Become a Site Supporter and Never see Ads again!

Author Topic: reducing hiss on playback using an sbm-1?  (Read 1018 times)

0 Members and 1 Guest are viewing this topic.

Offline papajohn

  • (0)
  • Taperssection Newbie
  • *
  • Posts: 10
reducing hiss on playback using an sbm-1?
« on: February 25, 2021, 04:49:17 PM »
So, thanks to Covid and safer at home protocols,  I've been transferring my old cassette live music collection.  Currently I am using a cassette deck > analog cable > Marantz PMD661 at 24/48 & 24/96.  Although the levels can be adjusted on the Marantz, most of the time the results are still low levels.   Would it be preferable to continue using Sound Forge to increase levels after the transfer and get more bits at a higher rate or would it be preferable to place an SBM-1 before the Marantz but only get 16/48?   So I suppose my question is will the SBM-1 reduce the hiss and noise by allowing a higher volume of music to be passed through to the Marantz?  Your opinions are appreciated.

Offline goodcooker

  • (38)
  • Needs to get out more...
  • *****
  • Posts: 3596
  • Gender: Male
  • goes to 11
Re: reducing hiss on playback using an sbm-1?
« Reply #1 on: February 25, 2021, 06:31:20 PM »

If it's "hissy" adding gain at any stage will amplify the noise along with the program material.

Try using a noise reduction plugin in Soundforge to take as much noise out of the file as you can at a lower volume level then amplify after noise reduction.
MBHO KA300 || Joly Mod Oktava MK012 || NakCM300 || ADK A51 > Sound Devices 442 || Reference Audio Designs MS2 > Tascam DR701 || Marantz PMD620 || Tascam DR680
Transfers - Tascam DA30 or Fostex D5 (dats) or Nak MR2 (cassettes) > Sound Devices USB Pre

http://www.archive.org/bookmarks/goodcooker

"Are you the Zman?" - fan at Panic 10-08-10 Kansas City
"I don't know who left this perfectly good inflatable wook doll here, but if I'm blowing her up, I'm keeping her." -  hoppedup

Offline jerryfreak

  • No PZ
  • (31)
  • Needs to get out more...
  • *
  • Posts: 6206
  • The plural of anecdote is not data
Re: reducing hiss on playback using an sbm-1?
« Reply #2 on: February 25, 2021, 06:59:53 PM »
So, thanks to Covid and safer at home protocols,  I've been transferring my old cassette live music collection.  Currently I am using a cassette deck > analog cable > Marantz PMD661 at 24/48 & 24/96.  Although the levels can be adjusted on the Marantz, most of the time the results are still low levels.   Would it be preferable to continue using Sound Forge to increase levels after the transfer and get more bits at a higher rate or would it be preferable to place an SBM-1 before the Marantz but only get 16/48?   So I suppose my question is will the SBM-1 reduce the hiss and noise by allowing a higher volume of music to be passed through to the Marantz?  Your opinions are appreciated.

the dynamic range of your marantz will exceeds the dynamic range of your cassette (even at 16/44). as long as the levels are peaking above  -30dB you are capturing all of the cassette material. There is nothing you can really add in the middle of that chain to reduce the tape noise relative to the source material, as goodcooker said, you'd need to remove it digitally in a DAW. And that typically takes a little of the high end with it.

plugins are improving all the time so if youre gonna mess with noise reduction, save the original unmolested transfer so you can give it another go down the road if desired. If you do it enough times you will find that you get better at it, even with the same tools.
currently "banned" for this "controversial" post
email me if you need to connect, as i am not allowed to send PM

-------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------
for sale (email in profile):
Mixpre6 v1 (NIB)
CA14 cards
(2) Manfrotto 099B mic poles

CMC-1K now orderable - 4-6 week leadtime

Offline kuba e

  • (1)
  • Taperssection Member
  • ***
  • Posts: 402
  • Gender: Male
Re: reducing hiss on playback using an sbm-1?
« Reply #3 on: February 26, 2021, 03:34:09 AM »
I also think that 16 bits is enough for cassette transfer. If you are using a noise removal plugin, it may be worth considering to do transfer with a higher sample rate e.g. 96 kHz. In a case you are not limited by storage space. Here is a thread where the theory about bit depth and sample rate was explained by our friends (it is long reading):
https://taperssection.com/index.php?topic=195295.0

Offline papajohn

  • (0)
  • Taperssection Newbie
  • *
  • Posts: 10
Re: reducing hiss on playback using an sbm-1?
« Reply #4 on: February 26, 2021, 11:09:52 PM »
thanks for the replies.  your guidance is appreciated.

Offline Numpy

  • + pace, amore e felicita +
  • (0)
  • Needs to get out more...
  • *****
  • Posts: 13869
  • Gender: Male
  • I support the Sierra Club, but don't represent it.
    • Oceana North America
Re: reducing hiss on playback using an sbm-1?
« Reply #5 on: March 01, 2021, 07:57:11 PM »
Hiss is a known quantity, but what types of noise do you want to remove?
I rember cassettes, there are many... wow and flutter of course, but do you mean mic handling noises, audience wooo, clapping ?
"Peace is for everyone"
        - Norah Jones

"Music is the drug that won't kill you"
         - Fran Lebowitz

Offline Jammin72

  • (0)
  • Taperssection Member
  • ***
  • Posts: 841
  • Gender: Male
Re: reducing hiss on playback using an sbm-1?
« Reply #6 on: March 09, 2021, 07:54:14 AM »
While it may be an extra step, doing the transfer in 24 bit will give you more headroom if you do want to boost a lower level recording in post.  16 bit IS enough but who wants to run through a whole tape to find the peaks before setting the recording level appropriately?   Everyone is right though hiss is a different issue.
Yes, but what do you HEAR?

Offline jerryfreak

  • No PZ
  • (31)
  • Needs to get out more...
  • *
  • Posts: 6206
  • The plural of anecdote is not data
Re: reducing hiss on playback using an sbm-1?
« Reply #7 on: March 09, 2021, 01:24:38 PM »
While it may be an extra step, doing the transfer in 24 bit will give you more headroom if you do want to boost a lower level recording in post.

theres no headroom to be had when transferring a recording with 50-60 dB of dynamic range to a 16-bit container with 96 dB of dynamic range. 144dB range of 24 bit just adds 48 more dB of purely noise

any cassette is completely saturated by +10dBU. by setting your levels on your 16-bit AD between -20 and -12dbU where your cassette is at 0dBU, thats about as good as you can do to capture the full dynamic range of the cassette.
currently "banned" for this "controversial" post
email me if you need to connect, as i am not allowed to send PM

-------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------
for sale (email in profile):
Mixpre6 v1 (NIB)
CA14 cards
(2) Manfrotto 099B mic poles

CMC-1K now orderable - 4-6 week leadtime

Online Gutbucket

  • record > listen > revise technique
  • (15)
  • Needs to get out more...
  • *****
  • Posts: 14227
  • Gender: Male
  • Gunther Theile nailed it!
Re: reducing hiss on playback using an sbm-1?
« Reply #8 on: March 09, 2021, 03:03:17 PM »
any cassette is completely saturated by +10dBU. by setting your levels on your 16-bit AD between -20 and -12dbU where your cassette is at 0dBU, thats about as good as you can do to capture the full dynamic range of the cassette.

This.  16 bits is plenty.  Setting levels set as indicated above is the key. 

..and represents good practice either way, because if you record to 24 bit based on the understanding that doing so will allow you to set recording levels lower, you could conceivably run into the EIN noisefloor of the 24bit recorder or interface's analog front end if levels are low enough.  Recording to 24bit will most likely provide only a somewhat greater overall dynamic range equating to something between 17 to 20 bits total, certainly not the full 24.  If you don't know the EIN of the digital recording device, this is unknown and you should set levels as indicated above regardless.
musical volition > vibrations > voltages > numeric values > voltages > vibrations> virtual teleportation time-machine experience
Better recording made easy - >>Improved PAS table<< | Made excellent- >>click here to download the Oddball Microphone Technique illustrated PDF booklet<< (note: This is a 1st draft, now several years old and in need of revision!  Stay tuned)

Offline morst

  • Trade Unionist
  • (2)
  • Needs to get out more...
  • *****
  • Posts: 4585
Re: reducing hiss on playback using an sbm-1?
« Reply #9 on: March 09, 2021, 03:48:20 PM »
if you ever wanted to use advanced noise removal in the future, having a high resolution version of that noise might be useful

Offline Jammin72

  • (0)
  • Taperssection Member
  • ***
  • Posts: 841
  • Gender: Male
Re: reducing hiss on playback using an sbm-1?
« Reply #10 on: March 09, 2021, 07:47:46 PM »
Thanks for the clarification on the headroom.

Yes, but what do you HEAR?

Offline kuba e

  • (1)
  • Taperssection Member
  • ***
  • Posts: 402
  • Gender: Male
Re: reducing hiss on playback using an sbm-1?
« Reply #11 on: March 10, 2021, 01:54:16 PM »
if you ever wanted to use advanced noise removal in the future, having a high resolution version of that noise might be useful

This should apply to the sampling frequency when we are planning to process the signal digitally. I am not sure if this should apply to the bit rate. Additional bits will be only zeros The lower bits will contain only noise. I'm not sure if we can restore the original signal from the noise. I don't think that's possible.

I hope the picture is not misleading.
« Last Edit: March 11, 2021, 03:10:14 PM by kuba e »

Offline morst

  • Trade Unionist
  • (2)
  • Needs to get out more...
  • *****
  • Posts: 4585
Re: reducing hiss on playback using an sbm-1?
« Reply #12 on: March 11, 2021, 04:58:10 PM »
This should apply to the sampling frequency when we are planning to process the signal digitally. I am not sure if this should apply to the bit rate. Additional bits will be only zeros The lower bits will contain only noise. I'm not sure if we can restore the original signal from the noise. I don't think that's possible.
I have little idea what will be invented, but I know that if the data don't exist, you won't have a chance to decide whether or not to throw it away later!?
I'm most interested in noise within the human hearing spectrum, but it might be the case that high frequency analysis could help remove audio spectrum artifacts.
What is there was some high pitched trigger signal just prior to each instance of an intermittent noise, for example?

Offline kuba e

  • (1)
  • Taperssection Member
  • ***
  • Posts: 402
  • Gender: Male
Re: reducing hiss on playback using an sbm-1?
« Reply #13 on: March 13, 2021, 04:40:31 AM »
I thought from the opposite point of view. When the noise exceeds and overlays the original signal, there is no more data to be recovered from these low levels. But I'm not a noise specialist. It probably depends on the type of noise. These are interesting things.

I prefer 16bit due to capacity and easier handling of files. Even for 16bit, the quantization noise is several times smaller than the noise of an old cassette. Probably more important is to set the right recording levels as Gutbucket explained. But I agree with you, If I had a very rare recording, then I would transfer it to 24bit.
« Last Edit: March 13, 2021, 07:39:20 AM by kuba e »

 

RSS | Mobile
Page created in 0.056 seconds with 38 queries.
© 2002-2021 Taperssection.com
Powered by SMF