Become a Site Supporter and Never see Ads again!

Author Topic: usb or pcmia interface  (Read 7091 times)

0 Members and 1 Guest are viewing this topic.

Offline ropscot

  • Trade Count: (0)
  • Taperssection Newbie
  • *
  • Posts: 19
  • I'm a llama!
usb or pcmia interface
« on: December 18, 2003, 06:21:30 PM »
I just recieved my gateway laptop in the mail, so now im looking for a recording device for it, I need something that I can record from the soundboard and my mics at the same time, can someone recomend a interface
thanks
Ron

jpschust

  • Guest
  • Trade Count: (0)
Re:usb or pcmia interface
« Reply #1 on: December 18, 2003, 06:25:32 PM »
how about the ua-5?  pretty good option and matrixing is totally possible with this unit.  usb in :-)

Offline ropscot

  • Trade Count: (0)
  • Taperssection Newbie
  • *
  • Posts: 19
  • I'm a llama!
Re:usb or pcmia interface
« Reply #2 on: December 18, 2003, 06:26:40 PM »
does it require ac power? also how is the sound quality
thanks
Ron

Offline nic

  • Big In Japan
  • Trade Count: (1)
  • Needs to get out more...
  • *****
  • Posts: 4700
  • Gender: Male
    • half dead batteries
Re:usb or pcmia interface
« Reply #3 on: December 18, 2003, 06:39:47 PM »
pcmcia is the better interface.  you can also get a firewire pcmcia card if the laptop doesnt have a firewire port...though most firewire interfaces are usually a bit bigger(ie, meant for racks), though, units such as M-Audios Firewire 410 is small and gives you the mic pres and inputs for matrixing...this unit can pull power from the firewire bus.


the water's clean and innocent

Offline ropscot

  • Trade Count: (0)
  • Taperssection Newbie
  • *
  • Posts: 19
  • I'm a llama!
Re:usb or pcmia interface
« Reply #4 on: December 18, 2003, 06:42:38 PM »
yea I have a pcmcia slot, so man this is such a tough decision on what to get
thanks
Ron

jpschust

  • Guest
  • Trade Count: (0)
Re:usb or pcmia interface
« Reply #5 on: December 18, 2003, 06:49:39 PM »
luvean, i disagree about pcmcia always being better, usb2.0 is just as fast and is way less a pain in the ass to be honest.  there are many ua-5 tapes out there and they sound great.  also it is powerable in the field.

Offline nic

  • Big In Japan
  • Trade Count: (1)
  • Needs to get out more...
  • *****
  • Posts: 4700
  • Gender: Male
    • half dead batteries
Re:usb or pcmia interface
« Reply #6 on: December 18, 2003, 08:00:58 PM »
usb2 is no where close to the bus speed of pcmcia!
another issue to consider is that MOST usb2 controllers do not run at its highest speed.
did you know that there are 3 speeds for usb2? 1.5mbs, 11mbs,  and 480mbs. they are labeled as low, full and high speed respectively...most of them(controllers and devices) are NOT "high speed". also even the highest speed of usb2 is only a theoretical peak speed...standard firewire has a higher _average_ throughput than the fastest usb2's _average_ throughput.

not saying usb/usb2 is bad, it isn't, but its more marketing than actual proven performance.
pcmcia is even faster and more stable than firewire400/firewire800....external scsi drives for laptops are based on the pcmcia interface
« Last Edit: December 18, 2003, 08:24:28 PM by luvean »


the water's clean and innocent

Offline ropscot

  • Trade Count: (0)
  • Taperssection Newbie
  • *
  • Posts: 19
  • I'm a llama!
Re:usb or pcmia interface
« Reply #7 on: December 18, 2003, 08:09:47 PM »
ok so what do you recomend I found the firewire 410 for $330 or should I go with something like the echo layla and use a external mixer
thanks
Ron

Offline nic

  • Big In Japan
  • Trade Count: (1)
  • Needs to get out more...
  • *****
  • Posts: 4700
  • Gender: Male
    • half dead batteries
Re:usb or pcmia interface
« Reply #8 on: December 18, 2003, 08:18:14 PM »
sorry about above...

pretty much any interface from the Edirol UA-5 to the Firewire 410 are good for what you will be doing. the MAudio unit is pretty new so the full field testing isnt in quite yet.
you will get the best results by mixing on the computer(you have more fine tune control) instead of a external mixer w/ headphones...for mixing on the pc, you want the interface to sent the audio channels seperately instead of mixing in the unit and sending a stereo signal to the system that you cant mix down later.

it really depends on your budget and how much gear you want to carry around.
my rig is mainly for archiving, I carry a 6U rack case(not exactly portable for the average show) and mixdown in post after the show


the water's clean and innocent

Offline ropscot

  • Trade Count: (0)
  • Taperssection Newbie
  • *
  • Posts: 19
  • I'm a llama!
Re:usb or pcmia interface
« Reply #9 on: December 18, 2003, 08:44:44 PM »
sounds great to me I htink I will probally go with the firewire 410

Offline F.O.Bean

  • Team Schoeps Tapir that
  • Trade Count: (126)
  • Needs to get out more...
  • *****
  • Posts: 40690
  • Gender: Male
  • Taperus Maximus
    • MediaFire Recordings
Re:usb or pcmia interface
« Reply #10 on: December 19, 2003, 07:16:03 AM »
good info luvean, +T bro...
Schoeps MK 4V & MK 41V ->
Schoeps 250|0 KCY's (x2) ->
Naiant +60v|Low Noise PFA's (x2) ->
DarkTrain Right Angle Stubby XLR's (x3) ->
Sound Devices MixPre-6 & MixPre-3

http://www.archive.org/bookmarks/diskobean
http://www.archive.org/bookmarks/Bean420
http://bt.etree.org/mytorrents.php
http://www.mediafire.com/folder/j9eu80jpuaubz/Recordings

Offline Simp-Dawg

  • Bad Little Dawggie
  • Trade Count: (2)
  • Needs to get out more...
  • *****
  • Posts: 15077
  • Gender: Male
  • Daddy needs a drink!
    • Colorado Tapers
Re:usb or pcmia interface
« Reply #11 on: December 19, 2003, 11:27:42 AM »
another option is the rme multiset, has 8 (i believe) analog inputs and spdif in/out as well.  if you already have any outboard gear (pre, a/d) this may be a good option for you.
another option is the usbpre which i use to go straight from my mics to the laptop, does the pre and a/d all in one box and sounds great.  downsides are it only goes up to 24bit/48khz and there's no digital outs while recording to your laptop, and the only analog outs while recording are the headphone monitors.  but that's only a problem for patchers, although it ends up working out nice for the md'ers
CO Crüe Benchwarmer

Playback: Denon DVD-2910 > Denon AVR-3806 > Segue Doghouse Speaker Cable > B&W DM-610i / Klipsch RW-10 Subwoofer

jpschust

  • Guest
  • Trade Count: (0)
Re:usb or pcmia interface
« Reply #12 on: December 19, 2003, 03:33:28 PM »
the multiset is a good unit but expensive.  also the analog inputs overload like a mofo so you really have to watch the amount of gain you give them

Offline tungstengruvsten

  • Trade Count: (4)
  • Taperssection Regular
  • **
  • Posts: 51
  • I'm a llama!
Re:usb or pcmia interface
« Reply #13 on: December 22, 2003, 01:47:31 PM »
... also the analog inputs overload like a mofo so you really have to watch the amount of gain you give them


hmmm with a measured 110dB of dynamic range, i'd say you aren't gain staging properly.  I've recorded 2 albums and many demos with these and used every pre from ART to Neve....never had a problem.  must be a settings problem or whatever the piece of gear before it in the chain.

also, USB does not give a true 24 bits.   hate to break it to ya folks but it's been proven.  marketing lies go a long way unfortunately.

Offline MattD

  • Taper Emeritus
  • Trade Count: (1)
  • Needs to get out more...
  • *****
  • Posts: 4634
  • Gender: Male
Re:usb or pcmia interface
« Reply #14 on: December 22, 2003, 01:52:43 PM »
Technically, nothing I know exists that gives a "true" 24 bits. Our 24-bit A/Ds probably top out at 21-22 under the most favorible real world conditions.

I am curious as to what you mean by that statement, though. Do you mean that USB introduces noise in the lowest bit(s)?
Out of the game … for now?

 

RSS | Mobile
Page created in 0.082 seconds with 40 queries.
© 2002-2024 Taperssection.com
Powered by SMF