Become a Site Supporter and Never see Ads again!

Author Topic: question: cassette transfers-- via computer, or r09hr  (Read 1639 times)

0 Members and 1 Guest are viewing this topic.

Offline red

  • Trade Count: (1)
  • Taperssection Regular
  • **
  • Posts: 105
question: cassette transfers-- via computer, or r09hr
« on: January 30, 2011, 10:47:43 AM »
I have a quick question.  For cassette transfers, is there an advantage if I go cassette deck > audiophile 24/96, or is cassette deck < r09hr just as good?  Thanks in advance for any insights.

Offline Brian Skalinder

  • Complaint Dept.
  • Trade Count: (28)
  • Needs to get out more...
  • *****
  • Posts: 18873
  • Gender: Male
Re: question: cassette transfers-- via computer, or r09hr
« Reply #1 on: January 31, 2011, 08:27:53 AM »
I'd use the R09HR for ADC.  The Audiophile 2496 will perform its ADC inside the computer, which is a particularly nasty EMI environment and may cause significant noise.  The Audiophile 2496 might have great shielding, but I wouldn't count on it for a consumer soundcard.  I know my old Waveterminal 2496 was surprisingly noisy for ADC, though I've never tested my Audiophile 2496.

Also, make sure your playback deck is in good shape and you adjust azimuth to ensure highest quality analog signal prior to ADC.

I have a quick question.  For cassette transfers, is there an advantage if I go cassette deck > audiophile 24/96, or is cassette deck < r09hr just as good?  Thanks in advance for any insights.
Milab VM-44 Links > Fostex FR-2LE or
Naiant IPA (tinybox format) > Roland R-05

 

RSS | Mobile
Page created in 0.314 seconds with 28 queries.
© 2002-2024 Taperssection.com
Powered by SMF