Become a Site Supporter and Never see Ads again!

Author Topic: Confused about equipment...  (Read 6857 times)

0 Members and 1 Guest are viewing this topic.

Offline Nielsen81

  • Trade Count: (1)
  • Taperssection Regular
  • **
  • Posts: 51
Confused about equipment...
« on: July 22, 2010, 06:07:42 PM »
Hi guys.
Well, I thought a lot about this, and now I'm asking or I will get nowhere, so you gotta cut it out in pieces for me :)

Here we go: When reading about equipment, I see people talking about recorders, mics and so on. Now, there's a few things, I don't know to much, if anything, about.


Now, here we go:
Battery box? Which one...or do I need one?
CA-9100 Pre-amp? What is that? And if I get one, do I need a batterybox then? What is it good for?

Hmm, I think that might be it, but I'll of course answer / ask when answers arrives inhere :)

Thanks in advance
Nielsen81

Have you taped a Nirvana show or do you know anyone who has? Then please contact me or go to LiveNirvana.com

Offline achalsey

  • Trade Count: (29)
  • Needs to get out more...
  • *****
  • Posts: 2187
Re: Confused about equipment...
« Reply #1 on: July 22, 2010, 08:01:11 PM »
check out 4 out of the 5 posts below yours.   ::)

But seriously, I started by asking this too but its always a good idea to start with the "where to begin" forum, lots of basic info.

http://taperssection.com/index.php?topic=35278.0

A battery box is exactly what it sounds like.  It is a box with a battery in it that therefore supplies your mics with power.

A pre-amp does the same thing but also adds gain so you can strengthen the signal.  (the CA 9100 is just one of the MANY types of preamps on the market)

So, are you getting into taping or just asking just to know?  Because there is a lot about to know besides that very simple answer.   

Offline Nielsen81

  • Trade Count: (1)
  • Taperssection Regular
  • **
  • Posts: 51
Re: Confused about equipment...
« Reply #2 on: July 23, 2010, 02:51:37 AM »
Well, I taped one show, but thats 3 years ago and it wasn't my equipment (I borrowed a MD), but I'm planning to get into taping, so I wanted to know those little things before starting :)

As I understand, I don't need a batterybox AND a pre-amp, only one of them, right? ;)

Thanks
Nielsen81
« Last Edit: July 23, 2010, 02:54:15 AM by Nielsen81 »
Have you taped a Nirvana show or do you know anyone who has? Then please contact me or go to LiveNirvana.com

Offline fmaderjr

  • Trade Count: (16)
  • Taperssection All-Star
  • ****
  • Posts: 1966
Re: Confused about equipment...
« Reply #3 on: July 23, 2010, 07:32:54 AM »
What recorder are you going to use? That may help us give better recommendations.

If you have a preamp you don't need a battery box unless you want something with a smaller footprint for stealth recording. If you record only very loud stuff, you can probably make do with a battery box and no pre.
If you record a lot of quiet stuff, a preamp would be better than a battery box with most recorders because the built in preamps of many recorders begin to add noise when you have to crank up the gain too high.

With some mic/recorder combos, it's possible to make great recordings of loud stuff without either a pre or a battery box, but it depends on the recorder and mics you will be using.
AT853's (all caps)/CM-300 Franken Naks (CP-1,2,3)/JBMod Nak 700's (CP-701,702) > Tascam DR-680
Or Sonic Studios DSM-6 > M10

adrianf74

  • Guest
  • Trade Count: (0)
Re: Confused about equipment...
« Reply #4 on: July 23, 2010, 07:55:25 AM »
Now, here we go:
Battery box? Which one...or do I need one?
CA-9100 Pre-amp? What is that? And if I get one, do I need a batterybox then? What is it good for?
Tonnes of answers to this in this forum ... if I got a dollar a day for each of these posts, I could retire.  ;D  [just kidding]

First, all of this depends on what you'll be recording and what mics you have/want to go with.  Secondly, the recorder (as fmadejr asked).

The Church Audio 9100 Preamp is a nice little piece of equipment for its price.  Essentially it allows you to boost the gain to your mics so that the recorder doesn't have to. . This will allow you increase the level of your recording more than your deck will without introducing extra noise (think of it like your stereo with no sound going through it... when you crank the speakers, some people can hear "hiss" or "white noise" - you're doing the same thing by using the recorder).

The battery box is redundant if you have a preamp, however - as fmadejr also stated, a battery box is nice when you want to go lower profile because you need to be in st***th mode.  Many of us here use both depending on the event and how tight security will be. Now that I own a preamp, I try to take that with me all the time but there are some situations in which the extra "bulk" is more of a problem than its worth.  With a battery box, you're using the recording levels on the deck to control how loud your recording is.  Depending on your distance from the stacks, you might "max out" on your deck and still not be hitting -6dB for peaks (this happens to me often when I'm using my Edirol R09).  This is where the preamp helps.

Let us know what mics and recorder you're looking at and we'll throw some ideas at you.

Offline acidjack

  • Site Supporter
  • Trade Count: (37)
  • Needs to get out more...
  • *
  • Posts: 5845
  • Gender: Male
Re: Confused about equipment...
« Reply #5 on: July 23, 2010, 09:49:57 AM »
If you are recording loud rock shows stealth and using standard small mics into any of the half-decent recorders (e.g., Edirol R-09HR, any of the Tascam decks, Sony M10) then IMHO a preamp is bulky and a waste. 

You use either a battery box OR a pre, not both. 

I would just buy a $39-$59 battery box and be done with it.  I would be very surprised - assuming you are stealthing loud rock shows - that you'd be able to tell much difference.  And the battbox will save you some space.  If you do a lot of acoustic shows, classical, jazz, etc. then the ST-9100 might be more your thing.  I'm probably going to get (another) one to run with my DPA 4061s, but that is for a specific application that is not stealthing loud rock shows.

Put another way, when I stealth with my $3500 DPAs, I just use a basic "battery box" (a Denecke PS/2) rather than even my relatively small Naiant preamp, because size is the most important concern.  I've stealthed with it both with the Denecke and into an Oade modded PMD660 and it sounds about the same to me.  Similarly, for loud rock shows, my DPA 4061s + battbox seems just fine to me.

YMMV, opinions may vary, and all that.
Mics: Schoeps MK4V, MK41V, MK5, MK22> CMC6, KCY 250/5, KC5, NBob; MBHO MBP603/KA200N, AT 3031, DPA 4061 w/ d:vice, Naiant X-X, AT 853c, shotgun, Nak300
Pres/Power: Aerco MP2, tinybox v2  [KCY], CA-UBB
Decks: Sound Devices MixPre 6, Zoom F8, M10, D50

My recordings on nyctaper.com: http://www.nyctaper.com/?tag=acidjack | LMA: http://www.archive.org/bookmarks/acidjack | twitter: http://www.twitter.com/acidjacknyc | Soundcloud: https://soundcloud.com/acidjacknyc

adrianf74

  • Guest
  • Trade Count: (0)
Re: Confused about equipment...
« Reply #6 on: July 23, 2010, 10:46:23 AM »
If you are recording loud rock shows stealth and using standard small mics into any of the half-decent recorders (e.g., Edirol R-09HR, any of the Tascam decks, Sony M10) then IMHO a preamp is bulky and a waste. 

You use either a battery box OR a pre, not both. 

I would just buy a $39-$59 battery box and be done with it.  I would be very surprised - assuming you are stealthing loud rock shows - that you'd be able to tell much difference.  And the battbox will save you some space.  If you do a lot of acoustic shows, classical, jazz, etc. then the ST-9100 might be more your thing.  I'm probably going to get (another) one to run with my DPA 4061s, but that is for a specific application that is not stealthing loud rock shows.

Put another way, when I stealth with my $3500 DPAs, I just use a basic "battery box" (a Denecke PS/2) rather than even my relatively small Naiant preamp, because size is the most important concern.  I've stealthed with it both with the Denecke and into an Oade modded PMD660 and it sounds about the same to me.  Similarly, for loud rock shows, my DPA 4061s + battbox seems just fine to me.

YMMV, opinions may vary, and all that.
In all honesty, I think it's pretty easy to bring a pre- (such as a 9100) and a deck with mics into a venue.  I remember the days of bringing a WM-D6 or WM-D3 into a venue and those things weigehd a tonne and were very bulky.

I know that it is easier to just bring an R09 or M10 with something like an Ugly Battery Box and some small mics but there have been times - even at rock shows - where I haven't been able to get enough gain from the deck (maxed out) and would've killed for a way of gaining up the mics more.  But I know where you're coming from when you say the battery box is "good enough."  I just know the OP might come across the odd situation where he wished he had the pre-.  And the 9100 pre isn't that big, either.

Offline fmaderjr

  • Trade Count: (16)
  • Taperssection All-Star
  • ****
  • Posts: 1966
Re: Confused about equipment...
« Reply #7 on: July 23, 2010, 12:12:32 PM »
In all honesty, I think it's pretty easy to bring a pre- (such as a 9100) and a deck with mics into a venue. 

I know that it is easier to just bring an R09 or M10 with something like an Ugly Battery Box and some small mics but there have been times - even at rock shows - where I haven't been able to get enough gain from the deck (maxed out) and would've killed for a way of gaining up the mics more.   

And the 9100 pre isn't that big, either.

Exactly. It's easy to stealth with this system if you know how and its a lot more flexible than a battery box. If not using a pre & you wind up having to max out the gain on your deck, you'd have gotten a better sounding recording if you'd used a pre. Of course if all you do is very loud rock shows you don't need the pre.
AT853's (all caps)/CM-300 Franken Naks (CP-1,2,3)/JBMod Nak 700's (CP-701,702) > Tascam DR-680
Or Sonic Studios DSM-6 > M10

adrianf74

  • Guest
  • Trade Count: (0)
Re: Confused about equipment...
« Reply #8 on: July 23, 2010, 01:02:15 PM »
Exactly. It's easy to stealth with this system if you know how and its a lot more flexible than a battery box. If not using a pre & you wind up having to max out the gain on your deck, you'd have gotten a better sounding recording if you'd used a pre. Of course if all you do is very loud rock shows you don't need the pre.
Sometimes if you're in an arena/amphitheatre/outdoor setting, you can't get close enough.  And some music halls, even though it's a rock show, aren't overly loud if you're in the first few rows of the floors. Just saying that's it's better to be safer than sorry.  I was burned twice in the past two weeks while waiting for my pre-.  :)

Offline aaronji

  • Site Supporter
  • Trade Count: (9)
  • Needs to get out more...
  • *
  • Posts: 3898
Re: Confused about equipment...
« Reply #9 on: July 23, 2010, 01:05:50 PM »
^^^ I don't know; there additional variables in the equation, including how sensitive the mics are and how clean the recorder's mic input is...Battery box > mic-in can be very nice sounding with the right combination of gear, and if it gets too loud for the mic-in, battery box > line-in should work well at that point...

Offline fmaderjr

  • Trade Count: (16)
  • Taperssection All-Star
  • ****
  • Posts: 1966
Re: Confused about equipment...
« Reply #10 on: July 23, 2010, 02:43:57 PM »
^^^ I don't know; there additional variables in the equation, including how sensitive the mics are and how clean the recorder's mic input is.

That's true, but Nielson81 hasn't told us his mics and recorder, so adrianf74 is just covering all the bases. If you have mics that aren't sensitive like (CA-14's  or any low sensitivity modded mics) and a recorder who's preamps get noisy if you have to crank them up (like an R-09, iHP120, Marantz 620, and maybe even an R-09HR) you MUST have a pre to get good results when you are recording stuff that isn't very loud like acoustic performances. With a pre you can actually get great recordings of quiet stuff with all these recorders.

I
« Last Edit: July 23, 2010, 02:52:07 PM by fmaderjr »
AT853's (all caps)/CM-300 Franken Naks (CP-1,2,3)/JBMod Nak 700's (CP-701,702) > Tascam DR-680
Or Sonic Studios DSM-6 > M10

adrianf74

  • Guest
  • Trade Count: (0)
Re: Confused about equipment...
« Reply #11 on: July 23, 2010, 02:50:58 PM »
^^^ I don't know; there additional variables in the equation, including how sensitive the mics are and how clean the recorder's mic input is.

That's true, but Nielson81 hasn't told us his mics and recorder, so adrianf74 is just covering all the bases. If you have mics that aren't sensitive like (CA-14's  or any low sensitivity modded mics) and a recorder who's preamps get noisy if yo have to crank them up (like an R-09, iHP120, Marantz 620, and maybe even an R-09HR) you MUST have a pre to get good results when you are recording stuff that isn't very loud.

I'm also speaking from my own experiences.  There was a post in "Tour and Show Information" about a taper who used CA-11's into his mic input and ended up with a distorted recording (at an arena rock show).  He didn't use a battery box rather MIC IN and was subsequently burned.  A battery box, at the very least, is a must.  A pre- is better.  But until we know more about the OP's gear, we'll have to wait.

Offline acidjack

  • Site Supporter
  • Trade Count: (37)
  • Needs to get out more...
  • *
  • Posts: 5845
  • Gender: Male
Re: Confused about equipment...
« Reply #12 on: July 24, 2010, 02:36:26 AM »
^^

Perhaps the CA-11 mics are extremely non-sensitive - I don't know as I don't use them. I can tell you from using CSBs, AT 853 (with the 4.7k mod), AT943, Audix 1280s on Church Cables and DPA 4061 that at any rock show of even reasonable volume, you absolutely do not need an expensive and bulkier preamp to provide gain.  I never (ever) have had to come close to maxing the volume on the R-09HR or the M10 (or the TCD-D8, back in the day) to get decent levels with mics and a battery box. 

If you have an extremely shitty recorder (any brand of Zoom, for example) then maybe you need a preamp.  Otherwise, if recording loud rock, while I understand the desire of people here to fluff both spending more money and spending that money on "home team" products, I'm afraid it is simply not necessary. If someone can produce an objective comp that suggests otherwise, I invite them to do so.  Otherwise, save your money.  My $.02
Mics: Schoeps MK4V, MK41V, MK5, MK22> CMC6, KCY 250/5, KC5, NBob; MBHO MBP603/KA200N, AT 3031, DPA 4061 w/ d:vice, Naiant X-X, AT 853c, shotgun, Nak300
Pres/Power: Aerco MP2, tinybox v2  [KCY], CA-UBB
Decks: Sound Devices MixPre 6, Zoom F8, M10, D50

My recordings on nyctaper.com: http://www.nyctaper.com/?tag=acidjack | LMA: http://www.archive.org/bookmarks/acidjack | twitter: http://www.twitter.com/acidjacknyc | Soundcloud: https://soundcloud.com/acidjacknyc

Offline Nielsen81

  • Trade Count: (1)
  • Taperssection Regular
  • **
  • Posts: 51
Re: Confused about equipment...
« Reply #13 on: July 24, 2010, 03:52:00 AM »
Hi guys.

Sorry, I didn't list the equipment, I want to use.
Well, I would like to get my hands on an Edirol R-09HR or a Sony PCM M10 and a pair of CA-14. That is good equipment, I read :)
I don't know to much about good BB's, so I would have to read about that.
I'm mainly gonna record rock shows, but you never know if they are playing some acoustic songs in between, so it could be a good idea to get a pre-amp too, if that happens, I guess.
Have you taped a Nirvana show or do you know anyone who has? Then please contact me or go to LiveNirvana.com

Offline Fatah Ruark (aka MIKE B)

  • Trade Count: (11)
  • Needs to get out more...
  • *****
  • Posts: 9954
  • Gender: Male
  • I dream in beige.
    • sloppy.art.ink
Re: Confused about equipment...
« Reply #14 on: July 24, 2010, 07:05:37 AM »
Hi guys.

Sorry, I didn't list the equipment, I want to use.
Well, I would like to get my hands on an Edirol R-09HR or a Sony PCM M10 and a pair of CA-14. That is good equipment, I read :)
I don't know to much about good BB's, so I would have to read about that.
I'm mainly gonna record rock shows, but you never know if they are playing some acoustic songs in between, so it could be a good idea to get a pre-amp too, if that happens, I guess.

Personally, if I were to run a Church Rig (and not have any other equipment) I would run: Church CA-14 (Card and Omni) > Church 9100 Pre-Amp > Sony M10. You can make very good recordings with that setup.

Obviously you've chosen wisely with the CA-14's. No need to look elsewhere unless you wanted to spend more money.

Since you want to record quieter music the 9100 is a good idea.

I would suggest the M10 over the R-09HR mainly because of the longer battery life. Both are good recorders. B+H Photo had the M10 on sale for $200. Not sure if it's still on sale.
||| MICS:  Beyer CK930 | DPA 4022 | DPA 4080 | Nevaton MCE400 | Sennheiser Ambeo Headset |||
||| PREAMPS: DPA d:vice | Naiant Tinybox | Naiant IPA |||
||| DECKS: Sound Devices MixPre6 | iPod Touch 32GB |||
|||Concert History || LMA Recordings || Live YouTube |||

 

RSS | Mobile
Page created in 0.078 seconds with 40 queries.
© 2002-2024 Taperssection.com
Powered by SMF