Become a Site Supporter and Never see Ads again!

Author Topic: difference of flac quality  (Read 2380 times)

0 Members and 1 Guest are viewing this topic.

Offline tod3sschu3tze

  • Trade Count: (0)
  • Taperssection Regular
  • **
  • Posts: 81
  • Gender: Male
  • Tape Metal!
difference of flac quality
« on: January 29, 2006, 11:58:41 AM »
what is the difference between the flac qualities 1-9? i think its a lossless format so there should be only one option!?
Stealth Setup(s):

NEW ONE:
Microphone Madness HLSC-1 > iRiver H120 + Rockbox > USB > WaveLab > Audio-CD / FLAC

OLD ONE:
Core Sound Low Cost Binaurals + Low Sensivity Option > 9V Battery Box > iRiver H120 + Rockbox > USB > WaveLab > Audio-CD / FLAC



tod3sschu3tze's Live Show & Bootlegs Trading List: http://trade.tod3sschu3tze.de

Roving Sign

  • Guest
  • Trade Count: (0)
Re: difference of flac quality
« Reply #1 on: January 29, 2006, 12:04:43 PM »
CPU time - Some folks would be up all night trying for level 9!!!

Offline macacopowa

  • Trade Count: (1)
  • Taperssection Member
  • ***
  • Posts: 563
  • Gender: Male
    • Barcelona Projecte Musical
Re: difference of flac quality
« Reply #2 on: January 29, 2006, 12:48:14 PM »
The time of encoding, differences between 5 to 9 are ridiculous in the final size
respectable rig:
Neumann km184 > Hi Ho Silver Clad Cables thegreatgumbino style> SD722

stealth way
CMC-8>3wire bb>R1/ ihp120





recordings on LMAhttp://www.archive.org/bookmarks/danimacaco

http://myspace.com/musickapes       http://db.etree.org/macacopowa

Offline tod3sschu3tze

  • Trade Count: (0)
  • Taperssection Regular
  • **
  • Posts: 81
  • Gender: Male
  • Tape Metal!
Re: difference of flac quality
« Reply #3 on: January 29, 2006, 12:55:57 PM »
so what option is the best to choose?
Stealth Setup(s):

NEW ONE:
Microphone Madness HLSC-1 > iRiver H120 + Rockbox > USB > WaveLab > Audio-CD / FLAC

OLD ONE:
Core Sound Low Cost Binaurals + Low Sensivity Option > 9V Battery Box > iRiver H120 + Rockbox > USB > WaveLab > Audio-CD / FLAC



tod3sschu3tze's Live Show & Bootlegs Trading List: http://trade.tod3sschu3tze.de

Roving Sign

  • Guest
  • Trade Count: (0)
Re: difference of flac quality
« Reply #4 on: January 29, 2006, 01:02:09 PM »
Depends on your CPU...If you have a gig of RAM and fast processor - you can go to level 6 - no problem...

And as the someone else pointed out the returns arent as great in the upper levels - its not a linear thing...you might only pick up a few extra MBs in the 6-9 range...

If you have a older slow pc - you may not want to wait...

but to answer your question - no difference in quality...

Offline tod3sschu3tze

  • Trade Count: (0)
  • Taperssection Regular
  • **
  • Posts: 81
  • Gender: Male
  • Tape Metal!
Re: difference of flac quality
« Reply #5 on: January 29, 2006, 01:05:51 PM »
alright, thank you!
Stealth Setup(s):

NEW ONE:
Microphone Madness HLSC-1 > iRiver H120 + Rockbox > USB > WaveLab > Audio-CD / FLAC

OLD ONE:
Core Sound Low Cost Binaurals + Low Sensivity Option > 9V Battery Box > iRiver H120 + Rockbox > USB > WaveLab > Audio-CD / FLAC



tod3sschu3tze's Live Show & Bootlegs Trading List: http://trade.tod3sschu3tze.de

Offline F.O.Bean

  • Team Schoeps Tapir that
  • Trade Count: (126)
  • Needs to get out more...
  • *****
  • Posts: 40690
  • Gender: Male
  • Taperus Maximus
    • MediaFire Recordings
Re: difference of flac quality
« Reply #6 on: January 30, 2006, 06:58:15 AM »
damn, my flac frontend only goes from 1-8, never knew they went to 9
Schoeps MK 4V & MK 41V ->
Schoeps 250|0 KCY's (x2) ->
Naiant +60v|Low Noise PFA's (x2) ->
DarkTrain Right Angle Stubby XLR's (x3) ->
Sound Devices MixPre-6 & MixPre-3

http://www.archive.org/bookmarks/diskobean
http://www.archive.org/bookmarks/Bean420
http://bt.etree.org/mytorrents.php
http://www.mediafire.com/folder/j9eu80jpuaubz/Recordings

Offline MattD

  • Taper Emeritus
  • Trade Count: (1)
  • Needs to get out more...
  • *****
  • Posts: 4634
  • Gender: Male
Re: difference of flac quality
« Reply #7 on: January 30, 2006, 10:10:43 AM »
Mine goes to 11! :D
Out of the game … for now?

Offline tod3sschu3tze

  • Trade Count: (0)
  • Taperssection Regular
  • **
  • Posts: 81
  • Gender: Male
  • Tape Metal!
Re: difference of flac quality
« Reply #8 on: January 30, 2006, 10:38:38 AM »
damn, my flac frontend only goes from 1-8, never knew they went to 9

i have got the flac plugin for nero burning rom, it goes only to 8, too.
Stealth Setup(s):

NEW ONE:
Microphone Madness HLSC-1 > iRiver H120 + Rockbox > USB > WaveLab > Audio-CD / FLAC

OLD ONE:
Core Sound Low Cost Binaurals + Low Sensivity Option > 9V Battery Box > iRiver H120 + Rockbox > USB > WaveLab > Audio-CD / FLAC



tod3sschu3tze's Live Show & Bootlegs Trading List: http://trade.tod3sschu3tze.de

Offline OFOTD

  • Amorican
  • Trade Count: (7)
  • Needs to get out more...
  • *****
  • Posts: 6307
Re: difference of flac quality
« Reply #9 on: January 30, 2006, 12:13:35 PM »
I use 6.  The size difference between 6 and 8 is tiny.  The difference between 4 and 6 is big enough that an extra minute or two of encoding is worth it.

Offline mmmatt

  • taping > photography
  • Trade Count: (3)
  • Needs to get out more...
  • *****
  • Posts: 4168
  • Gender: Male
  • ... A broken angel sings from a guitar
    • LightCraft Photography
Re: difference of flac quality
« Reply #10 on: January 30, 2006, 01:08:42 PM »
Mine goes to 11! :D
yeah... don't forget to check your cucumber at airport security...  ;D

Matt
I do think taping is the reality of the business..it is also an impetus for artists to create studio CDs that are ART, not just another recording...    Fareed Haque  2-4-2005




Canon 24-70 f2.8L, Canon 135 f2L, Canon 70-200 f4L, Canon 50 f1.8, > Canon 5D or Canon xt (digi) and Canon 1N (film)

 

RSS | Mobile
Page created in 0.055 seconds with 35 queries.
© 2002-2024 Taperssection.com
Powered by SMF