Become a Site Supporter and Never see Ads again!

Author Topic: Quick FLAC ???  (Read 2677 times)

0 Members and 1 Guest are viewing this topic.

Offline timP

  • Trade Count: (1)
  • Needs to get out more...
  • *****
  • Posts: 3537
  • Gender: Male
Quick FLAC ???
« on: October 10, 2005, 08:23:18 PM »
Just was wondering if level 1 or 8 was the smallest?


and while your at it, how much better/worse do you think the sound quality is either way?

isn't supposed to be lossless either way?...


just looking at 30+ shows I have taking up alot of space on my HD


thanks
« Last Edit: October 10, 2005, 08:25:41 PM by tpoff »
?>FR2LE

Offline bluegrass_brad

  • Trade Count: (16)
  • Needs to get out more...
  • *****
  • Posts: 3581
  • Gender: Male
  • Old and in the way.
Re: Quick FLAC ???
« Reply #1 on: October 10, 2005, 08:28:04 PM »
8 is the smallest.  There will be no difference in sound quality, only the file size. It is lossless either way you do it. 
CK1x, CK2x, CK3x > Hub Industry Cables > Naiant PFA or MK46 > 460B
CK1, CK8, CK63 > 460b

"That was back in a time when society was not quite ready for this music. Anyone remember those days? That's when punk rock was dangerous, right?" - Mike Ness

Offline timP

  • Trade Count: (1)
  • Needs to get out more...
  • *****
  • Posts: 3537
  • Gender: Male
Re: Quick FLAC ???
« Reply #2 on: October 10, 2005, 08:29:14 PM »
thanks 

+T
?>FR2LE

Offline F.O.Bean

  • Team Schoeps Tapir that
  • Trade Count: (126)
  • Needs to get out more...
  • *****
  • Posts: 40690
  • Gender: Male
  • Taperus Maximus
    • MediaFire Recordings
Re: Quick FLAC ???
« Reply #3 on: October 10, 2005, 08:30:17 PM »
im doing a compare list of diff flac levels to prove how small of an improvemnet level 8 is compared to how slow it is :)

starting now!
Schoeps MK 4V & MK 41V ->
Schoeps 250|0 KCY's (x2) ->
Naiant +60v|Low Noise PFA's (x2) ->
DarkTrain Right Angle Stubby XLR's (x3) ->
Sound Devices MixPre-6 & MixPre-3

http://www.archive.org/bookmarks/diskobean
http://www.archive.org/bookmarks/Bean420
http://bt.etree.org/mytorrents.php
http://www.mediafire.com/folder/j9eu80jpuaubz/Recordings

Offline BWolf

  • Trade Count: (2)
  • Needs to get out more...
  • *****
  • Posts: 5965
  • Gender: Male
  • Always on the prowl...
    • Etree Trading List
Re: Quick FLAC ???
« Reply #4 on: October 10, 2005, 08:32:37 PM »
im doing a compare list of diff flac levels to prove how small of an improvemnet level 8 is compared to how slow it is :)

starting now!

bean, you got way to much time on your hands.  can't you find something better to do with you time  :smoking2:  ;D 8)
"The best jazz is funky, and the best funk is jazzy" -SMOOTH
------------------------------------------------------
Neumann AK20/AK40s > LC3 > KM100 > Lunatec V3 (MS mod) > SD 722 or Microtrack 24/96  (Hi-Ho Silver Custom Interconnects)
------------------------------------------------------

Offline timP

  • Trade Count: (1)
  • Needs to get out more...
  • *****
  • Posts: 3537
  • Gender: Male
Re: Quick FLAC ???
« Reply #5 on: October 10, 2005, 08:32:59 PM »
Bean

def interested in what you find...


keep on posting
your going to have 20,000  by the end of the week!.... 
?>FR2LE

Offline bluegrass_brad

  • Trade Count: (16)
  • Needs to get out more...
  • *****
  • Posts: 3581
  • Gender: Male
  • Old and in the way.
Re: Quick FLAC ???
« Reply #6 on: October 10, 2005, 08:34:08 PM »
thanks 

+T
You got it and backatcha.
CK1x, CK2x, CK3x > Hub Industry Cables > Naiant PFA or MK46 > 460B
CK1, CK8, CK63 > 460b

"That was back in a time when society was not quite ready for this music. Anyone remember those days? That's when punk rock was dangerous, right?" - Mike Ness

Offline F.O.Bean

  • Team Schoeps Tapir that
  • Trade Count: (126)
  • Needs to get out more...
  • *****
  • Posts: 40690
  • Gender: Male
  • Taperus Maximus
    • MediaFire Recordings
Re: Quick FLAC ???
« Reply #7 on: October 10, 2005, 08:36:51 PM »
well, ive been waiting to start my new job for a couple weeks, just waiting on the call to start 8) :smoking:

well, w/ all the geeky shit on this site, I figured why not 8)
Schoeps MK 4V & MK 41V ->
Schoeps 250|0 KCY's (x2) ->
Naiant +60v|Low Noise PFA's (x2) ->
DarkTrain Right Angle Stubby XLR's (x3) ->
Sound Devices MixPre-6 & MixPre-3

http://www.archive.org/bookmarks/diskobean
http://www.archive.org/bookmarks/Bean420
http://bt.etree.org/mytorrents.php
http://www.mediafire.com/folder/j9eu80jpuaubz/Recordings

Offline MattD

  • Taper Emeritus
  • Trade Count: (1)
  • Needs to get out more...
  • *****
  • Posts: 4634
  • Gender: Male
Re: Quick FLAC ???
« Reply #8 on: October 10, 2005, 11:57:27 PM »
im doing a compare list of diff flac levels to prove how small of an improvemnet level 8 is compared to how slow it is :)

starting now!

If you have enough time to do that, you can encode at level 8. :)
Out of the game … for now?

Offline Gordon

  • Trade Count: (22)
  • Needs to get out more...
  • *****
  • Posts: 11789
  • Gender: Male
    • my list
Re: Quick FLAC ???
« Reply #9 on: October 11, 2005, 01:20:07 AM »
I did some comparisons a while back between 6 an 8.  I did only single files though and not whole shows but the difference was not that big.  I used to always use 8 but it takes fucking forever.
Microtech Gefell M20 or M21 > Nbob actives > Naiant PFA > Sound Devices MixPre-6 II @ 32/48

https://archive.org/details/fav-gordonlw

https://archive.org/details/teamdirtysouth

Offline F.O.Bean

  • Team Schoeps Tapir that
  • Trade Count: (126)
  • Needs to get out more...
  • *****
  • Posts: 40690
  • Gender: Male
  • Taperus Maximus
    • MediaFire Recordings
Re: Quick FLAC ???
« Reply #10 on: October 11, 2005, 02:22:29 AM »
I did some comparisons a while back between 6 an 8.  I did only single files though and not whole shows but the difference was not that big.  I used to always use 8 but it takes fucking forever.

yep, i just tested and had a nice post for ts.com on comps, and it got erased before i could post it somehow :(

\but anyway, the biggest difference was between 1 and 3, l;ets say the original wav was 707 MB, the flac-6 was 458 MB and the flac-3 was 458 MB(same damn compression) but the flac-1 was like 470 MB(12 MB diff from 3/6), and then the flac-8 was only 1 MB higher than the flac-6, at 459 MB

so no huge differences unless youre running flac level 1

personally, IMO, i think your best bet is flac 6 because of encoding speed and decoding speed, flac-8 takes my comp too long to encode on, but I dont know about yours!
Schoeps MK 4V & MK 41V ->
Schoeps 250|0 KCY's (x2) ->
Naiant +60v|Low Noise PFA's (x2) ->
DarkTrain Right Angle Stubby XLR's (x3) ->
Sound Devices MixPre-6 & MixPre-3

http://www.archive.org/bookmarks/diskobean
http://www.archive.org/bookmarks/Bean420
http://bt.etree.org/mytorrents.php
http://www.mediafire.com/folder/j9eu80jpuaubz/Recordings

Offline Ed.

  • your popsicle's melting
  • Trade Count: (0)
  • Needs to get out more...
  • *****
  • Posts: 8662
  • Gender: Male
  • FJ Baby!
Re: Quick FLAC ???
« Reply #11 on: October 11, 2005, 02:26:34 AM »
i usually stick with 6.


Because nothing says "I have lots of money and am sort of confused as to how to spend it" like Bose.

Offline itook2much

  • Trade Count: (0)
  • Taperssection All-Star
  • ****
  • Posts: 1526
  • Gender: Male
  • AKA rspencer
    • my masters
Re: Quick FLAC ???
« Reply #12 on: October 11, 2005, 02:41:04 PM »
Level 8 really doesn't take me that much longer, and any space saved is space saved IMO.

And it decodes at the same speed.
So use level 8 & go have a smoke while you wait (your call as to what level smoke ;)  ).
DPA 4060 (CS HEB) > CS BB > Edirol R-09

Backups:  DPA 4060 (1/8"), SP-BMC-2, SP-SPSB-6, Sony MZ-NH1

Quote from: tomluvsgiants
rule #1 - get the show taped
rule #2 - see rule #1    >:D

Quote from: Grace Hopper
“If it's a good idea, go ahead and do it. It's much easier to apologize than it is to get permission.”

 

RSS | Mobile
Page created in 0.211 seconds with 39 queries.
© 2002-2024 Taperssection.com
Powered by SMF