I love you too, Mr.Picks......nice cables.
that's all you got eh?
I shouldn't expect much from you when it comes to wit.
I cannot understand your tone of familiarity. I do not know you, nor have never met you, Mr.Picks. Let us keep it that way.
I have never had a troll, nor do I want one.
Thank you in advance, kind sir.
Surely you haven't forgotten all those wonderfully colerful PMs you sent me a month ago.
I havent'. For someone who doesn't know me, you had a pretty easy time being a douchebag to me.
figured i'd give you the respect of being an ass-hat ..back to you.
I'm finished now though.
Nice try at coming across as a mature and reasonable adult. Keep it up. It becomes you much more than the sophomoric, insulting 20-something year old mentality, poor humour that you were slinging around previously.
Sorry for the venom injection to the rest of the innocent bystanders.
I"m out of this thread from here on out until something useful comes up in discussion on this deck (like when one is in hand). All this speculation is garbage until then.
I've got a hornet in my undies w/this Cap-n-hook character.
Back on topicthe whole "future proof" is just marketing bla bla, imo.
I believe the thought being that DSD is the highest resolution you can use on any recorder out there today. so you can "dumb it down" to anything that might become the "future standard PCM resolution for mass markets"...,
thats how I read into it any way. Sort of like they are making it sound like its the digital equiv. of mastering on Reel2Reel or other types of tape..., and the flexibility that leaves when brought into the digital domain.
The balanced input of the MR1 was cool and all, but I hardly got any benefit from it in concert taping w/our standard compliment of premaps, mics..etc running in front of it. It just required custom cables...(which was the PITA part to me).