Become a Site Supporter and Never see Ads again!

Author Topic: partial 24 bit sources, what to do?  (Read 1527 times)

0 Members and 1 Guest are viewing this topic.

Offline jagraham

  • Trade Count: (20)
  • Needs to get out more...
  • *****
  • Posts: 2998
  • Gender: Male
partial 24 bit sources, what to do?
« on: November 25, 2010, 12:25:01 PM »
i run two rigs, one 16 bit and one 24 bit.  often when i have both rigs running, especially at a festival, i do get a little lazy.  often i wind up with an incomplete source.  is there an appropriate way to patch the 24 bit source with the 16 bit?  so far i have not even bothered to do this.  all i have done in the past is just dithered to 16 and patched with the other source.  anyone have any input?
Mics: Nak CM-300s, Nak CM-100s, CP-1s, CP-2s, AT-853s(Cards, Hypers, Omnis) CA-14s(Cards, Omnis)
Pres: CA STC-9200, CA-UBB
Recorders: Tascam DR-70D, DR-2D, Edirol R-09

ISO: 1 Teac ME-120, CP-3 Caps, AT-853 Subcard Caps

Offline Brian Skalinder

  • Complaint Dept.
  • Trade Count: (28)
  • Needs to get out more...
  • *****
  • Posts: 18868
  • Gender: Male
Re: partial 24 bit sources, what to do?
« Reply #1 on: November 25, 2010, 12:31:26 PM »
is there an appropriate way to patch the 24 bit source with the 16 bit?

I'd simply crossfade* from one to the other, perform other edits as/if necessary, mixdown to 32bfp, SRC, dither to desired final bit-depth, track.

* I like a longish crossfade of 15-30sec so there's a nice, smooth transition, rather than an abrupt one.
Milab VM-44 Links > Fostex FR-2LE or
Naiant IPA (tinybox format) >
Roland R-05

Offline ghellquist

  • Trade Count: (0)
  • Taperssection Member
  • ***
  • Posts: 477
  • Gender: Male
Re: partial 24 bit sources, what to do?
« Reply #2 on: November 28, 2010, 05:31:44 AM »
My take on this.

I would not worry.

Once you have normalized the volume of the 24 bit recording ( increased the volume to closer to 0dB ) there is not much use in keeping the extra 8 bits. Simply dither down to 16 bits.

The fact is that no 24 bit recordings has anything but noise in the lowest several bits. You can check the specs of your box. The really good ones comes up to 110dB S/N, many lower priced ones struggles at 96dB or lower.  Theory gives about 6.01 dB plus or minus some change at the total for each bit. So 96dB is 16 bits ( equal to CD quality ) and 110dB would be a few bits more. Theory and practice both confirm that the difference to 99% is only a question about the position of the noise floor. Some purist say they can hear some extra definition, I definitely cannot.
 
I use the extra bits in 24 bit recordings to allow a larger headroom before clipping. I move the input volume down a bit, say 12 dB, to get that extra headroom for handling increased volume or unexpected things. I move the volume up in software when home before publishing.

The main difference between recorders generally is not the number of bits. Instead it is about the quality of the circuits. I would rather record with a really good 16 bit recorder, say an old-time professional DAT, than one of the lower quality 24 bit machines. In my experience the really large difference is in the analog circuits. Adding a good preamp really helps more than going to 24 bits.

// Gunnar

 

RSS | Mobile
Page created in 0.046 seconds with 32 queries.
© 2002-2024 Taperssection.com
Powered by SMF