things you should have been writing up for me.

Offline bhtoque

  • Trade Count: (3)
  • Needs to get out more...
  • *****
  • Posts: 3308
  • Gender: Male
  • So much music, so little time.
Re: Edirol R4 review
« Reply #20 on: May 25, 2005, 01:44:20 PM »
see Jason....these are the things you should have been writing up for me.


You need a PDF of the manual. I just read the section on 4ch mode.

BTW, I'll bring it back to you Thursday night. I forgot it was in my hard case when I gave John the R-4

JAson
MG 200/210/270
AKG c422>s42>Hydra silver interconnects
AKG 391/92/93>MK 90/3 actives
>AM Hyper-Conductors
Studio Projects LSD2>MiAGi II
>Edirol R-4 (Oade T Mod)

db.etree.org/bhtoque

Offline Nick Graham

  • Amorican
  • Trade Count: (3)
  • Needs to get out more...
  • Posts: 4068
  • Gender: Male
Re: Edirol R4 review
« Reply #21 on: May 25, 2005, 02:01:04 PM »
I do have one comment/question...

In the review you state you've had no problems running 24/96, but didn't you get multiple errors at one point (a Derek Trucks show I think?) from being too close to the PA?

Am I imagining this? Was this somebody else?

Not trying to call you out at all, just seeing if I remember correctly.
Right now nothing...in the past: Schoeps CMC6, AKG 480, AKG 460, AKG 414, MBHO 603a, Neumann KM100, ADK TL>Schoeps MK4, Schoeps MK2, Schoeps MK41, AKG ck61, AKG ck62, AKG ck63, Neumann AK40, Neumann AK50, MBHO ka200>Lunatec V2, Lunatec V3, Apogee Mini-Me, Oade M148, Oade M248, Sound Devices MP2, Sonosax SXM2>Sony (mod)SBM1, Apogee AD500>D7, D8, D100, M1, R1, R4, R09, iRiver HP120, Microtrack

Offline wbrisette

  • Trade Count: (2)
  • Needs to get out more...
  • *****
  • Posts: 2855
  • Gender: Male
    • Homepage
Re: Edirol R4 review
« Reply #22 on: May 25, 2005, 02:25:38 PM »
Nope. When in 4 channel mode, all 4 channels are recorded as 1 wave file. So a) you need software than can deal w/ a 4ch .wav file and b) even without 4 input sources, you get a 4 ch .wav with silence in the empty tracks.

Download the Fostex Broadcast Wave utility (from Fostex's site) and it will split a broadcast wav file into separate tracks. This works on both Windows and Mac OS computers.

Wayne
Mics: Earthworks SR-77 (MP), QTC-1 (MP)

Editing: QSC RMX2450, MOTU 2408 MK3, Earthworks Sigma 6.2

Offline Nick's Picks

  • Trade Count: (33)
  • Needs to get out more...
  • *****
  • Posts: 10260
  • Gender: Male
  • I thought I heard.......
Re: Edirol R4 review
« Reply #23 on: May 25, 2005, 02:30:02 PM »
I do have one comment/question...

In the review you state you've had no problems running 24/96, but didn't you get multiple errors at one point (a Derek Trucks show I think?) from being too close to the PA?

Am I imagining this? Was this somebody else?

Not trying to call you out at all, just seeing if I remember correctly.

you talkin' to ME !
:)
that was w/the FR2.  I've had zero problemw w/the R4.  Jason?  Youve used it more than anyone probably.

Offline Brian

  • Trade Count: (2)
  • Needs to get out more...
  • Posts: 9392
  • Gender: Male
Re: Edirol R4 review
« Reply #24 on: May 25, 2005, 04:25:59 PM »
Nope. When in 4 channel mode, all 4 channels are recorded as 1 wave file. So a) you need software than can deal w/ a 4ch .wav file and b) even without 4 input sources, you get a 4 ch .wav with silence in the empty tracks.

Download the Fostex Broadcast Wave utility (from Fostex's site) and it will split a broadcast wav file into separate tracks. This works on both Windows and Mac OS computers.

Wayne

whoa...cool!  I wonder if it puts together to seperate mono .bwf files to form an interleaved stereo .bwf file.  thanks for the heads up wayne.

Offline bhtoque

  • Trade Count: (3)
  • Needs to get out more...
  • *****
  • Posts: 3308
  • Gender: Male
  • So much music, so little time.
Re: Edirol R4 review
« Reply #25 on: May 25, 2005, 06:20:37 PM »
I do have one comment/question...

In the review you state you've had no problems running 24/96, but didn't you get multiple errors at one point (a Derek Trucks show I think?) from being too close to the PA?

Am I imagining this? Was this somebody else?

Not trying to call you out at all, just seeing if I remember correctly.

you talkin' to ME !
:)
that was w/the FR2.  I've had zero problemw w/the R4.  Jason?  Youve used it more than anyone probably.

Yeah, I've seen a couple shows were vibration killed nick or carl's FR-2. No problem with the R-4 though.

The only problem I had with the R-4 was I brickwalled the crap out of my first recording with it because mic in was too sensitive for the Oktava's and Mofro. Well, that and having to give it back  ;D

JAson
MG 200/210/270
AKG c422>s42>Hydra silver interconnects
AKG 391/92/93>MK 90/3 actives
>AM Hyper-Conductors
Studio Projects LSD2>MiAGi II
>Edirol R-4 (Oade T Mod)

db.etree.org/bhtoque

Offline kgreener

  • Trade Count: (4)
  • Taperssection All-Star
  • ****
  • Posts: 1448
  • Gender: Male
Re: Edirol R4 review
« Reply #26 on: May 25, 2005, 06:32:42 PM »
man, the way y'all keep talking about this unit, i'm ready to go get one right now.  but with a reminder about the line-in deal you and nick have mentioned, i think i might wait it out for a Doug mod before taking the plunge.  then again, i've heard some of your (jason's) recordings and they sound great.  but i hate waiting!

what to do, what to do...

Offline Nick Graham

  • Amorican
  • Trade Count: (3)
  • Needs to get out more...
  • Posts: 4068
  • Gender: Male
Re: Edirol R4 review
« Reply #27 on: May 25, 2005, 06:34:35 PM »
I do have one comment/question...

In the review you state you've had no problems running 24/96, but didn't you get multiple errors at one point (a Derek Trucks show I think?) from being too close to the PA?

Am I imagining this? Was this somebody else?

Not trying to call you out at all, just seeing if I remember correctly.

Gotcha...

You've been the "guinea pig" for so much new gear, I couldn't keep straght which was which.

+T

you talkin' to ME !
:)
that was w/the FR2. I've had zero problemw w/the R4. Jason? Youve used it more than anyone probably.
Right now nothing...in the past: Schoeps CMC6, AKG 480, AKG 460, AKG 414, MBHO 603a, Neumann KM100, ADK TL>Schoeps MK4, Schoeps MK2, Schoeps MK41, AKG ck61, AKG ck62, AKG ck63, Neumann AK40, Neumann AK50, MBHO ka200>Lunatec V2, Lunatec V3, Apogee Mini-Me, Oade M148, Oade M248, Sound Devices MP2, Sonosax SXM2>Sony (mod)SBM1, Apogee AD500>D7, D8, D100, M1, R1, R4, R09, iRiver HP120, Microtrack

Offline Nick's Picks

  • Trade Count: (33)
  • Needs to get out more...
  • *****
  • Posts: 10260
  • Gender: Male
  • I thought I heard.......
Re: Edirol R4 review
« Reply #28 on: May 26, 2005, 07:16:42 AM »
Doug sounds like he plans to offer mods.  And i'm sure they will be the same ones he always offers.  This box is capable of having two mods, one of each flavor on the different stereo pair inputs.  now THAT would be cool.

There is no doubt that it would improve with these modifications, or by running a nice preamp in front of it.  I still maintain that it is not a necessity, but is favorable.  It sounds good stock.  I hve not found myself wishing for anything in front of it.  But I could see picking up a V2 for the front end.  Extra baggage, but probably the same price as the extra mods will be.

I dont know what Doug sells these for.  But add probably $400+ for mods.  that puts it in the 722 price range?  I dont know what those cost either.
I bet a W+ or T+ mod R4 would blow the doors off of any other hdd recorder under $8k.

Offline boa

  • Trade Count: (6)
  • Taperssection Member
  • ***
  • Posts: 579
  • Gender: Male
  • crowesbase loves you
    • crowesbase:an.amorican.archive
Re: Edirol R4 review
« Reply #29 on: May 29, 2005, 09:53:51 PM »
Nevermind. Ya think I'd learn learn something from the wealth ofknowledge here...D'oh!

http://taperssection.com/index.php?topic=38945.msg521872#msg521872

When running low on battery power you have to stop recording and power down before switching to the Walwart, otherwise your recording and settings you might lose.

I was using a 8xAA Powercell 2300mah to power the R4 and was running Stereox02 with MG SMS210 (DINA) and DPA4061 (spaced 36").
Second time I had used the Powercell units and noticed their quick decline on the meter throughout the first 5 minutes of TBC @ Little Rock, AR. At the end of the first song, I grabbed the power adapter and plugged in and the R4 turned off. Completely. Then I powered it up, and it recorded fine the rest of the night.


Outside of that lesson learned the hard way, the rest of the show smokes and I cant wait to run it again in June, provided I can stealth the R4 for the Crowes/Petty tour...
« Last Edit: May 30, 2005, 09:41:44 AM by boa »
Microtech Gefell m22 >  Babynbox > Sony m10acm
Microtech Gefell mv200/m21 > Aerco mp2 > Roland r44ocm

 

RSS | Mobile
Page created in 0.099 seconds with 39 queries.
© 2002-2024 Taperssection.com
Powered by SMF